/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6280004
so no actual improvements it still looks like plastic

coomers are mentally ill. i'll become a single issue voter if it means that porn gets banned and their fucked up brains get splattered across the floor

>>6280004
You AI retards really need to study your fundamentals.

good morning sir

>>6280004
Guys AI will take your jobs in 2 weeks, trust me bros. AI will learn exponentially! tech advancement is on a J-curve! I will upload my brain to the cloud so I can live on the internet forever, I hate my real life and I'm too afraid to die.

please spare me ai bros

Take a seat and have a snack.

>>6280041
>>6280009
>>6280007
>>6280014
holy mother of seethe

>>6280050
>Plates to hide the fucked up hands

>>6280004
>>6280050
>>6280055
Why don't you start taking commission instead of shilling on 4chun?

>>6280050
Isn't anime food supposed to look good?

>>6280066
I tried but I got no takers. I don't get it, my portfolio has hundreds of high end prompted images, better than 99% of IC, but nobody is interested in hiring me. I sent my portfolio to a couple of studios nearby, one didn't respond, the other responded with a poop emoji. I tried doing commissions, but my online social circle are all prompters too, so nobody wants it.

>>6280068
You will eat ze photos of beans and zlop

>>6280072
Because they're all already doing prompts too lol. "Prompt Engineer" will never be a job because anyone can do it.

>>6280055
yeah, they are coping. I've been doing comms for the past 4 years and I think we're done.
People saying: "oh but AI won't do porn, or real faces, or it sucks at line art"
that's just a matter of time untill it can do those things.
Our only hope (artists) is to start selling Trad. physical art.

>>6280050
>eldritch hands and faces
>english-looking food
is this the best the AI can come up with?

>>6280050
why do they all have that weird "impending doom" look to them, and I'm mostly talking about the faces. it creates like a feeling of dread

>>6280095
Trad art will die after some time. AI-retard users will print that work, have a signature and sell it as their own. I think they will abuse “ink” prompt a lot. Just look at what happened with music - a lot of untalented, undisciplined normies started to use software to make their voice sound “cleaner”, post it on YouTube and earn ton of money. I don’t even want to talk about rap/hip-hop community because it’s degenerate.

>>6280095
>I've been doing comms for the past 4 years and I think we're done.
I am now demoralized, pajeet

>>6280095
>that's just a matter of time untill it can do those things
Now you just having a "2 more weeks" cope moment.

>>6280117
>pajeet
I'm yuropean

>>6280121
Not him but the AI has drastically improved in a time span of just two weeks due to the crafty prompt engineers and with each input the AI learns and builds its visual library. Personally I cannot wait until what the next piece the AI will paint in the next two weeks it's going to be a thrill watching all these new artists discover their creativity.

>>6280134
>their creativity

>>6280134
>new artists discover their creativity.
*the AI fulfill their requests

>>6280136
Post the last creative piece of work dumb frogposter.

>>6280134
Yeah man! In two weeks, I'm gonna make the best emma watson nude ever, /ic/ gonna be seething over 9000!

>>6280143
atta boy

>>6280060
>>6280066
>>6280068
>>6280098
those are just quick samples by some anon
he made like a dozen of them

>>6280146

>>6280134
>and with each input the AI learns and builds its visual library
many people probably wish this was the case, but there is no learning happening.
That's why the idea of artists removing their works is completely futile. Anyone with SD can create works of AI art without an internet connection even.

>>6280146
>>6280149
I KNEEL

>>6280149

>>6280155

>the internet is already flooded with trash Daz renders made by hacks
>now it will also be flooded by trash AI art made by hacks
I want to be off this ride

>>6280167
the future is now old man
maybe you'll get AI tool to filter out AI images lmao

>mfw I have my own IP and none of this will ever affect me

>>6280146
>>6280149
>>6280155
>>6280160
Children of the corn.

People here are coping hard. If somebody posted any of these >>6280149 paintings (minor flaws not withstanding like the hands which AI can't do yet) here 3 years ago he'd get 20 you's and everybody would be asking for their blog and what they studied to get this good. The fact that a computer can shit this out in 2 seconds definitely will have ramifications on the art industry.

>>6280169
I have something even more powerful than that, I have working eyes.

>>6280170
I'm gonna make an IP with prompts! It will have better art than 99% of ic! I just need to come up with an appealing prompt style of my own, that stands out...

>>6280004
escaped from Chernobyl??? look at those tumors, LMAO

>>6280188
Post your work

>>6280175
>If somebody posted any of these >>6280149 paintings (minor flaws not withstanding like the hands which AI can't do yet) here 3 years ago he'd get 20 you's and everybody would be asking for their blog and what they studied to get this good.
Wrong, he's get called a rendermonkey and told to fuck off to artstation and the admirers back to rebbit.

>>6280175
It's less cope, and more ic getting used to the way AI makes images, and being repulsed by it. it's similar to how some trannies might have been passable 8 years ago, but now you can clock them in a thumbnail due to the over exposure in fields we are in(games/art/tech)

>>6280004
>didn't bother to img2img the odd sized breasts, the fucked-up anatomy on the abs, and the severed right arm
2/10 apply yourself nonartist

>>6280189

>>6280194
Prompters have had this amazing tech for what? 2 months now? what great artwork has been created? They have nothing to hold up as an example, just bits and pieces here and there. Where is the art that is gonna trend on artstation!

>6280072
>I tried but I got no takers.
If you had any self-awareness you'd realize what it says about your works and your usage of AI. But then if any of the shitters flooding the board had any self-awareness, they'd do something productive with their life instead of trying their best to larp as a gremlin.

Ban AI threads.

>>6280139

>>6280175
actually I would tell him to set himself on fire for being a pedo. you? at least you didn't dedicate your life to learning how to draw pedo shit so i'm not as impressed. you should be shot at the back of the head instead

>>6280146
>>6280149
>>6280155
>>6280160
those images say about you: you are a fucking pedophile!!!

>>6280004
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l01AMCBG0Wk

>Anything I don't like is now a pajeet shill
The copening continues

>>6280224
High effort shit post.

>Post: "Look at Stable Diffusion! It's amazing!"
>Post: Reply: "Wow this is crazy. Artists are going to seethe!."
>Post: Reply: "What program is this? This is cool!"
>Post: Reply: "Check out our general on /g/."
>Post: Elsa AI collage
>Post: Pepe AI variant
>Post: Wojak AI variant
>Post: reply: "Artists are going to be out of the job soon!"
>Post: reply: "What prompt did you use?"
>Post: reply: "Artists are seething. Check out our general for tutorials."

>>6280121
hilariously enough, the JUST 2 MORE WEEKS meme actually applies to AI considering how fast it updates

>>6280227
Emad is your god now. You are all honorary pajeets if you use Stable Diffusion.
Take the poo to the looooooooooo

>>6280149
>>6280146
>>6280155
>>6280160
wish ai images could also link to the art that it referred to so i can go to the source rather than sort thrugh these mishmash chimera pieces

>>6280227
Use toilets instead of shitting on the street, Poodeesh.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l01AMCBG0Wk

>>6280095
what I find funny is y'all niggas really think "real" sell
>try mugging this

>>6280235
>No progress for AI in two weeks
>2 more weeks applies to AI
huh? It's all side progress. nothing has moved forward. img2img was a month ago, in-painting I was doing in Dalle back in april..geez it's been that long haha.

>>6280227
>SIRS! SIRS! DO NOT REDEEM! YOU BITCH! YOU BITCH! DO NOT REDEEM!

>>6280246
Is the Pajeet prompting in your room right now?

>>6280227
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ie_l0AJe13o

>>6280243
I thought it improved with every prompt? being AI and all
two weeks ago it was producing jankier stuff than what's in this thread. or maybe people are getting better at prooompting

>>6280254
The users are manually improving it by polishing the prompts and feeding it more things to leech off of.

>>6280190
Yeah but that's more because this place if filled with salty losers. The fact remains that a lot of people wish they had the skills to create images like those.

>>6280239
only listed in the prompt :greg rutkowski and alphonse mucha
the rest is prompts and AI model

>>6280254
Before you couldn't do hundreds or thousands of images on your own as you were limited by the daily limits or discord beta limits and cost.
Running on your home PC means you can just set it to generate 1000s of images overnight for you so sift through when you wake up.

>>6280272
The salty losers are the winners here, though. The real losers are those that spent years and decades to get proficient only to end up beaten by a thing that generates the same content within minutes that they make within weeks.

>>6280219
cope

Can the new AI model render India to have toilets?
https://www.mirror.co.uk/news/world-news/daily-waste-indias-urban-streets-9364812
These shocking images of life in India show the desperate lack in provision of toilets for those living in its cities.
The world's largest democracy is also one of its most powerful emerging economies - but India still ranks top for having the greatest number of urban dwellers living without a safe, private toilet - a staggering 157 million.
It's also the country with the most urban dwellers practicing open defecation at a massive 41 million.
The problem is so big that the daily waste produced on the streets of India’s towns and cities is enough to fill eight Olympic-sized swimming pools, or 16 jumbo jets, with poo, every day.
As cities expand, the number of urbanites living without basic sanitation has swollen by 26 million since the year 2000.
Despite the government’s campaign to make sanitation a priority, India’s towns and cities are growing at such breakneck speed that the number of urban dwellers living without sanitation is growing every year.
An estimated 100 million of these have no choice but to defecate in the open - using roadsides, railway tracks and even plastic bags dubbed ‘flying toilets’.
The high population density of urban areas means that diseases spread fast in the absence of good sanitation.

>>6280254
>I thought it improved with every prompt? being AI and all
why is this such a common misconception?
The other big one is that it's "erasing signatures"
some serious dumdums in the world

>>6280291
>"artist are beaten"
>AI even can't draw hands on people
Go shit on a street, poodeesh.

>>6280291
>generates the same content within minutes
Prove it. Post an AI pic of a cartoon man and woman jogging together in a park with basic line art.

>>6280298
how long do you think until that's an under $10 fiverr fix
I have the greatest respect for brushmonkeys, I really do, but y'all need to adjust your expectations moving forward.

>>6280298
Wait till he replies with his cope.
Heh.

>>6280291
Generate a picture of two clowns on unicycles.

>>6280292
fuck off
>>>/lgbt/

>>6280291
>a thing that generates the same content within minutes that they make within weeks.
Then post an example. Here's a prompt for you to use: jungle woman in leotard surrounded by dinosaurs. Put your money where your mouth is and show us the AI being capable of doing that in just minutes.

>>6280309
>>6280304
NTA but if you have seen any of the higher quality generations, you would know that this is easily possible. The only reason you're asking for "proof" is because you know that you will never approve of anything shown, something will always be "wrong" with it such that you feel safe and comfy in your established convictions.

In fact what I'd suggest that anon do, is make a grid with half human-drawn examples. But that seems like a lot of work for this.

>>6280314
>"this is easily possible"
>doesn't post it being possible
You're a pretty cheap shill.

>>6280314
>NTA but if you have seen any of the higher quality generations, you would know that this is easily possible. The only reason you're asking for "proof" is because you know that you will never approve of anything shown, something will always be "wrong" with it such that you feel safe and comfy in your established convictions.
seems to me that you're coping about AI not doing all that great

>>6280314
>already backpedaling
HAHAHAHAHA

>>6280134
Creativity? A prompter? You guys really are delusional.. You will never be an artist. Remember that.

>>6280314
You ai shills were so confident in posting victorian abominations but when asked for it to draw basic simple cartoons you pussy out.

>>6280291
Generate an image of a ninja perching on the wing of a spitfire, while the pilot is freaking out.
Generate an image of a female doctor in a grimy back alley operation room, grafting a machinegun to the head of a yakuza, complete with detailed tattoos.
Generate a fish-eye image of a man in a bus, reaching out to the viewer, holding his own heart in his hand, clutching it tight so the veins bulge, onlookers are nonplussed.

>>6280320
Look at me. I am the Artist now.

>>6280004
>tfw when tfw when when your wonky AYYAI abs are sliding off to the side of your body
>tfwhen rip

>>6280316
Every time. and if they do get something resembling the request, it's hours later.

>>6280322
>>6280318
>>6280317
>>6280316
BTFO me! Guess you're right and your livelihood is safe :)

>>6280330
Come on, be a man. Generate the cartoons! it's easy!

>>6280330
i don't make money off of art, and you will never be an artist ;)

>>6280314
>"THIS PROGRAM TAKES ONLY A FEW MINUTES TO MAKE ART THAT TAKES ARTISTS WEEKS!"
>can't prove it with just normal black and white cartoon prompt
You pajeets suck at shilling and suck at maintaining hygiene. Learn how toilet functions before claiming you know shit about technology.

>>6280325
you're asking too much from a coomer. If this subhuman can jack off to chopped tits and mangled mutilated bodies, anything will impress him. That's why coomers are not worth discussing anything with, they're feral humans

>>6280291
>thanks for your slave labour artists now fuck off!!!!1

Without our collective creativity and effort you would'nt have shit. This AI would be nothing without us. And now you find enjoyment in the disenfranchisement of a whole field of creativity.
Don't bother replying. I won't give you any more attention. People like you are nothing. You are nothing. Worthless, soulless, spitefull mutant.
Go back to your pod and keep prompting you mediocre, dumb as a rock, bugman.

>>6280314
>can't even draw a cartoon clown on a unicycle
Your """AI""" is pathetic and so are you.

>>6280327
Haha. Like I care about your delusions. I'm just surprised people like you exist.

>>6280004
There will still be touch-up work for brushmonkeys, at least for awhile

>>6280359
It's no delusion, I'm currently prompt smithing another drawing right now. What are you doing besides flailing your arms around screeching at imaginary Pajeets?

>>6280004
>fuck...
>just kill me
What the fuck is this attitude, like guys are you really mental or what? The whole board gone to shit. Wtf, zoomers fuck off to /lgbt.

>>6280364
>screeching at imaginary Pajeets?
You are pajeet by soul faggot, souless i mean and a zoomer wow.

>>6280368
Whole board is getting spammed by a few retards and when they get BTFO they just make another thread where they reply to each other.
Jannies are fucking useless as usual.

>>6280291
Then have the AI do a simple draw request that would take even a beginner artist just 10 minutes or less to do. Have it draw Pikachu holding up an AK-47. Pikachu is the mascot of the most popular media franchise in the world and the AK-47 is the most popularly sold gun in the world, so that should be super quick and easy for an AI to render, right?

>>6280375
Yeah, it's all done by one guy who rallies his secret Discord army which creates threads and they're all replying to each other and it's not regular people who are impressed by the AI trying something new and having fun discovering their artistic side oh no it can't be that other people are actually having some fun creating art instead of grinding fundamentals of academic studies from profile shots of old men and painting still lifes of fruitbowls before they get to draw big anime tiddies absolutely not.

>>6280364
I'm just calling you out. I'm actually quite calm. Enjoying my day. Just know; You'll never be an artist. You haven't gone through the journey.
You're just typing words. Just like I am now. Only difference is I don't confuse it with art.
And I've been painting and drawing for decades. Don't ever compare yourself to me.

>>6280385
Jeesus. Haha. He really thinks this makes him an artist. He's serious isn't he? Just fuck off out of here then. You're at the bottom of the totempole.

>>6280385
It takes 5 seconds to prove you wrong.
I'm sure the term brushmonkey is organic on not something this guy is already trying to spam the board with in hopes of replies.
Same goes with the low effort doomposting.
>>6280360
>>6280307
>>6280393

>>6280391
>>6280398
So you two are "real" authentic Artists, ok let's see some of your artwork friends after all an Artist creates an impression of what he perceives on canvas to express himself to others you as an Artist cannot deprive yourself from sharing your work especially in the midst of your peers so how about it Duchamp let's see your fucking piss urinal.

>>6280004
it doesn't "make" anything it just copy pates from other artist's work without their permission. I'm surprised nobody has filed a lwasuit against thie ai plagirism shit yet

>>6280401
>brushmonkey
haha stealing this

>>6280406
Hahaha. Oh I'm being challenged by the arrogant prompter. I'm quivering right now. I better do as he says to prove myself.. rofl.

I think I got under your skin. Because you KNOW I'm right. Everything I've said it triggered you. Haha. Anyways. Enjoy your texting. You should call yourself that; a texter. Haha.

>>6280427
Ironically I see nothing but text coming from you instead of posting your visual art piece.

>>6280414
That's img2img. Same as this pepe image.

bot thread

>>6280406
I'm the same person btw. And I would never call myself an artist. I'm an illustrator. Now goodbye "texter". You've taken up enough of my time already.
Hopefully you grow out of this delusional phase and gain some humility..

>>6280431
Like I owe you anything. We don't take you seriously. Your cope is laughable. Now goodbye texter.

>>6280314
>The only reason you're asking for "proof" is because you know that you will never approve of anything shown
So you post faceless anime chicks with deformed abdomens and laughably uneven breasts but you only now have standards when it comes to showing cartoon characters jogging and on unicycles?

>>6280443
Oh well excuse the fuck out of me Mr. Illustrator I was under the impression we were having a discussion about Artists, you talk about developing humility yet you're quick about correcting others to address you as an Illustrator as if you're some kind of a big shot working for Hollyjew.
>>6280449
The copening continues.

>>6280431
>You gotta proove yourself! It's unlikely I'm talking to a pro artist on an artboard!
Bro... Some of us just stick around even when we gitgud, other art communities are pozzed to hell and back.

>>6280455
Nta
Cope
CoPe
coep cpoe

You degenerates with your meme speach, fucking hell.

Seethebehehe

>>6280004
Boobs growing half an inch below clavicles.
Dislocated shoulder.
Missing arm.
Distorted abs and misplaced navel.
Random lines and grooves all over.

This is proof that you have low standards and are easily impressed by the machine aping colors and rendering style from the art that was scraped from the internet and plugged into its database. Any artist would notice the myriad errors here, and even a layman will notice upon closer examination.

>>6280460
Because that's all you do is cope, you refuse to post your art so instead you make any excuse not to and you cope with that.

>>6280304

>>6280469
I'm not even the same guy you're replying to. I don't need to post my art for my arguments to be valid. I never said I was a bigshot. However I am a skilled illustrator. You seem to get off on putting me in some kind of box. So you can control the argument. So you can make a fool out of me.
My whole point being; that typing words into a box doesn't make you an artist. And if you think that makes you an artist; you're arrogant.
Humble yourself texter.

>>6280469
I'm typing right now; I don't confuse that with real draftsmanship. Neither should any other rational person.

>>6280456
Exactly..

>>6280497
Nta
You are idiot
Wow

>>6280497
Jesus christ, those bodies and faces are horrifying.

Lmao the pajeet shit is actually wearing the spammer down
Sir do not redeem

>>6280497
now do one with *basic line art*.

>>6280004
It's really over isn't it? Wonder how will poojeets on the board cope

>>6280497
it cannot do line art. it always has to have rendering

People should have put the kibosh on this right away. This is the death of art. I don't even understand how this is legal.

>>6280520
>>6280549
>>6280572
And this is why I didn't bother with the "challenges."
One could throw down 30 of these in a very short amount of time, and really no effort once an initial prompt is giving good results.

Find the best or most appropriate to the need, and then do a little touching up. Boom.
But no, it's "literally unusable". Bad faith discussion to shield your fee-fees from the harsh light of reality.

Your skills are not as important or impressive as you thought they were. You may have spent a lot of time doing the equivalent of juggling for applause.
But you should accept reality anyhow, even when it's hard.

>>6280611
>AI creates better art
>OY VEY IT'S ANOTHA ART SHOAH

>>6280624
Then do it if it's so easy.
Every fucking time you idiots get BTFO and everytime you have a fucking shitty excuse-
"I-i could fix if I wanted to!!!" and you sound like a fucking clown everytime.

>>6280624
Right now, you're the /beg/ getting all butthurt from facing critique and making excuses why you won't, or cannot, fix the obvious mistakes in your art.
Why did you come to the Art & Critique board?

>>6280631
Why is it my job to convince you of anything?
I'm just here because I find the meltdowns and acceptance and resistance all very interesting.
Reality is reality no matter if I bother convincing you of it. And if you can't see what's in front of you with this, then you have your head in the sand.

>>6280624
You're wrong, but also why are you here, do you even draw? did you come here from /g/ just to gloat?

>>6280644
>Why did you come to the Art & Critique board?
This is a major event in art, it's interesting to read and participate in its discussion.

>>6280497
it's not linear art, it's a black and white drawing, with grayscale.

>>6280645
>Why is it my job to convince you of anything?
Because you have made outrageous claims but never back them up?
Burden of proof it's on you guys no matter how much you try to spin it around.

>>6280662
>you have made outrageous claims
Show me the outrageous claims I have made
>you guys
Who?

Don't bother responding to the pajeet artist. He's just angry he will soon return to street shitting.

>>6280624
Prove it then. Do all that stuff and make the pictures anatomically correct and presentable.

>>6280677

>>6280291
You claimed.
>beaten by a thing that generates the same content within minutes that they make within weeks
>>6280304
Then anon asked to do his prompt
>>6280497
Post this garbage
>>6280624
And then you claimed
>Find the best or most appropriate to the need, and then do a little touching up. Boom. But no, it's "literally unusable". Bad faith discussion to shield your fee-fees from the harsh light of reality.

If it was so easy to edit and "fix" the issues you would have already done it.

>>6280624
>Your skills are not as important or impressive as you thought they were.
That's rich coming from someone shilling a supposed art "AI" program that can't even draw basic humans running.

>>6280004
The aifag: Post your art

Chad Artist: So that later it copies it with the AI? Fuck off

>>6280654
What discussion? This topic has already been discussed to hell and back in the last two weeks, there's hardly anything left said that hasn't been already.
And if you had been paying attention, the few artists on this board who actually make art and have been experimenting with SD, find it rather "meh" at best. Yeah, it's pretty good at doing some things as long as you don't expect anything too complex or specific out of it. Yes, you could optimize some parts of an artist's workflow using it. But overall there isn't much of an advantage to using it over just drawing and painting or 3D modeling things yourself.
3D in particular is the big elephant in the room. There's this technology that has existed for decades that can produce crisper and more precise, perfectly rendered art than any human artist or AI, and that shit can do animation too, easily in fact. And yet we fuckers still draw.

>>6280709
Only one of those is me though.

>>6280726
>to hell and back

You people serious? I've not once been perturbed by this AI garbage.
Take a picture of a celebrity made easily with a camera that digitally renders what it scans into pixels. Nobody cares because a machine made it. Thus, anyone could make it. It's cheap, it's fast, it has no value beyond the button you pressed to create it.
Take the same image except an artist rendered it photorealistically in pencil on paper? 100k upboats, 50k comments. People cream their pants. Why?
It's not the image that people value. It's the humanity behind the craftsmanship of something. Be it art, furniture, food. We as humans will always love to jerk ourselves off to the fact that we're human and sapient and capable. That we can do things ourselves. The ego we have just for existing cannot be stifled, and creating by hand is and always will be a way to stroke that ego. I call it the existential masturbation principle.
And that's precisely why AI will end up where we see clip art and stock images now. Worthless in value, merely an inconvenience to artists as they figure out how to definitively prove their work was not generated by machines.
The people who created this AI were subject to the exact same ego, creating a machine to show their capability and human ingenuity. But that's where the capability ends. The art that their creation spits out cannot fulfill anyone else's ego beyond the hollow husk of delusion. It's not even close.
Always remember that photographers are a dime a dozen, because there is no fuel for our collective ego in the work of pushing a button a little better than someone else. The same future awaits those who input into an AI to generate artwork.
Hand made artwork cannot die because our egos cannot die. A human touch will only become more valuable after all of this because we love to stroke it to being human.

>>6280715
>refuses to posts any work
>hates indians but lives in eastern europe
>posts some bullshit like this in the art critique thread

>>6280744
>hates indians but lives in eastern europe
shitskin tried to have a point here. even the poorest eastern europeans at least have outhouses

>>6280743
>And that's precisely why AI will end up where we see clip art and stock images now. Worthless in value, merely an inconvenience to artists as they figure out how to definitively prove their work was not generated by machines.
i've already noticed artists on fiverr slashing their standard rates

>>6280743
>how to definitively prove their work was not generated by machines.
Literally nobody does or will give a shit about this. Mostly not now, and even less shits will be given in 6months, 2 years, ...

>>6280624
>Find the best or most appropriate to the need, and then do a little touching up. Boom.
Then do it. Prove your AI can fix its mistakes and make good anatomically correct art.

>>6280756
>>6280758
AI WILL replace all of the background noise in our lives. It will become the advertisements we tune out. The promotional posters we ignore. It will be on every label and every useless disposable item. When AI is in everything, it will be worth nothing. But human creation and ingenuity will never lose its worth, because our egos are immortal. Your naive hubris is frankly sad.

>>6280765
The AI does most of the work and then I touch up the mistakes in photoshop.

>>6280765
I will not, nor do I need to.
Reality doesn't change either way. If you can't see that those illustrations would be simple to touch up, then you're either retarded or discussing in bad faith (no touching up would satisfy you)

Having fun btfoing ai shills in the other thread. Gets deleted before I can do my finishing move. Feels bad.

>>6280743
>It's the humanity behind the craftsmanship of something
finally, some common sense

>>6280781
Are mods actually doing their job for once? That's a rare event

>>6280095
I will still pay hundred of dollars for artists to have drawings of my wolf slut being railed by humans.

What, are you poor or something? Go buy a toilet lol.

>>6280779
>Reality doesn't change either way. If you can't see that those illustrations would be simple to touch up, then you're either retarded or discussing in bad faith (no touching up would satisfy you)
You're wrong I always give credit where is due.
Point is touching up stuff is not as easy as you claim and that's why anons are calling you out.

>>6280784
I think the shill reported his own thread. He taking such a beating.

>>6280769
>But human creation and ingenuity will never lose its worth, because our egos are immortal. Your naive hubris is frankly sad.
this is so delusional

Honestly sad how people write "30min" "1hr" next to their drawings because AI can already do better in less than 4 seconds.

>>6280789
should be easy enough to prove him wrong then

>>6280790
Show me a side by side by side comparison of AI vomit and real art. Then tell us again which is better.

>>6280790
4 seconds huh. Show me those dalle feet again mother fucker!

>>6280004
>new model just released
Care to name it?

>>6280792
we just wait

>>6280799
Keep waiting buddy.

>>6280786
We're thinking of different kinds of touching up
>generate image
>rough touch up in photoshop
>put it back with same prompt, low denoise

And now that inpainting works, it's even better.
>set a mask for the area you want to generate over again
>alter prompt for something different in that spot
None of which I'm going to show you, so you can already feel that I am BTFO'd if you'd like.

>>6280790
Times up, buddy boy.

>>6280802
Generate over again, with the same ai, getting the same shit results. You actually believe you can get good clean line art out of those joggers? With inpainting or img2img?

>>6280799
keep waiting, i'm gonna improve at drawing and I'll be better than you at several things kek. except I won't ever be inserting words in a search box because that's just soulless, there's no "me" in it.

>>6280806
What's this supposed to prove?

>>6280802
>We're thinking of different kinds of touching up
You're wrong I know exactly how this stuff works because I use it too, shit's fun.
>None of which I'm going to show you, so you can already feel that I am BTFO'd if you'd like.
Like I said I asked because I know for a fact it's not as easy as you claim.

>>6280789
You are truly pitiable. You and anyone else who are only shilling and spamming about AI because your own egos are going unfulfilled, so you seethe and writhe at the thought of artisans and craftsmen who will continue to impress humanity with their dedication to their craft. These are the pathetic cries of lazy cowardly people who wilted in the face of adversity and struggle, choosing instead to follow the path of convenience in life at the cost of your own validation. Now it's become your life mission to make it everyone else's problem. There are better ways to feel successful than whatever this is you're doing. This whole thing is futile, as you only hasten your own devaluation. Chasing your tail and going nowhere.
AI will be everywhere in the next few decades, everywhere. Meaning the increased rarity of hand made work only increases in value and concentrates into an even more exclusive discipline. The wealthy will then discard AI without a second thought as it becomes synonymous with cheapness. Synonymous with the common man. So keep chasing your tail, it means nothing to me.

i like how the shitskin AI shill is actually using the world "delusional". the arrogance of not realizing the irony

>>6280806
>Posts literal glowing vomit
>Draw this you cheeky artists!
Dingbat.

>>6280809
all the guys coping here can't replicate anything like that but NVidia GTX 1070 can

>>6280817
Which original piece is NVidia GTX 1070 replicating?

>>6280821
a little bit of each from millions of pictures by deviantart nobodies

>>6280079
Yeah I’m starting to think the only market available for AI art will be art prints. E.g but a nice frame for $20. High-quality photo paper print for $5. Sell for $50-$100.

Boomers will never figure out a computer in general and they’re probably the core market.

>>6280826
So you're stealing real art from people and passing it off as your own. btw, those "millions of nobodies" will still get more praise and recognition for their work than you ever will; posting this derivative crap in an anonymous image board. lmao pathetic

>>6280837
nope, i got one of my gens on the frontpage of artstation.

Oh boy... artists still think AI art advocates are aiming for "muh recognition".
No one wants to be artists. We want to eliminate artists as a profession.

I dream of Prompteurs and Brush Monkeys living together in peace

>>6280842
same thing applies

>>6280845
Why? What right do you have to do that? Why do you deserve to have a job more than artists do?

>>6280845
>No one wants to be artists
kek, every single one of you faggots wishes this tool made them artists. you are obviously an exception, because you're a frustrated retard with a dysfunctional brain who failed at becoming one and got rightfully btfo for being subhuman

>>6280845
y?

>>6280845
The bullies you hate are a domino piece that will lead back to you eventually.

>>6280845
>implying the value of distortionless, perfect human art won't skyrocket after ai poo floods every normie social media

two more weeks sir

>>6280852
a much better user experience to call friends on the phone without having to go through a switchboard operator first

>>6280845
>we just want to eliminate the human condition and ego, idiots

>>6280849
Techbros like him see humans no different than pieces of code. Humans capable of creativity and expression are seen as bugged code that needs to be removed.

>>6280852
>>6280849
because he's a failed artist you dumbasses. he got told to fuck off and that he's not going to make it. and rightfully so, he practically seethes about this every day as you can see.

>>6280845
>We
fuck off

>>6280855
>thinks the price of his art is going UP

>>6280867
beavis and butthead?

>>6280868
How much money are you making off of your "art"?

>>6280789
That is how they are. Solipsistic normalfags where they're the centre of the universe. Every "creative artist" type is exactly like that.

>>6280855
i'm a newfag , came here because i'm tired of this AI art spam everywhere, flooding even my favorite boards. I began to draw a few days ago both digitally and traditionally so I can measure myself against these retards in the future. if they won't get bored of their novelty, that is. yes I'm that fucking petty

>>6280867
>>6280869
Finally a worthwhile use for this stuff, at least it will have value in making me laugh sometimes while the memes are still fresh.

>>6280872
Boo hoo, bitch.

>>6280869
>>6280875

>>6280872
There are egomaniacal morons in this thread who really think they can destroy art entirely.

>>6280878
This is definitely the best use of tech so far.
Kills me with laughter every time.

>>6280878
Thanks doc

This just makes the job of the concept artist easier. I don't get the dooming.

>>6280871
And how much are you making out of yours?

Pandora's Box has been opened, and now we've unleashed the cataclysm. Art is dead. Photography dealt it a blow, and just as it was recovering, AI Art will now finish what was started two centuries ago.

It's over. See you all in the fields of Elysium.

>>6280871
the important thing is that you make less

>>6280899
>he says as he posts real art
what a clown

>>6280903
y?

>>6280892
This art of a literal shithole is way better than any art ever posted on this board.

>>6280909
kek the seething is palpable. i'm so glad this board made you feel this way, you deserve to feel miserable. how long till you kill yourself, I wonder

>>6280907
breaking the artfag monopoly and their commission mafia racket

>>6280915
basado

>>6280892
>goats in the painting
truly a masterpiece

>>6280915
what monopoly lmao, commissioning art has never been cheaper or easier due to oversaturation, fiverr, skeb, etc

>>6280134
Ai will fizzle out into nothing. The ai art “boom” has already happened. Progress from here will be slower next slower

>Industrial revolution will fizzle out into nothing. The machine “boom” has already happened. Progress from here will be slower next slower

>>6280919
you haven't seen anything yet

Another thing I find really funny is that AI "art" is still in its infancy. The more it evolves, the higher the barrier of entry will become to make top tier AI art, as people create new techniques and methods and skills required to use it to its highest potentials. And then these same people bemoaning art and artists will wind up right back where they started, as the AI "artists" take on the role of today's artists as their object of scorn. The real solution is to get over yourselves, artists will continue to exist for all eternity.

>>6280925
look at me. i am the artist now

Prompt: old man cooms in cunny
it's over boys, the AI is awake

Are these AI threads just perma /beg/s being crabs?

>>6280924
> meanwhile me getting 160 for a blue delphox being railed

>>6280927
pedophile, you've been told "NGMI" for years probably, it will stay that way forever

>>6280934
yeah

>>6280934
yes

>>6280937
Wow.
Is that a lot of money in your country?

>>6280925
To be an artist you need to have the mind of an artist and the ability to materialize your mind for everyone to see. None of these are present with AI artists, who write a couple of requests and then are given choices to pick out from. The AI is the artist, not the person making the requests who acts more like a commissioner. The more specific the request/commission, the better the art the AI produces.

Art will keep on living but the role of the artist as producer of art has been successfully eliminated. There will be one artist now, with billions of styles but none of what makes it individually human.

>>6280927
>art scene outskills you
>seethe at the art scene
>create AI art to outskill them
>AI art scene outskills you
>seethe at the AI art scene

>>6280327
YWNBATA

>>6280948
I bet my art is better than yours.

>>6280146
>>6280149
>>6280155
>>6280160
The Mucha influence is clear, but I also see Alke in there as well. Impressive technology indeed, but I can't say I'm fond of how people are hyping it up.

all this ai art shit just validates my theory that mucha would've been the greatest digital artist of all time if he had existed now instead of 100 years ago

>>6280004
>AI art is now officially fappeable
Its 100%, unironically over

>Sirs! Do not redeem!

ITS OGRE
>>>/g/88661892
>>>/g/88661895
>Trained on 300k+ high resolution Danbooru images
>finetuned on Danbooru images to better capture finer facial details
>September 26th
The dawn of the Waifu age cometh! Load up on those medicinal grade copium lads you unironically have two more weeks!

>>6280041
This is my plan. Except I want to live forever because I love my life too much to want to embrace death. Also I want technology to make my waifus real

>>6281090

yawn

>>6280934
No, just indian shills.

>>6280136
AI is the artist but the person behind PC is the commissioner. Idea guy if you will.
This levels the playing field between regular Joes and art school fags.

>>6280945
in south america, yes it is, average monthly is 190 in this shithole.

>>6281090
That's illegal.

>>6281200
>help me judicial system
omega cope

>>6281179
Damn you must living like a king. Here in the south this is one weeks worth of groceries

>>6280847
Draftsmen, artists, illustrators will ALWAYS be above you. We made you. Remember that you pathetic piece of nothing.

>>6280934
Probably. Pawns in a game they don't even understand. Full of spite and jealousy. I hope everyone keeps working towards their goals regardless. Don't let these parasites invade your mind too much. You need to hone your skills and leave the prompters to their typing. They have no idéa the amount of work, dedication and mindful planning it takes to get to where you are right now.

>>6281219
>help me judicial system
what else is the judicial system supposed to do? Aren't they around to help people? oh wait, I guess a criminal wouldn't think that way haha

>>6281090
AI can do this? >>>/g/88661707
Holy shit i think i don't need to commission anyone anymore now

>>6280899
The art is dead, because a group of coomers masturbates with pedophile images generated by an artificial intelligence?????????

Fuck off, Lmao

>>6281090
Finally more AI booba for all.

>>6280095
>I've been doing comms for the past 4 years and I think we're done.
pyw because I think you're full of shit.
Comm artists are probably the least likely to suffer from AI since AI can't make what's in your head. It can't make specific detailed OCs and will never be able to. It can't make tiny corrections that a client will tell you they want you to change. It can't do anything that comm artists specialize in doing.

>>6281266
Wow it’s more people standing still and staring straight at the camera! Incredible!
You’ve probably never even commissioned an artist before.

>>6281400
>Comm artists are probably the least likely to suffer from AI since AI can't make what's in your head. It can't make specific detailed OCs and will never be able to. It can't make tiny corrections that a client will tell you they want you to change. It can't do anything that comm artists specialize in doing.
What stops clients from saying "fuck it, not gonna pay 50 bucks and wait 1 week for my smut, I'll proooomt instead"

>>6281400
what about skeb tho, that site doesnt have revisions or anything and its basically like manual prompting

>>6281527
You're illiterate, or...?
>It can't make specific detailed OCs and will never be able to. It can't make tiny corrections that a client will tell you they want you to change. It can't do anything that comm artists specialize in doing.

Unless you think people commission artists and just say
>draw big booba gril! With big boobs! and and ASS!!

>>6281538
I think a lot of the techbros unironically think that that’s how art works.

>>6281538
>It can't make specific detailed OCs and will never be able to
It absolutely can though. Sure maybe not all on one prompt, but through a couple passes using img2img and inpainting and the most basic bitch photo editing/blocking it absolutely can.

>>6281543
>It absolutely can though
If that were true you would've posted an example already, poojeet.
>Sure maybe not all on one prompt
And that's why it sucks.

>>6281374
wtf are those eyes, i'm starting to believe that schizo anon that literal demons are manifesting in this technology

>>6281543
Okay, so prove it. Recreate any big name artist's OC using prompts.
Recreate some weird shit like Cteno by slugbox.

>>6281543
>It absolutely can though
Prove it.
> through a couple passes using img2img and inpainting and the most basic bitch photo editing/blocking it absolutely can.
Again, prove it. Post something like naked Lorelei from Pokemon milking herself and have it be on model.

>>6281558
>>6281557
>>6281548
inb4
>w-w-well it's not there yet, but give it [short amount of time]!

>>6281563
/g/tards btfo. Try raiding /ic/ again in a couple of years.

>>6281563
don't know how he thinks this is actually going to work given that we are still years and years away from true AI

>>6281558
>Again, prove it. Post something like naked Lorelei from Pokemon milking herself and have it be on model.
this guy cranked it while writing this post

>>6281543
You poo-in-the-loos love making these statements about what this tech can do without any proof. Here's a simple prompt: a black and white picture of Marcie putting makeup on Peppermint Patty. That's something your average amateur drawfag can do in just a few minutes.

>>6281558
>>6281557
>>6281548
I have no real drive to "prove" anything here, especially to such a disgusting group of catty cunts. You can think whatever you want, and even better: Go ahead and stick with the idea that AI can't make specific detailed OC. Doesn't matter to me at all.

I get you feel attacked, but you might be surprised to know that the very few times it's come up, /sdg/ is basically uninterested in artists or discussing artists. I've seen a few anons bring up that they've started getting into trad/digital art from playing with this shit.
The ones who come here talking about "destroying art" and so on are trolling. And they're doing it because it's incredibly easy.

>>6281575
>I have no real drive to "prove" anything here
Oh course you don't, pajeet. Because you can't.

>>6281575
>I have no real drive to "prove" anything here
L m a o
You were (are?) that kid in middleschool that told everyone his girlfriend was super hot but went to a different school, huh?

>>6281574
>poo-in-the-loos
>Marcie
>Peppermint Patty
dunno what any of these are

>>6281572
Who is this nigger

>>6281575
Yet again the poojeet shill spergs out after people ask for basic requests and proof.

>>6281582
he's the guy that's taking your job

>>6281575
>asking for proof of a technology working makes you a catty cunt
You faggots suck at marketing. Maybe you aren't shills. Maybe you're just retards doing this shit for free.

>>6281575
>I've seen a few anons bring up that they've started getting into trad/digital art from playing with this shit.
i doubt that, no offense but i really do believe that this shit will spell the death for drawing and painting long term, which is ironic because it is just a mesh of the visual language that has been developed via people drawing and painting. I can't imagine people being able to see potential in their /beg/ scribbles compared to being able to accidently shit out a da vinci or something from proompting which i think is very sad.

>>6281575
>feels attacked by people asking him to produce simple drawings

deniers refuse to create anything better than what the ai shits out

>>6281580
Of course you don't, they probably don't have the peanuts in India.

>>6280004
ARTISTBROS????

>>6281597
I've taken ai art as a base and fixed the many glaring horrible flaws, does that count?

>>6280050
Amazing, better than everyone in this board.

>>6281615
that's ai acceptance and you'll be more successful than purely manual or prompt-only

>>6281619
b-but i don't like vegetables!

>>6281575
>becoming a whiny baby any time someone asks for simple pictures
Every fucking time. Go back to shitting in your streets.

>>6280004
it looks like she has two separate normal maps on

>>6281597
The ai has yet to draw competent hands.

>>6281628
To impress street shitters and twitter, just add a whole bunch of "detail". It doesn't matter if it makes sense. Just any rendered fleshy bumps will do.

We are FUCKED!

do you like this robot, /ic/?

someone posted this and I saved it because I think it's nice

>>6281632
Dalle2 has drawn some good hands actually, but it’s hit or miss.

>>6280004
I am so fucking sick of hearing about AI. Do you work for the company or something?

>>6281481
>Wow it’s more people standing still and staring straight at the camera! Incredible!
LMAO that's literally what everyone does, what gets the most likes and jerks off to
>You’ve probably never even commissioned an artist before.
Watch out that you don't float away with that much copium you're inhaling

>>6281726
>that's literally what everyone does, what gets the most likes and jerks off to
Huh?

>>6281730
seethe more, poorfag

>>6281744
What?

>>6281726
>what everyone does
Just a couple of hacks do this.

>>6280050
>>6280146
>>6280149
>>6280160
>>6280155

These are unironically a good base to start. Just gotta paint over some of the more fucked up aspects and retouch according to your tastes/needs and you’re already done with 80% of the work. I’m sure the trad artists were saying the same thing with the advent of digital media but then there’s us who grew up with digital media reeing about AI when it’s simply another tool in our shed.
Can’t let technology intimidate you, guys. Gotta make use of it so you don’t get left behind.

>>6280845
>We want to eliminate artists as a profession.

the thumbnail trickery is fucking based and inhuman levels of memery are otw

>>6280134
giving everyone access to "art" will just sully the meaning of "art" even more when everybody can do it.

>>6281785
disgusting picture

>>6280041
>job
i draw for fun

>>6280847
they can never live peacefully with glorified Google image searchers

>>6281952
i mock AI fags for fun

>>6280897
Answer my question you coward.
>>6280903
That's none of your business. You have no right to determine how much I make.
>>6280915
Yeah, okay. Keep fighting the good fight, buddy.

>>6280927
>>6280327
Keep telling yourself that.
>>6280364
Alright, you're not a pajeet, you're just a faggot bitch.

>>6280845
>No one wants to be artists
holy fucking cope, every prompter is creaming now because they have a chance to be artist even if they failed in learning the trade and put the work for it, I love this but you are delusional if you think no one want to be an artist

>>6282354
I want to make art but I have no aspirations to "be an artist" like as my identity or vocation, get a grip

>>6282365
you can't make art without being an artist, otherwise you're just a consumer

Not like this artistbros...

>>6282354
>chance to be artist
No one ever want to be like you, tranny.

ai is 80% of the way there, but the other 20% seems like it will be extremely difficult.

the ai relies on human produced art as its source. but unlike a regular human, it needs billions of images to make progress. where to get these billions of images? it can't use AI-produced art, because ai produced art is bad training data, it wont improve if it is trained on AI produced images, it still wont be able to do things like hands.

so currently, ai still needs a much, much larger training set - but there's only so many human made pieces of art that exist to train on. additionally, these data sets are collected by scraping the web - but there's now no way to know if the image you scraped is human or ai made except by manually checking it, to my knowledge. so the data set is actually becoming more corrupt over time.

the only other option is to somehow optimize the deep learning model itself, so that it can make better use of the data it already has. but, there's still a limit. unless the ai is improved to the point where it actually understands what its generating on a deeper level, it will never be able to handle semantic meaning, context etc.

i'm not new to ai stuff in general, but stable diffusion interests me. how do i compile one without seeming like a brainlet? because i am a brainlet.

>>6280004
God wills it!

>>6283332
Trial and error if I had to guess. I'm sure there are tuts online.

>>6283120
You retard, ever heard the saying "art imitates life" or some shit? Just use regular pictures and have the AI work backwards and develop different styles, effects, etc

>>6280007
Good enough for the twitter crowd

>>6283120
>because ai produced art is bad training data
That's not actually true. It needs human labeled images to get bootstrapped, but at some point it can switch to training data generated and labeled by itself. If you are training multiple AI simultaneously, they can generate training data to each other.

>>6281554
>though
which anon said what about demons in tech?

Artistbros...

>>6280204
What significant art have you produce?

>>6280068
>Prompt: british food
plz understand.

>>6280050
Mhhh yes