[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 130 KB, 520x488, FgIIcQCVUAAbVDe.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349447 No.6349447 [Reply] [Original]

>you wouldnt download a color
absolute state of adobe cucks KEK

>> No.6349448

The motherfuckers copyrighted a colour?

>> No.6349450

>>6349447
>they copyrighted a color
digicucks eternally BTFO kek

>> No.6349459

>>6349447
Oi doy do you have a loicense for that color love?

>> No.6349461

>>6349447
When I was in Australia that was one of the first things I noticed: Cadbury copyrighting the color purple. kek
https://www.cucocreative.co.uk/recent-news/can-you-trademark-a-colour/

>> No.6349462

>>6349448
As I understand it Pantone colors are ready made dyes that allow a consistent color in print when using spot color, i.e. not a mixture of colors like CMYK but rather pure paint to achieve a specific hue. So this doesn't apply to digital painting in general unless the client asks for a specific Pantone color for a certain part of the illustration. Someone else might be able to explain it better.

>> No.6349464

>>6349447
Kritabros we can't stop winning!

>> No.6349467

is this a joke

>> No.6349468

>>6349447
My white characters are now in blackface. Adobe! fix this now!

>> No.6349484

>>6349462
Apparently this is a screenshot from Pantones website or something, showing the censored values so you can't steal their colors lmao

>> No.6349485
File: 59 KB, 1000x761, FgKDiBbXEAESkEf.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349485

>>6349484

>> No.6349492

>>6349467
We're repeating history where certain colors are reserved only for the few and only if you're painting specific people.

>> No.6349495

>>6349467
>>6349492
Don't worry,you only have to pay $21 a month for the Pantone plug-in.

>> No.6349504

>some rightoid will probably think about copyrighting one of more of the colors of the pride flags
kek

>> No.6349507

>>6349495

What's stopping them from starting timed DLC colors on top of the $21/month plug-in? Or event-exclusive colors that expire after a holiday they're promoting it for? What if they partner with Paypal and social media giants to catch pirates who use unauthorized colors in their artworks and charge the offending artist $2500 per artwork?

Just throwing ideas out loud.

>> No.6349518

>>6349507
CEO of Color Trademarks here.
You're hired! You start on Monday, 7 AM.

>> No.6349519

>>6349518

OSU! YoroshikuoneshimaSU!

>> No.6349556
File: 18 KB, 251x200, good-grief1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349556

>>6349447
niggers are copyrighting a COLOR. Meanwhile artists cant even copyright their damn works from AI

>> No.6349568

>>6349556
Why would you want to copyright your work from the Ai? It's not like you didn't already reference off another hack and besides the work the Ai outputs would be dissimilar to yours. No, just because the Ai has a similar sitting pose to your drawing doesn't mean it gives you grounds for infringement.
>>6349566
The copening continues.

>> No.6349569
File: 234 KB, 917x871, 438.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349569

>>6349507
Whats stopping them from making an anti AI color palette?
H-have we stumbled on to something bros?

>> No.6349570
File: 116 KB, 1600x1117, angry-indian-man-smartphone-working-home-technology-remote-job-people-concept-196294059.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349570

>>6349568

>> No.6349589

Digicucks lost AGAIN

>> No.6349596

>>6349568
SIR SIR DO NOT REDEEM

>> No.6349609
File: 227 KB, 840x480, 1587491668917.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349609

I'm not surprised honestly.

>> No.6349617

>>6349609
is this real? why can companies copyright common phrases? what stops someone from making a song with all common phrases and start striking everyone?

>> No.6349631

>>6349617
of course it’s not real, retard, that’s not even how credit cards work

>> No.6349633
File: 182 KB, 1000x761, checkmate.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349633

>>6349485

>> No.6349640

>>6349633
MODS

>> No.6349644
File: 73 KB, 178x227, Just look who you are.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349644

>>6349568
I used myself as reference

Why would you want to copyright color from the use? It's not like you invented new color and besides the work the Artist outputs would costs you nothing. No, just because the Artist has a same color to your color doesn't mean it gives you grounds for infringement.

>> No.6349646

>>6349631
It's not real...yet

>> No.6349661
File: 122 KB, 398x309, 1449371887122.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349661

>>6349568
God I can't tell if you're all just the same person that shill AI with just how fucking formal they type and long winded they get

>> No.6349664
File: 233 KB, 1500x2100, 1666927344163899.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349664

>>6349568
Niraj, I am going to add toilets to all my paintings of anime girls floating in voids and there is nothing you can poo to stop me

>> No.6349678

>>6349447
Should I just make a Pantone palette for Krita?

>> No.6349683
File: 57 KB, 532x512, honk.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349683

>>6349447
>ai corps can use your entire portfolio to train their products for free and if you object you're just mad lol
>but you can't paint with this certain hue that's copyright infringement
honk honk cunt

>> No.6349685

>>6349462
Pantone colors are used for design and manufacturing. People who make enamel pins are an example some of the crowd here might understand applying it towards. You're mostly right, but digital painters don't need pantone stuff since they'd likely just need a basic cmyk palette if they're aiming for print work that will be executed by an inkjet style digital (not offset) printer.
You can buy the pantone with color recipes in cmyk and hex value to bypass this, but I'd imagine hunting down a used copy means they'll go up in resale value

>> No.6349686

>>6349678
I don't think anyone who needs a pantone pallet is the type of person using krita. That's more of an inkscape thing.

>> No.6349689

>>6349685
*You can buy the pantone book, I meant

>> No.6349694

>>6349633
SIR PLEASE DO NOT PICK
SIR SIR!!!

>> No.6349695

>>6349447
Why is Adobe trying so hard to kill their own company? This is the last of a long series of absolutely retarded choices.

>> No.6349770

>>6349683
i hate late stage capitalism.

>> No.6349790

>>6349447
to quote some use in hackernews comment regard this
>This is not about the colors, FYI. This is about someone referencing a specific Pantone product as a spot color. And the automatic conversion from that spot color name to the regular RGB / CMYK color values is now gone. But if you embedded the actual RGB/CMYK values into your file, then it'll still open just fine and display those colors just fine.
Edit: Also, converting from Pantone to regular RGB/CMYK is a lot more lossy than one would think. If I reference a Pantone product, that pretty much covers all properties of the printed surface, including things like reflectivity angles, fluorescence and phosphorescence. A cheap xRite will already measure reflectivity in 13 wavelength bands. And then it'll average those 13 characteristics into 3 RGB numbers. Professional color measurement tools can have hundreds of properties per ink type, thereby making reduction to 3 values even more lossy.

If I give you RGB, that merely specifies the color at direct reflection under normal light. If I give you a Pantone ID, you also now how it'll look from the side or under UV light. RGB specifies an averaged wavelength mixture, Pantone specifies a chemical ink mixture.

>Edit2: You know these car paints that have fresnel reflections, meaning they appear to have a different color of you look at them from a different angle? That's an excellent example of a case where you need to specify a specific ink type like Pantone, because the RGB value changes based on the viewing angle.

>> No.6349793

>>6349790
in short its nothing burger for non Pantones user

>> No.6349798

>>6349793
Correct.

>> No.6349799

>>6349695
This is Pantone pulling their shit out of Adobe who partner with them. Unlikely that Adobe did this on their own since Pantone kinda doing this for many other thing

>> No.6349813

>>6349447
>capitalists will defend this

>> No.6349814
File: 168 KB, 423x423, 1530025331731.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349814

>>6349813
kys gommie.

>> No.6349844
File: 336 KB, 704x400, 1648619647501.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349844

>>6349790
I score 100% in color-perception tests and I don't give a single shit about any of this, printing companies are autistic as fuck, to a target audience that is most likely unable to tell blue and indigo apart.

>> No.6349852

>>6349844
yeah i'm even more confused now, who are they even selling these special colours to??

>> No.6349950

>>6349814
do you have a license for that image

>> No.6349952
File: 817 KB, 1364x535, file.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349952

>>6349447
I only use opensource drawing programs.
Copyright law is raping of the free market by private companies endorsed by big mommy gov

>> No.6349987

>>6349568
Has the image generator drawn from life? Has the generator ever even observed life? No, because its entire library is 100% other artwork, be they photos, graphics, or paintings.

>> No.6349990
File: 265 KB, 800x800, 1536964663716.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6349990

>>6349950

>> No.6350072

>>6349852
>special colours
more like special calculations of specific colors on multiple materials under many light conditions where they autistically record it on real life.
so probably print business, cars, and house paint visualization.

>> No.6350140

>>6349952
This. Free software is the only way.
(Also, it's like the MTG 30 anniversary fiasco, people are now proxying their own cards.)

>> No.6351113

>>6349799
>>6349695
pantone is chargeling 15$ per licence per month for using their colors, and lets be clear, unless you are doing product design you do not need pantone, and if you are doing product design you are saving so much money by using pantone that the cost is negligible.

>> No.6351116

>>6349813
its bullshit yes, but if you aren't saving more money using pantones than what it costs to use them, you have no need to be using pantones.

>> No.6351160

>>6351116
missing the point
they copyrighted a color
A COLOR

>> No.6351251

>>6351113
Great, making money off of copyrighting colors. If that isn't jewish I dont know what it is

>> No.6351275
File: 29 KB, 338x600, 744.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6351275

>Using post-2017 Photoslop

>> No.6351724

>>6349461
Trademark != Copywrite
You can't make chocolate eggs with mainly purple packaging, or make your mail trucks and logo mainly brown, but color trademarks don't prevent you from using a color at all.

>> No.6351726

bruh wtf
the fuck is going on in the 2020s

>> No.6351731

>>6349664
>adds toilet to negatives
heh, nothing personel

>> No.6352993

>>6351251
>>6351160
its hard to tell what the copyright actually is for their colors, because if they hold a copyright strictly on color than they could easily just sue everyone who ever printed a gradient, and seeing as you can just import the exact values for the colors into photoshop and use them, its not like photoshop is killing the use of the colors either.

the copyright on the colors I believe is in the context of the pantone color library/catalogue. I be 100% real, I dont give a fuck about that, because no one outside of product design should ever be using pantones.

>> No.6353002

save us csp

>> No.6353042

>>6349683
>>6349770
>/ic/ is starting to turn into /pol/
You know what to do then

>> No.6353049

>>6351113
lmao nigger. If I want to use a color, I will pick and use said color. I never thought I'd have to pirate a color but here we are.
The guys who founded the company that now own Pantone are literal Jews. Fucking kikes

>> No.6353051
File: 24 KB, 860x900, ok.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6353051

>>6349484

>> No.6353073
File: 102 KB, 800x599, swat-team-73706981.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6353073

>>6349633
>meanwhile in front of anons house

>> No.6353090

>>6349633
kek

>> No.6353114

>>6353049
go for it, you are not in product design where panton can really save you months and hundreds of thousands of dollars due to colors not being correct.

yes they are jews, its bullshit, but its still saving you SO much more money than it costs that its kind of a who gives a fuck.

>> No.6353122

>>6349447
How?!?!??!?

>> No.6353130

>>6349447
Pirated PS yesterday. Feels fucking good, retarded company

>> No.6353134

>>6349519
C-cute! I'd love to have you as a co worker