/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6254894
Find another hobby.

how can I get good as an AI artist? What is your favourite one? Maybe I can study his work and prompts

rate my AI prompt.

>>6254898
doesn't really look leyendeckery. where are the brush strokes? the shapes? 1/10

>>6254900
Well, the premium one might gives better result. Now rate Caravaggio.

No you didn't. Enough of the shitting up the board with pointless demoralization threads.

Ban AI threads.

>>6254898
>>6254903
>>6254910
What's your obsession with Henry Cavill? Why make all the pictures of him?

>>6254915
>No you didn't. Enough of the shitting up the board with pointless demoralization threads.
>Ban AI threads.
as if the jannies arent in on it lmao

>>6254918
He's the most recognizable image in the data set. The rest of actors produce literal shit.

>>6254894
He will get fired, want some proof?
Hey, bro >>6254898
Can you rotate his head so he's facing directly at the camera in this photo you have provided us?

>>6254942
like this?

>>6254898
he even has the fucked up Joss Whedon's justice league lip

>>6254946
No, i want this exact picture >>6254898 but i want him to face the camera full frontal view like this picture >>6254903

>>6254935
>The rest of actors produce literal shit.
You can't simply prompt "A handsome man 1930 poster" or whatever else?

>>6254946
HA!

>>6254954
You're aware that this is a feature that's actively being worked on and will be available in at most a couple months? Select part of an image, specify what you want to change ("character facing the camera straight-on"), and generate.

>>6254946
nice baby

>>6254958
I don't care if it's in development, your inability to provide proves my point. You would get fired over this.

>>6254965
do you not have the ability to think ahead a bit and acknowledge that your 'point' will be irrelevant even a couple months into the future? where will you shift the goalposts next?

>>6254955
no

>>6254967
>a couple months into the future?
Do you understand how computers work? It does not matter if you can rotate his head in like two months, there will always be a limit, sweet pie.
Unless Ai starts working over fully articulated 3D models with the capability of emulating lens distortion and optical illusions, you will never possess the skill set of a real artist.

How long will it take for AI to reach that level? Months? Years? Decades?
And even if AI could do all of that, can it "stick" to a certain style and output pics in that same style?
AI at the moment is just a toy. It's not even good as a sketch tool because it gives you a fully fleshed picture, it's literally just a toy for people to play with and generate things they imagine. This whole drama about replacing artists is sheer ignorance, it's like saying google translate will replace real-life translators.

>>6254894
post his artstation pls

>>6254967
>just two more weeks
haha cope and seethe, pa/g/t

I'm not an artist but I posted a concept art I generated with AI to see what would happen and 30 minutes or so later I received a job offer to create characters for a video game.

>>6255116
*I posted on Artstation

>>6255117
pyw bro

>>6255116
Did you mention that you were using AI? I wonder if that's just how many jobs are available right now, or if that AI piece was impressive, or if that was scam?

I've come back to /ic/ after a few years and it's wild how pervasive and incredibly boring these AI threads are. It would be nice if there was an AI board to move it away from here, it was contained to a single general or just outright banned.

I understand the argument of it being called 'art' however the other half of this board is critique, you can't really critique an AI generated image. they would be waiting for the developers to improve the AI.

>>6255123
correct, mods are useless. even if the AI apocalypse weren't currently underway, you would be able to tell by the fact that this board is flooded with generals

>>6254903
The light areas look overexposed, form doesn't look properly rendered. The fill light in the shadows is far too saturated for Caravaggio.

>>6255123
Agreed, even though AI should be discussed on here, it's gotten ridiculous. Most of the threads and posts are just bait anyway.

>>6255120
>>6255121
Didn't mention it, it was for remote work on a small Disney game and they just wanted proof of experience and examples of creating characters. I guess with a more advanced version of the AI I could have totally fooled them. Personally I'm not interested at all to get a job in art, it was just an experiment but you can be sure that beggars will flood the market eventually.

>>6255147
>they just wanted proof of experience and examples of creating characters.
This isn't something that can really be faked by AI, the experience obviously, but also designing a character - there's a lot more to it then simply have a fully formed character just appear as well as industry standards for showing such things.

>you can be sure that beggars will flood the market eventually.
this is really gonna fuck with recruiters, so that is at least one good thing.

>>6254903
Hey, this is great, can you just fix the hand real quick?

>>6254898
This is coming along nicely, good job! Can you give him a normal shirt collar and some buttons, though? Just use what he was wearing in the reference picture we sent you, thanks.

(4shyt lol)

>>6254967
Where’s my self driving car?
Why do companies still hire human translators?
AI hasn’t put a single industry totally out of work yet, it’s always “give us 5 more years”. Why are you so sure that art is going to be the first industry that totally falls? And in a few months, no less?

>>6254894
AI will replace you and you will accept it because you choose complaining instead of drawing.