/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Machines will never have juicy soles.

>>6250295
I've seen some AI feet. There is no way AI threatens foot art before AGI.

>>6250302
humans have a monopoly on the lewd. Let the machines be machines, and humans be animals

Human beings may not be perfect, but a computer program with search engine theft algorithms is hardly the answer to art.

>>6250309
bada-based

>>6250309
what does it steal exactly?

>>6250318
>what does it steal exactly?
how do you think art ai works exactly, anon?

>>6250323
i don't know, but you claim it steals, explain how

>>6250327

>>6250330
this doesn't prove it steals anything
you have your own definition of theft apparently

>>6250330
finally someone gets it
this isnt isnt "AI" its fucking algos photobashing based on certain parameters
and any advancement in quality is just these sleezebags scraping the internet to create a massive dataset
literally nothing improved in the tech side of things besides scraping art they shouldnt have

>>6250335
>5.8 billion image dataset
>filled with copyrighted property
>not theft
and you're a plenty smart fella

>>6250339
these AItrannies can't cope anymore. They keep making new threads to avoid any real discussion

>>6250343
its /ic/
this place has more mentally ill retards than 99% of the site
this includes also a large chunk of twitter/reddit tier shitters form the fujos, oc, and dad threads

>>6250343
there are no words theft or steal in the text
even plagiarism is used cautiously with "akin to" attached to it

>>6250352
I hope one day amazon makes a digital tulpa by datamining your e-footprint of you too

>>6250293
honestly can't wait for an Open source "game creation AI" to be trained on old gen platforms and new stuff and see how well they generate "new" games

>>6250360

>>6250308
this shit is so obviously traced over a model tho

https://youtu.be/RsfzS4T8mf0

Scumbag makes 5k a month off of midjourney

>>6250381
He makes 0. It's clickbait.

Is animation the way to go now if you still want to work with art? I'm not a doomer but it's clear people will be hiring artists less and less over the next few years. Animation on the other hand will probably take a long time until AI catches on, if it even is possible.

>>6250345
It was already obvious the thing was just photobashing, now, it's not bad, I won't even say "it's not art", but it's hardly going to make for mass consumption.

>>6250381
Wait until 100 or 200 copycats appear, but that's ok, it's another market, funnily enough, there is also artists who get revenue for doing hand-made stuff at Youtube despite 3D printers and CAD:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wxFbfjeHyg

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y_FHn6-J1YQ

Or illustrations for that matter, despite Wacom and Photoshop:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s2GlIeQnkDM

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OM6MPIMeCws

>>6250293
You don't even have your own thoughts unless someone programs you to parrot that, lol

>>6250406
you will definitely be a lot more secure, especially with 2d animation. Learn Japanese while you're at it too, they have 400+ animation studios in Tokyo alone

>>6250406
are you genuinely that naive?

>>6250406
watch the news, it's not that far off
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9O-XgkXcP3o

AI will never take away what gives SOVL to MS Paint drawings. :3

>>6250293
>die in 1 hit

>>6250373
We already have ubisoft

>>6250308
You'd think they would also have a monopoly on getting ankles in the right places.

>>6250442
Kek

>>6250378
at least they draw unlike you