/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6442187
No idea, I never really thought about it
AI is replacing artists? tl:dr?

>>6442188
Now that’s a woman

>>6442187
I literally just make a shitload of mislabelled drawings to fuck up its learning process, and the funny thing is, i use ai to make them

sorry street shitters, your little project is gonna fail, but i hear macdonalds is hiring

>>6442188
nah just ignore it, it should be ok :)

>>6442191
why do people associate ai art with indians? is there proof their the ones doing it?

>>6442194
Aight, will do :^]

>>6442197
most engineers are pajeet street shitters, and i remember a while back there was a dedicated AI shill who got supremely buttmad over people making fun of indians.

>>6442187
My work is too shit to be useful for AI

>>6442187
>i hear mcdonalds are hiring
you heard wrong

>>6442213
>there was a dedicated AI shill who got supremely buttmad over people making fun of indians
kek
https://vocaroo.com/13P9BRo3G0fl

>>6442188
Imagine being carried by her strong arms

must be nice desu

>>6442187
I enjoy them. Finally I don't have to draw anymore

>>6442197
The primary sponsor behind Stable Diffusion is an obese Indian. The guy who is behind the porn spinoff, Unstable Diffusion, is also an Indian. Indians are also prone to engaging in sleazy, low effort, tech related schemes to try to make a quick buck.

>>6442223
>real cp and photos of dead children make up this algoturd

>>6442224
You mean like pretending their latent copyright scam is a magical genie?

>>6442187
Artists are essentially living in a cyberpunk dystopia.

>>6442187
I do pixel art. AI can't into it.

>>6442227
elaborate? literally nothing has changed for me apart from having more threads to hide

>>6442233
We gotta fight for our right to not be super art identity theft'ed? AI is only gonna get better and better at that. More than copying your visual style, it copies you in a way you can't put into words.

>>6442187
>not making art solely for your own amusement
Ngmi

>>6442187
I am not worried. I think it's cool. That said, I am not relying on commissions or drawing someone else's idea to make a living. I already have a non-art job I am happy with and make graphic novels on my own terms.

I think most people will still prefer a real human artist over AI anyway, barring a few generic stuff they might want to visualize.

>>6442265
>bleans
I'm giggling

>>6442237
are they working on making it more rascist or less. Wasn't it morphing monkies with blacks and visa versa on /g/ or /pol/

>>6442238

"It's no different from fan art!"
"Copyright is a really corrupt and outdated concept"
"You did this to yourself, you uploaded your work online to begin with!"

Drugs.

>>6442238
I'm always amused by the "you should make art for free" argument, which apparently ignores that the people producing these are in it to make a huge amount of money, using the art of other people. So apparently artists shouldn't be drawing to make money off their own work, because somebody else should be monetizing it for themselves. They also seem to be silent about people setting up patreons to make new models and people selling generated art commissions.

>>6442285
Holy
Based

>>6442280
More. They are adding "black man" to prompts that don't specify race.
>Give me a picture of a CEO robbing a bank, by greg rutkowski
>Diversity filter kicks in adding "black male" to the prompt.

>>6442281
>Do you know that Hitler was a human artist/ paintpig / drawnazi