/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6337716
>Regulated
Well you cocksuckers got what you bitched for, so when will we regulate everyone else that uses references?

>6337719
lol so mad and bitter

>>6337724
Did you even read? Pixiv is saying that they believe Ai enables creativity and they're not banning it they're merely trying to appease crybabies like you by giving you the option to censor Ai.

Reminder he's 24/7 on here

>>6337719
stay mad.

>Please note that these changes are not necessarily permanent, and may be reviewed and modified as necessary. We're also considering taking additional measures, such as updating the service's Terms of Use and Guidelines and revising other pixiv features
if pajeets keep stealing and spaming AI shit it's going to get permanent banned, mark my words Ai related work is going to get banned from pixiv, oh no AI-sis we got way too cocky!

>>6337729
Nigger you got the jim crow laws treatement and got segerated like how black people had segeration laws, enjoy nignog

>>6337719
Referenced work is made, not generated, which means you need to actually do it using you own skills.

AI Art can be beautiful, yes, there are still some problems and limitations, but it’s just a matter of time, now what is wrong is comparing someone that generate an artwork (prompter) to someone that actually make an artwork (human artist).

>>6337737
It would be a real shame if somebody went out their way and claimed your posted work has elements of Ai in it so you can end up being filtered now wouldn't it?

Wow pixiv will finally be usable again

>>6337749
i can post the psd whenever i want not like you pajeets, keep coping <3

the ban of images generated by ias is inevitable, nothing can support millions of pajets generating thousands of cursed images per minute

>>6337756
Sure, just don't let the big bad Ai steal your style now.

This is really great, if they can segerate this they should also filter the countless shitty 3D stuff

>>6337764
AI by itself isn't evil, you pajeets are the lowest scum of earth and you are getting what you deserve and i'm sure this is just the begging, not so cocky now aren't we?

>>6337772
the beginning* shit i'm so happy that i mistype a lot lmao

I don't hate AI but AIbros were really working hard to burn the bridges before they got established as a niche. Not saying they won't eventually be the most popular "art" form but they are making more enemies then friends to the point I wouldn't be surprised if NFTs have less haters then them.

>>6337716
pAIjeets BTFO

At least being able to filter is a good start.

Doesn't address the fact that current AI "art" is simply stealing from other artists and vomiting a new image with random noise.

>>6337719
Hello, mikushit

>>6337719
Don't lump me with you, proompter.

>>6337729
Literally 1984!

A.I.bros....
When will we redeem.....?

https://www.pixiv.net/en/users/81897676

My recommendations are already getting bombarded by AI crap, although I don't see an option to filter yet.

>>6337716
>no plans to remove it entirely
time to move somewhere else

>>6337810
It's in the picture, the option will be implement in late october

>>6337829
*implemented

>>6337777
Nah they are also /beg/ging

Wait... so uhhh... they basically create a banishment room for AI arts?

>>6337716
that was fast

i’m right again

>>6337716
What if I take an AI image and fully paint over it, which category will that fall under?

>>6337749
is this point some kind of joke? you always have the original file. artists don't just output 300x500 melted images
my god, you really are a retarded pajeet

If only the moderation on /ic/ made a decision to put all the shitters in their own sub-board too.

Ban AI threads.

>>6337719
YOU GOT BTFO LOL

>>6337716
You asked for it, art fags.
In the future, we will give government free art AI. They will monopolize art and ban human made art. You will be force to do real job.
You had a chance to pursuit art as hobby and leave your fake job to superior AI but you picked fight with us.

>>6337719
>references
BOOHOO NIGGA, LOOK SOME UP AHAHAHAHA

>>6337990
yeah right the moment I hit you with a high powered magnet you will cease to exist

>>6337990
jokes on you 99% of artists are not doing this for a living unless they live in the third world where they can live on 2 bux a month

>>6337719
seethe more mikuturd

>>6338037
It’s funny how nearly every 3rd world country has been able to take advantage of being cheap art labor for 1st world countries except India and the Middle East
Middle East at least has an excuse of most being so hung up on sexuality they’d kill you but India? They’re just to stupid to draw

>>6337990
You have been shilling this thing for the past month so much you're starting to talk like a robot yourself

Learn a thing or two from pixiv, /ic/ tranny jannies

>>6338091
ill buy you a drink when you come back from being banned, since this place is ran by fucking jews and transform fetish furry pedos

>>6337719

>>6337719
>>6337729
based

>>6337719
you know people can get in trouble for photo bashing stuff right, and some places actually require you to show your references for stuff or give disclaimers if use copyrighted characters

It'll be interesting to see if art gets browsed more or if AI gets browsed more. I think I already know though

>>6337716
Oh goddammit I was about to tweet a complaint about AI images taking up 16 out of the 20 artwork slot shown on a page.

>>6337778
It's like anything tech related is almost always met with scums trying to exploit them. Huh, it's as if the tech industry is full of these scumniggerpajeets.

>>6337716
This is bad, the thing about AI flood is that all these billions of images with similar artifacts would corrupt the base parameters of the dataset as it datamined more and more AI pics ensuring its self destruction by thinking all those terrible armpits or shadows are the standard; now pajeets can just filter AI works out and datamine even more specifically human made creations

>>6338077
Pajeets cant draw. If they could they wouldn't resort to muh neural network for their daily coomer dose.

>>6337990
well you know theres a bunch of serial killers, gang members, and deranged people who are also artists aside from the industry folk
>pic related is from a death cult
at some point you have wonder who you fa/g/s are saying your trying to mog

>>6337938
They are not banning AI, they are supporting AI, retard

>>6338202
*Seperating it to their own seperate shithole
retard

>>6338213
>pixiv acknowledges that AI is the future of art making and tries to accomodate it on their site
>own separate shithole
Holy cope, faggot. Look at your old post.

>>6338214
>Makes seperate ranking for it (that everyone's gonna toggle off)
You're so desperate it's pathetic

>6338214
Hi mikufag

>>6338129
lmao fuark off what if they say it’s all constructed? There’s no way to prove someone photobashed even if it’s glaringly obvious. It’s like steroid use

>>6338217
>chages the goal post
Look at you LOL. Read your initial post. You got BTFO hard.

>>6338221
>N-no U got btfo'd!! *wipes tears*
lm@o

>>6338222
>banning all AI art on pixiv
That’s what you said in pic? No? >>6337938
Get fucked retard.

>>6338202
i'm spamming the website with AI shit, being as obnoxious as i can. i think it's only a matter of time. :)

Holy shit mikufag is fuming

>>6337716
nice
let the pajeets wallow in their own filth

>>6337719
>regulation is good when I like it
/ic/rabs lol

mikutranny seething gives me life

>>6338225
Good riddance artist will be obsolete trash soon
Hahahahahhahahhahhahah

>>6337716
I thought I wanted money to maintain a decent standard of living, but what I actually want is a digital sidekick and sweatshop, all in one, a "valuable ally" like R2-D2, which, on second thought, was a really, really dumb character, and George Lucas was a brain-dead moron that fooled everyone

>>6338269
meh.

The universe of crappy art just accelerated its expansion, from 10 to the Nth power.

>6338269
Not even the bot that melts drawings beyond recognition and infuses it with other melted pieces will make your trash worth looking at, mikufag

>self-reporting uploaded artwork with AI or not AI
Yeah as if those pajeets are going to out themselves as prompters.

>>6337716
That's a pretty weak statement. It would be nice if these sites would issue a strong, unequivocal condemnation of the people who scraped up millions of copyrighted artworks and used them, without the knowledge or consent of the artists, and without any compensation, to build their product. THAT is the issue.

There isn't much that can be done to enforce a ban on all images in the creation of which AI was used. Sure, it's easy to spot untouched AI-generated images right now with their melted features and mangled hands. Still, if someone paints over AI, or prints it out and uses it as the basis for a traditional painting, nobody is going to know. It has already long been the case that artists could trace over 3D models or photographs without disclosing such. Barring some unprecedented invasion of privacy (permanent CCTV in your studio monitored by the Pixiv mods if you want the right to upload works, haha), there's no way to police against these practices.

An artist who needs such crutches still won't produce works on a level with those made by one who doesn't need them. And the latter will be able to use them (if he so chooses) to better effect than the former.

For people that don't want AI in their art, maybe there will spring up some tightly curated sites with smaller numbers of artists, relying more than anything on the honor system.

>>6338284
Depends if they are gonna implement a section in the reports for " untagged AI post "

>>6338292
>maybe there will spring up some tightly curated sites with smaller numbers of artists, relying more than anything on the honor system.
Fuck yes please give back early 2000s deviantart

>>6338292
tracing over AI shit is alright i guess. even that takes skill and you couldn't ask a /beg/ to do that without fucking it up. what i'm looking forward to in order to get rid of AI spam is programs that are able to detect AI generated images, just like how there's stuff that can detect shopping.

>>6338306
Iirc NAI has their own metadata for the images they generated. If you reimport NAI's image it'll detect the prompts and settings used for said image and ask you if you want to reuse it. Pixiv could simply do the same and automatically categorize them as AI and it'll already probably cut down half of the spams because lazy fucks couldn't even be bothered for extra steps.

The other half who did put in the extra effort would just get reported instead.

>>6338292
> nobody is going to know.

Machine learning algos can also be trained to detect generated stuff, in theory. It should be trivial. Give it the image, now generate the predicted prooompts.

And if algos were really proud of their work, they code encode a watermark anywhere in an image as a hash, with an 8 pixel matrix of 16 million colors as data-points, embedded all over it that couldn't really be detected by the nekkid eye

>>6338220
>"they" say it's all constructed
I'm sure that hold up in court, plus can they/(you) actually back up that claim if you have no references or sources or even a fucking psd or anything showing your fuckin process
>or were you dumbass saying the final result is all that matters

>>6338423
the would have to prove without a reasonable doubt that you did it, it’s not something you can prove unless it’s basically 1:1 which is impossible just by how it actually works

Separate but equal !

>>6337719
hot faggot sex with mikufag

>>6338425
you'll only have the "AI" image and nothing otherwise to cite your claim it wasn't taken
>people won't notice
>say something that wasn't proven false multiple times

>>6337716
>and we have no plans to ban AI-generated artwork completely.
>they didn't even ban it
Stopped reading there, I can't believe that we live in a timeline where Furfags of all people are more based than Japan, but. Here we are.

>>6337716
>the creative community and technology can coexist successfully
The farming community and technology could only coexist if the farming community was shrunk to like one percent of its pre-technology time.
The difference is, of course, that the product of art is the availability of a personally meaningful activity for a population that can't find meaning in keeping itself fed anymore. Technology has successfully automated its end goal without doing much for all the issues keeping humans from achieving it.

>>6338202
>>6338214
>>6337729
did you niggers not read the last paragraph

>>6338644
>a bunch of legal limits
Ok

>>6338647
>upon researching the ethics and legality of AI programs we have determined this was not a tool like previously thought, but an attempt at replacement

Funny how AI companies always claim to be "tools for artists" but then turn around to other companies and normies saying its a finished product

>>6337990
>that grammar
Emad HAS GOT TO send better pajeets

>>6338664
My friend, it isn't nice of you to complaint like that. Watch your mannerisms or else I will call you a bloody bitch bastard to you're face.

>>6337716
the moment pixiv and other major art sites heavily restrict pregenerated photobashed AI moodboards is the day 4chan will finally get off its ass and ban all these threads because you just know the only reason they're allowing half the boards to be overrrun with 500 fucking threads about this shit is because of some fake-ass neutrality stance when really they're just waiting for it to lean one way or the other before making their move like a bunch of cowards.

>>6338698
japanese people consume way to much $oy, perhaps consuming $oy is a prerequisite for moderator status

>>6338713
what the fuck are you talking about.

>>6338139
indians have a shit culture that is based on a werid mix of elitism, laziness, and cheating
3 things that will get you nowhere with art

>>6338608
Time 2 draw furry den

>>6338692
Nigga who the fuck do you think are

>>6338830
As someone who had a bunch of pajeets coworkers, can confirm.

>>6338841
Always have been ;)

>>6338334
This is already happening in Danbooru/Gelbooru

>>6339511
>>6338334
b-b-but techbros told me that that's not how it works t-t-that AI art is undetectable and no program would ever detec when an image is AI-Generate, AIsis why do you keep lying to me??? we got too cocky

>>6337990
well crafted bait, the slight esl english is just *mwah*

>>6337990
Sure, and Google Glass will be normalized attire and NFTs are the future of digital monetization. I've heard it all before, saidesh.

>>6337716
Based nips. Fucking gaijins have to ruin everything great that the nips provided. You AI prompters have to shit up the place with your shitty AI art. Glad to hear they doing something to stop the pajeets from shitting up the site.

On a side note, I really wish Pixiv would allow crypto because I don't trust Paypal.

>>6337719
t. seething pajeet

>>6337716
AI art will never obtain the same level of soulfulness as real artists who pour their blood, sweat, & tears into making their masterpeices. Some AI art is flat out creepy & the fact a non-human entity made it makes the creepy factor worst.

>>6337974
AI is a broad term, since it can cover art, music, animation, etc. It really deserves its own board, just like vtubers.

>>6337990
ok pajeet.

>>6342243
>aicels
I preffer to call them pajeets but it's good the mainstream calls them out too

>>6342243
>use img2img
>the output resembles the original image
AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA SAVE ME NIGGERMAN, I'M GOING INSANEEEEEEEEEEEEE

>>6342272
nice cope pajeet. day of the loo soon.

reminder indians are
>lazy
>cheaters
>elitistst
these are all traits that make bad artists, this is why india has produced no great illustrators or had any effect on the art world

>>6337762
500 million pajeets and south east asians flooding the internet with synthetic pizza

>>6343104
They also have no concept of value, that's why they keep shitting out new poo babies and now at 1.4 billion of them on this sorry planet the value of a single Indian is less than zero. They want to do the same thing for art, flood the intertubes with their AI generated diarrhea until there's so much noise and data clogging up the pipes that the value of an AI generated image is worth less than poop.

Well, maybe it already is.

>>6337749
I can just take a photo of the canvas sitting in my workshop

>>6337810
It's so tight at the bottom you can see her tears

God this boiling seething hatred for pajeets that don't even know what a 4chan is, rent free one could say

>>6337719
>we
Shut the fuck up AI faggot.
>>6337716
Good, I'll enable that shit the moment it pops up, AI spam is the biggest trash dump I've ever seen in art, even from thumbnails I can spot this generic trash.

>>6337716
>You'll be able to filter out AI-generated work in your searches
I bet this feature will be for Pixiv Premium users only because Pixiv are greedy pigs.

>>6337810
How'd you generate those tight pussy lips?

India will take over the world just you wait faggots

>post AI stuff on pixiv
>fix hands, feet and other imperfections by hand
>over 5k followers already
>not using AI tags
come at me niggas

>>6343737
>I bet this feature will be for Pixiv Premium users only
First thing that came to my mind.

>>6343764

Inb4 it's premium feature

>>6343764
>no proof

>>6338334
stripping metadata is trivial tho unless you literally embed it in the image itself by physically altering certain pixels and that's still trivial to prevent/remove if your AI is open source

>>6343926
>just dox yourself bro so we can report you
have an AI Art

Reminder to steal any and all AI art for your sketches, concepts, photobashes, and paint overs. No matter how many hours these people spend retyping words and cherry picking samey blobs, the have no process to prove in a fight.

>>6347021
nah they can keep their shitty composition and poor perspective lol

>>6337719
False equivalence. References are nothing like AI. You're feeding a prompt into a computer and claiming it as if you made it. Nigger pajeet

>>6347021
>hours
>retyping words
bruh..
anyways I'm completly fine with that
here have one of my favs
feel free to make anything you want based on it
I can even give you webui prompt to remake it if you want

>>6347021
>>6347117

>>6348212
the AI will get better at this, hell, it will get to a point where it wont need you to type anything at all if it knows your tastes. this is the end goal of these technologies.

>>6337716
This wouldn't be a problem if they let us filter more than two tags without buying premium. Genshin impact and furshit will never leave my filters list

lol the shills are bumping threads from a week ago
the desperation is real

>>6348219
>Meanwhile other boards have new artists with lots of requests being filled by [A.I]
But the desperation is real!

>>6348216
That's one part that amuses me, improving technology raises the skill floor even more. Whatever pride they have in their prompting skills will be nullified like how artist are reacting.

Only people truly winning are artists infusing AI into their workflow. I let the AI make suggestions but all decisions are my own, the only one altering my actual piece is me. It's helped me up my game by giving me options for different routes to take and bring up small details.

>>6348234
>other boards have new artists [giving the middle finger to AI]
>lots of requests being filled by AI [because AI has made artists obsolete]
Which one is it?

>>6348234
Yea cool fantasy, everyone is getting pissed over aislop defiling their more popular fandoms and characters like touhou or genshit with the same melt shit

>>6337990
anon-kun what please do the needful,
what are real job left for artist like me?
what job not be replace with AI and newest TESLA robot by elon musk ??? who ruin my life with doge coin, cannot work in coding for this reason of HATRED!!!

>>6348336
At this point you're probably a falseflag (not a good one at that) from how retarded you are for giving a (you) to a post from a week ago

>>6348340
careful faggot there is now legal precedent for me to sue your ass for billions and trillions of dollars for pointing out my obvious "false flag" so watch your back

>>6347021
already ahead of you

>>6347021
But you art will end up having no movement and cookie-cutter, you have to learn on your own how to make your drawing more alive

>>6344345
I does look AI generated , the background is a giveaway, it is without much composition

>>6348396
Oblong moon gives it away. Now we need post render A.I. to fix original A.I. render.

>>6348396
it's AI generated because she looks like Emma Watson

>>6348396
well yeah
never said it didnt
have cyberpunk city by Jan Matejko

So has pixiv added this yet? It's almost the end of the month and whenever I check a new tag of things I get AI spam filling up searches.
These things are so generic and shit I can even tell it's AI just from the thumbnail, when is the trashman coming to throw out the garbage?

>>6342243
Kek, basically a new form of DA users who'd trace over official Sonic art, doodle on a jacket, color him teal, and call it an original artwork.

>>6348212
The "ideas guy" in its natural habitat.

>>6349904
just add "-ai" in your search to filter 99% of it

>>6348235
You have no clue what you're doing. This is like the studies done on the usage of digital technology in general. When a user, especially a child, adopts a digital tool, they have a burst of brain activity/development that puts them on top of the average for their age. As they learn the tech, the brain gets used to it and development begins stunting and lagging behind compared to peers.
If you want AI tools to be useful instead of luring you into a trap, use them to learn from the AI. Learn how it improvises details, uses colors and creates interesting motifs in the picture. It's a composite, so it's ultimate use is as a learning tool. But if you think your decisions are not getting taken over by reliance on the tool, you're wrong.

>>6349988
Holy shit thank you. Now the site is useable again.

>>6348396

Her left hand is the first thing I noticed.

>>6348235

For sure you will have a lot of place to create with things being thrown in your face. Such a helpful tool, not at all harming what a human can actually do.

It also wont cripple future generations in that sense for sure.

Idiot.

>>6337990
>The shitty esl
>Avoiding typical meme phrases like "good morning sirs" and "do not redeem"
Anon I just wanted to compliment you on your superior bait level, good shit

So uhh what's keeping the streetshitters from simply not tagging their shit as AI?

>>6348212
>I do think AI art is more mentally challenging, as you can't just grab the pen and draw as you wish.
This has layers...

>>6350999
I have to imagine he's trolling, but honestly he probably doesn't realize that what he's saying makes no sense at all, and would immediately undermine the entire purpose of image generators in the first place.

For anybody who thinks art generators will help your skill and creativity, ask yourself:
Has autocorrect improved your ability to spell?
Has the ability to instantly set reminders improved your memory?

>>6351039
its a feebile mind that kant thinka moar then wun way to spel a wurd.

>>6351043
Or doesn't wonder why you always have to tell autocorrect that nigger and kike are actual words.

>>6348212
challenged*

>>6351039
>Has autocorrect improved your ability to spell?

Yes.

>>6337716
>ai art is just a tool like any other
FUCK YOU PIXIV TWITTER IS NOS OFFICIALLY BETTER THAN YOUR SHITTY WEB APP

>>6347430
No one wants your "key artwork by Ilya trending on artstation" trash.
>>6348212
"You can't just grab a pen and draw as you wish." Holy shit, this is pure comedy.
>>6348358
>you have to learn on your own how to make your drawing more alive
I use AI for color pallet ideas, texture, and weird ideas and stick to the really abstract acid trip vomit stuff like Wombo or Dall-E. I don't see tools like that as much different from when I'd draw ideas I got from some weird pattern I'd see in a cloud or a tree. It's much more to work with compared to the frankenwaifus the street shitters keep spamming.

>>6351225
you seem upset

>>6351529
Flawless piece

>>6348212
Whatever he's smoking I want some of it

>>6351529
>shill is impressed with a worser version of chinese mobile game ads pictures
yeah why am i surprised, it's the same nft crowd so i shouldn't try to converse in the first place

>>6351563
you seem awfully angry at worse version of chinese mobile game ads pictures

>>6351577
Astounding!

Crazy how much seethe there is about AI art tools. lmao

>>6351714
Did you get tired of using torino aqua's drawings and now you're taking the legend that is mery_s2's drawings and changing their filename to prompts kek

>>6351714
Could be because you faggots are insufferable.

>>6338292
I'm still amazed that such a simple fact is flying under everyone's radar. Where are the credits, the royalties? These thieving niggers had to split their companies into different nonprofits to worm their way out of all legal trouble.

>I get to falsely report over-rendered pinup coombait images as "not properly tagged as AI"
Based

>>6351714
>AI art absolutely flopping, getting banned from image platforms left and right
>streetshitters are now taking real human-made art and trying to convince us that it was made by AI
The absolute STATE

>>6351739
Emad has a potatobrained child to care for, give him a break sirs

>>6351714
Aifags have been trying to fool artists with filename prompts for months. it has never worked. what do you get out of it?

>>6337716
ai pajeet india prompt steal thief AI generated
remember that i have your ips pajeets
https://files.catbox.moe/trgvml.png

Is anyone else amused by how image generator users are so blown away by how a machine can generate an image, but mock the very humans who can actually draw? Like they'll jerk off over their vague, directionless computer generated paintings after they typed "trending on artstation" into a dialogue box, but simultaneously give zero shits about the actual humans who drew or painted the works which trended on artstation that allowed the proompt machines to generate anything in the first place.

It's really the epitome of the "I made this" comic

>>6352833
The disrespect is a little unsettling to me... The machine they toy with wouldn't even exist as it does now if it weren't for the thousands of artists who were willing to share their works online.

>>6352833
You dont have a respect for the Chinese sweatshop worker who connected two chips in your iPhone because a dumb robot could do it better. Same for artists. Why have respect for a person who does the same thing as exe file, but slower?

>>6352899
There's value to be found in craftsmanship. People who draw have more value than so-called model engineers much like chefs are more valued than fast food workers or knitters and individual fashion designers than sweatshop workers. The mockery towards artists at the current moment stems from poor manners, inflated self-importance, as well as jealousy at the lack of skills that others have.

>>6352839
Wonder how many of these artists would actually agree to have their work fed into this disgusting woodchiper of a data laundering machine

>>6352956
not many. This might be worth a thread at some point, Anyone can feed 30 images into the AI to train artist specific models. I just spotted this one, no credit was given but it's obviously trained on Sam Yang's work. looks even more convincing than the Hollie Mengert one from last week.

>>6348212
There are so many layers of retardation to this.

>>6352963
How do they expect to get away with this?
>you can't copyright a style
Sure however thats different from ripping peoples shit this is even a step beyond what these companies have done (though they did enable shit like this) idk what recourse someone can have but I doubt randos can use the same "non profit scrapping is ok" excuse idk like do they expect no one to notice

>>6352963
Where did you find this? Jesus

>>6352969
StableDiffusion subreddit. I signed up and got banned almost immediately for replying to Indian SD users with articles about India's toilet crisis.

>>6352963
I don't like his style but this is actual identity theft at this point, it's like someone wearing your face. Imagine how much your skin would crawl if you were an established artist with a developed style and some nasty pajeet just took 30 of your pics and could now generate as much of your art as he likes, literally fastfoodifying your work.

>>6352972
based and loopilled

>>6337719
Retarded brainlet kys asap

>>6352973
Agreed, it's absolutely identity theft at this point. I would be tempted to hunt down someone who did this to my work. First befriend them, make them believe I appreciate they loved my work enough to do the training, then do some collabs, then meet up...

>>6352963
>Anyone can feed 30 images into the AI to train artist specific models
Kiwiniggers will continue shilling that AI is just a tool that will help artists.

>need to circlejerk a dead thread with dumbass arguments
The absolute state of AI shills

>>6352972
fucking kek
>>6352968
It's also not comparable to copying a style like an aspiring artist would because the output of the machine is entirely dependant on the quality/style of the input.
It's as if artwork were a raw material owned by whoever made it, and they feed it to this processor without paying or crediting anyone. Baffling.

>>6353041
>It's as if artwork were a raw material owned by whoever made it
That a good way to put it. It's also like source code theft.

Legalize Art.

>>6353155
Legalize the right to murder indians.

4chan. Home of fauxtraversy.

>>6337719
seethe more pajeet. you will never be a real artist

>>6352808
no but work on yout fucking handwriting nigger

>>6352899
You realize that, in the context of your analogy, artists would be the product engineers, the image generator the factory that makes knockoffs, and the codekiddies producing shitty images with the generators are the slave labor?