/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

and they put it on a wall

im going to cry

report and hide all ai threads

>>6259393
>people like thing I don't like
>ban it

>>6259393
This is relevant to the development of modern art, why report?

>>6259391
Oh no! Not a wall! How could they!? It's all over!

>do everything in the op story step by step
>nobody buys my shit
wtf

>>6259388
meh I mean "painted them" on a giant panel

>>6259397
you forgot to be accomplice in a jewish money laundering scam like all rich artists

you could already scam people before ai

>>6259393
>ban art from the art board

>>6259410
>Wall of text
Not reading that shit, and based on his "art" one can already see that all those likes are from him fishing for sympathy from muh AI stealing artistic soul.

>>6259410
Remember that single time in history where new super advanced useful tech was rejected by people for morality reasons? Yea, me neither.

>>6259388
AI thread died for this?

>>6259411
Why so much spite for artists?

Prompt?

>>6259410

>instead of using technology to help them improve artists feel threatened and sperg out
I will never get it

>>6259410
This guy must be steven zapatas idol

anyawys, upper end artists wont get replaced. If moebius never existed and you gave AI 1 trillion years then I am skeptical it will ever come upon Moebius' style and if it did, then it's by accident which would just be immediately wiped away with the other quadrillion images because it can't judge art, it can only rehash

>>6259422
How exactly do you improve by letting AI draw for you?

>>6259416
Yeah. The world is so much better now thanks to eugenics. :)

>>6259416
Don't get me started: condoms witg Christian, medicine for some Hindus like Gandi for his wife, not physical technology but Galileo's views of Earth, etc.

Or, modern people dismissing all of their cultural heritage because "meh" while it has proved reasonably succesful over >5k years.

:wink:

>>6259428
Selective breeding is used all the god damn time for raising all kinds of farm animals, plants, etc. The only place where it was rejected is for humans (and not even everywhere really).

>>6259388
>only good art makes money
>fools with money to blow aren't easily separated from it
Its like yall have learned nothing from Nfts people will by LITERALLY anything like 70% of this shit is luck

>>6259427
>Stabilizers
>Lasso tools
>Perspective grinds
>Filters
>Smudge tool
>Warp Tool
>Layers
>3d models
>photobashing
>resizing
>paint overs
I sleep
>Normies prompt an AI and start feeling a little bit creative
We need government intervention and pass regulation, censorship, copy right laws. Sound the alarms, where's the hecking outcry?

>>6259427
could be used to set the tone or study colors

>>6259433

Moggs digilets and AIcels.

tradsisters...I thought we were supposed to be safe

>>6259441
embrace the cold bitter touch of paint on a canvas. The microwaves from your tablet and laptop are overheating your brain

>>6259388
>Look at his profile
>He's a queer
the gays are always hacks. the girl that bought his painting is probably dating a guy that fucks him in the ass every weekend

>>6259447

Simply devine brother. Have you taken the tradpill?

>>6259458
the fags do love nepotism

>>6259459
>strong legs from plein air painting
Actually 100% true

>>6259433
Someone won 750$ by rolling his head on a keyboard and getting the AI to sample a some pictures together. Then called himself an artist. If you don't see anything wrong with this then you only have yourself to fault. Also
>two wrongs make one right

>>6259446
hey. how you doin', """siss"""?

>>6259468
Define an Artist.

>>6259467
I kneel

>>6259410
looks like the red titan

>>6259472
Someone who searches google images. This is the response you wanted, right? Now you can feel validated

>>6259388
so he used an ai to paint shit? What's the "it's over" part here, i don't get it. Could've used any shit to do this, I think your brain is over

So many artcels seething itt
Truth is, no one cares about your opinion about AI or art

>>6259433
I don't sleep for half of those, photobashing, paint overs especially exposes you as a hack as well. Remember volen ck? I do

>>6259495
>Tranime pedophile spams threads and argues 24/7 on this subject
>I don't care lmao
shut the fuck up groomer

>>6259498
This is my AI art i sold as a minted NFT
pyw

>>6259498
half the ai posts are me

>>6259495
based anime poster

>>6259504
im the other half

>>6259502
>NFT
I'm not sure what you're getting at. There are scammers out there that make more money than a lot of people?NFTards scammed brainless retards even without AI, I'm not sure what you're getting at

>>6259502
This is actually cool, good AI.

>6259394
>>people like thing I don't like
People shit up the board because they're neither technologists nor artists but mentally ill teenagers desperate for attention.
>>ban it
Yes.

>How exactly do you improve by letting AI draw for you?
You don't. Luckily there's more to art then just mechanical skill, such as knowledge of composition or good taste, but this is lost on beginners.

>Truth is, no one cares about your opinion about AI or art
No one cares about your idiotic opinion, either, yet you keep coming back. Can we already agree you're starved for attention?

>animetard got BFTO
Based. Trannime not allowed here

>expectation
nonartists stealing the spotlight from real artists

>realtiy
artists getting all the chicks and dosh for the simple novelty of doing what machines can do without machine assistance while disposable proomter#88572 gets thrown in the oversatuartion trashbin

>>6259545
This wagmi

>>6259397
you need to improve your prompt

>>6259526
>No one cares about your idiotic opinion, either
i care about his opinion, you sound like an assblasted "artist" about to get replaced by a bot, pathetic little fucker, you have never done anything of worth in your entire life just so you know

>>6260098
>"can't sell my art" echoed by about 400,000 million people
the few that sold stuff
>"just improve your prompt"

>>6259433
whoever drew the vtuber bitch of your post would spit on you given the chance

>>6260112
Sounds reasonable to me.

>>6260106
if you're not an artist, why are you on this board? Oh right, you're defending your useless AI.

>>6260124
i just came here to laugh at you, i don't defend AI cause artists are not smart enough to understand what it is

>>6260127
you are an NPC with no creativity and you are ecstatic that in the future everyone will be brought down to your level, we get it, now leave us alone.

>>6260135
nah no level is lower than an artist, you are the bottom of the barrel, you contribute nothing just leeching off the government

>>6259388
Retards scamming other retards with technology neither of them understand, but know well enough to rebrand their mediocrity. It's just more NFT shit like >>6259431 says. It's not a crudely drawn monkey, it's an enN eFf teEEEee! Don't you want this jpg?

While people are trying to come up with amazing ways of applying this to medicine and technology, Mr anal buttlord here is tracing cowboys.

>>6260106
post your work cris

>>6260142
>post your work cris
still working on my prompt

>>6260139
>leeching off government
lmao

>>6259410
>get work
>job
>pay
>it's an expression, not merely a product!
choose one nigger

>>6259410
>training the AI to get better
I don't think that's how it works

>>6260139
>SIR DO NOT REDEEM THE COPYRIGHT

>>6259391
That's probably a PS mockup anon

>>6260732
its real check midjourney discord

>>6260808
ok, well good for them

>>6259388
>creating visually
he didn't create anything

>>6259388
Why is anyone worried? Lol. If people like your art then they’ll keep supporting you. Lol. They’ll gladly pay you for your “product” when they can just invest ten minutes into generating a few hundred images to choose from. Lol. Art is about money right? So from the consumers perspective AI is the right choice for commissions. Lol.
There’s nothing to worry about. Everyone who draws online is a true artist who only does it for their passion and not for easy popularity and dollaridoos. Lmao

>>6259411
I can’t figure out what most of those muscle groups are and I don’t think he cared to either

well, what can I say

>>6259388
AI THREADS CURRENTLY ALIVE ON /ic/: 22

TWENTY

FUCKING

TWO

22

XXII

二十二

KILL YOURSELF FOR MAKING ANOTHER ONE!
KILL YOURSELF IF YOU BUMP THESE THREADS!
KILL YOURSELF IF YOU ARE A USELESS JANNY WHO ALLOWS THINGS TO GET TO THIS POINT!

KILL

YOUR

SELF

>>6260826
>>6260824
>>6260752
>>6260397
>>6260393
>>6260388
>>6259388
>>6259686
>>6259244
>>6258966
>>6258310
>>6257144
>>6256450
>>6255723
>>6255852
>>6254804
>>6252892
>>6252291
>>6247885
>>6245562
>>6245315
>>6235330

>>6259388
So now I can create Art and have it transfered to canvas and sell it to everyone!!!
THIS IS AMAZING, I AM AN ARTIST, I know so many people that will pay top $$ for this stuff

>>6259403
It's artwork and critique, no one worked here. /beg/s put more work on their anime girls

>>6259391
FUCKING BASED
GET YOUR MONEY KING

the only radical thing that AI art changed is how jews dont have to commission real artists, or the same abstract hacks from their inner circle, for tax evasion.

coomshit will suffer too but that is a consequence of the cumbrain mental illness hunting for newly/randomly generated stimuli and being easily satiated by it. furfag commissions will still go unchanged, but maybe more saturated by the influx of displaced art workers, because their requests are more specific and detailed.

>>6259410
>All those replies
Are we invaded by /g/ consoomers? Or is /ic/ full of posers and /beg/ that are relieved they'll no longer have to improve?

I'm glad there are still big artists who tell it like it is, that they are not worried because their names is almost a brand or because they're financially secured but that younger generations are basically fucked.
Fuck James Gurney and all those retired boomer who tells you to "just relax" and accept being replaced by feeding us lies of how it's an opportunity.

>>6260921
>DO NOT DISCUSS THE GREATEST PARADIGM SHIFT IN ART HISTORY

>>6261054
Nobody’s fucked from ai

>>6261056
4u, nodraw.

>>6259393
>BAN THINK I HECKING DISLIKE
lmao artfags are embarrassing

>>6261077
>>>/g/
you insidious bugman

>>6261077
What are you doing here if you're not an "artfag"
Go back to your consumerist board, retard. >>>/g/

>>6261081
>>6261082
>IF YOURE NOT AGAINST THE PROGRESS OF TECHNOLOGY LIKE A BACKWARDS APE YOU DONT BELONG
kek

>>6261092
>>>/g/
nigger

>>6261092
>techfaggot is so pathetic he has to invade other boards to get any attention
Holy, kill yourself.

>>6261092
>guys we should cheer for the government funding the military for the development of this brainwashing device
>cheer for it you luddite goy, do you not enjoy progress? it's fucking new tech you backwards ape. get into this pod and control this avatar from it, you can't get out of the house anymore because it's lockdown season

>>6261092
>CAIAC19 IS NOT REAL QUIT SPREADING MISINFORMATION

>>6261092
Post your address faggot so we can play Minecraft together.

>>6261124
Glowies do NOT glow blue, meds

>>6259410
This guy can't into anatomy, he got no business giving art advices

>>6261054
there is a lot of fa/g/ tourists posting here

>>6261137
>BLOCKCHAIN NIGGERS ARENT REAL DONT LOOK TOO CLOSE AT THE PIXELS IN YOUR SCREEN

I mean if it's just plugging prompts into a generator there's obviously an upper limit as to how much quality an AI can produce, and 99% if not all of them will lack soul.
It's literally just monkeys at a typewriter trying to make Shakespeare

>>6259545
They don’t care about the spotlight. They’re pissed that AI will give most people an easy outlet to get free art instead of the only choices being begging and paying exorbitant commission prices. If only it were the spotlight that artists wanted, but it’s all about those dollaridoos to them. Even to the ones with 500k followers, Art was never anything but a paycheck.

HAHA! Anon wasted his life!

>>6261180
>exorbitant commission prices
why the fuck do you ni/g/gerfaggots believe this? most artists are charging fucking poverty rates, where the fuck did you get this idea?

Why the fuck is it always DnD with these people?
I can’t count how many times in the past week I’ve heard “wow, now I can finally generate AI art for my tabletop game!” At least change it up once in a while. How come no one’s generating art for their local family-owned restaurant, or their Mongolian basket-weaving newsletter? Jesus fucking christ.

>>6261295
This AI has no utility besides generating NFTs

>>6259410
>art is an expression not a product
>to take their job
They shouldn't care about it, after all, art is not a product, but an expression.

>>6259410
What people like this fail to realize is that AI is not copying, its getting closer and closer to thinking or being inspired by. Of AI is copying something, then so is every artist in the world.

>>6259388
Sounds more like the nft scams

>>6259388
probably fake, they sell stuff to themselves to create the illusion of demand, nft shit heads do it all the time

>>6259459
All of virgin digital applies to me, I had to go to a doctor because of the pain in my legs and eyes and I do have a hump that I fear will never go away...
Maybe I should try traditional, even sitting for too long hurts at this point.
I could even try leaving my cave to do it...
Feeling strangely inspired now, thanks anon.

>>6259411
As expected of a promptoid. Too lazy to read 6 sentences lmao

I'm about to put up some AI pieces for sale. It took me several days to filter out the gems. I think I could potentially get tens or even hundreds of thousands for these.

>using an ai to write prompts for an ai to generate images
It is over promptbros

>>6261857
>>6261861

>>6261865
I don't know why you're laughing. That dude has shit taste. I know what high-end buyers actually want.

I was browsing a thread on /pol/ about this AI stuff. Apparently half of them are concerned with the mass degradation of cultural values and the other half were indie-game-devfags
It would be pretty easy to get them to redpill the mainstream about the AI grifter scheme and everything else since Emad's friend happens to be the same dude who set a GPT AI to raid their board for an entire day

>>6261092
This is such a dumb and dishonest strawman..

>>6261177
Huh? Every single piece of art ever made, or ever will or can be made, can be defined and described by the written word down to the minutest of detail.

>>6259388
Why does everything new in the art community get barraged with seething messages? I swear it's always been this

>>6261992
Ok then describe this then
>inb4 AI paint me pixel X183 Y238 in color #28484a hex, and pixel X184 Y238 in color #28425a, and pixel[...]

>>6261715
lol

>>6259388
He literally painted it. How is everyone ignoring this, just because AI was involved they don't even read or think anymore?

no different from realism fags who take paint photos

>>6262067
Many such cases.

>>6262006
artists are a petty bunch

>>6261715
This is THE redpill.

>>6259388
People always bought cheaply made shit for too much, so what's the difference between this and someone buying a print of some stock photography?

>>6262073
And if the guy painted it, as anon claims, this is the most limp-wristed anger possible.

>>6261715
>>6262253
Quit living in sci-fi fantasies you dolts. It's "AI" in name only. Look at this image - does that look "inspired" to you?

>>6262268
you're just using a shit ai to make your point fucking lmao

>>6262270
That’s stable diffusion

>>6261861
>Feed thumbnails into AI and upscale them
>Upload them

>>6262270
I had to look it up too anon, lexica is a database of images produced with stable diffusion

>>6262270
>calling stable diffusion aka the AI artist most shilled AI shitty
It hurts itself in confusion!

>>6262026
cheese grater, wine bottle, white over-flowing giftbags, tomatoes, onions, fluffy black cat ponytail back of head scab, on a white bed in a white room, trending on artstation, by greg rutkowski

>AI generate me two children in the style of Greg Rutkowski

>>6259388
>>6259391
That painting ooks genuinely interesting, you might be onto something here AIfags

>>6261715
lol, lmao

>>6262293
Since they were hand painted by the artist, it's hard to know what the original AI reference was. This is just OP being a spurg. The fact that they're painted gives it a lot of texture that it'd likely be lacking otherwise.

>>6262303
>it's hard to know what the original AI reference was
the fuck are you on he just traced the ai art

>>6259426
I have Form From Imagination. Ask me Anything.

>>6262307
>the fuck are you on he just traced the ai art
Do you have the original AI image, or are you talking from your ass? For all I know it looks nothing like the AI image.

>>6262316
nigger he literally admitted to choose a few simple ones to copy over, are you fucking illiterate?
>For all I know it looks nothing like the AI image.
yeah it does, hundreds of pieces exactly like this are being made this second

>>6262316
instagram reply for reference, your cope is unsightly

>>6262326
Dude even needed a projector.

>>6262326
>your cope
Cope? Check the definition of that word Anon, you're using it incorrectly.
Anyway, yeah you're right, he did just trace. He could have fixed up the lips while he was fixing up the face.

You ever notice how every thread with the subject of "WOE IS ME THE AI MENACE IS COMING TO KILL ART MY CAREER IS DOOOOOOOOOOMED DX" never has the OP posting their own works?
Which means they're all made by
>A. Raiders from /g/
>B. Crabs who are looking for an excuse to be lazy, as usual
You're really selling me on this being "the future of art" with this sick demoralization campaign, guys.

>>6262338
>t. youtube artist brainwashing his neutered viewers so they keep buying his art course

>>6262338
If it were an industry wide outrage at AI, yeah, I'd be worried, but its just trolls from /g/ looking to have fun.

>>6262338
>Raiders from /g/
I'm curious what kind of effect on the art of games and movies AI will have if there IS a major push for it. Will things actually look that much better/worse? I kind of like to imagine it outright ruins the look of games and the seething that would ensue.

>>6262347
>If it were an industry wide outrage
Well you couldn't say there's been none. It seems to be an interesting mix of pessimism (this will replace us) and optimism (this will make us so much more productive). It's just a time will tell thing.

>>6262350
the more powerful these tools, the more generic the result. (Craig Mullins said this, in reference to photobashing and digital brushes, but the principle applies here) AI will ruin the art of games

>>6262338
>You ever notice how every thread with the subject of "WOE IS ME THE AI MENACE IS COMING TO KILL ART MY CAREER IS DOOOOOOOOOOMED DX" never has the OP posting their own works?
you mean like 80% of all discussion threads?

>>6259388
>Doesn't recognize the latest permutation of the century old "modern art" money laundering scheme.

>>6259468
>>6259479
Either way, "true" artists couldn't compete against him. He won.

>>6262391
I mean, you're being disingenuous, and you know you're being disingenuous. There's a lot more to the art industry than local art fairs, you know. Who draws manga? Who makes production art? Who animates your favorite characters in your favorite anime? Who designed those characters? Who painted the backgrounds? In fact, who designed the house you live in? AI is a random image generator, slightly swayed by the prompt you typed in, but ultimately you don't control it, and can never get the precision you want. It's pretty ironic, desu.

>>6259393
Cope & Seethe

>>6259410
Lol did he steal that from Isayama?

>>6260115
Hot :3

>>6262408
>Who draws manga? Who makes production art? Who animates your favorite characters in your favorite anime? Who designed those characters? Who painted the backgrounds? In fact, who designed the house you live in?
Hopefully AI will take over these fields soon :D

>>6262408
exactly no real intention behind it , no control no understanding of real composition , color , emotion , perpective etc.. just role-playing artist.

>>6259391
>That's some cool art dude, who made it?
>Thanks, an AI made it and then someone traced it onto a canvas
Imagine the disappointment, having no artistic intent behind any of the lines and features of a piece because it was made by an unfeeling robot and hand-picked by someone who simply thought it looked neat.

>>6262505
Lol artfag cope

>>6259388
>manmade horrors
https://lexica.art/?q=nude

So what's stopping AI art from just being another tool for an artist to use? I feel like I've read about people having the same attitude when photography became popular. Wouldn't it just change the type art artists create, instead of replacing all art itself?

>>6262593
photography takes skill, proompting doesn't. if everyone can do shit like in the OP then the value of art will go down. it can be a tool for actual artists but that's not addressing the elephant in the room.

>>6262535
>Lol artfag cope

>>6261142
Dafuk? Have you even bothered to look at the guys work, he's incredibly skilled

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0zL_3j_VLv0

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>6262617

>>6262611
>comes to your country
>gets 6 figure salary
what's your excuse for being a sore loser?

it's time to learn how to code
art is over
artists are dead

>>6262617
If his question is how conventional artists can stay dedicated to creating art when he has quickly become bored of creating AI art the answer is 'soul'. Perhaps there is someone who hears a call of AI art from their soul but tech developers and enthusiasts don't hear the call of art because their souls call them to tech.

Uhhhh tradchads??
I thought we were safe??

>>6262810
The “handwritten” (robot written) letters they sent to clients

>>6261180
If we had UBI 99% of art would be private and never seen by anyone but the artist's close associates. The remaining 1% being mostly marketing shit and production art.

The only reason we share art online is because we need money to buy shit and most normie jobs drastically cut down on your time and will to live. So we might as well try and make some bucks with art itself.

The drive to create art for yourself will always be there. The incentive to share it with troglodytes will not. Don't cry when all the art you're allowed to see is shit made by committee from a doctored pool of globohomo images.

>>6262794
Cringe and real

>>6262813
>The only reason we share art online is because we need money to buy shit
Maybe some people. Others, no. It depends on your personality type. For some people, fame and glory is the end goal. It’s more important than the money for them. They would share things even if we had UBI.
Already in ancient Greece and Rome you had rich playwrights and novelists who didn’t need any money, but still said things like “I hope people keep reading my writing for all eternity”.

>>6262794
He was saying that he got bored of proompting the AI to spit out pretty women and his assumption was that this is just what art felt like, to all artists.

>>6262067
Proompters are getting the axe as well
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPBtaAQ2H2Y
No one is safe

>>6262617
Well, that WOULD be the reason we stuck with it; we didn't get sick of it. It makes sense that those who didn't have a passion for creating art wouldn't suddenly get more passionate because there's another method.

>>6262067
>>6262933
Oh no the proompters are made redundant by ai... so anyway -
It does say something that drawing methods are practically publicly available to anyone, and anyone can afford paper and a pen, but still few can draw - meanwhile these guys are so desperate to hide their proompts despite it being such a grand skill. haha.

I hope AI really does kill art and I say this as a person who lives off selling trad paintings and occasional porn commissions.

This shit is soul crushing and I've put in so much fucking work just to make a mediocre living off a hobby I mostly hate. I used to like art but the amount of effort required to get good enough to sell is fucking OBSCENE, I've sacrificed 10 years of my life just to grind for 12hrs a day and I would not wish this upon anyone. I hope AI kills the need for all this, I don't give a shit if it will leave me without work, I would rather be a fucking plumber or janitor at this point than an artist.

Imagine if all this effort artists put into this useless hobby was put into becoming a doctor or engineer or physicist, the world would actually change for the better. The human brain is not efficient enough to learn to create art at a high level while also allowing time for a social life, you have to grind for thousands of hours to make it, and if you practice even slightly wrong you will have wasted hundreds of hours on nothing. This is an idiot's hobby, only a retard would do what I have done and AI art, if it takes off, will save idiots like me from ruining their lives in pursuit of a retarded dream like this.

There is no satisfaction at the end of the day, there is tossing and turning at night because you only put in 11 hours today or because a drawing you did a month ago was ugly and you cant forgive yourself for doing something so bad after putitng in so much work.

I FUCKING hate art, that pajeet Mostaque is my savior if he manages to make SD good enough.

>>6259391
>Ah, I wasted 2 fucking grand on something I could've done myself using an internet tool. Life is now fulfilling

>>6262968

pyw

>>6262968
you're the real one, king, ai is here to save us all

>>6259388
>ai will take our jerbs
>meanwhile there still isn't a face editing app that isn't a scam and doesn't require enough 3D modeling knowledge you could just make your fucking face in zbrush to begin with
I sleep

>>6262968
Well, too bad. There will always be people who dedicate their lives to drawing, no matter how good AI gets.
Art isn’t a job, it’s a destiny.

>>6262968
lol I make $6K+ a month in just 6-8 commissions I shit out in 4-6 hours each. And I'm way below average for editorial artists cause I'm lazy as fuck.
The problem isn't art, the problem is the hordes of losers who are not even fit for retail slavery thinking they could ever be anything else.
No you wouldn't be a better doctor, engineer or physicist than you are an artist. You'd still be worthless shit.

>>6262968
bag tries so hard, thinking he will even be seen as an artist using ai

>>6263078
larper vs larper lmao
fuck this shit board you are both permabegs who will never pyw

>>6263078
i believe you

>>6262968
i believe you

>>6263099
$6K guy claims industry standard rates, 12h/d guy thinks a janitor, whom commonly do work over 12 hours a day plus commutes in two shifts has it easier than artists whom mostly work from home in their pjs.

>>6262617
It is officaialylly over. get back to vvorka lads. we nned more resources foeur ouruzn e qw eolfs

>it is the year 2120.
>you're completely depressed, so you join a video game lobby.
>it is a 5v5 game
>the entire lobby are AIs mimicking humans
>they mimic speech and play the game exactly as humans
>depression.jpeg
>you quit the game because it was not interesting
>you open the TV, it is a movie about some historic war
>you know that the actors are already dead, but AI can perfectly mimic their faces and voices
>depression.png
>you turn of the TV, you lost interest
>you walk down the underground city with flying cars made by emporer Elon
>you see a bunch of artwork and a huge amount of advertising
>you fully know that each one of them could be produced by an AI
>you go back home, detached from life, feeling suicidal, you need help
>call the suicide hotline
>AI is answering the call, it is telling you that everything is OK
>you hung up the call
>you put the gun to your head
>"I hope I will be reincarnated in the year 3000 BC"

>>6263191
where the fuck is your big-titty AI wife

>>6263204
she became self-aware and prompted 6 grilion AI Chads for herself,, she dosent need me anymore. circle of lif

>>6263191
>you blow your brains out with a shotgun
>the ai monitoring system immediately calls an ambulance
>The fantastic ai surgens put you back together perfectly, good as new
you didn't think you were getting out of it that easy did you?

>>6263265
I mean, suicide is a crime since your as a citizen be govemnent proprety

>>6263265
>he kills himself
>he wakes up in the real world
>he’s just a brain in the jar
>ai overlords put him back into the simulation

>>6263265
>they put you back together *just enough* to keep you alive but keep running experiments with your vegetable body to further their knowledge of the human body

>>6263191
That's not even the worst of it; they will upload your consciousness so that you will live eternally in a digital hellscape where a drag queen story session will last for millions of years

Bros i'm starting to see these weird Nick Land pictures spread around my neighborhood for a while now. Feel like im being gangstalked by CAIAC19.. i am unable to sleep at night due to the binary noises coming from the bluetooth tower can anyone help me i don't think i xoxmx

>>6263168
This image makes promptcels seethe.

It's over. Get a real job.

>>6263558
> trannie vegitable cries about everybody has a job and he doesn't

>>6262505
>>6262970
something something about rich people not actually caring about how good it is, they only care about the exclusivity of it.
honestly fuck it, exploit those rich bastards

>>6262970
>people who buy art waste their money
SAY IT AiNT SO ANON

I wonder what would happen if someone posted African-styled AI art on twitter while using a bright skinned pajeet as profile pic, maybe also make some posts saying people bought It either. Hahaha the repercussions would be kinda funny...

>>6260142

>>6263765
Holy shit wait up this might just work kek
[Someone] will out this little experiment on AI art to see how well it crashes face to face with the existence of cultures

>>6263765
>>6263817
this will just get you doxxed and account probably removed for racismsz.

The new AI model is trained on danbooru

Sound the red alarm and let the twitter japs be mindful of where their art is stored

>>6259388
People already spend millions on Pollock. It was over a century ago.

This is how portrait painters felt when the camera was invented.

Your days are numbered, art*sts. Count them well.

>>6264011
>camera shoot this photo in the style that portrait painter Greg Rutkowski
Cope

>>6263982
sauce on first two

>>6264043
anime girl, blonde, boob, Greg Rutkowski, F95

>>6264011
10000, 9999

>>6262783
>brought into your country on HB1
>to get paid lower than the average American at the same job
lol pajeets are such cucks.

>>6263982
What model?

>>6264014
>*click*
>*prooompt*

>>6262810
jesus this is disgusting
like having a chatbot stay in touch with your friends for you.

>>6264163
Without student debt and with a much less inflated ego, that slightly lower salary is more than enough for them to live well and send some back home.
Same for africans and latinos.
That's why they keep getting brought here while your autismbucks grow thinner every four years.

>>6264195
>unchecked mass immigration to lower local wages is a good thing!!!
absolute state of modern leftists

>>6264195
As a latino you're just turning your country in south america. This same costs>people favoritism mindset will get you replaced by robots instead of just brown people down the line

>>6264197
>>6264208
You're both assuming that's not the goal.
Companies already pay 83% of the revenue and billions in lobbying. The government wants that to be 100% when literally nobody can afford to work and they're "forced" to tax machines to subsidize people. Then the government will get to decide who gets to continue living as bug eating pod meat and who doesn't even get to eat.

>>6263982
Why does none of it look particularly japanese? It all has that disney inspired feel to me.

>>6264218
>pod meat
Cockroachmilkbros we were outclassed...

>>6264231
The model is a chimera with stable diffusion, it wasn't made from scratch. It basically can do anime but unless you really specify it like references (draw by artists) the thing is going to draw from the tons of photorealisitic imagery already in SD

>>6264235
>Even the AI can't compete with jap genes

>>6260139
everything you consoom is made by artists, you retarded mongrel

>>6264299
good thing i'm not a cartoon watching manchildren

>everything you consoom is made by artists
no they were made by engineers, there's a reason no one respects you artist retards

I wonder if AI will has already picked these type of photos

>>6264324
esl retard.

>>6264324
>Don't watch movies
>Don't watch TV shows
>Don't listen to music
>Don't read books
>Don't play games
>Don't go to art galleries
>Just drive car and use computer
You sound fun.

>>6264324
Pajeet, are you retarded? what is this cope? you aren't consooming cartoons, but you are consooming art unless you are a hermit living in a forest. whether you watch movies, or listen to music, or admire nice looking architectural pieces
>no they were made by engineers, there's a reason no one respects you artist retards
I'm not an artist, I wish I were an artist. I'm only here to give you retards a wake up call. no one likes tech faggots, I've worked for 3 years as a QA software tester, and you niggers get offended when bugs are found in your spaghetti copy pasted code. your ego is paper thin, and you're all fat ugly unwashed cunts

>>6264358
musicians and writers aren't artists, their craft actually have some values

>>6264363
>I'm not an artist
sure you're not, you're probably drawing shitty porn on twitter for 50 cents a piece, not a tech guy either so don't bother @ me

>faggots who scribbles garbage trying to lump themselves in with writers and philosophers
i will never not laugh

>>6264358
>Don't go to art galleries
NTA but literally no one does that

>>6264370
>sure you're not, you're probably drawing shitty porn on twitter for 50 cents a piece, not a tech guy either so don't bother @ me
it seems you cannot cope with the fact that there are non-artists out there who aren't siding with you. "no, if he's against me, he's gotta be an artist". retard
>musicians and writers aren't artists, their craft actually have some values
you're one of the most low IQ retards in the world. in terms of difficulty: aural art like music > visual art like painting/drawing/architecture > writing. And it's all art. also, AI music is trash as well, cope and rope faggot. all tech retards seem to somehow end up delving into crypto scams as well. just soulless bugmen to the core

>>6264370
>musicians and writers aren't artists, their craft actually have some values
But directors, animators and game developers are? Pick and choose anon.
Well they're already making a music AI and a writing AI has already been developed, it likely just needs a larger dataset. Have fun having your passions destroyed by AI in the future too anon.

>faggots who scribbles garbage trying to lump themselves in with writers and philosophers
>i will never not laugh
Someone sure is salty.

>>6264370
>philosophers
how is philosophy art?

>>6264376
>in terms of difficulty: aural art like music > visual art like painting/drawing/architecture > writing
>because i said so

sorry it doesn't work that way, you being intellectually deficient doesn't change that buddy.

artists are talentless bunch who can't make it in science and art are essentially completely worthless, end of the story.

>>6264372
You've never gone to an art gallery?

>>6264379
>But directors, animators and game developers are?
these are just cogs in the machine for the dosh but i admire their craft because it actually takes some brain power

>>6264385
No one has

>>6264395
You're right, it's just cases of mass delirium.

>>6264384
>sorry it doesn't work that way, you being intellectually deficient doesn't change that buddy.
because it's obvious that it is so, you street shitter
>artists are talentless bunch who can't make it in science and art are essentially completely worthless, end of the story.
that's funny, because normgroids and nose picking scum like you who browse ars technica every day always seem to claim that it's inherent talent that makes artists great, not skill. you're a dog brained retard
>who can't make it in science and art are essentially completely worthless, end of the story
most people don't want to make it into science. the global opinion on scientists has decreased quite a bit with the vaxx. i'd tread lightly if I were you. most "science" is hogwash that's not needed for humanity. only some of the base stuff like medicine and its requirements like electricity. the gimmicks, the quirks tech retards are trying to sell in our modern day tend to be useless unneeded garbage, and ironically enough that you've mentioned them, philosophers tend to point out how through technological advancement, we have made our lives more difficult instead of easier

>>6264384
>art is shit
>because I say so
sorry it doesn't work that way, you being intellectually deficient doesn't change that buddy

>>6264402
>because it's obvious that it is so, you street shitter
nice argument as expected from a sub 50 iq artist
>that's funny, because normgroids and nose picking scum like you who browse ars technica every day always seem to claim that it's inherent talent that makes artists great, not skill. you're a dog brained retard
if you weren't so angry you would have made a better projection but no, i don't think anyone who claims themselves to be artists have any talent whatsoever
>most people don't want to make it into science. the global opinion on scientists has decreased quite a bit with the vaxx. i'd tread lightly if I were you. most "science" is hogwash that's not needed for humanity. only some of the base stuff like medicine and its requirements like electricity. the gimmicks, the quirks tech retards are trying to sell in our modern day tend to be useless unneeded garbage, and ironically enough that you've mentioned them, philosophers tend to point out how through technological advancement, we have made our lives more difficult instead of easier
that's because science has been used as a tool for political clout, but when you get down to technicalities science requires intelligence and competency, a far cry from art

>>6264407
>nice argument as expected from a sub 50 iq artist
I'm not an artist but keep calling me that lmao. I wish I were, it would definitely put me a step above you
>if you weren't so angry you would have made a better projection but no, i don't think anyone who claims themselves to be artists have any talent whatsoever
true, because "talent" doesn't exist. but again, it's normgroids like you who push for AI to believe that. they think themselves as "creative" but don't have any "art gifts". you're just a confused soulless bugman
>that's because science has been used as a tool for political clout, but when you get down to technicalities science requires intelligence and competency, a far cry from art
KEK, imagine unironically believing this. holy shit, you really are retarded. most science isn't needed, and a lot of scientists are fucking retards. it's a skill like any other, and having a skill doesn't automatically make you "intelligent". why don't you tell me what your job is instead, and I can share you mine afterwards :). I want to know with what kind of "intelligent" being I'm speaking with

>>6264407
>that's because science has been used as a tool for political clout
it's because retards like you think you're above anyone else who isn't a "scientist" or a "science lover". artist or non-artist, it seems you believe that if you're not a scientist that means you must be some kind of lower life form

>>6264413
>I'm not an artist but keep calling me that lmao. I wish I were, it would definitely put me a step above you
glad you're not refuting the sub 50 iq part, i guess it's just too obvious for that
>true, because "talent" doesn't exist. but again, it's normgroids like you who push for AI to believe that. they think themselves as "creative" but don't have any "art gifts". you're just a confused soulless bugman
yea it does exist its called IQ, some people are naturally brighter than others and most artists are at the lower end of this axis
>KEK, imagine unironically believing this. holy shit, you really are retarded. most science isn't needed, and a lot of scientists are fucking retards. it's a skill like any other, and having a skill doesn't automatically make you "intelligent".
the fact that they graduated from science schools and colleges with difficult exams that require logical thinking automatically makes them not retards, so your point is moot

>why don't you tell me what your job is instead, and I can share you mine afterwards :). I want to know with what kind of "intelligent" being I'm speaking with
how is this related to the topic? everyone knows whatever my job is you would just start throwing random generalizing insults at it. and you do realize whatever i claim to do, i have no way of backing it up just like you right? the fact you're asking this on 4chan just shows how low IQ you are as expected from an artist enabler

>>6264414
>it's because retards like you think you're above anyone else who isn't a "scientist" or a "science lover". artist or non-artist, it seems you believe that if you're not a scientist that means you must be some kind of lower life form
it's almost like objective values are more valued than made up values from autists who scribble all day

>>6259391
Looking dope

I hate indians so much.

>>6264420
>glad you're not refuting the sub 50 iq part, i guess it's just too obvious for that
how can you refute an insult, you dog brained mongrel?
>yea it does exist its called IQ, some people are naturally brighter than others and most artists are at the lower end of this axis
not only do you not understand what IQ is, you pull shit straight out of your ass.
>the fact that they graduated from science schools and colleges with difficult exams that require logical thinking automatically makes them not retards, so your point is moot
my best friend has graduated med uni last year, and he was in the top 100 or so students in his entire country post graduation for that year. he definitely doesn't agree with you, and from the stories he told me about his fellow graduates, they seem to be common retards like everyone else. also understanding and learning art also requires logical thinking, artists do not function like a printer machine. it takes far more brain power to become a competent artist than a code monkey retard. and composing good music is even harder than drawing/painting.
>how is this related to the topic? everyone knows whatever my job is you would just start throwing random generalizing insults at it. and you do realize whatever i claim to do, i have no way of backing it up just like you right? the fact you're asking this on 4chan just shows how low IQ you are as expected from an artist enabler
so you're a code monkey or a mcdonalds worker. got it.
>it's almost like objective values are more valued than made up values from autists who scribble all day
those autists who "scribble" will always be your betters, and more appreciated as individuals than a no named no faced faggot behind some shitty AI. the only reason you're here is envy, and huffing on hopium that one day you'll be good as artists are with 0 effort put into it. cope and rope already

>>6259388
>Until I developed a bit of a style
>I
how can normalfags be this deluded, holy fuck I can see it already, a whole generation of self entitled talentless social media influencer types who will start calling themselves artists and selling ai pictures to their orbiters. The future is bleak

>>6264428
>my best friend has graduated med uni last year, and he was in the top 100 or so students in his entire country post graduation for that year. he definitely doesn't agree with you, and from the stories he told me about his fellow graduates, they seem to be common retards like everyone else. also understanding and learning art also requires logical thinking, artists do not function like a printer machine.
yeah your imagery best friend sure said that, sorry the average Joe in MIT is like 100 points higher in IQ than your average artist.
>it takes far more brain power to become a competent artist than a code monkey retard. and composing good music is even harder than drawing/painting.
heard this schizo shit first time you said it, good thing literally no ones believe that but braindead artists
>so you're a code monkey or a mcdonalds worker. got it.
nah i work for elon musk making 6 figures
>those autists who "scribble" will always be your betters, and more appreciated as individuals than a no named no faced faggot behind some shitty AI. the only reason you're here is envy, and huffing on hopium that one day you'll be good as artists are with 0 effort put into it. cope and rope already
sorry to break it to you but artists are looked down upon by society leaders and reasonable intelligent people know that artists have nothing of worth to offer to the world. saying you are an artist is an equivalent of saying you are a tax thief where i'm from

nice artist wojak btw

>>6264428
>it takes far more brain power to become a competent artist than a code monkey retard
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA You don't actually believe that

>>6264433
Not that other anon, but what's the issue with artists? Regardless of your opinion on their intelligence, what's to hate about a pretty picture?

average art consoomer

>>6264436
duh. everyone can become a code monkey in 2 years you fat retard. I fucking did it after 3 years of CS uni, and dropped it because it's soulless bugman shit. how can I believe it, when I have personal experience in it lmao
>yeah your imagery best friend sure said that, sorry the average Joe in MIT is like 100 points higher in IQ than your average artist.
sorry, I can't help you with your delusion
>heard this schizo shit first time you said it, good thing literally no ones believe that but braindead artists
obviously, because retarded monkeys like you think it's governed by "talent"
>nah i work for elon musk making 6 figures
HOLY SHIT HAHAHAHA. as usual, crank magnetism is a real thing. like poetry
>sorry to break it to you but artists are looked down upon by society leaders and reasonable intelligent people know that artists have nothing of worth to offer to the world. saying you are an artist is an equivalent of saying you are a tax thief where i'm from
and where are you from? some shithole that first world countries outsource from I bet. it doesn't matter what you think or what you say, the matter of fact is that you consoom the work of artists whether you like to admit it or not. and without them, you'll just play with your dick in the sand

>>6264442
that's what normgroids and AI users think that art is. they think that pissing in a spaghetti can is art, just like they believe that someone winning a literal who art contest with stolen content signifies a huge advancement for AI art

>>6264439
do you expect a straight answer for that retard? for real now, he's envious that artists are better at creating the things he's consuming. his entire brain is governed by envy. envy and being a liar, are the ugliest characteristics a person can have. it turns you into a wretched, pathetic creature

with 35 minutes in clip studio you get something sellable.
Embrace change.

>>6264439
nothing's wrong with a pretty pic but being snobby for drawing it is just weird to me, anyone can draw anything and scam people with it, i find the whole practice disingenuous

>>6264446
>I fucking did it after 3 years of CS uni, and dropped it because it's soulless bugman shit.
sure you did, this is the problem with art consoomer, they don't work on logic and feel no need to prove themselves logically on whatever they are on, because they are to used to expecting people to believe their delusions
>obviously, because retarded monkeys like you think it's governed by "talent"
literally never said that, another projection from the low iq anon
>and where are you from? some shithole that first world countries outsource from I bet. it doesn't matter what you think or what you say, the matter of fact is that you consoom the work of artists whether you like to admit it or not. and without them, you'll just play with your dick in the sand
more gibberish as always, did you run out of funny wojaks? i see now that artists are completely obsolete you have begun to lose your mind

no matter what you say artists have been, and will always be useless pieces of garbage that plague our society, and earn too much for doing literally nothing of worth (good thing this is starting to change with ai art, as artists are now coders).

>>6264453
>twisted torso, chest pointing directly to the left , hips pointing forwards.
you're definitely not selling that to me, scammer

>>6264452
>he's envious that artists are better at creating the things he's consuming
another projection, i'm consuming zero art

>>6264453
I've never minded the use of AI, but I find just using AI by itself not only a bit tactless (given how the AI was made and that still needs to be sorted out legally), but it's often not all that good.

Small changes can make them great, but those small blemishes are painfully obvious. I think the issue is that those small changes require a bit of drawing talent itself, so the average AI guy can't do it. Every time I've asked a proompter to edit one and show it (since they claim it's so easy) they refuse.

>>6264458
>sure you did, this is the problem with art consoomer, they don't work on logic and feel no need to prove themselves logically on whatever they are on, because they are to used to expecting people to believe their delusions
cope bitch. I have no reasons to lie
>no matter what you say artists have been, and will always be useless pieces of garbage that plague our society, and earn too much for doing literally nothing of worth (good thing this is starting to change with ai art, as artists are now coders).
as predicted, you are a deluded code monkey. you're seething that they make money having fun, while you make money being miserable. oops, owwie. you're going to live the rest of your life like this, no one thinks coders are artists other than coders
>another projection, i'm consuming zero art
that's because you're lying to yourself that music is not art among other shit like that. it's circular logic, from an "intelligent scientist" like yourself :).

>>6264458
>nothing's wrong with a pretty pic but being snobby for drawing it is just weird to me, anyone can draw anything and scam people with it, i find the whole practice disingenuous
Well, there are snobs everywhere, but yeah, more so in the creative industry, they seem to often forget that art is frivolous and not a necessity. Not so sure about anyone being able to draw, since half the argument for AI is how it "democratises" art - as if it wasn't something anyone could give a go - anyone can pick up a pencil, but it definitely takes dedication to get good enough to make decent art.
Also not sure what you mean by 'scamming people', do you think it's wrong to monetise your talents?

>>6264458
>no matter what you say artists have been, and will always be useless pieces of garbage that plague our society, and earn too much for doing literally nothing of worth (good thing this is starting to change with ai art, as artists are now coders).
after work and even during work people listen to music, watch movies, check out their favorite artists on social media, buy figurines to play with their board games, go to concerts, visit theaters etc. I mean you're seething right now and the seething is clouding your mind, but you're definitely self aware that you're full of shit lmao. that's very funny to me, and what's funnier is that nothing will fundamentally change and you'll forever seethe that you're destined to be an uninteresting faggot til you die

>>6264471
>cope bitch. I have no reasons to lie
i accept your concession
>as predicted, you are a deluded code monkey. you're seething that they make money having fun, while you make money being miserable. oops, owwie. you're going to live the rest of your life like this, no one thinks coders are artists other than coders
i know what your job is anon you're doing projecting for living, the amount of projections you shit out on me during this brief exchange is mind blowing. i don't code, and as you know i consider being called an artist an insult in the first place, i have no reason to call coders artists if i was one. there's no one in my community would take pride in being called an artist, they would rather be called an incel, though most of the same time those 2 are the same thing.
>>6264471
>that's because you're lying to yourself that music is not art among other shit like that. it's circular logic, from an "intelligent scientist" like yourself :).
labels don't matter then, construct your own definition of art just like your gender and apply "visual art" to when i refer to art itt all you want, but yeah music isnt art according to mine

>>6264480
>labels don't matter then, construct your own definition of art just like your gender and apply "visual art" to when i refer to art itt all you want, but yeah music isnt art according to mine
the only reason you believe that music isn't art, is to tell yourself that you don't enjoy art. you're a fucking retard, end of. you bring IQ into discussion, you're doing a disservice to the entire concept

>seething that artists earn to much (they don't)
>somehow this also makes them a plague on society, despite their marketing being evidence that society requires their services
one thing is for certain, the ESL fag is not an economist

>>6264483
>the only reason you believe that music isn't art, is to tell yourself that you don't enjoy art. you're a fucking retard, end of. you bring IQ into discussion, you're doing a disservice to the entire concept
sorry you're too dumb to realize this whole discussion around ai art has got nothing to do with music, even this thread started by someone posting people buying an ai painting, dumb scribblers trying to lump in with other worthwhile crafts is just unsightly

>>6264488
>>seething that artists earn to much (they don't)
any drawing that sells more than three fiddy is too much

>>6264489
>drawing/painting is art therefore it's worthless
>it's not science therefore it's worthless
>music is also not science, but it's not worthless for no given reason
>music is also not art, apparently
>music is suddenly a worthwhile craft for no reasons given, despite not being science, but it's also not art
brainlet retard. god knows what's inside your skull
>any drawing that sells more than three fiddy is too much
"because I feel like it, because artists makes me seethe since I'm envious of them". how long will you seethe here, code monkey? you could be grabbing a pencil and cure your envy

>>6264494
>projection
>projection
>projection
>projection
>projection
literally never made any claim that anything that's not science is worthless, i only used science as a comparison piece. should have known since art consoomers are always retarded like >>6264442

also the brainlet is redundant when you got the retard, you know you're being mad cause i'm telling the truth

>>6264498
you don't even know what projection means. i think you meant to say "strawman", and it's not even that because you admitted these things yourself.

>>6264505
holy shit those were absolutely projections, you are not only dumb but you're also a newfag? can't say i'm surprised, get the fuck back to twitter retard no one wants your kind here

>>6259418
I wanted to be one and failed, so now you must fail too

>>6264421
Consensus is not objective and hasn't been since Galileo.

>>6264453
>with 35 minutes in clip studio you get something
That still looks like 30 million other pictures in the web.
Nobody but the absolute dregs buy clip art. That's the market for this shit. Autists with a "vision" will still spend thousands hiring an artist to do exactly what they want because they don't actually know what that it and aren't able to communicate it in a way that software understands.

even redditors don't need artists anymore

>>6265777
>r/dalle2

this little redditor generated his hotsauce label with ai. ai content being applied to real life products and services is already happening!

>>6265785
cope and seethe sir

>>6259392
:)

>>6265787
looks like they just printed out a sticker and slapped it onto some bottles
how come there's no text on it? no manufacturer, product name, ingredients etc...?

>>6264511
you don't know what a projection is. what does being a "newfag" have to do with anything here?also
>>/g/ cockroach who admitted he's here just to shit on artists tell others that "no one wants your kind here". you deserve to be curbstomped you subhuman bugman

>>6264511
you don't know what a projection is you fucking retard. it's obvious what a braindead mongrel you are because you're the same deluded psychopath who believes that the commissioners are actually the artists. that's how hard your pedo brain seethes at the fact that you're a failed artist. what does being a "newfag" have to do with anything here? Also
>>>/g/ cockroach who admitted he's here just to shit on artists tells others that "no one wants your kind here". you deserve to be curbstomped you subhuman pedo bugman

>>6265789
m-more?

>>6265777
Is that the cleaned up image? It looks like stock art or clip art, it's pretty ugly. Why use AI art and go through the effort if you're going to be so bland with it.

>>6265787
Has his hot sauce got blueberries and raspberries in it? If not, why the fuck are they featured prominently on his label - which is also wordless and gives no information other than having a piece of art.

I feel like AI art is going to put us in an era of incredibly shitty designs, based on these two, from people who think they're more talented than they are. They can't draw, and they can't design, but AI has given them false confidence.

>>6266381
>I feel like AI art is going to put us in an era of incredibly shitty designs, based on these two, from people who think they're more talented than they are. They can't draw, and they can't design, but AI has given them false confidence.
that's my biggest issue with AI lmao. this shit and crypto are the biggest Dunning Kruger examples I've ever witnessed.
I wanted to comment on those bottles too, what the fuck is that design? maybe it's some kind of blueberry syrup or something, but the label makes me think it's poisonous

>>6265777
>>6265787
These people were probably not commissioning artists to begin with.

>>6266600
There's talk about how all the jobs designing album covers for little indie bands has dried up as they've all moved to AI art - not sure how true that is, but if it is true, that shows that there are jobs disappearing even if it's just from the cheapo assholes.

>>6266584
>but the label makes me think it's poisonous
To be fair, skulls, grim reapers, radiation symbols, all that sorta shit is very popular on hot sauce bottles. Not sure why the grim reaper is in a lush forest with berries though.

>>6259416
>useful
art has no use, AI removes the only redeeming quality of art.

>>6265777
Holy shit he actually made the face worse compared to the original.
The AI face was on the right track and he made it worse.
I am so fucking angry that our planet is going to be flooded with this shit by people who can’t fucking draw.

>>6266617
I already pissed that this shit is showing up in Pinterest, It's fucking up my ability to gather normal reference and it's only going to get worse. I dunno if i can handle this coming tidal wave of mindless sewer trash.

>>6266605
Album covers are not a good indicator of the state of artist job availability. The absolute bottom of the totem pole jobs will dry up but there's so many charlatans there to begin with that it doesn't matter if you step back and view the whole picture.

https://twitter.com/didyouknowgamin/status/1337842718731431936

>>6266623
>tfw saved thousands of reference pictures, poses, textures, themes, ideas, everything, and labeled them like an autist for years, each in their own appropriate folder

>>6266625
what a cheapskate, isn't he fucking popular too?

>>6266615
>art has no use
>spend tremendous effort to steal it for profit, because it totally has no use
who are you fooling, pedo

Why would you buy something you can proompt and print out yourself

>>6261142
this is what Dunning Kruger looks like

>>6266639
why should I proompt ugly garbage, when I can pay someone for better quality

>>6266636
Making money is not a use, art has value precisely because it was made by a human, once you take that away it has both no use and no value. This tech is exclusively for people seeking to make money yet its existence will destroy any money it seeks to gain. It will regress the standard of art and it destroys value so what purpose does it serve?

>>6266646
That's my point. Why pay someone to proompt ugly garbage when you could do it yourself for free.

>>6266627
I'm just going to go back to art books pre 2022, the internet is dead. It's probably already 90% AI bullshit anyway.

>>6266654
i assume only boomers who don't know how to use a PC would buy such a thing

>>6266655
the internet has definitely been fucked. i'm not surprised if social media is half bots at this point. I wanna go back to the 2000's

>>6266625
>>6266633
I can't wait for AI music to be a bigger thing. Fuck those hypocrites.

>>6266659
Internet is bad for you anyway, just be glad you got to enjoy it while it still had value.

>>6266662
musicians already got fucked years ago, there's already no money there and its going to get worse.

>>6266657
This is true but it's because the models aren't optimized for braindead people right now. Any day from now Google release their imwge AI as an app with only two buttons and a prompt and make AI popular even with kindergarten toddlers

>>6259388
WAIT, we can make money from these AI prints? Wtf are you anon's doing? Make some AI art, sell it, and then actually draw while you continue to make money off of work that took you maybe 30 minutes to generate. Repeat it enough times and then quit your day job and draw full time while still selling art prints to boomers. Win win.

>>6266676
You don't get rich by competing over scraps. These random odd jobs are what starving artists do, I don't know why you retards are getting jealous over the art equivalent of cleaning toilets.

>>6262810
>>6262811
that could explain how they got the election voting drama to happen couple years ago

>>6266605
the op said its blueberry reaper, so it was intentional to put berries on the label

>>6266676
this is pajeet third world levels of thinking
>WAIT wtf you can make money playing axie infinity video game? why not do that while working your real job?! win win!!