/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6505786
we have 3d printers for this moron.

>>6505786
yes, i am learning 3d

>>6505786
>>>/3/

>>6505786
Yes, I want to learn after I get good at drawing.

>>6505786
Depends on the material. If its made of stone AI cant do shit because 3d printers cant print stone

>>6505786
Just because you think you can learn to sculpt doesn’t mean You can escape your fundies anon.

I whittle stuff, it's pretty fun

>>6505786
why the fuck would you care about ai automating anything

I'm getting into wood carving/whittling. I wanted to make cute little dolls and puppets from wood.
It's a little hard, but fun as well. Though the hardest part is finding the time to do it.

>>6506288
It's such a fun and satisfying hobby (even if you can slice your fingers open if you are not careful)

>>6506284

>>6506284
lmao

>>6505786
I wanna make custom minis.

>>6505801
>t. never used 3d printers

>>6506295
cute

>>6506351
Thanks. I wish there was a regular sculpture thread on /ic/ but apparently no one sculpts or carve traditionaly anymore.

>>6506878
meant to post this picture too

>>6505801
you think a 3d printer makes a 3d model for you? lmfao

What modeling software should I use to make something like the OP posted

so do you guys just want to do create just nothing actual artistic intent?

at this point the only reason to do art is for you own enjoyment

>>6507078
Blender

>>6505786
>AI

Reminder that """AI""" recently was exposed for literally just copying its training data and not "using it to learn like a human and producing something new". AI art for commercial use is dead in the water and you have nothing to worry about.

https://www.vice.com/en/article/m7gznn/ai-spits-out-exact-copies-of-training-images-real-people-logos-researchers-find

>>6505786
You can literally already make 3D renders with AI retard. Why would it matter if AI can do the same thing? If you enjoy the art you make and think AI art is ugly then what's the problem?

>>6507127
Oh look it's this post again.
>Look for highly duplicated images in the data set
>tried to prompt that image 500 times each.
>Of the 350k duplicate images generated 500 times, only 109 actually came back sort of similar.
>109 out of 175,000,000.
>0.0000622857%
Wow. Also the newest model removed a lot of the duplicates. Case is dead in the water.

>>6508642
>sort of similar
Those only were almost perfect matches, you pajeet. They didn't even consider the slightly less close matches, but still infringing matches, which are way more likely to be found. You will lose the lawsuit, you dirty indian.

>>6508646
A 0.0000622857% exact replication rate. Oh no!
Anyway

>>6507127
>>6508646
Holy retard
It's like the people just shouting random buzzwords without understanding them, that's what you are doing, also
>"using it to learn like a human and producing something new"
Humans don't produce stuff out of thin air, they need reference points and data to create anything. By default anything you make is derivative simply because you have life experience. You are trying to make a table? You seen thousands of tables in your life, and so you know how a table is supposed to look like, so you make it so. The way AI and humans learn is different, but the entry point and exit point are exactly the same. Both take in sample data to output composite product.

>>6508652
An algorithm that need to process billions of images without permission to be usable can't and shouldn't be treated the same way as a human. Not to mention it's impossible for humans to crunch that amount of data like that. Just because someone in the field called it "learning" it doesn't mean it's remotely similar to what humans do. You're being disingenuous, pajeet.

>>6508672
You are being retarded, Kashmir
Unlike the algorithm, you have benefit of at least 18 years worth of memories, during which you've seen gigantic amounts of data, more than the software could reliably process. Also, unlike the software, you have the benefit of being able to see one object at multiple angles, it has to work off similarities between different objects. And the best thing out of them all is, you can make a model entirely free of copyrighted materials, but you cannot do that yourself Kashmir, due to amount of copyrighted material you ingest daily. So in the end, AI is potentially more ethical than humans are.
And no, it shouldn't be treated same way as a human as it's merely a tool, an extension of a person

>>6506295
I like this

>>6506279
>>6506295
>>6506881
really like these. you’re cool, anon.

>>6508701
>>6508831
Thanks here is a group picture so I don't post too much and spam the thread

>>6509574
I'm a dummy

>>6509577
Tools and materials

>>6505786
Only clay figure. Marble sculpting is dead.
>Boomer found a big marble.
>"anon want to sculp it into master piece?"
>"nah, sculp it into fengshui ball and sell to ching Chong for quick buck"

>>6509580
is this really all you need? what wood is it?

>>6509678
It's basswood. Out of all those tools I use 2 knives 90% of the time and could get away with using only one.

Not pictured : leather strop to keep the knives sharp, some sandpaper to finish the carving and sharpen the knives, and linseed oil to finish and protect the carvings. A small saw is useful too.

If you are interested I would recommend starting with only one knife and a few pieces of basswood and go from there. It's all you really need for a near infinite amount of possibilities.

Oh and maybe some bandages too lol.

>>6508672
You don't get the consent of artists who's work inspired your own over the course of your entire life. You've seen billions of objects over your lifetime and that is what informs your style. You don't create in a vacuum.

>>6506284
The cope is here

>>6506284
funny that no one could answer this

>>6509861
funny how you haven't killed yourself yet.

>>6506284
Because we probably like creating stuff and come up with our own idéas and becoming a prompter is not gona cut it for most creative people. Especially not those of us with a lot of experience.
Becoming a buttonpusher for an algorithm is not the same as creating something from your own skillset that you've honed for years. Obviously.

You would know if you were one of us that you can't compare the two.
We're driven by other incentives than quick bucks and efficiency. It's a true joy to a lot of us to be able to express ourselves through our mediums, to push boundaries and overcome. It becomes adictive once you see that you can indeed overcome and you find yourself in your work.
The creative freedom of being able to convey dreams and idéas, the feeling of fullfilment and wonder is unmatched. Like no other.

Imagine wanting to replace that with prompting. I would rather be a hobo on the streets.

Might seem vague and I'm sure some other anon could explain it better but all of this is self explanatory and motivations will change depending on the person.
We're creative people. We're not wired like the technerds that primarily use these AI algorithms.

>>6505786

I've been 3D modelling again for a couple of months now and it's fun. I like it but I always miss the feeling I get from drawing on paper or digitaly. The messyness of the whole process and how quickly you can put idéas down.
Not having to worry about a whole bunch of technical problems and processes is liberating.
Also I've noticed that I get so caught up in it that I neglect my paintings/ drawings and I regress. There is a bit to catch up on everytime I get back to drawing.
Feels a bit like a half assed sacrifice because to me nothing beats drawing and painting. It's my passion and I always come back to it.

I guess it depends on you and wether you find that you can make that compromise to juggle between mediums or if you want to replace one with the other.
Try it out. See for yourself.

>>6510588
You've just listed reasons why you shouldn't care