/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6494385
if you're trying to imply that loomis method doesn't work for anime heads then you're an idiot

anime heads are closely proportioned towards children and sometimes even baby heads. it makes it look cuter. women sometimes emphasize the presence of their foreheads to lok more youthful so exaggerated proportions on characters is something all artists do
these are head types that are covered in his books
i can't imagine loomis would take issue with what illustrators do to make sellable art

>>6494385
he would understand that to balance big face features you need a big head or else it will look bad, and he wouldn't be doing useless threads trying to mog something he didn't understand like OP, less shitposting and more grinding sweaty

>>6494385
I mean, he focused on realistic art, right? And he probably did not see much anime in his lifetime. I think we could extend this question to "What would Loomis say about anime stylisation in general". I read his book about drawing heads and he talked about the interesting variety in human faces, so I think he could be disappointed in anime leaving out potentially interesting features. On the other hand, he also talked about changing the proportions of the head to achieve different effects, so maybe anime head proportions that are deformed to make the character look cuter could be interesting to him. I like this question, pretty interesting.

>>6494385
Same thing he said about Tex Avery. That he wished he was that good.

>>6494385
He would probably laugh so hard then die from a stroke like the boomers here.

i love that this thread is just shitting on OPs retarded misunderstanding of how anime heads work.

>>6494385
Loomis was fully aware of stylized cartoon proportions. You have to understand the rules in order to break them.

>>6494621
Post your floating anime head.

Loomis would be a /asg/ and /lsg/ enjoyer.

>>6494385
Literally the first fucking chapter of Loomis is about big-headed characters.

>>6494635
drew one up just for you.

>>6494664
Ironically yours is missing half of the volume from the head.

>>6494684
i usually fill it in with the hair and dont draw the second volume. i just visualize it.

>>6494385
You mean cartoon stylized proportions? Like he literally had in his first book?

>>6494693
That's not how it works.

>>6494698
you want it more fwappy?

>>6494703
If im wrong feel free to correct this btw , i don't mind being wrong. especially if i'm shitting on OP for not getting it if i don't get it.

I know the guidelines are somewhat off but i didn't draw it with the lines in there.

>>6494385
maybe he shouldnt have created the lomis method afterall...

>>6494748
Why not? It's like draw the rest of the owl. Funny to watch people attempting it.

Loomisbros...

>>6494823
bottom left looks like Corporal Klinger

>>6494392
fpbp

>>6494823
loomisissies on their way to transform their marroage in an open interracial relationship