/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

At this point failure to adapt AI in to your artwork is akin to being against the use of computers at all

>>6290076
Essentially. Even though my art style is simple, I already used photobashes to help me make make detailed pieces within a set timeframe for prints and such. AI is just a more abstract source of stock art in some areas, and a concept artist in others.

>>6290073
I don't see any point. maybe it's helpful if you are going for hyper render monkey shit. My style is similar to Tatsuyuki tanaka, katsuya terada, lots of line work, minimal rendering.

>>6290093
Post your work lol

>>6290073
easier to use 3D so i can actually make things exactly how I want them
seriously don't understand why ai is hailed as some sort of giga shortcut when you just have to learn the bare basics of Blender and boom, both characters and environments for you to bash and draw over with any lighting, angle you want

again, this shows people here are retarded
if you want a true shortcut use 3D like it has been used for 10-15 years instead of relying on a computer to magically generate you generic shit

literally got a model I reuse for the feet coomers and have reused 30+ times to make 30+ different illustrations you wouldn't tell they come from the same fucking source since ei can manipulate the model
fucking retards cant even use crutches and shortcut tools properly

>>6290099
So AI can steal it? no!

>>6290093
My style is also line work based. None of the AI is visible in my finals. My market likes ornate fairy tale level work that's easy to read, but provokes an esoteric feeling. The AI is great for coming up with acid trip tier concepts to bash together.
>>6290108
>literally got a model I reuse for the feet coomers
That works for people who make a living taking commissions from coomers. I don't; I sell prints, merch, and originals for a different niche yet highly consuming group. I just use the models in CSP if I need to, but a quick gesture sketch is usually enough since there's more focus on costuming and scenery.

>>6290073
What prevents you from generating your own AI shit for photobashing?
High level AI art creation is very similar to photobashing anyway. You think they all just type a prompt and press a button once?

>>6290073
I advocate that you are a nigger
>>6290076
Nigger

>>6290159
I do both. If I see something I like in the feeds, I take it. I don't see a problem in stealing something from a group that can only keep generating word salad prompts while thinking they can beat artists.

>>6291310
atta boy.

I am doing this for 3 months sirs.
>stealing
its open source :) and gene is out of the bag after all

>>6291310
>>6291322
*quoting you

>>6290073
Not a bad idea actually. At the very least, it'll give good ideas - and it's not like you're stealing a character or composition from an artist, and what's the AI bro gonna do? Accuse you of stealing his mass produced stuff? Like he even remembers the one of two hundred he made that day.

>>6290076
For personal work? Who cares how someone draws or wishes to enjoy themselves. For professional work though, yeah maybe.

>3 hours prompting to paint over for another 3 hours or 3 hours painting and be done
Hmm

>>6291322
fucking hell, that image is nightmarish

>>6291368
Why?

>>6291322
>pic related
what in the actual fuck am i looking at?

>>6290076

There are people who draw and paint without using computers, and some even make a good living off their art, and still use computers for other things.

I get the feeling the average /ic/ poster can’t imagine that it’s possible to draw without all these crutches, and that being able to do so makes you faster and gives you more freedom than if you have to rely on AI or tracing. They can’t fathom why someone wouldn’t use these things, or that doing so would actually slow them down and hamper their creativity.

You can use a calculator rather than learn how to do arithmetic but at the cost of your own mental sharpness and independence. The push is for everyone to let the machines do everything, including thinking, for us. But the benefits of, for example, learning to draw and actually drawing, go beyond the immediate image produced on a sheet of paper. You are exercising parts of your brain that will atrophy if you turn your agency over to a machine.

>>6290073
You might as well hang out with joggers

>>6291322
>its open source
That's the spirit. I used the word "stealing" because I anticipate some of these AI bros to get territorial over their "carefully crafted prompt" since they're trying to monetize them in some markets. To me, their prompts are open source, too.
>>6291343
Even if he does, you can just go "prove your work", "show me your layers/work setup", "you can't steal a concept." This is a free for all for ideas.
>>6291364
More like 3 minutes prompting. I try not to spend too much time. Drawing is easier.

>>6290073
THIS IS NOW A /g/ BOARD!
THERE ARE CURRENTLY 14 AI THREADS UP ON /ic/!
BUMP! LOOK AT THIS AMAZING AI ART I FOUND!

14!

FOURTEEN!

XIV!

十四!

I HAVE REPORTED ALL OF THEM, YET JANNIES DO NOTHING ABOUT IT!
ONLY WHEN THERE ARE 20+, THEY DELETE ONE OR TWO TO PRETEND THEY'RE WORKING!

>>6292878
>>6292843
>>6292660
>>6291749
>>6291690
>>6291073
>>6290073
>>6289391
>>6289237
>>6289199
>>6289098
>>6286753
>>6278246
>>6273432

>>6290076
how the hell did this piece of dogshit win an award
were the judges fucking high or something?

>>6293939
the second place was unironically /beg/ tier

>>6292924
lol!

>>6293939
It was a county fair entry in the photomanipulation category. They're making a huge deal about a bar so low, it's buried.

>>6293945
>>6294203
AITARDS BTFO

>>6290076
you sound like a dumbass and the constant shilling only makes you look like a faggot. Same for the other guy calling people who don't use AI luddites when everyone here uses the internet
>honestly I believe you fa/g/s are just product placement at this point