/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6273596
you first nigga

>>6273596
ok let's go

>>6273598
I am a rater, not a drawer.

>>6273607
Low beg

boomping

>>6273596
Then post it your work.

Rating threads are useless without specifying whether it's from ref or imagination

>>6274958
not using ref is already /beg/ tier

>>6274962
Tell that to Hogarth

took me about a few seconds. still learning

>>6274973
Everything is wrong. nothing has a shape that makes sense. Are those people? oh... they are... gloop. a bridge? made of sand and wood gloop. even the mountains are a strange collection of shapes.

>>6274973
wow that's so immersive!
i really like the gothic architecture mixed with rural pathways and greenery.
It's amazing how surreal that looks!
Who is the ai-director and where can i buy a print of this?
This will look so good in my studio near my marvel funkopop collection!

>>6274973
unique as always, mr rutkowski

>>6274985
i studied the great impressionists like monet

>>6274973
Impressive, you can almost discern what the artist was thinking and feeling as the artist moved his fingers over the keyboard.

>>6275042
ah yes "impressionism" still tried to be realistic

>>6273607
mid-beg
you got some creative juices, but it's fairly obvious you have a lot of fundies to study
>>6274142
low int
I like your work, Gabe, but you have to eventually move out of the easy stuff and start challenging yourself. There are so many small issues with your style, if you stood back a little bit and experimented with styles outside of your own, you'd be far and ahead better than you are. don't become another stuck-in-his-style andy, evolve

>>6275067
a gothic futuristic city surrounded by mountains and a lake, a detailed matte painting by Raphael Lacoste, cgsociety, fantasy art, matte painting, unreal engine 5, rendered in unreal engine

Rodin study

>>6275160
fucking laughed

>>6274973
That's somewhere in mid-high /adv/, it's certainly better than what 99% of this board is capable of, I don't know why anyone would bother actually making art manually anymore.

>>6275354
the same could be said of human artists so far above your level that you'd never reach them in a thousand years. dont be so defeatist.

>>6273596
i love this picture
>fedora neckbeard harasses a m'lady

>>6275354
Anyone could shit that out with photobashing after a 1 hour tutorial. Don't be retarded.

>>6275401
Post your photobash.

>>6275390
That's not true, because I could fire up DALLE or stable diffusion and make something that good in a few minutes. It's like asking people to thresh their own grain to make bread, manual art has been outmoded.

>>6275452
But that doesn't look good?
It's a garbled mess and at most it can be used as concept art.

do you really have to turn every thread into AI discussion

>>6275459
It looks good to me and 99.9% of the population, you coping about it not being perfect isn't going to help you when it would take 5 years of practice to make something similar manually with 40 hours of work. Considering AI art will reach parity with professional human artists some time in the next few years, I wouldn't even have time to learn to paint like that if I wanted to.

>>6275463
>Considering AI art will reach parity with professional human artists some time in the next few years
HAHAHAHAHAHA
You have no clue what are you talking about, learn how the tech works before making absolutely retarded claims like this.

>>6275476
You've seen the difference between DALLE and DALLE-2, right? Those models were 8 months apart. I give human artists 2 more years tops before they're completely outmoded.

And besides, it doesn't need to be perfect, it just needs to be good enough that it's faster for a normie like me to fix it in photoshop than it would be to actually learn to draw it from scratch.

>>6275488
Hey you seem to know your shit. Will AI be capable of animating in the near future? Like frame by frame stuff. I want to make videos on top of my art, and was thinking of getting AI to animate my art for me.

>>6275488
This further proves you have no clue what are you talking about. DALL-E 2 is a diffusion model DALL-E 1 is not.
Unless you change how the software works internally quality is going to stay pretty much the same.

And besides, it doesn't need to be perfect, it just needs to be good enough that it's faster for a normie like me to fix it in photoshop than it would be to actually learn to draw it from scratch.
Sure, people who haven't learned to draw traditionally nor digitally are definitely going to put in the effort now with yet another tool.

>>6275495
EBSynth can do that right now anon

>>6275495
What about the massive difference between SD 1.3 and 1.4? That's just from 2 months of training. These models have a lot of room to get better still, it sounds like you're coping a little bit.

Also, there's no effort required, that's the point. I can make beautiful art in seconds with absolutely zero experience. I guess you must feel pretty silly having spent years learning to make art only to have some rando like me sorta blow you out of the water, but it'd probably be best for you to get over it and accept it already.

>>6275002

>>6275581
>EBSynth can do that right now anon
That takes videos and style shifts them.
There are a few GAN papers about animating still images, but they haven't reallt progressed in years.

>What about the massive difference between SD 1.3 and 1.4
The difference is not that noticeable? The biggest change were the weights not the model.

>Also, there's no effort required
To get good staff you need to use img2img extensively and unless you're blind you can spot AI art from a mile.

>>6275452
>people doing what they love for a living has been outmoded
You're an anithuman

>>6275581
Passionless consoomer spotted. I wonder how it must be, wanting so many things in a shallow way, but never wanting something deeply. It sounds like hell on earth to me.
Ah yes, gotta love coming home from sephora selling fragrances all day to prooompt some images that you had almost no say in from a product of the collective hard work of actual artists. A future where basically no one will be able to live off of doing what they love, where we're flooded with fast food images done cheaply, everyone is poor except a small handful of silicon valley elites that have sold the hard work of artists directly to the consumer, skipping the middle man.

You never had the love for art to do it the right way, and you expect anything other than fast food to come out of that?

What are you doing on /ic/, if you don't mind me asking?

>>6275610
Brother you are arguing with a machine. I agree on everything but the posts you are replying to are not organic in the slightest.

>>6275663
Possibly true, hadn't considered it

>>6273720
>>6275094
What are the fundies? It's been two years.

>>6275394
> I support womens rights and your right to vote m'lady. If you marry me you will be my queen and I will let you sleep with other men because f*ck patriarchy.

t. current day neckbeard

>>6274985
That’s the beauty of it. It skirts the line of realism and abstract in such a way that your mind fills in the gaps and corrects flaws as you observe it. It’s so crisp and perfectly executed but with enough ambiguity that you as an observer are free to interpret it as you see fit. The figure standing on the bridge. Does it look like a man In ancient Japanese garb fishing? Or does it look like something else to you? The thing in the water. Is it a creature or is it a rock? Looking at it will reveal the processes of your own psyche to yourself like a Rorschach test. I personally find it interesting. And AI did this? We may see a new era of art that plebs call bullshit but patricians will appreciate in the way it’s supposed to be appreciated. Just like twenty years ago a splash of paint on some patio furniture was impactful and pregnant with meaning to those who got it, but normie retards were self gatekept by their inability to try and understand something beyond the surface level

>>6275986
The emperor has no clothes.

>>6275354
get ye gone demoralization jew

>>6275986
Just go look at clouds if that's what you want from art.

>>6274142
Permabeg.

>>6275998
I do. And I enjoy abstract art the same way because unlike you and other abstract and AI haters, I’m not afraid of my own imagination. I revel in it. The cool thing about AI is that I’m not experiencing my psyche through the expression of another human, as is the case with abstract.

sketch book thing

>>6273596

>>6273596

>>6273607
beg, looking into values and rendering might help you push further from here
>>6274142
hi beg, a lot of your fundies are there, they're just not coming together all the way. These could be really nice, but there are points where your forms just end up a touch too flat, too asymmetrical, too off perspective, or out of proportion for them to really land.
>>6275322
int, for a portrait at least
>>6276078
hi beg, it's nice for a sketchbook thing, rendering and line economy could be something to work on
>>6276084
beg, proportions are wack
>>6276309
int, for a singular eye
>>6276324
hi beg, nice looking studies/notes, much of the proportioning is wack though

>>6275891
The fundamental concepts unalienable to art and design such as composition, value, perspective, proportioning, colour, rendering.

>>6274973
looks fake

>>6276324
>>6276376
tnx

i do struggle w/proportions, any tips?

>>6276084
can someone put this mercwip lineart through img2img?

Here’s my most recent painting.

>>6276376
neck yourself pawel

>>6276394
Draw some figures from imagination. Then look up some figures from reference, pull out a ruler, and start taking some measurements, both horizontal and vertical. Try to make said measurements in terms of body parts (i.e. head or arm lengths/widths.) Compare those measurements to what you made. Adjust where needed.

>>6275891
to be more specific, you have to learn how to apply what you have learned, and not just draw after studying whatever without applying it. line confidence, shape confidence, and implying 3d forms through 2d shapes in 3d space are just a few. that last one is somewhat drawabox related, although i'd personally skip that method, as it's such an easy route to stop drawing altogether as it sucks the fun out of it almost entirely.

instead, take your favorite 3 artists, pick a piece that you aim your own art to look like, and do a study on it. you'll realize so much just through comparison, and it won't suck the fun out of drawing.

>>6276418
who?

beginners try to start drawing right away but now i always spend a few minutes thinking about what i want before i hit the art button

>>6275394
Pretty sure the context is that she's in mourning as well.

>>6275972
jokes on you i can't grow a beard
asian genes you know

>>6273607
looks good for a sketch, i can tell you have a sense for line weight being important if you where to ink line it.
>>6274142
excellent use of black space on the motorcycle though im not sure i can say it translates the same to the clothes on the right.
>>6275322
looks great! maybe its just the photo but id like to see more darkness and definition. when i full size this image i lose what definition i can see when its thumbnail due to this.
>>6276078
pretty good curves, better than i do in traditional for sure. the lines feel heavy handed, maybe try using a harder pencil ?
>>6276084
I like the vibe of this mecha/armor stuff but maybe try practicing the 2 separately? like the others said the human proportions are off but if this was pure mecha it would be fine. you clearly have an interest in robot type stuff so why not dedicate 1 sketch book to each or force yourself to do alternating pages 'humans' 'mecha' 'humans' then once you feel you have a good grasp separately combine them like you did here.
nice shading for depth, lacks detail in areas but the overall form is spot on. id be interested to see you do a full face and see how you abilities carry over on the other side of the face.
>>6276324
cool sketches! i like the muscles. seems like a great show of practice! keep it up.
>>6276394
reminds me of my old school books filled with doodles like these. pretty fun to look at. try practicing hatching if you like to draw in a ball point pen, its useful for shading and giving alot of extra polish on a school book sketch.
>>6276416
its interesting, im not much a painting guy tho so sorry cant help much. the clouds look cool if not a bit lacking in other colors.
>>6276816
i like this one too, reminds me of the crazy newgrounds animations i used to watch. great coloring and detail!
>>6276850
is this your sketch layer? it looks like it might be. you could easily clean this up. looks good to me!

Here is one of mine

>>6277314
just realized that pic isnt so good at full rez. its actually quite small irl. here is a different one.
both where drawn traditionally then photographed and tweaked in photoshop (this one more than the first)

>>6276394
How long you been drawing?

>>6273607
4/10
>>6274142
7/10
>>6274973
why do people post this shit and who are the people who post it? are these people who give up on drawing and try to make artists feel bad by saying "oh look at this ai art so much better than everyone". this looks like a blob, photobashers can make the landscapes this is trying to mimic in an hour.
>>6275322
5/10 not sure if it's your camera but push your values
>>6276084
6/10
>>6276324
4/10 i like the sleeping doge
>>6276816
6/10
>>6277314
8/10

only started drawing with the intent to improve and few months back, haven't kept a consistent schedule though

>>6277455
>photobashers can make the landscapes this is trying to mimic in an hour.
this is 100x faster and infinitely cheaper

>>6277455
>rating out of 10 with no basis of what the rating means
good job, very helpful anon
you're ign except even more worthless

i'm finally getting good at human anatomy

>>6277455
>why do people post this shit and who are the people who post it? are these people who give up on drawing and try to make artists feel bad by saying "oh look at this ai art so much better than everyone". this looks like a blob, photobashers can make the landscapes this is trying to mimic in an hour.
you can't do it.

professional ai prompt engineer here, trad fags btfo

>>6277477
And also inconsistent as hell? What's your point?

>>6277491
just hit the art button 100 times until you get a good result

>>6273596

>>6277492
>AI posters have no clue how the tech works
You could have at least told me to use img2img or inpainting.

>>6277477
like someone else said, it's inconsistent, also inflexible because you can't make the changes you want to make, you can't just tell the ai what you want and have it make it.
>>6277478
just my immediate impression on if i liked it or not lol.
>>6277483
do what? photobash? yeah I haven't done much of it. quit seething.

>>6277475
Slav/10

>>6275354
>I don't know why anyone would bother actually making art manually anymore
and you never will

>>6275401
it's an ai generated trash

>>6277475
int
>>6277455
high beginner
>>6276850
high beg
>>6276416
high beg
>>6276084
beginner
>>6275322
intermediate
>>6277510
really rad, but the level is kind of medium beg almost high beginner, crazy cause the thumbnail is sick
>>6277318
>>6277314
med to high beginner

>>6273607
Beginner
>>6274142
Starting intermediate
>>6274973
fake
>>6275322
low Int study
>>6275592
cringe
>>6275891
despair
>>6276078
low beg
>>6276084
high beg
>>6276309
beg
>>6276324
beg
>>6276394
higher beg
>>6276416
low int
>>6276850
low int copy
>>6277314
intermediate
>>6277510
low int
>>6277781
average beg
>>6277858
intermediate study

extra, back when i did amateur porn.

>>6277858

low intermediate

seems like you're in a weird spot where you can't decide how realistic you want each character to be, i'd work on matching the style of the body / anatomy with the face.

also a lot of it is looking like someone who learned a bunch of anatomy but doesn't know when to stop drawing the way you do when you're learning / practicing.

you could do both realistic and more stylised styles, but you need to understand exactly what makes it work cohesively for each character.

>>6277886
that Mamimi is pretty nice

>post on a power level thread a few months ago
>get rated mid beg
>get MASSIVE GAINS and improvement
>post new work on new power level thread
>get rated low beg
It was all in my head.

>>6277914
thnaks, she's a fan favorite for many people i guess.

>>6277919
Post again I'll give you an honest power level rating.
I swear it as a nazi.

>>6277919
a lot of these power level ratings are biased and subjective to what the particular anon that's doing the rating actually values or is focusing on learning themselves at that moment.

also don't weigh the entirety of your skill as an artist on one or a few drawings that you've done, sure it's a good indication, but far from reliable.

that said, you're probably either still mid-beg or an anon had a good day a few months ago and wanted to make a /beg/ feel good, there's no way of knowing, but after only a couple of months it's easily expected that your stuff in the beginner levels won't separately register as better or worse when whoever is rating doesn't have that last piece to measure it too. also this shit will take years, just trust the process, and progress isn't always linear, most artists backwards and forwards, but generally the overall trend will be going forward. a few months is no time at all.

>>6275488
>I give human artists 2 more years tops before they're completely outmoded.
Dude, what is this even mean? Art isn't chess. A computer can never be "objectively" better than humans at subjective tasks like art or music.
>But eventually, no one will be able to tell AI art from human art! What will you do then!?!!?
That just proves my point. If people cannot tell the difference between what a computer does versus what a human does, then the computer hasn't replaced the human yet, as humans will clearly still be competitive with the computer.
>But studios won't need artists anymore!! they'll just use AI!!!!!
And artists won't need studios anymore, because they can use AI to do tasks they'd otherwise need a studio to do.
If you think this is the end for artists, it isn't. It's a new beginning.

>>6277919
Going from bad to bad isn't much of a difference to the common people. Only you are aware of the improvement, because people will compare you to pros. Unless you post a progress pic.
Are you eloisa anon?

>>6275322
is this charcoal or pencil?

Curious

>>6275322
high beg.
>>6276309
low beg that took the time to measure.
>>6276850
mid-high beg
>>6277314
high beg
>>6277318
mid beg
>>6277464
low beg
>>6277475
int
>>6277781
low beg
>>6277858
low int
>>6277888
mid beg

>>6278019
That's one stoic dude, he moves the pack to by moving first. Good leader but pride has betrayed him in the past so he stays humble.

It harkens to Rome in celebrating a won War the Ceaser would have a slave remind him that he is but a man.

>>6278085
Genuinely appreciate that, thanks!

>>6278012
Pencil

curious

>>6274142
low int
>>6276084
idk, cool idea but can't tell if proportions are intentional or not.
>>6277455
mid beg
>>6278019
I like

>>6278032
>low beg
Lmao post your work.

>>6273596
here my most recent work

>>6279027
Esdeath mad

>>6278684
Looks nice, but also unfinished. Good understanding of lighting and planes of the face. Intermediate at the very least.

>>6279075

>>6278684
Blog?

>>6273607
based

>>6277493
soul

posting purely out of curiosity

>>6280084
As a thumbnail I thought it was an x-ray of something stuck inside a rectum. It's a cool ship though. I got some Tsutomu Nihei vibes. int

>>6276394
>>6276324

high beg/intermediate

Looks like you enjoy drawing.

>>6276812
Is this AI?

>>6279562
>>6279075
>>6278698
>>6278684
>>6277886
>>6277858
>>6277781
>>6277510
>>6277475
>>6277464
>>6277455
>>6277314
>>6276850
>>6276816
>>6276416
>>6276394
>>6276324
>>6276309
>>6276084
>>6276078
>>6275322
>>6274142
>>6273607
I'm so sorry guys but all of you are begs. If I ignored you, you may be high/beg/ or an ai tard. Not even a single int in this thread, sad... really

>>6280217
No, I created it.

>>6273596
??

>>6280428
That's a girl.

>>6280415
pyw

>>6280423
Don't lie.

>>6280428
Strokes are strong.

>>6280451
Is AI art not art?

I took this photo with my very own hand. My power is beyond evaluation.

>>6280510
I took it at work, I am no arsonist.

>>6280415
Are you taking into account how long people have been drawing? Dilate? Disintegrate spiritually speaking? Seethe?

>>6280415
Pyw. Cringe.

>>6280494
AI art. Go post on /g/ or something

Finished just today, had fun, Red Claw is very underappreciated, read a threat about how she is that here on 4chan so I felt I had to depict her acutally being the way she would be if handled by mature comic artists: an unleashed crazed beast :)

>>6280445
>>6280600
uh ok

>>6279687
lukaj_k on twitter
>>6280084
need blog

>>6280692
pure kino

>>6280697
Lol

i had it framed

>>6280084
blog?

I still have light years to go untl i am satisfied but this is the first attempt at getting into digital art (drawn on the 23rd of July) contrasted with something i did today.
I'm just trying to get a hang of photoshop and learn how to paint.

>>6280608
lol it's not ai

she drive

>>6280961
i'm sorry i legitimately thought this img2img at first glance lol

>>6280963
based rhodie

>>6280804
I never heard of this artist. Thanks for the prompt. Hope he will not end up like Greg.

>>6280982
is that fucking carlos lmao

>>6280697
/int/ but youre probably a pedophile

>>6280697
And did you use a ref for this? If you used a ref this is still low beg if you take away the rendering. High beg if no ref because it's such an easy pose. Try being more dynamic next time.

>>6281080
No, no refs anon.
>>6281062
What's your point?

>>6281102
oops

>>6280697
>westoid face
>disfigured giant hand
>fucked up shoes
kys begtard

Why does every beg drawing invariably appear to get photographed in a drafy eastern europe apartment with a single lightbulb in the ceiling?

>>6280697
>>6280697
I'm coming for you baylego. I know where you live.!!++!!!!
>>6281113
You are around intermediate but you are afraid of using lineweight. I also draw without reference too on occasion. You will look at honoka's ass!!!

>>6281080
I was there. He did use a reference for the body but not for the face.

>>6281198
Guess he's low beg then. The rendering is ok though.

>>6281198
>>6281195
I know exactly who you are, you don't even know the sound of my voice, why are you lying anon.

Howdy, I’m FlashFirePrime/HallowedMarmalade!
This is my latest work, a doodle of my OC, Blanche, attempting a sumo deadlift while I cheer her on from the sidelines. I’ll probably put it on my Twitter later. Whaddya think frends? :3

>>6281723
hellboy as batman on a chimney in the style of bill watterson, minimalist, line art

>>6277481
"realistic face"
>nigga

relatively older work

Art school dropout checking in

Here's some chubby elf/goblin idea I made today. Drew the face a little different than I normally do (I usually don't draw noses), not sure how I feel about it but I'm trying to experiment more and try new things.
I'll review some work as well.
>>6280494
He looks really cool. Love the detail, especially on the hat. It makes me wonder if you have deeper narrative significance behind the patterns on the hat, like if it's meant to reference some in-universe religion this character follows or something, or if you just thought it was cool looking. Either way I like it.
>>6280961
I like the mood here. Maybe I'd advise against not making the background so bright, or maybe moving that brightest spot closer to her face? Idk, I feel like the background distracts from the character in the foreground. Just a thought idk, still a cool pic.
>>6281408
I like the idea and her body. Why the name Blanche though? No big deal, it's just such an oldtimey name I wondered..
>>6280540
Super cute.

>>6280839
@tychorion1 on twitter
Sorry for late reply, saw this just now.

Artificial Intelligence is taking over and this is how you guys still draw? Jesus, push yourselves a bit more the future of art lies in your hands. Most of y'all are just lazy, not even trying, are you gonna stay beg forever? ffs

>>6282227
nah i'll just wait till our emad bro completely replaces us
he's is unstoppable, progress is unstoppable, you can't fight it, it's over

>>6273596
Powerlevel? Like in what sense?

I have over 200,000 youtube subscribers and have had sex with an asian woman and about 50 white women (those don’t count and might as well have been trannies).

Idk. People used to say they had childhood memories of my videos around the world, specifically us and uk. I have friends who said they met people who talked about how they liked my videos growing up. But it’s depressing because it is all past tense and I have nothing else really. Trying to reinvent to be present tense notable.

>>6280697
this is fucking terrible lmfao

>>6280697
Unappealing horse face, chimpanzee/tranny anatomy

Only k2d can save you now kek

>>6281825
Honestly, it’s quite a simple reason why I named her Blanche. It’s because she has white hair and Blanche is French for White lol.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YxgzxojrHZo

>>6277475
test

>>6277919
I’ll let you in on a little secret: the people doing these power ratings aren’t just crabs, but retarded crabs.

Just finished this yesterday.

>>6277493
Hell yeah, sharpen the crab's features and the background.

>>6281164
>>6282367
>>6282378
tehehe I'm gonna have to ask you to post your work anon, otherwise you're just validating my point

>>6281408
honestly, i know what you look like in real life, you look a lot cooler than that. but cool overall

>>6280697
This looks like a paintover of something I saw in an AI thread

>>6282791
Not him but you also called me a beg

>>6273596
my study.

>>6282791
nta and its the first time posting in this thread, but shitters like you are the reason I avoid posting here in the first place. you shouldn't be calling a vast majority of this thread begs when those others are still better than you. by your rating system, you are mid beg. by what skill level is intermediate? in your eyes? by what skill level is pro?

If I remember correctly, you generated an AI artwork, and then drew over it, and are now parading it as if you made it fully. you're a fucking meat puppet

>>6283173
Slow down at the start. Don't start painting until your preliminary drawing has correct proportions.
If you don't want to use guide lines, Try imagining negative-spaces at creatures with specific proportions. Say a white whale on the left there biting his hat, see how it's lower jaw is smaller?

>>6283192
I'm not studying the proportion. I was studying the colors and brush.

>>6283185
>low/beg/
You're only here if you have a horrendous aesthetic taste, not only because you just picked up a pencil, but because may probably have a mental deficiency
>/beg/
you suck at everything, you may have stared here. Still everything is wrong, but you may have a decent aesthetic taste, your stuff may be appealing and soulful
>/int/
Solid grasp of fundies, solid style, can draw from imagination. You can absorb abstract concepts, you're becoming a healthy human being.
>/pro/
The 1%, nothing to do with making money, if yes, half of us would be pro

Ergo, by that metric, yes. You shouldn't be demoralized by sucking. I'm barely scratching /int/. And regarding the ai gossip, I find it hilarious, please keep it up, and know that I had nothing to do with it. Pic related

>>6283228
bad excuse

>>6283241
how so? I've achieved my objective of that study.

>>6283245
as a pre-beg, you should focus on basics like proportion whenever you can, Attempting Leyendecker study is admirable, but you didn't get remotely close, only superficially. He uses strokes economically, that's the point. You've done thousands of superfluous strokes in an attempt to mimic, without understanding the intent.

>>6283251
post your work then?

>>6283321
u first

>>6283324
that's my work. already posted mine. the one you're criticizing.

>>6283321
Unfinished, but here is a Leyendecker study from earlier this year.

>>6283329
so a direct plagiarism?

>>6283336
>plagiarism
I do not think it means what you think it means

>>6283343
I do not think it means what you think it means

>>6283336
You're not even trying have a (you)

>>6283351
It means what it means regardless of what you think

>>6283354
>It means what it means regardless of what you think
likewise

>>6283355
now kiss

>>6283329
how do you get that canvas texture? Did you use a brush or texture overlay?

>>6282478

just take a photo

>>6283406
That was a brush. From this brushpack
https://www.mediafire.com/file/rk0nh415xvn1e6d/yizhengKE.abr/file
The brush is "R. M. - G. Oil Art CANVAS Tex ENHANCE More Brush"
Not sure who made that.

>>6283417
The artist if you are unfamiliar
https://www.artstation.com/kyz

>>6283417
thanks bro I appreciate it alot

>>6283417
See were being helpful here

>>6282791
Why do you draw long ass legs?

>>6280804
is that yours?? it's great

>>6283798
What's an ass leg

>>6280697
low int
>>6280840
very low beg
>>6280961
mid int but that head is beg
>>6280963
mid beg
>>6281113
int
>>6281408
low int
>>6281825
high beg
>>6282383
at this point looks beg.
>>6282791
int
>>6283173
mid beg
>>6283329
idk but looks really good. very pro
>>6283733
low beg

>>6280697
low int
>>6280840
very low beg
>>6280961
mid int but that head is beg
>>6280963
mid beg
>>6281113
int
>>6281408
low int
>>6281825
high beg
>>6282383
at this point looks beg.
>>6282791
int
>>6283173
mid beg
>>6283329
idk but looks really good. very pro
>>6283733
low beg

>>6284001
forgot to add pic isn't mine

>>6284001
Post your work.

Was a live figure drawing, 5 minutes.

Never finish any painting I do, but I get to this stage.

>>6284104
are you the artist who draws big anthropomorphic animal women with human shotas?

>>6284001
What method are you employing to decide which posts you do and do not respond to

>>6284468
The ones that are hard to understand whats going on I pass >>6282521
. Same with those that have clashing power levels, like >>6282564

Some 7 minute gestures

>>6284851
Bro why did it rotate, they look so much worse now

>>6284855
it just happens when phone posting anon

>>6283329
time lapse? I'd better learning by watching over reading instruction.

>>6284703
I made the second one, I know it's not perfect, but since you said it clashes I'm curious what parts work and what parts don't.

>>6280697
>>6282791
I'd say high int with just a few steps before pro level, rich in unique technique, yet you have some critical flaws regarding construction, especially those knees and leg flows (referencing without proper stylizing?). Pretty good colors too.
>>6279075
Mid int, high beg if I was in a bad mood.
>>6277314
Mid beg, good sense of composition.
>>6284104
I'll say pro, but you'll need to finish this one, if not you'll stay in int level. Lighting, composition and atmosphere are pretty damn good.
>>6281723
With this amount of stylizing, I can't really read your ability, so I'll just give you a free pro because those are some nice colors, good posing, good composition. Easily could be printed as a comercial poster.

>>6285063
To geneours anon, I apreciate the high ratings, but don't be so complainant

most recent okay piece

>>6285153
Ehhh...... PrOmT?

On a serious note, it is overpainted and bashed a bit right?

>>6285063
Kino taste.

>>6285063
What`s the workflow of your`s?

Started drawing 2 weeks ago. Should I keep practicing forms or can I advance to values/shading now?

>>6285162
Only for the gun I used a 3d model

>>6285269
How'd you do the background? Perspective lines? Very nice stuff.

>>6285290
I took reference from a train station near me, and used the perspective ruler on CSP. It's a lifesaver

>>6285118
I'm trying to be realistic here, not pessimistic.
>>6285166
Sketch, put basic colors under, fuse the layers and start painting over up until I'm satisfied with the rendering.

I'm sure I'm some level of beg, I'll give my honest beg opinion ratings though.

>>6282521
mid int. It is a bit difficult to tell what's going o but maybe that's on purpose?

>>6282564
Pro! super beautiful I could stare at this for minutes and be entertained. I hope one day I can draw like you

>>6282791
high int. Nice hands and coloring

>>6283173
mid int. I think you've successfully gotten the colors of the face, but from the thumbnail I can see that your ear is significantly darker. I also feel your brush is too hard and opaque

>>6283329
high int. I really like that canvas effect

>>6283733
low beg. I can tell you're trying not to symbol draw, but you're also really lacking form

>>6284035
high beg? If you had more time to work on it I'd be able to tell better

>>6284104
high int, cool faces and reflection

>>6284726
low int? Somehow the jacket looks flat, maybe because I don't see the segments in the silhouette?

>>6284851
mid beg. I don't really agree with getting that much detail in a gesture but it does look like a decent sketch

>>6284944
mid int. The bumps and texture look very good

>>6285063
high int. nice work! How long did this take you?

>>6285153
mid int. I love how moody the lighting feels

>>6285172
high beg, nice hatching

>>6285249
low int. You should definitely advance!

>>6285422
high beg, cute!

>>6285422
High beg, give blog

>>6285249
Cool.work bud, you'll go far if you stick to it. I recomand at least trying out value. Just try not to get complacent and stagnate.

>>6282564
Gorgeous stippling, I love this style. Trying to emulate something like this myself. Do you have any particular influences or stylistic inspiration that you can share?

>>6285422
>>6285430
>>6285434
samefag

>>6285456
pyw anon

>>6285036
I meant that in some aspects it is int, like the composition and linework and of course that smoke looks good. Also the dog is great. But there is no perspective so te castle looks beg and that shield and soldier look flat.

>>6285462

>>6285476
idk why you are so confident about your work

>>6285479
You're right, the troon might be working overtime.
>>>/b/885943769

>>6285418
>I also feel your brush is too hard and opaque
it's hard round brush with 100% hardness. :DD
because I don't know how to fix my intuos tablet.

>>6284001
>mid beg
actually I'm just pre-beg. this anon gets it >>6283251

>>6285516
What program?

>>6285480
Man... When are you gonna get better? I'm getting kinda sleepy looking at your stuff, you seen it once you seen it all, sad really. Not bad, not offensive, a big fuckin nothing

>>6275042
>>6275081
>>6275986
>>6276056
Abstract isn't really a good word to describe impressionism. It was more holistic than abstract. Yes, the details were obscured by the raw brush strokes, but the picture was always unambiguous when interpreted as a whole, there are no guessing games, it should be clear what is what when you take the context in mind. Later artists entirely missed that, and made just messy art.

The blue is just a watermark in case I want to post this somewhere else.

>>6282791
Uncanny, stilted and boring. AI mogs you kek

>>6282985
Kek you are really good Anon, you can probably start selling at this level unlike the shitter you responded to who paints over AI generated crap.

>>6285544
SAi. even in Photoshop, the brush is hard round brush.

my prompting is getting insane

>>6285656
>not blurry or artifacted
Nice non AI art my friend.

IG: a.k.a.abid

>>6285684
i upscaled it with an ai

>>6285698
>i upscaled it with an ai
With would have nothing to do with prompting.
But anyways dude stop embarrassing yourself I could straight up post the source if I wanted, you ain't fooling anyone.

>>6285612
What fixed it for me multiple times (had 4 different devices, chink-ware, bamboo, intuos 4, Cintiq...) is to try out older drivers. Also try using wintab drivers.

>>6285448
Thanks man, that means a lot :) and I'd recommend looking at the work of Aubrey Beardsley and Sidney Sime for reference

>>6285465
You're right, something irked me about the castle in particular but I'd never done a vast scene like this so I wasn't sure what the problem was. Are there any pieces or artists that you know that do that kind of perspective well? Either way thanks for the feedback, I really appreciate it!

Here's something that took me about a day (?) to make.

Why not

>>6285249

>>6285249
>>6285985
I meant to post and ask you if you copied a pic or it was from imagination, those lines are really clean

>>6273596
Just finished this.

>>6285418
>low beg. I can tell you're trying not to symbol draw, but you're also really lacking form
What's form?

>>6286189

Form is the 3d physical structure of whatever you're depicting on the picture plane.

>>6286202
Then what's wrong with my form here? >>6283733
I used the Loomis method, and it looks fine.
If you were talking about shading, I would understand but form? Really?

>>6286205

Nta so I don't know what they were thinking. Shading is a visual representation of light (not) hitting the forms you show. The Loomis method is a shortcut for illustrating scenes, the books themselves assume you can copy well, and you'll get better at using it if you can do observational drawing first. Bargues, cast drawing, and life drawing are the best exercises to teach you to translate masses you observe to a 2d surface.

>>6285456
big if true

>>6286215
I grinded observational drawing until people started accusing me of tracing. I think that's good enough.
It's weird that I'm getting a downgrade back to low beg when I was getting consistent mid begs last month, though. And what did he mean by symbol drawing?

>>6286230
Worry less about your power level and more about making your studies as accurate as possible

>Draw this for some dude I follow for free
>He asked people to draw him and his son like Yujiro and Jack
>Alrighty then
>Trace their figures, Change their muscle mass, Redraw their heads and all that shit
>Spend like 4+ Hours rendering Yujirou
>Ass hurts from sitting on it without a break
>Finally Finish it
>Not great but not bad
>Send it to him
>Looks great anon please email it to me so I can repost them on my Instagram
>Sure.JPG
>Email it to him
>No response
>FFW 2 days later
>He posts other peoples art but not mine and some of them are straight up chicken scratch or people just randomly coloring over the reference and sending it back to him.
>Oh well maybe He's doing them in sets I'll just wait another day
>Check today
>Still didnt post mine
>Made some other dudes his background which I think mine is better then
I'm seething all I wanted was a fucking shout out

>>6286235
>accurate as possible
With eyeballing or measuring?

>>6286236
are you brazilian or latinx?

>>6286243
>LatinX
Kys, But no I'm like 30% spic and 90% Euro

>>6286244
70% Euro my bad I'm retarded

>>6286237
Both, your eye is king but you have to learn how to check yourself

>>6285418
>high int. nice work! How long did this take you?
Two months, obviously there were weeks I didn't work on it, but I at least tried to give it 1 hour every now and then.

>>6286244
You're latinx, and the fact that the x makes you angry it's what's makes it funny

>>6285762
You're welcome. Also, I see this piece depicts a sacked city, but is there more story to it? I'm an illustrator for my own literary works, not sure if the same for you, but either way I was curious to know more.

>>6286302
It's for a book a friend of mine is writing, he wanted pictures of each of his 6 deities and this latest one is his setting's God of death and rebirth. That's all the instruction he gave me other than that he appears wearing a blindfold at times, so I'm afraid the story of the scene are left up to the beholder. He's one of those "do whatever you want" kind of requesters.

>>6280982
>>6280988

>>6286287
>Let me tell you what you and what you're suppose to be called
I only dont like it because Liberals are being hypocrites by forcing it onto people whilst saying that it's wrong to do so.

>>6286245
>I'm retarded
but only 30% of the time.

>>6286322
You've done an excellent job depicting it, especially with a somewhat nebulous prompt. Maybe I'll post something to toast you tomorrow.

>>6285418
kaiji anon here, thanks for the critique! didn't realize the silhouette made it look flat

>>6285686
I like your work but I think the extreme lovecraftian grotesque spookiness is not kino like you might assume. Maybe try doing a more subtle piece

>>6286367
>republican using liberal mockery to get a rise out of you for a laugh
>”hate liberals because-“
I hate liberals too but fuckin lol

pose study

Damn, only 1 person rated me as int, rest all said beg ;-;
Where should I improve?

>>6286236
mid beg
>>6286027
low beg
>>6285992
mid beg
>>6285956
mid beg
>>6285881
high beg
>>6285686
low int
>>6285422
mid beg
>>6285418
high beg
>>6285249
mid beg
>>6285172
mid beg
>>6285153
high beg
>>6285063
low int

>>6286880
It's like a golden ratio with the her butt in the center lol.
btw the racoon pose is weak. He shouldn't have that pose in that moment. Look at manga.

>>6286880
Low beg. Youre probably drawing from imagination and choosing the most comfortable ass pose you can think of. Which results in a boring and unimpressive drawing. Its almost all made of flat shapes and no forms. Whoever rated you int isnt doing you favors, hes probably biased because its furry.

>>6286952
mind doing a redline?

>>6286967
Yeah I mind furfag. Id not really trying to be too helpful here.

>>6287071
beg.
poorly done foreshortening flattens the drawing.

>>6287061
>>6287094
>>6286952
post your art, dumpster.

here's something i did recently /ic/unts

>>6287310
Int

>>6286880
>low beg
can you explain why it's low beg?

>>6286860
Poltards by definition are Far left, The Far right would be anarchy while the full left is complete government control which is what /pol/ wants.

>>6287442
not that anon, but there's nowhere near enough to go off from just a sketch of a portrait that you tweaked and coloured in. you could be mid depending on your other work. i'd just say be more ambitious, it'll push you more, and also give you a better idea of where you're at and what you need to work on. a lot of anons just grind out sketching heads endlessly (and get decently good at it) and barely ever go beyond that.

>>6287133
beg

>>6287310
low int

>>6287071
beg

>>6286939
mid

>>6286878
beg

>>6286236
perma-beg

>>6285992
beg

>>6285881
high beg

>>6286367
I love using latinx as an insult, and I love that you get mad, so cute lil latinx

>>6287928
You might catch early ESLs but honestly it's wearing off on me, you guys are overusing it as an insult.

>>6287626
That was someone else asking why it was rated low beg. I think the person who said low beg was just salty or something like that. I'm not saying I'm very advanced, just not low beg.

>>6277886
whats your discord?

>>6278684
akirel <3

>>6285418
youve got great talent, wahts your discord?

>>6288293
>>6288295
>>6288301
samefag

>>6288304
true but you're also me.

>>6287626
I rarely even color heads to begin with. I posted that one because it's the newest colored work I had.

>>6285992
>>6286880
>>6287634
How do I ascend lads? Why am I so beg?

>>6288349
basically, just work on your fundies. anatomy, form, values, clothing studies, etc. pick any one of those and there's a good amount that could be improved regarding it.

for that image, i'd say the biggest problem (and quick fix once you get the hang of it) that stands out to me is the values, there needs to be more darks / shadows around the character (not just the boots). your darkest parts are consistently a mid orange colour that really shouldn't be far from what the value of the regular shadows could be. way too light for occlusion shadows that you're using if for. the way your character looks, is as if the entire body and clothing has a level of light emission, makes it clear you don't understand lighting all that much.

i'd recommend doing some figure painting studies, trying to get exactly what you see in the reference image. start out with black and white to start out with, i'd even say use the colour picker for the first couple of goes too, it'll give you a solid feel of the range of value you should be going for. some youtube tutorials that walk you through painting the face / figure will give you a good understanding too, i'd recommend looking at oil painters and how they do portraits / figures. also desu also i'd recommend practicing painting a few inanimate objects before doing figure painting.

you've definitely got a bit of experience, so i really don't think it will take you too long to learn the right concepts in terms of value painting, you should get a good easy boost in your level if you do this right.

>>6287634
why don't any of you elaborate on your ratings, it would help anons here actually take your ratings more seriously

>>6288411
i did >>6288405

not gonna write details for every anon, chances are they won't check back into the thread and it'll be wasted time.

>>6288415
then why even bother in the first place. it doesn't help that you just say "beg", "low int", "beg", "beg" to a bunch of anons without any elaboration. It leaves them guessing and just feeling like they're doing something wrong. make a fucking effort or don't bother

bruh read the topic of the thread, if you want clarification, just ask.

>>6288419
bruh read the topic of the thread, if you want clarification, just ask.

>>6288425
>bruh read the retarded topic of this thread
yeah and I don't agree with it. it surely doesn't help just to get a rating and i don't know why you wouldn't feel compelled when assessing a piece not to actually give some feedback

>>6288419
If it dosent help you, you may be too stupid. Think on your own, and think why you're there

>>6288419

> It leaves them guessing and just feeling like they're doing something wrong

well, they ARE doing something wrong, so mission accomplished. And the general, well known rule that never fails is to read the sticky, and that will tell you to focus on your fundamentals. that's it, that's the answer for everything. but should an anon want extra help, ask instead of acting like a child.

>>6288431
so make your own thread where the rules are what you want them to be, you fucking idiot.

>>6288460

>>6288460


>>6288460
new thread, same rules :)

>>6288405
>is as if the entire body and clothing has a level of light emission
Because the shadows aren't dark enough?