/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Don't worry, /ic. No one here's art is worth "stealing".

>>6355500
There are a couple coom artists I want to train the model with.
Pic related for example.

this is literally rape

Digital art is dead.
I'm returning to traditional mediums.

I, for one, welcome the death of artists.

Can you fucking subhumans stop talking about AI art for FIVE seconds?

>>6355520
And yet you feel the compulsion to shitpost in every A.I. thread.

>>6355520
Why stop talking about subject that will make sure you never ever make it, and nobody will ever make it. This is the end, and you just want to pretend it is not happening. This is the end of art, this is the last year for artists, and next year for artists of other mediums. You will not just not find job ever again, but your hobby will be seen as worthless, just a waste of time. Kids will be discouraged from being creative since it is now fully redundant perk.
Stop drawing NOW, stop thinking about art NOW, stop looking for creative hobbies NOW. You are now worthless piece of shit, worth less then Chinese sweatshop worker making smartphones from different parts, not being replaced by a machine because he is cheaper. You are now worth less then a file download. Kill yourself nigger.

>Why stop talking about subject that will make sure you never ever make it, and nobody will ever make it. This is the end, and you just want to pretend it is not happening. This is the end of art, this is the last year for artists, and next year for artists of other mediums. You will not just not find job ever again, but your hobby will be seen as worthless, just a waste of time. Kids will be discouraged from being creative since it is now fully redundant perk.
Stop drawing NOW, stop thinking about art NOW, stop looking for creative hobbies NOW. You are now worthless piece of shit, worth less then Chinese sweatshop worker making smartphones from different parts, not being replaced by a machine because he is cheaper. You are now worth less then a file download. Kill yourself nigger.

>>6355546
Are you seething because less and less people give a shit about AI now that the novelty had worn off?

>>6355546
cheaper than droids, and easier to replace.

Sam yang got ai-jacked too.

lol

>>6355546
I draw because I enjoy it.

>>6355551
People stopped talking about it because people saw what it does, artists already said how they will rope themselves and thats it. Its like saying global warming or amazon deforestation is no longer an issue because people already know its fucked so people stopped reporting and talking about it. There are still famous people talking about the AI, there are still artists who say it will destroy their carriers.
So stop making art, the sooner you stop, the better for you. Stop consuming media since it will remind you of this, stop thinking creatively. Next year we will see the rise of text2video where it will fuck over 3D artists and animators. Then we will see text2text become very competent and replacing all writers, and with the help of text2video it will also replace online content creators. Your favorite youtuber? Now he is replaced by AI. Film, music and gaming industry will go bankrupt by 2024. You will spend most of your time online arguing with textbots, and then Ai will move into science, programming, and finance. All you fuckers with white collar jobs and university degrees will be fucking jobless starving on the street. Major cities will go hungry and your metropolitan or suburb area full of office worker moneys will become Detroit. All because you are stupid niggers.

>>6355546
lmao, what a fucking retarded crab. I'm only starting myself

>>6355572
haha ww3 go boom

>>6355572
ah, the desperate wails of a starving poorfag. this is why I laugh at the lower class.this is what they want deep inside. it's all envy deep within, that they're scraping the bottom of the barrel daily because their mental ineptitude led them to failure. suffer

>>6355572
>you fuckers with white collar jobs and university degrees will be fucking jobless starving on the street
do you think programmers who make AIs are blue collar workers or something? lmao you fucking retard

>>6355572
kek sorry to hear you're the bottom of the barrel trash maybe get a job and find a hobby you neet ass motherfucker

>>6355579
They will automate themselves in 3 years. Only the team leaders will remain typing in prompts and thinking of ways how to automate next field. It will boost their productivity many many times over. Finding a new field to automate will take a day and making fully feasible program will take just a week instead of 6 months.

>automating the creative fields before any blue collar labor
>training AI to amplify media escapism instead of humanizing android meidos
epic
nice one pajeets
good going globohomo

>>6355584
your retarded predictions are more brain damaged than those of Elon Musk's. shut the fuck up. are you the OP? you think that blatantly stealing someone's style with AI is something to be admired? you fucking subhuman vermin

>>6355572
I just skimmed through your posts but they read as someone that tried hard to become an artist, didn't make it and is just having a meltdown trying to tell to himself that your failure is ok because those that succeded are going to be automated anyway.
People like you do nothing but encourage me to keep doing art, if I ever end up in autist rage like you are, I'll know for sure I've been buck broken with no return.

>>6355495
>blurry deformed messes
>fine-tuned
Good morning sirs.

>>6355587
Rosie... I'll never feel your curves... Or push your buttons... Why live?

>>6355572
You pajeets always treat technology as magic even when the results are shit.

>>6355584
Are you a Singularitarianist?

is it just me or has the capabilities of Ai image generation come to a halt since late august?

sure the 'what it trains on' has been refined, but as far as quality of what it achieves from there, it's kind of seemed stagnant.

not saying Ai is a nothing-burger but it seems to have hit a bottleneck. we've been told '2 more weeks' since the end of August lmao

>>6355588
No, but I know that the progress became fast and the companies found a way to easily automate everything and dodge any law accusations. Just release it Open Source and your enemies will become apathetic instead of furious, since you cant delete something from the internet when it is open source, it will forever remain on some hard drive of some autist. Prepare for the same to happen with other fields. If art is not sacred enough to be saved from automation, then what is?

>>6355587
Thats because they are researchers, not humanitarians or government. They just research whatever and stop until government band them. It just so happens that creative fields are easier to automate then most blue collar labor. I have a theory that all intellectual work like science, math, art, philosophy and business operation are actually simpler mentally todo then just walking around, finding a broken piece of pipe or whatever, choosing the right tool to use and then fixing it with your hand. We just believed the opposite because smart people do the intellectual stuff while dumb people do the manual for most of history.

>>6355618
(cont)
But think about it, we as animals evolved to run around, find food, locate predators and so on ever since we were fish. We then further evolved to develop these skills further and also gained other perks requiring bigger intelligence like being social in groups and being dexterous. Look at dexterous animals, monkeys are smarter then cows because monkeys need to climb trees and jump a lot, have precise movement to not fall from the trees, cow just walks around on the field eating grass. Evolution hardwired our brains to be super competent at these tasks, so the fact that even a moron can do them is less about it being mentally easy, but about the physical skills to be so essential for our survival that every human has it no matter their IQ. Now the stuff like math, art, science, philosophy and so on, it all came on as side effect. We evolved to hunt mammoths with sticks and rocks, not to be artists or engineers, it just so happens that our cavemen brains are good at it, probably because it is not that difficult in the first place. So yeah, I think driving a car is more complex then the whole idea and essence of creativity

We need more talk like this from people that matter instead of randos on comment sections.

Of course when all their cards are used up AI fags boil it down to "The technology exists, and it will be used. The bell can’t be unrung". But we still need to filter out the trivial talk clogging up discussion like the ethical and legal stance of AI tech or whether AI works the same as human artists. The cat is out of the bag so we ought to reorganize the way digital content is stored on the internet. Before this simple violation of human spaces turns into fullblown terrorism.

>>6355620
So what?
Should people stop doing it and consuming that which comes from another human because of automation? What's stopping me from caring about the art and opinions of another person?
I truly don't understand how people think that because something can be automated it invalidates everything that is done without it, as if people will scorn and spit on that which is human because it is not the money efficient way of doing things.
Modernity and capitalism (Yes, I used the c word) has rotten the minds of people, if anything I hope people realize that the idea of your worth as a human being dependent on your contribution to the machine is retarded.
Art is probably one of the hardest things you can do, not because of the end product but because of the insane requirements it asks for the person doing it, it is about the human, it is about the experience, not about the end result, and every single fa/g/ fails to see it, either because they're legit bots with no subjective experience or because they abandoned the idea of their subjective experience being worth anything.

>>6355623
I was surprised by how intelligent the comments were. If only more people could be like that.

art is gonna turn into runescape in ironman mode.

iron-man's are respected, their stats are worth more in others eyes, and they still get enjoyment out of what they do despite an 'easier' option of just getting to buy all your gear off the grand exchange being just a few clicks from being accessible. but that just ruins the fun, and marks you as just another standard account.

even if jobs suffer, it doesn't mean all respect for what you do goes out of the window, at that point you can still do it for you. make art in the ways that you never had the incentive to, like maybe you wanted to always start doing outdoor plein-air painting. you get to just focus on that now, or whatever it is that inspires you.

sure if the worst was to happen (i still don't think the level of doom that many pajeets spread will happen) but taking the rope still isn't the best option. it's not the end of your life purpose, there's a lot more for you to do, even if it didn't end up being your final career, and people WILL still care about what you do.

>>6355598
I am not Pajeet, I am doomer
>>6355605
Yes, it will happen, and it is likely that this is the time it happens, like 40% likely. AI recently started consuming many office jobs, students are using AI to write their essays, Copilot released recently and so on. Everyone is just focused on art and artists because art is special, art is a thing that people attribute soul to and most people recoil at the thought of art being automated, not just artists who will lose their jobs. Again, I am clarifying that I am not a real artist, I am evolutionary biology master degree holder and a game developer. I fear that in few years it will replace all of gamedev as well, all of media, and there will be nothing new coming out, all just stale discussions about "What should I generate next fellow bros?". The recent AI advancement was staggering, and I dont mean recent like 6 months when this art shit started happening, no, I mean past 3 or 4 years ever since GPT3 was released and RTX cards became thing the average upper class anon had in their computer.

>>6355620
>>6355639
The drawing as spectacle side of art will still persist even in a world where art itself is automated, though the way this tech works means you could possibly even falsify that given enough training. But training AI to kill off manual artists for good is like robbing a bank for a single dime. The nature of this tech in which everything and anything can be made, remade and falsified means that one can no longer trust anything they find or communicate with on the internet and digital carriers in general. It's either surrendering to the matrix with zero care for the real world, or reconsidering the internet and computers as calculative tools and entertainment hubs while retreating to real life for social communication and content making and discovery.

>>6355657
Yes, this is a real threat that everyone keeps ignoring. Everyone just focuses on "oh no, boo hoo, artist no longer gets money, guess you need to find a side job". This tech has the ability to completely destroy the internet and human freedom with Megafeed. TikTok already proven that it can know what people like without people actively searching for their favorite content or choosing what they want to watch like on YouTube. This is the ultimate reason why bigtech wanted all of your data no matter what, to flood the internet with textbots and fake people, to keep its numbers of users growing faster then the human population, because they are addicted to growth and they will do anything to secure the growth.

>>6355623
>The cat is out of the bag
lol, fuck off with this shit already. the issue with the wall of text in picrel, is that those AI strengths are worthless without capability for self awareness, self criticism and self evaluation.

>>6355652
>traces over AI generated image
>no one can tell

>>6355495
>Left is her art and right are AI generated images.
As if we needed to be told

>>6355669
show your process then retard. or have an actually good and unique idea. most normies already assume digital art is a 'press button to make art' deal anyway, if it's a good idea then they're impressed. or do trad art.

do all 3 of those (and actually be good) and normies will still see you as something to be impressed by. bonus if you sell yourself as a personality too and not just hiding behind an avatar.

>>6355502
that looks like sharp metal cutting right into her breast and the physics make no sense. Whole thing ruined.

>>6355587
Because blue collar jobs are serious business. This is why AI cars are taking so long. If someone gets killed a researcher might end up in jail. You can't automate personal liability.

It's almost good but it's not "Novelai" good. Just one more week of serious tweeking.

>>6355563
What is this from, it's now mandatory reading for All artists now.

>hype's already dead
>spam is getting less sever
But keep making your daily thread OP we are here to laugh at you.

>https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/yjy7aw/comment/iuqsjin/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=web2x&context=3
AI fags truly are soulless lmao

The cishets won this time. Cope.

>>6355704
I think they are just guys playing with a toy. Fuckers who spam Pixiv and Deviantart are the real monsters

Trans women are women. AI art is art.

>>6355697

see: >>6355605

longest 2 weeks of my life

>>6355763
Not nearly as long 2 weeks as China collapsing

>>6355655
I agree.

I'll move to live in rural area in a small house with a small farm and I'll draw till my death, alone, neither now neither in the future I want to live in this society.

you guys actually care what others think about your art? lol

>>6355495
*crying noises*
Ai hasn't even shown it's final form

>>6355655
You are the usual idiot who is trying to sound more reasonable by using the arguments other people used to clown on you.

>>6355514

>>6355546
>>6355572
why the fuck do AI fags hate people who can draw so much ? to the point where they try to rub the ai in like they won or something ? are they jealous ? do they envy talented people ?

>>6355572
>stop having a soul and a mind of your own.
didnt read the wall of text you posted but i assume you are telling people to just "turn off" their creativity. "the same creativity that brought us here in the first place" to be like you. a souless flesh automaton animated by neural transmitters. with his only remaining emotion being envy for thoes who have talent.
if im mistaken then plz post something shorter lmao

>>6355830
They want the sense of accomplishment without any of the effort, it will never come and deep down they know it

>>6355606
it depends. how many grand masterpieces are there for the ai to copy from ? it cannot go above copying. unless it becomes sentient like humans with the ability to create. which is big no no for the continuation of our species

>>6355838
Funny how you equate talent having a soul and talentless with being a flesh robot, all the while robots are the ones having the talent and sucking and pretty much everything else

>>6355844
see >>6355623

>>6355844
??? robots just copy shit from talented people. by your logic i can be just as talented as da vinci if i traced the monalisa

>>6355848
It'd look like shit even if you traced it because you're talentless. You don't draw, poojeet.

>>6355495
>MysteryInc152 is Ogbogu Kalu, a young Nigerian engineer living and working in Halifax, Canada.
Like pottery

>>6355546
>You will not just not find job ever again

I'm starting to get pissed off at ESLs more often lately.

>>6355860
Get a job and learn some Spanish.

>>6355850

i do draw. and why do you assume everyone you dislike is indian ? lmao. still my drawnig kinda sucks still and im trying to improve thank you for asking envious ai fag

>>6355850
>It'd look like shit even if you traced
lmao just decribed ai art. a very polished turd copied from real art

>>6355842
beyond that sentience means pretty much every job is gone, so at that point who would give a shit. but also that's not even in the ballpark of current Ai so that discussion is just tinfoil hat tier at this time, not even worth considering for this topic.

>>6355495
>as little as 20 images
>tfw I post so infrequently that all of my public art is from wildly different points in my development, different art styles, and different rendering techniques, and mostly some form of sketch
S-sure feels good to be a non-productive artist who almost never finishes anything...

>>6355873
wut? im just saying if retards decide to make robots capable of learning things 1000x faster then humans become sentient. things wont be looking too good. it can make existence be meaningless since it literally does everything even art and creative jobs. so what is there left to do as a human being besides eat shit consume and fuck ?

ai fags dont see ai beyond it just being a tool that is used to "win" against artists and "prove" that they are useless out of spite. also its very likely this would happen if people dont do anything to stop it since the science retards dont stop and ask whether they should do what they are doing.

could have sentenced this better but oh well

>>6355590
this

>>6355495
>Left is her art and right are AI generated images.
I was worried that it was all AI and pajeets actually managed to make something decent. Everything on the right looks like fucking trash. Thanks for confirming there's still absolutely nothing to worry about.

>Don't have the job
>This will take away the job
> Talk about it with no end
>Never spend time getting good enough to beat the AI
>Damn AI lost me my job

>>6355908
>lost me my job
YOGA

>>6355582
>kek sorry to hear you're the bottom of the barrel trash maybe get a job and find a hobby you neet ass motherfucker
you know who's unironically one of the jobs currently in risk of being replaced the soonest?
radiologists
sure it will take around 5-10 years to be widly adapted in big hospitals and high tier clinics and there will be always at least one person checking on AI diagnoses so there's someone to blame for the fuckups but it will happen
go ahead tell me being a radiologist is bottom of the barrel
I unironically believe that >>6355572 is how AI apocallypse will happen
there wont be 1 big evil AI determined to kill humans
it will be slow phasing out, guided by laws of economy
humans will no longer be needed
eventually we will just have bunch of AI systems working for each other and very small population of elites living in post-scarcity society

>>6355908
It will ruin your hobby. Art will be so devalued that whatever you ever make will always be as valuable as 3year old doodle.

>haha art generators have made artists obsolete!
>desperately feed their generators a real, actual artist's work in order to produce shitty approximations of it, instead of feeding their program machine generated art
What did they mean by this?

>>6355928

>>6355930
>It will ruin your hobby. Art will be so devalued that whatever you ever make will always be as valuable as 3year old doodle.
not exactly. because a 3 year old cannot draw or paint

>>6355933
sure frogpost all you want nigger I work in related field of healthcare, and I wouldnt chose radiologist career rn if I culd get education for free

>>6355936
I see you cant understand what I meant. Your painting will be seen as the same trash as crayon drawing. Yes, your mom will be proud and your friends might pretend to be impressed, but they wont care, all it takes is 1 tap of button to get better result then your drawing.

>>6355948
Then explain
>>6355932

>>6355954
Its in its infancy. For the real master plan to happen you will release it on AI controlled accounts with permutations and let natural selection take its place. Those that get lot of followers and retweets will be permutated further and further. This way it will evolve into pure perfection for the average person. Human free goyslop.

>>6355948
are you retarded? a painting is a painting, some AI generated shit will be AI generated shit. it's AIfaggots like you who will be treated like a 3 year old, not a draugthsman or painted. these are treated differently. I know you're being a disingenuous cunt, but you've gotta be put in your place

>>6355956

>>6355957
or painters*. also, find better ways to crab people, pajeet. this one ain't gonna work. literally the opinion of most people on things is worthless anyway, they believe that art comes from talent or whatever. they're seeping envy at every step. only a fool would care about the validation of clueless retards like yourself

>>6355546
Gramophones exist and people still want to learn how to play the guitar

>>6355948
You won't understand because you never put any effort into anything in your life. People appreciate the hard work someone has put in to achieve something, you don't tell an Olympic archer that a gun is more accurate, you don't tell a strongman that a crane can lift more than him. They are respected because people recognise the effort that was put in.

>>6355968
>tfw got goosebumps while playing Mother from Pink Floyd with my guitar teacher
these AIjeets, non-creative losers and non artists will never know the pleasure

>>6355572
Ahw man that's shit... Well at leat I still have my 3 million euros worth of real-estate.

>>6355532
YPWNBA

>>6355572
Use the enter key, retard.

>>6355948
Read
>>6355590
and don't come back, you're transparent in your motivations and insecurities, please, go to therapy or something, this is getting sad

>https://old.reddit.com/r/yiff/comments/ykbmly/cute_deer_f_furcoder/iusbi04/
man, it's so obviously AI generated. not just because the picture is obviously AI generated, but because these lice come out of the woodwork and just drop these pictures out of nowhere, with no artist past, nothing to show for regarding their own personal progress. these cunts really are special cases aren't they?

>>6355830
You ever notice you don't see the same kind of vitriol towards corpos that literally profit off of misery?

>>6356000
>the one guy who was seething because the generated creation that he modified was minted as an NFT by somebody else

>>6355830
Because art is something they simply don't understand. They are people who live in world of 0s and 1s. You can see it in their comments all the times. They only know extremes. Something is good or bad. There is nothing betwen. When you make invention that is revolutionary, it replaces past one. Winner and loser. Clear 0 and 1 scenario.

But art is opposite of that. Its normal to say that you don't like the piece that won the competition the most. Its possible that one that took 10th place will sell for the most because it struck fancy of some eccentric.
Art doesnt have ultimate style. There is no universal "best" style that replaces all others. Even if something gets popular there will be people who dont like it.
To put it simply world of art is polar opposite of their world. And if they can't be part of it, they want to ruin it.

>>6355984
>you probably will never bang asians

>>6355546
>>6353075
Ahhh yes the /3/ attitude towards art. Completely unpersuasive crabbing that sounds like like a raging anime villain foaming at the mouth as he gets swallowed up by a rape portal.

>>6356038
kek

>>6355590

literally this guy... kek

The future looks seriously grim. What the fuck was even the point of making a machine able to do something that's completely useless and whimsical like art
Of all the spheres of human ingenuity, I would had never expected to see transhumanism put one of its disgusting paws in reality through fucking sexy girls and monsters drawings.

>>6355606
yeah, if anythig ai has made my workflow way esier, adding textures here and there, img2img is super helpful, haven't drawn a single cloud in months hahaha, might take a while before it "steals" anyones job, until then it's just making my life esier and making me money,
as it is today only people somehow skilled can really capitalize on this, and not these tech dorks ai simps lol

>>6356058

you draw animu?

>>6356048
>all those words
>"natural technical skill"
>oh also have some furfag art (*BY ME*)
Let me guess - this guy posted his horrible furfag scribblings somewhere, was told he sucked, and has been seething about it ever since.

>>6356060
i do pretty much everything, mostly currently focusing on visual development for a videogame

if the hopes of artists are still alive, it is only because they manage to live on the thought that AI has already reached a plateau, an illusory (and very fragile) idea that is obviously not based on anything

>>6356071
It's really ironic how the moment I managed to land an actual industry job after multiple decades of struggle, this shit happens
I feel like I fell back beyond where I started
I wish I could explain with words my feelings, but I can't
Jesus fucking christ. This is the fucking end.

>>6356057
>What the fuck was even the point of making a machine able to do something that's completely useless and whimsical like art
Social destabilization. Artists and programmers have historically worked together in both industry and entertainment (and quite often involve dedicated, intelligent people who probably share interests), and now image generation tech has pitted them against each other.

>>6356077
This is the first time I see a conspiracy theory make a bit of sense

>>6356058
How much is a "while"? Is it like 3 moths or 6 years?

>>6356077
The funniest thing is that they are both in the same boat. Coders are being replaced by Copilot and AI researchers are hardly coders, they mostly just design neural networks and let them learn on the sources.

>>6356048
this guy types exactly like one of the faggots from here

>>6356094
It's the guy making all the AI threads I bet

>>6355899
both look pretty bad IMO, they look so flat and lifeless the faces look dumb and ugly.

>>6356048
What a poor soul.

>>6356086
i mean who knows? but as i understand it, noise difussion by itslef won't be enough to replace anyone, cause it's not real "intelingence" it will always need someone behind it, now who do you think would get that job? some dork so has no idea how to create anything cool, or someone who has been developing that part of the brain that produces cool images? untill these dummies can create real artificial inteligence all they'll be able to produice is the cringe shit we've been seeing and nothing more hahaha

>>6356071
Ok wyro

>ai hype was totally organic

>>6355495
Shitesh, I am going to add toliets to all my paintings of anime girls floating in voids and there is nothing you can poo to stop me.

>>6356117
That's not how it works. Obviously you still need people after automation, you just need less people.

>>6356129
how much less or what other oportunitties for independent projects it will create nobody knows, but none you ai dorks will benefit from this and i already do hahaha

>>6356071
>if the hopes of artists are still alive, it is only because they manage to live on the thought that AI has already reached a plateau, an illusory (and very fragile) idea that is obviously not based on anything

hahahahahah

>>6356138
All of humanity will benefit, if things work out.

>>6356123
>I am going to add toliets to all my paintings of anime girls floating in voids

>>6356071
>still can't answer where the full release of 1.5 is

>>6356117
>>6356129
>>6356138
AI can generate those texts
There are already prompt generating AIs, you write it what you want, and it will convert it into prompts for the imigen AIs based on the most popular and highest rated prompts.

>>6356160
https://huggingface.co/runwayml/stable-diffusion-v1-5

>>6356163
>this fucking shit again
nigger i said the FULL RELEASE

>>6356162
all of that and you still get those cringy results? damn.

>>6356162
>there are already prompt generating AIs, you write it what you want, and it will convert it into prompts for the imigen

GPT-3 generated prompt run through SD.v4

Ai artists and codetrannies of all sorts will be punished by God for destroying the soul of humanity and making the world an altar for the birth of the antichrist. Meanwhile every true soulful artist like myself will enter the Kingdom of Heaven and bathe in the sanguine sea of paradise forever.

>>6356152
Based and loo-pilled

>>6356178
Even better, haven wont be garden of pleasure, instead it will be cozy house in middle of nowhere and every once in a while you get visited by army of angel simps ready to enjoy your art, give you critique and be your fans.

I dont think artists will die out per say as long as someone wants to draw despite knowing the meaningless of it and continue to do so simply for themselves or if they so choose to then people will still be artists. The more worrying thing is the eventual possiblity that in the near future because of AI, everything digital you will not know weather it is real or not anymore. I think alot of these issues with AI seem to stem from the innate antihumanist nature of it. Where everything is just a means to an end. I don't think the prospect for people is very good. Unironically i think Teddy K was right. I feel like the symptoms of too much technology is more than rearing its ugly head at this point. Too much water can kill man as with air so i dont see why technology isnt the same. I mostly agree with >>6355890 statement that science tards never stop and as if we should. It seems the only time people listen to any dangers when it is clear and immediate. The worst of all, any tard can have access to this. I personally dont think it would matter if AI is sentient or not because we cant even prove if other humans are so we can only measure its affects. This whole AI shit is mostly going to end up the same as tale of Icarus.

>>6355520
>stop talking about the future of art

I've just been ignoring it. Haven't really felt a difference.

>>6355890
>so what is there left to do as a human being besides eat shit consume and fuck ?
https://youtu.be/jp3OhC3NoMk?t=84

>>6356217
Heaven is what you want it to be.

>>6356165
it is the full release you retard. 1.5 has been out as SaaS even before the RunwayML release. It is exactly the same model down to the hash.

You will own nothing
Your skills will have no value
Your creativity will be stunted
You will never again be able to trust anything you see
You will be afraid to say what you want
You will be afraid to share your skills
Anything you produce will be sucked up and repurposed to produce artificial content
AND YOU WILL BE HAPPY

>>6355572
Your posts make no internal sense. You describe a fully automated system with AI reaching a singularity, yet keep the assumption that any buying and selling can take place anymore when AI has eradicated the labor market and then some. There are no price signals to coordinate production then that transmit tacit information about human valuation. You need a completely different system of economic distribution. People will starve on the street and robots will mass produce at inhuman levels 24/7 in the dark for whom? You? 10 people?

>>6355669
Show yourself doing it then. You AIfags constantly claim that you have the skills to fix the mistakes in generated images but you never do it.

>>6356326
Pick one:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1SRqJ7F_6yHVSOeCi3U82aA448TqEGrUlRrLLZ51abLg/edit#gid=1862355009

>>6356038
Feels bad, man.

>>6356048
Even r/stablediffusion thought he was a faggot.

some coomer in the /g/ sdg thread just shared his anime girl prompt and it had Dostoevsky in it
guessing he saw the Vasily Perov portrait of him and wrongly thought Dostoevsky was the name of the artist rather than the subject
I'm gonna kms

>>6356380
brainless consumers will be brainless retards.

>>6356236
the guy that made cartoons to spite loli threads was doing a meaningless work, only wasting time and energy for nobody.

AI replacing artists is the best thing could happen

>>6356550
You're replacing the good artists with vision and soul you idiot. The conmen in your pic will continue their con business as usual.

>>6355572
Crabs and losers shilling for ai art is sad, just stop your constant suffering and do double flip.

>>6356550
AI will do nothing to harm these "artists", it will embolden them. They probably feel smug knowing a robot will never shit on a canvas and shoot themselves for the sake of art.

>>6356555
I'm not worried about rpg maker H games

>>6356380
>>6356383
probably just tested generating random names and liked the results

>>6355546
You say all that in maybe a half aware way, I can’t tell if you’re celebrating or not, but I mean it when I say that if art is taken away from me there will be nothing left worth doing. There was never anything else.
But I also don’t believe in just killing myself, I’ll need to do something, even if that means not creating things.
And frankly, something has to be done about the “live in a pod, stay in your wage cage, eat the bugs,” etc future that’s coming for us. This is just the next step in corralling people into the shittiest possible society. That’s why they choose to automate the humanities first.
I genuinely do not care who offers me what, whether they’re communists, fascists, Nazis, I do not care anymore. If my art career fails than the only thing left is political action, because if I’m not allowed to create, I will find a way to destroy.
Within means that respect the law of the land of course.

>>6356581
>because if I’m not allowed to create
why some keep pushing this meme? no one is stopping anyone from drawing

>>6356550
these things will keep existing despite AI bullshit, and it won't harm the hacks at all, you stupid fuck. in fact dadaist dumbfucks are the ones to praise AI a lot. you should probably kill yourself right now, you retarded ni/g/ger.

>>6356550
good thing we have an AI to replace these dumbfucks. no wait we don't.

>>6355563
shit bruh

>>6355712
>devs, programmers and coders are the cishets
Fuckin’ lmao, you realize a group of trannies is called a “dev team” for a reason right?

>>6356550
In what way is AI harming postmodern eyesores?

>>6356594
>a group of trannies is called a “dev team”
kek

>>6356579
you shouldn't say things that you don't believe

>>6356585
There’s several reasons why AI gets in the way of artists being able to create.
If I’m not able to do art professionally, I’m not building the skills or influence it takes to bring my visions to fruition, and even if I did make a great piece of work using AI, it’d get drowned out in the sea of other auto-generated AI slop. No one will be able to tell what’s real and what’s not anymore, and worse yet, I gave up my soul for a mediocre end result.
All of your time will get sucked away, not even by worthy endeavors but by fake jobs for a fake economy of busywork that’s fucking meaningless. Making PowerPoints to pitch to a board some product initiative for a thing you don’t care about because you need rent money, that’s the GOOD ending. More likely, you scrounge and barely get by working in food service, unable to have a family or even take care of your aging parents.
If everything is automated and nothing else about how humans establish worth changes, there will be nothing left not just for me but for the vast majority of people.
It’s bigger than art and pretty pictures, AI is about controlling thought and information. Fucking surveillance technology, deepfake news, the works.
At least it used to be possible that with enough dedicated work you could make a living as an artist. I got to be a self sufficient full time artist for 8 months this year. My gig is still ongoing but the other shoe is dropping in slow motion with this AI shit.

I'm sick of retards pretending that SD isn't a nothing burger in the world of art, if that wasn't the case you wouldn't come here everyday to seek validation. If there's anything to be gained from all this talking is that the fact that people need to stop giving away all their data to corpos for free.
But my biggest wish is for jannies to do their fucking job and clean up this shit.

>>6356621
Dumb frogposter kys

>>6356633
Struck a nerve?

>>6356619
I am thinking about picking up terrorism. I had normie career for years but when I lost my last job to employer gpoing bankrupt I decided to go for art and then AI happened. I am sick of academia, I am sick of normie job and now I have nothing left in this life.

>>6356685
What's the annual salary like for terrorism?

>>6355928
Schwab moment

>>6356729
holy pajeet seethe, actual third worlder impotent angst >>6356695

kek where did you find this

>>6356729
I'm genuinely scared of people living in the made up realities that exists solely in their mind.

>>6356729
I don't understand it. Doesn't India have a rich art culture of their own? Don't they have a ton of established philosophical thinkers? Why are so many of them like this?

>>6356729
This really reminds me of that "Strong men create good times, good times create weak men, weak men create bad times" meme.
This is the future of "A.I. art". Milions of such NPCs spamming their creations left and right.

>>6356729
>evony towers

>>6356071
>if the hopes of artists are still alive, it is only because they manage to live on the thought that AI has already reached a plateau, an illusory (and very fragile) idea that is obviously not based on anything
>Artbreeder
>AI Dungeon/NovelAI
>The myriad of other flavor of the month AI generators
So far no AI generator has progressed much beyond its initial scope. Granted, AI Art advanced pretty rapidly in the past few months, but to think that that level of progress is inevitably going to continue goes against the trends I've seen with other AI generators. I think it's more likely to stagnate just like them, and then we're going to get a sudden drop of an AI that is significantly better in a couple years. But better in what capacity? Realism? Fidelity to an art style?
So far, all AI generators have a fundamental issue of coherence that I haven't seen a proper solution to that wasn't 'just fix it up in photoshop' or 'just fix it up with inpainting!' The first one relies on you having skills as a digital artist to fix, the second still requires the AI to produce something coherent. Ultimately, it doesn't know what a hand is or what a face is or what anything is, it just associates a certain probability of pixels with those objects. The best AI art I've seen is the one where the flaws are hidden, but even then the thing falls apart upon closer inspection when you realize that none of the details make any sense whatsoever. The AI doesn't understand geometry, but it is very good at creating an impression of detail.
I proompted this in MidJourney, and while it is great to look at, it's also noticeably off when you take a closer look at the details of the armor, or even the overall structure of it.
The impressionists would have liked it a lot.

>>6355495
>need at least 8-10GB of VRAM to train on Dreambooth
Fuck.

>>6356783
AI generation will become incredibly influential. You’d be insane to not use it in your workflow in some way from this point on, ex: inpainting.

>>6356799
I can see myself using it to create moodboards and quickly explore a design, but I'm never going to use it to actually create a finished product. I enjoy drawing and painting too much for that.

>>6356799
examples? I don't see how in-painting, then having to paint over the thing you in-painted because it's off in some way would speed up my workflow meaningfully.

>>6356799
I'm not opposed to new tech, but I don't see how that's done in its current form. Sketching or testing colors takes mere minutes, and that's achieving a more precise look that you have more control over than whatever you can request an AI.
Designdoll and such 3d programs also cover my needs when it comes to complex poses and perspective, and while I see AI improving this marginally, I don't get how it'd significantly change things.

>>6356783
I think the reason for the boom is that it surprised everyone and people started investing a lot in it. AIdungeon and other text2text seemed very uninteresting to most people as opposed to this thing. Prepare for text2video to be even more funded along with text2game.

>>6356814
>sketch desired pose/composition
>send it to img2img
>done

>>6356823
But you can’t work on the clothing design.

>>6356835
Yes you can, you just draw it over the generated image

i feel like the seething anon is right, but he's coming off like a huge doompilled fagggot.
i don't think anyone could escape what's coming. this tech is revolutionary and will change EVERYTHING, right now it's just at its infancy, imagine what it could do in a couple of years.
i just want to say, fellow artbros, good luck, find a way to survive.

>>6356823
>sketch desired pose/composition
>send it to img2img
>get something that has nothing to do with the original drawing
woah... the future

>>6356846
>get something that has nothing to do with the original drawing
Promptlet.
Also play with denoising levels and Classifier-guidance.

>>6356846
Do you even know how to use the software moron?
Do you know what denoising strength is? Do you know how the Euler model works?
Cope harder idiot

>>6356841
You just know this tech is mostly going to be used by fucking google or some evil company to brainwash yet more and more people with chirurgically targeted ads and carefully crafted virtual spaces designed to isolate people and push them to consoom and stop thinking at all
Meanwhile newer artists get discouraged from doing art at all, what's the fucking point when you can just type a prompt and the machine does all the thinking and imagination for you
I don't see anything good coming out of this shit, it's just dystopian all around, and AIcucks pretend its just muh le tool, stop imagining things dude let the goymachine do all the work for you its so easy!

>>6356853
No img2img result ever capture the sprint of the sketch. It's hard even for artists, but AI is better right?

>>6356819
>Prepare for text2video to be even more funded along with text2game.
Text2video is extremely likely, but text2game is a long, long ways off I think. How would you even train an AI on games? There are so many different programming languages and the source codes of the vast majority of games aren't publicly available.

>>6356846

>>6356862
This looks nothing like the sketch and the only good parts in this drawing are the ones the artist retouched lmao what the fuck are you trying to prove here

>>6356860
>it's hard for the AI
>it's hard for artists

So what's your point?

>>6356861
Plus a massive chunk of modern game creation is wiring up shit in an engine. not just coding or modelling. You could get really basic stuff like asteroids or pacman I'm sure.

>>6356854
>You just know this tech is mostly going to be used by fucking google or some evil company to brainwash yet more and more people with chirurgically targeted ads and carefully crafted virtual spaces designed to isolate people and push them to consoom and stop thinking at all
Ads are a possible use of this tech, but targeted ads are unlikely to be the main source of revenue for this technology. The big secret about targeted ads is that, actually, they don't work. It's more likely that we're headed towards subscription services for the very best models. NovelAI, MidJourney and Dall-E 2 are already doing just that.

>>6356864
I know lol, that's why i posted it.
>>6356866
My point is that artists can do it, it's just hard. AI can't do it.

>>6355572
>implying that these art pieces weren’t already ai generated.

>>6356870
Of course a machine will never be able to make something exactly as you wish ever, but hey, they can make something pretty neat 1000 times faster :)

>>6356878
ok, but what good is that? I don't need something neat, I need a finished version of that sketch.

>>6356878
>backpedaling already

>>6356881
That's ok, spend 4 hours polishing your turd, meanwhile I'll make 30 masterpieces (yup, I'll use that prompt) more appealing than yours

>>6356883
Learn to prompt.

>tfw prompt "artists" realize that sooner than later prompting itself will be improved and streamlined so even a child will be able to churn out the sewage he does
you're nothing, rajeesh

>>6356887
The only way to post my work without dox is posting studies.
Which leads to "AI copies just like you do".
boring

>>6356887
>spend 4 hours polishing your turd
But that's the AI workflow?

>>6356898
The “sewage” is on par with most online artists though??

>>6356823
I've been experimenting putting my shitty sketches through waifu/stable diffusion and seeing what I get. I think the results are a little cute, but as other anons say the lack of control can be frustrating, even when I mess around with the denoising settings and whatnot. Feels like i'm rolling for a good result in a gacha game sometimes.
Then again i'm kinda new to it so maybe things will get better as i learn more.

>>6356922
It's lower than dirt. There's nothing to see, it can barely be qualified as "art". I'd look at a million /beg/ turds before a single eyeful of AI swill. You might not realize it, but none except your fellow AIcuck and coomers looking for a quick release care at all about this garbage.

>>6356854
Governments will utilize this technology to make hyperreality even more impenetratable. It will take simulacra to wholy new levels.

>>6356942
>ai art is lower than dirt
It made the whole art world seethe in an instant. That should tell you how much you are coping right now, faggot.
Get with the times.

>>6356946
>Get with the times.
Dude everyone already forgot about it.

>>6356948
LOL

>>6356878
>>6356887
You will shit out thousands of kitschy derivatives because you lack the vision and the skill to see what is wrong and what is boring with your soulless gatcha rolls.

>>6356946
>wow why did this tech born from stealing from million of artists to attempt to replace them made them seethe?
Fucking head scratcher bro, of course I'm seething, these niggers literally stole from me and fellow artists for you /g/niggers to dance on the mangled remains of our works, anyone who makes art for a living should be angry about this.
Where are my royalties? How can I pull my art out of their piece of shit dataset?

>>6356954
>they stole from me and fellow artists
The AI simply learned from your material. Nothing has been stolen. When you go do your “studies” on other people’s work, you do the exact same thing the AI does. I get it, it sucks for you, but it was inevitable at this point, and it will get much much more worse in the future.

>>6356946
>Get with the times.
No.

>>6356956
see >>6355623

>>6356296
no its fucking not you dumbass

>>6356783
> AI Art advanced pretty rapidly in the past few months
>ML learning been out for years
>all of a sudden has rapid progress when it starts using copyrighted work

>>6356943
That's another big thing to worry about.
Have any of the AI bros addressed this yet or is it all part of the plan?

>>6356956
Now make it learn music from artists

>>6356970
>starts using copyrighted work
always has been.

>>6356973
show me

>>6356982
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Authors_Guild,_Inc._v._Google,_Inc.

>>6356971
>Have any of the AI bros addressed this yet or is it all part of the plan?
they think it's "cool". they aren't called bugmen for nothing, they are simply inhuman

>>6356985
books? bro im talking about images

>>6356956
>Nothing has been stolen
i wonder if you will get it through your skull that this really means nothing. it's software made to plagiarize art no matter how much you try to make the AI seem like a "human". this whole think is a pathetic marketing scheme

>>6356956
Even if that were the case, it doesn't matter how exactly the data laundering process works. They took copyrighted material and fed it to a computer to create a for-profit product. The "it just learned" argument holds no ground. Try creating your own AI using copyrighted Lion King and Donald Duck pictures and see if Disney lawyers don't come to pound your ass.
The way they split into various nonprofits to create the AI to muddy the waters, and how they're bending the knee to music producers, is very telling that they knew exactly what they were doing. AI is never going away, which is why this shit has to be regulated as soon as possible.

>>6356893
>learn to search on google
a """""""""""""skill""""""""""""" that won't even be relevant shortly

>>6356993
you ever hear about google images?

>>6356729
This a new kind of cope, lmao, also this had nothing to do with copyright, what is he even trying to say.
t. third world artist

>>6356729
this has to be a bot. i refuse to believe this is a real person.

>>6357002
ok final (You) Paj
this has nothing to do with AI IMAGES in the way I described it

>>6357012
>collecting copyrighted works to put in a dataset used for training a machine learning algorithm has nothing to do with collecting copyrighted works to put in a dataset used for training a machine learning algorithm
ok.

>6357018 is a pajeet of the lowest caliber
you ask these street shitters to post proof relevant to the topic at hand and they give you something completely unrelated to what you're talking about

>>6356956
>>6356946
You're >>6356048 spiritually or perhaps literally this guy.
I don't know why you would ever want to make art, when you clearly hate it and those that make it. You don't want to learn or have any respect for the rules of art that still govern your A.I artwork, you can't see the issues with composition, value, anatomy, form etc because you're not an artist, and since you're only validated by other retards like you fall into a false sense of security on which you think you don't have to be an artist because others are not artists, but what happens when everyone is? do you think you'll still be able to bullshit your way to fame with your basic normie eye and prompts?
Why do you even want to have to ability to make art quickly if you hate it so much? What is it about real artists that make you seethe and cry and shit your pants so much?
You'll never know what it feels like to be able to perceive what an artist can perceive, what it feels to create, real artists don't want to use A.I generators because in their current state they're worthless to us, but if the worst case scenario happens (your doomsday scenario) on which A.I is the obvious option you'll still be outperformed by real artists, because you can't explain what you're doing, you can't control or have any sense of real creative direction, because you depend on the artstyles of others of which you have no idea of what the strenghts and weaknesses are, you're illiterate, you're an idiot with a calculator screaming at mathematicians that they're useless now.

>>6356995
Yes, I wish people would stop comparing the image generators "learning" to people learning. An image generator is not a person, it doesn't learn like people, and doesn't have special rights unique from those who developed it and those who use it. The developers processed raw, copyrighted data, without permission, so that their invention could produce other data, through direct usage of that copyrighted data.

>>6357049
>without permission
you don't need permission, maybe you should but as it stands right now you don't.

>>6357052
You don't need permission to do it as research, for non profit reasons. Stability AI funded the research though, and then when on to monetize it. Emad is going to prison.

>>6357064
DELETE THIS

>>6357085
Error: You cannot delete a post this old.

Really hoping that climate change brings us all back to the stone age so artists can go back to being actual artists and techfags have to go back to being accountants or whatever fucking worthless numbermonkey job there was.

>>6357037
Didn’t read lol

>>6357101
>when AIshitters start pooing in my cave for paintings again
NOT AGAIN

>>6356048
>>6356729
jesus fuck

>>6357101
You can still do art at your next job.

>>6356996
>>6356995
>
>try creating your own AI using copyrighted Lion Ling and Donald Duck
SD is open source, everyone including your dog can train their model on an artist or anything really with like 4-8 photos with things like Dreambooth.
And so what if you trained a model on those characters? Artists can post their own artworks based on copyrighted characters and sell them on the internet already. Why aren’t they getting sued as well?

>>6356962
Ok buddy whatever you say. Stability is going to be releasing a new CLIP which hasn't been made public yet.

>>6357037
You can easily control the direction of what you want. If anything Artists have a huge advantage over coomers and techchads prompting because they don't know aesthetic values, studies and overall eye for a presentable work.
Not to mention tools like inpainting/outpainting, img2img outputs, like its a literal golden goose for artists.
I do realize I'm talking to mostly mentally ill people that are highly threatened by AI

Trans women are women. AI art is art.

>>6357118
>Artists can post their own artworks based on copyrighted characters and sell them on the internet already. Why aren’t they getting sued as well?
Fan art technically infringes copyright and can be ground for takedowns etc, but most artists let it slide because it's free advertising/its not worth going after small fishes. However some companies hold a firm grasp on their licenses and will send takedown notices at their discretion.

>>6357119
Nigger I know you never held a pencil in your hand your whole life. But drawing what you want is still more efficient that playing gacha with generators.
Why do you think interested as plummeted lately?

>>6357118
>anyone and their dog can steal art to create shitty computer collages
we know, rajeesh, we know, but its still theft

>>6357131
wrong, I'm a trad painter but I mostly stick to landscapes, and seasidescapes. I have often taken watercolor backgrounds I've made and img2img them.

>>6357134
pyw

Label it "Parody" and claim "fair use". Simple.

>>6357140
no that doesnt work ramesh, you cannot claim ownership of the product of a machine "which operates without any creative input or intervention from a human author". Are you literate? can you read whats written in the copyright laws book? and no, your prompts aren't enough to count as input, oops!

>>6357134
pyw

>>6357119
>ok vuddy
jeet detected.

>>6357145
Give your BF a big hug!

>>6357145
sue me

Holy keks
Look at all the replies posts like these
>>6356946
gets, often with seething malding replies like this
>>6357037
.
>IM TOTALLY NOT MAD AT ALL
>THIS IS ABSOLUTELY NOT WORRYING NE AT ALL NUH UH
>THATS WHY I MUST REPLY TO EVERY AITARD POST
>THAT'LL SHOW EM!

>>6356861
>>6356867
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zm9B-DvwOgw
>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zyH_CiZJTw0
Soon(tm)

>>6356038
why even live

>>6357119
>You can easily control the direction of what you want. If anything Artists have a huge advantage over coomers and techchads prompting because they don't know aesthetic values, studies and overall eye for a presentable work.
So exactly what I said?
>real artists don't want to use A.I generators because in their current state they're worthless to us, but if the worst case scenario happens (your doomsday scenario) on which A.I is the obvious option you'll still be outperformed by real artists

Notice I'm not here to say that art is dead from A.I, I'm saying that even if A.I takes over artists that know what they're doing will outperform prompting fa/g/s.

>I do realize I'm talking to mostly mentally ill people that are highly threatened by AI
I've seen that it's mostly mentally ill people hyping it and saying art is dead
>>6357184
>IM TOTALLY NOT MAD AT ALL
>THIS IS ABSOLUTELY NOT WORRYING NE AT ALL NUH UH
>THATS WHY I MUST REPLY TO EVERY ARTIST POST
>THAT'LL SHOW EM!

>>6356729
I read this in a pajeet accent

>>6357200
I genuinely wonder what the next fad in tech is going to be.

"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”

So, we are in stage 3?

>"First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then you win”

>So, we are in stage 3?

>>6357200
>codex only works in OpenAI cherrypicked enviroment
>Copilot was trained on the entirety of Github and it's still fucking shit
Machine learning is good only when you need pattern recognition and you can tolerate errors and artifacts.

>>6357219
Stage 4? Already?

>>6357119
So at its very best it still
>can't draw eyes clearly
>can't draw hands fucking at all
>can't match anatomical features in a way that's consistent with perspective
>can't do anything more dynamic than front facing or 3/4 angle poses
>can't do proper body fat displacement
>can't draw appealing nipples or genitals

You faggots were insisting we'd get exponential improvements in October that would magically fix everything because DUDE FUTURE TECHNOLOGY THE YOUTUBE ALGORITHM FED ME A VIDEO MADE BY A SHILL THAT MILLIONS HAVE SEEN SO I'M AN EXPERT TOO!!!!111

Enough of your shit, you've lost the argument

>>6357237
You can see the usual AI color blending from the thumbnail you don't even need to go into the details.

>Stage 4? Already?

is there a easy tutorial for that ? it could be nice for reference

Also people lost thier mind but they dont bat a eye when 15 CSR clones cameout

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NNl7GQFTULU
Evolution according to indians.

>>6357134
You AIpajeets always insist you're artists even though you never post your work and think deformed generated images look good.

>>6357272
Starting to notice a pattern with Indians and blatant dishonesty

>>6357226
Does that mean AI art will forever have mishaps and prompters will forever have to fix up the small errors and pick 1 in 4 images that looks good?

>>6357279
Yes? We still don't have a good upscaler that doesn't fuck up small details or blows up artifacts and that's a much simpler problem to solve. NNEDI3 came out like 10 years ago and it's still one of the best.
>small errors
Not this is dishonesty lmao.

>>6356861
It might be far off, but so was text2image just half a year ago. Notice that lot of AAA companies are not actually releasing games anymore since they get hated on for being buggy mess and making hyper realistic graphics is extremely difficult. I bet Epic is currently sucking up data from Unreal projects and building their own text2game in secret. Keeping it secret since their primary customer are indie devs that would quit Unreal because Epic tired to automate their asses.

>>6357118
A company's legal team might see a difference between random individuals drawing copyrighted characters in pieces of fanart which ultimately aim to do nothing to meaningfully impact the original IP, and people distributing programs which attempt to produce knockoff pieces en masse, with the apparent goal of replacing, or otherwise devaluing, the original producers.

>>6357286
You know why you retards are so invested in this "AI" stuff? Because you don't want to change the status quo of your life. You hope that some scifi bullshit will come your way and allow you to "make it", be it drawing, game design, writing or whatever. You never put any effort into anything but wanted not only to be able to do things but also to be successful. You're the kind of people who buy a drawing tablet but never put in the effort to learn to use it.
And now you idiots are deluding yourselves into thinking that "THIS IS IT" and "AI" will realize all your dreams while you keep procrastinating, but keep dreaming you'll make it big with your blurry messy images or your buggy javascript pacman clone.

>>6357290
So what? They will try to sue millions of retards using AI?

>>6357298
More likely the people on huggingface and the like who produce and distribute the models, at least one of which I saw had set up a Patreon.

>>6357297
You know why you retards are so invested in this "AI" stuff? Because you don't want to change the status quo of your life. You hope that no scifi bullshit will come your way and make your skill irrelevant, be it drawing, game design, writing or whatever. You put all your effort into skill that had years of warning it will be automated, but you didn't do your research on AI research. You're the kind of people who dismiss the potential of your job being automated until it finally is.
And now you idiots are deluding yourselves into thinking that "THIS IS IT" and "AI" will be a fad, but keep dreaming you'll make it big with your worthless images or your buggy javascript pacman clone.

>>6357306
Nigger I do machine learning for a living and I plan to change career in a few years.

>>6357310
I do science and gamedev for living, and I plan to also change my carrier in a few years

Lotta rage. Lotta seethe. Little more cope, guys.

>>6357306
No one expected the creative fields to be automated so fucking soon. People thought we would get android maids and flying cars before machines could master trivial things that people enjoy doing and consuming like making art or music.

>>6357326
>No one expected the creative fields to be automated so fucking soon.
Where have they've been automated?

>>6357322
The time for cope has run out. Now comes the time for drastic measures.

>>6357330
>drastic measures
Let's strike! No more art until the government bans A.I. !!!! Artists unite!

>>6357326
>master
>>6357119
Again, even at its best with all the little inpainting and tireless cherry-picking for the least fucked up results, this is the best it can do.

If you're going to lie about reality in hopes that it becomes true, might as well wish for plumbing and body hair genetics that don't make girls of your race want to puke

>>6357326
Detroit: Become Human warned us.

>>6357326
There were many image filters made with AI, like that spaghetti AI. Photoshop had the tool that allowed you to just cut out parts of image and fill them with what the AI guessed would be there, like cutting out people from the image and so on, it even worked on videos. There were many AIs like thispersondoesnotexist.com or thiswaifudoesnotexist.com which made photorealistic people indistinguishable from real photos and anime waifus that were kind of decent looking, looking similarly to anime girls you get from models not trained specifically on anime like Waifu Diffusion and NovelAI. GPT3 was released for a long time making texts and AIs extending songs was out also for many years. All I listed here is at least 2019 and the song stuff is 2017. The sphagetti AI was back from 2015, which is basically copying artstyles, or doing image2image. Photoshop had object detection back in 2020 and content aware fill was in 2019.

You might ask why would they release something that would inevitably lead to creative fields being replaced. Well, the Diffusion model that all text2image work on is based on computers identifying objects correctly from noise. The object detection is required feature for literally anything done with real life operating AI in robots. All the manual labor jobs we still have now either require you to grab stuff and put it somewhere which is easy job and clunky robots are way too expensive for that, and jobs that require finding stuff, analyzing it, and then do the manual labor. All the things that are simple and require lot more muscle power rather then observation and analysis are already automated with big machines.

Humanoid robots are not a thing because human shape while very versatile is also not that efficient. We still don't have AGI to pilot humanoid robot and the humanoid robots we have are very expensive because of lithium batteries.

>>6356048
I honestly never had an ego about making money with art, but holy shit seeing how much my success makes people like this seethe makes me just want to wave it in their pissy broke faces even more, lmao. Furry retard can't make it in the easiest part of the art world and wants to feel superior? ahahahahahahahahaha broke faggot, no money, no recognition, has to work a stupid wagie job, has to cry on irrelevant forums all day

>>6357383
>write a wall of text to say absolutely nothing

>>6357326
>No one expected the creative fields to be automated
What creative fields have been automated? You keep saying it but don't actually show it.

>>6357395
Indians do this with failing restaurants they open in the states. Everyone in town agrees the place sucks, all the human reviews show that, but somehow mysteriously every day a bunch of new reviews that all sound the same pop up to give glowing praise.

>>6357395
Its like with truckers or reporters/article writers. People said how they are gonna get replaced, we had GPT3 write articles that are unrecognizable to human made articles, we have self driving cars doing their job and self driving in areas that are not city centers (perfect for highways that truckers drive on) and yet they still are around and not even the minority. I think the recent boom in popularity is because
A) That fucker who won the state competition brought it to public eye and people started thinking it is actually useful, thus driving the investment into those companies
B) Stable Diffusion was released open source, which gave birth to all the companies using their code and making their own models
C) Pretty pictures are more impressive to people then chatbots

>>6357404
You didn't reply to the question.
Also to add
>we had GPT3 write articles that are unrecognizable to human made articles
Wrong.
>we have self driving cars doing their job and self driving in areas that are not city centers
Wrong.

>>6357416
Article
https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/sep/08/robot-wrote-this-article-gpt-3
The self driving cars thing is still not true I agree

>>6357326
THIS.

I mean, what the fuck? Sci-fi, visionaries, everyone never ever mentioned about this because of all the utilities technology could have, that would be by far one of the least important.

We all think about more efficient energy consuming, advancements in security, health, education, transports, but art?

>>6357461
First that article is obviously edited.
But anyways there are a lot of giveaways it was written by GPT, like the insane amount of short sentences.

>>6357471
This is science and academic research for you, they dont find solutions to problems, they are just researching and sometimes finding something useful.
T. biologist

>>6355775
based, that's the dream brother

>>6355699
From the lettering, I guess it's from 2000 AD.

>>6355563
This is still preferable over our reality with StableDiffusion. Emad just releases this technology open source free to download. Now every loser can just download the thing and run it on their computer as well as make new models super easily. I think that Emad is the single person responsible for the fast advancement and the reason why nobody is trying to sue it. He already won by releasing it open source and for everyone, while everyone praises him for being a hero and not keeping his toys for himself.

>>6355699
Judge Dredd. Look for "Kenny Who?".

>>6356862
Hahahahahahaha and pajeets think you won't get commissions anymore, even beggers are picky with details.

>>6357471
The tech has existed for a while like other anons have already mentioned already. But Emad releasing it as open source has been equivalent to leaking the drafts for creating nuclear WMDs. Now everyone will have to live with this stuff with fragile rules and common agreements and expressing concern over minor violations, until someone goes ahead and blows it up big time.

>>6355560
no wonder, he literally draws the same face over and over, must be very easy to train ai on his samey shit

>>6355495
I draw as a hobby. I'd keep drawing even if literally no one ever looked at my art, so fuck this AI thing. You will never take the drive to create away from me

>>6358231
Not really, Google's private AI image generation software is almost 20x more powerful and they still haven't utilized it in any meaningful way that's replaced artists or any of these doomer scenarios. In the examples we've seen it still isn't that impressive either; it fails at a lot of the detail specificity and uncanny valley blurry errors that open source AI engines produce. This is like watching third world children fight over a box of Nintendo Wiis. None of this shit is the future or anything but a toy that maybe a handful of people will be able to profit from.

>>6355704
Fucking soulless

Satan, here is my soul. I will suffer forever in your frozen lake right next to you.
All of that if you use some of your dark magic and make sure this >>6358790 anon is right and that this will be the future.

if you retards haven't noticed, the bottleneck of Ai hit somewhere mid-august. give me a single example of where image generation has improved since then. (it hasn't). all those hundred of thousand more images in the dataset, training refinements, etc. and the images still look of the same quality as they did back in August.

incase you negros didn't realise how stocks work, it's in the companies upmost interest to hype up their tech as much as possible in order to get the most money while its hot, hence the big promises and guarantees that this is the future of entertainment. doesn't need to be true, just get people to pour in the money and get richer.

stop worrying and draw more.

>>6359059
From /g/. It might not look like much of a improvement to you, but how would you even improve it at this point?

>>6359069
yeah it was spitting out those exact looking things in august, hence my point. i could think of some ways, but also same-face character portraits / pinups are one of the few niches it can do well. that wasn't ever my area, but also a lot of the results like this are happened upon, cherry picked good results. it's all still a crap-shoot, especially if you want something that isn't the exact same thing over and over. look at the lexica database for a more realistic look at what people are getting, and note that the front page is also the popular / successful lot of the outputs.

>>6359088
OP post is example of something the AI research evolved in since August. We had that example of Dreambooth research paper showing clock and dog in august, but now we see people stealing artstyles of people who were not even used in the training.

>>6359107
yeah but the quality of what it does is still stagnant. it's about as far away from replacing the artist it's trained on as it was back then .

>>6359122
Sounds like Satan listened to my begging

>>6355546
Nigga, I'm a fisherman I make $200K a year working only 8 months. I draw because it's fun.

>>6356887
>i'll do 30 things the boss didn't ask for instead of what the boss asked for
That's how you get fired.

>>6357471
>security, health, education, transports
Stuck in the 80's because of either lithium or bureaucracy.
We won't get flying cars or actual cures instead of treatments until we find better compact energy sources and get rid of democracy.