/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

So, get a real job.

>>6276903
>will also rise the prices of traditional art
why?
tradfags are so delusional lmao
They think in a world where ai can create everything a man can image someone will care about some backwater retard smearing shit on a canvas

>>6276903

>>6276903
>but will also rise the prices of traditional art, since few people will know how to paint or draw
Doesn't make any sense. All the jobless artists will just fill all the areas that can generate money. Learning traditional tools is easy compared to learning how to draw and paint. All art is going to get cheaper and commissions are going to die in certain quality ranges. Though it honestly was retarded to begin with what kind of shit tier art could make money.

All it is going to do is further segment the market into one concentrated on human makers, which will be more luxurious than AI-made mass-produced kitsch, and add a bunch of roles around wrangling AI outputs. Every technology introduced so far has done so.

Ban AI threads.

>>6276954
And that segment will be filled with indians and chinese that just edit and touch up ai art to make it look natural.

>>6276903
sage ai spam
hide ai spam
report ai spam

>>6276903
Dude, an artist can't make money off traditional art. As long as they're alive the art is worthless

>>6276903
I only need to pay $70 for my monthly bill in a third world, not my problem

>>6276903
I'm tired of AI dooming, I'm going to keep drawing and getting better regardless of how good a computer gets at it. I'm still going to try to make money off it because I'm convinced people will like it.
Things like Patreon operate more like a "tip jar" anyway, you don't give artists money because you have to, you do it because you want to. This same model applies to streamers too.

>>6276945
you will draw for food, tradchud

It's good that introvert retards get their dreams shattered of making a living of sitting at their asses at home, never needing to face a real person. Maybe some of you now will get out a little bit and try to live. Art without the need to earn money eventually from it is much better anyway.

>>6277009
You're incredibly naive, but good luck anyway.

>>6276903
>AI art is just gonna drive down the prices of digital art
Nah, now there'll be fewer people getting into the game, you can raise your prices as the supply dries up... Assuming you stick around. Just say it's Bespoke art or something to attract the rich idiots out there.

>>6276995
I honestly think third worlders are gonna be hit hardest by this. Many (maybe not you) shit out low quality works quickly to keep their prices down, but don't have the talent to make work worthy of a higher price. We'll see how it goes.

>>6277035
>Nah, now there'll be fewer people getting into the game, you can raise your prices as the supply dries up... Assuming you stick around. Just say it's Bespoke art or something to attract the rich idiots out there.
yeah just like all those rich etsy knitters

>>6276903
>but will also rise the prices of traditional art

"-in traditional style"

>>6276903
>but will also rise the prices of traditional art
ai can't do this?

>>6276929
Why should they when they can profit off something that they actually like doing, wagecuck?
>>6277031
Go fuck yourself you condescending prick.
>>6277020
Fuck you. People's jobs could be taken away and you have the audacity try to make it out to be a good thing with your self important crap?
>Art without the need to earn money eventually from it is much better anyway.
You don't know shit about what you're talking about.
I should find you and kick your sissy ass.

>>6276903
so you're saying, trad chads really are the true enemy of AI art?

artists shouldnt be rich. simple as.

>>6276903
bro i got this for free. You wouldve charged me at least 300$ and made shittier job the first 5 times. It´s over.

>>6277552
That's your opinion.

>>6277553
I refuse to believe this isn't satire.

>>6277574
How can *rt*sts even compete? 0$

>>6277553
>>6277581
Amazing. Print it and hang it on your wall

You can just get a projector, generate a.i. art and then project it onto a canvas and paint over it.
Still need some basic brush skill and know how to handle the medium but this is basically how people have been working in traditional for decades (and even before that with camera obscura etc) but now with a.i. no one can ever find your ref

So previously resolution was the issue. I generated the image with AI, used another AI to upscale it and third one to make image clear and high contrast. I can upscale and clear out this image indefinetly .Problem solved.

>>6277553
you've never paid for a single piece of artwork, rajeesh

>>6276903
Thank god. Artist don't deserve to put rates that high.

>>6277795
Anon you could have at least replied to the original thread.
But either way I asked you to upscale the pic because I knew it would look even more blurry (and in fact it does).
I appreciate you took the effort to do it at least :)

>>6277795
nigga what is this, just photobash instead lmao

>>6277795
Generate something that isn't utter garbage, worthy of being official art for a high value IP and I'll get a real job.

>>6277009
This.

>>6276941
Yeah, I'm pretty sure the people who collect art are going to make an AI image then print it to display it at their homes, almost as if a tangible objects had a inherent balue over digital objects.

>>6277009
This tube generation is cancer

>>6277553
Yikes

>>6276954
Lookup on YouTube "Humans need not apply".
The industrial revolution displaced people in that it removed them from jobs, but also gave them new ones. The machines needed handling and were designed as tools to help people make better things.

This time its different. The machines are designed to replace humans. And whatever a human can do, a machine will simply learn to do it better.
If its a task with a right and wrong answer, the ai will simply learn how to discern boh.

Most artists are mad at the AI generated shit because it asks the question "what is good art?" Or, in more modern terms, "What's soulful?"

>>6277876
>Most artists are mad at the AI generated shit because it asks the question "what is good art?" Or, in more modern terms, "What's soulful?"
zoomers discover the philosophy branch of aesthetics

>>6277876
this is not even about strictly AI, the industries were forming back then. now the industries are established and there will only be job losses.

>>6277031
>I will draw anyway
this INFURIATES the pajeet

>>6277553
you should pay me money for showing that to me, retard

>>6277009
>This same model applies to streamers too
Holy shit, just came to me the meltdown is gonna be legendary when AI celebs/streamers become a thing.

>>6276929