/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6249236
Cool so everyone uses AI art and he ends up in and draw

i see a comment right fucking there dipshit

im crying

>>6249236
>AI will never measure to real art
>STOP SUBMITTING AI ART ITS REAL UNFAIR WHEN THEY WIN

>>6249236
>AI is crappy art which will never amount to real art created by us real artists!
>NOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T JUST HECKING SUBMIT AI RELATED ART TO AN ART COMPETITION IT'S SUPER UNFAIR BECAUSE IT'LL BEAT US REAL ARTIRINOOS NOOOOOOO
The seethe and cope is so great they're becoming disturbed and delirious.

>>6249252
>>6249249
Is it just me or ai trannies are always trannime posters?

>>6249254
It's just you and it's rent free.

>>6249254
trannies are busy spamming blacked threads of /gif/ and /pol/

>>6249236
This guy probably won between $200-$300 for first place

>>6249284
It was closer to $1000. Art has changed forever. Right now digitards are experiencing what is possibly the biggest cope of their entire lives. They have been made obsolete in a blink of an eye by forces beyond their control, just like portrait painters during the dawn of the mass-produced photograph.

>>6249500
AI art before the 2020s was the equivalent of modern trans people; botched and unappealing abominations that fooled nobody besides those who willed themselves to be fooled. This is different. This is the equivalent of troon fantasy tier magical sex transformations in their tranime where a man is transformed, bone structure and all, into a female. People are already winning art competitions with AI art. It's all downhill from here

>>6249510
$750. Also he was in the photo manipulation section, which is what the ai art is. The ai doesn't create anything, it just photobashes stolen art.

>>6249513
Holy shit this tranny analogy is unironically the most precise commentary about the art scenario I've seen

>>6249284
He was competing versus 3 other people unironically

>>6249254
shalom shabbot

>>6249513
>AI art before the 2020s was the equivalent of modern trans people; botched and unappealing abominations that fooled nobody besides those who willed themselves to be fooled. This is different. This is the equivalent of troon fantasy tier magical sex transformations in their tranime where a man is transformed, bone structure and all, into a female
nailed it

>>6249541
>>6249532
>>6249513
le.... samefag

>>6249546
Take it easy, /dad/let. We're just using you to make an analogy

>>6249236
This is an imageboard. Post the fucking piece instead of a fucking twitter screenshot of some literal who's take you fucking nigger. If you're going to continue shitting up the board with AI shit at least do it right.

>>6249254

>>6249577
The OP image contains a piece of astonishing artwork that 99% of this board would not be able to produce in months of constant work. Get your head out of your ass.

>>6249585
you will never feel the warm touch of a real woman

>>6249590
Your bitch will leave you for a prompt engineer chad making 300k/year

If I take a picture of something with my camera is that AI

>>6249725
>trying to compare the dawn of photography with the beginning of the tech singularity which is literally infinite times more important and world-changing than photography
oh no no no no no

>>6249725
No but everyone cheats using AI camera filters nowadays to appear prettier than just taking the pic would make them be

>>6249725
Can a camera see your entire face if it takes a photo of you wearing a mask? Facial recognition AI can

>>6249725
You didn't create the world, it was generated by a big bang or a god, using it in your work is just as bad as using AI.

HAahahah. Most artists are all going to be out of work by the end of the decade and I will be laughing.

>>6250062
Try the end of next year

>>6250069
That's even funnier. What will today's "illustrators" do for a paycheck next? AI will even take over their main income: furry OC's. Inflation and AI will drive them back to working food and retail LMFAO

>>6250078
Illustrators will make money from the lawsuits that bankrupt AI devs

>>6250062
There's nothing funny about the death of creativity. Everything and everyone will become even more soulless.The internet will be drowned in meaningless corporate generated content, even more so than now. I'm not even an artist but I see nothing good coming out of this.

>>6250084
Any bets on who will be the first to try a lawsuit on Stable Diffusion?
>genocidal japanese hentai illustrator
>some manhua publisher
>Nintendo

>>6250084
>1 like, 0 retweets
yep... amazon is crumbling any day now...... I have it on good authority from a government source that must remain anonymous that OPENAI and the DEEP STATE are going to be taken down by a lawsuit in two more weeks. Trust the plan

>>6250091
Your burger brain has been fried by all the corn syrup you drank. But sure Amazon is a nuclear potency now, it will make China kneel

>>6250084
Did anyone end up attending the forum she held today with Craig Mullins?

>>6250088
Reconcile. The art being produced for decades has been soulless because we are in a spiritual crisis. Look at how people reacted to Covid. I'm not advocating for traditional aesthetic either btw.

>>6250099
Reposting what two people in another thread said:
--
watching an AI panel where Craig Mullins was a speaker, all he did was say a bunch of doom shit and then left lmao
i was watching craig and i wanted to kill myself out of secondhand embarrassment
he had obviously been paid to say this shit by Amazon or whoever the ultimate owners of all this tech are because he was sweating as he parroted a bunch of talking points that wouldn't have been out of place in an /ic/ troll post about dall-e

>don't be jealous
>tech is progress, this was inevitable
>be happy you were alive now and didn't have to learn fundamentals for 10 years like we did
>young artists are the future, old guys like me will just have to adapt, we've done it before
>you have to ask yourselves whether you're opposing this because you think it's bad for art as a medium or because of your own ego
i was legitimately light headed watching a man sell his soul in real time

>>6250105
Sounds pretty based.

>>6250105
Gurney, Mullins, and all the old guys don't care about the future of art anymore. He literally implied he didn't care the machines were ripping off his art to replace younger illustrators.

>>6250105
I mean he registered for twitter to mint nfts lol
Dunno, I think it's easier for old men to accept since their time has already passed.

>>6250122
counting down the days until proko makes a pro-AI vid then asks for donations to Jewkraine at the end

>>6250105
>young artists are the future, old guys like me will just have to adapt, we've done it before
Man I feel like this misses the point too, there are no 'young artists' anymore, AI shit is so piss easy even a baby could accidentally roll over and paint a masterpiece

>>6250084
Illustrators don’t get that there is no way to prove how a picture was generated. If I Have to face the possibilities of a lawsuit, I’d just fake being an artist while using AI.

>>6250165
>what are timelapses
>what are process sketches
AI art as it stands is incredibly generic anyways so good luck passing yourself off as an artist

>>6250136
>AI shit is so piss easy even a baby could accidentally roll over and paint a masterpiece
If you haven't been raging against the last 100 years of art where people have LITERALLY sprayed shit or menstrual blood on canvases and made masterpieces, don't complain about AI

>>6250165
You can prove through video process such as speedpaint, a lot of software like Ibis keep a video of your creation process

>>6250171
>AI art as it stands
What year are you stuck in? 2011? The algorithm is making progress every single day. That's the point of the singularity - there is no "as it stands", it's spiralling out of control and learning more and more with every passing hour, you moron

>>6250173
since you're not involved with the art world I'm sure you wouldn't realize just how much drawing and design has been going on in the last century and a half

>>6250173
Those 'people' had their own medium and didn't compete with ours at all, unless you expect a holocaust museum to accept your pregnant name frank

>>6250176
I'm keeping up with AI every day. Yes, it's very generic, and it has not more use atm than stock photography.

I am worried about where it's going, given how much plagiarism and theft is happening at the moment to train these machines

>>6250178
t. R. Mutt

>>6250105
>you have to ask yourselves whether you're opposing this because you think it's bad for art as a medium or because of your own ego

Suddenly that one faggots twitter outrage makes sense

>so umm if this upsets you and you want to support a real genuine human artist give me a follow and like my art!!11!

>>6250223
>being angry at theft is egotistical

>>6250230
His whole shtick was egotistical including all the misinformation he spewed, made several posts spreading that misinformation and begged for follows with each one

Even /ic/ is full of this twitter shit now, its pathetic

>>6250235
Wanting to prevent creative rape is not egotistical.

>6250235
>STOP SPREADING MISINFORMATION OVER OUR LEGIT INDIAN AI GOY!!

It feels like there are no artists here anymore, 60% of the comments are laughing at artists. what is going on?

>>6250254
Go to the Draw Art Daily discord, they're laughing about raiding this place with pro-AI posts

Just draw loli porn. All those AI image services ban sex, and even the ones that will crop up that allow to generate sex images will undoubtedly ban loli.

>>6249236
>ai wins some literally who contest from what was most likely a bmufuck nowhere county fair
Also this
>>6250260
Tech bros will never replicate my loli bestially hyper cock vore art out of fear of losing corporate funding.

Bump.

THERE ARE CURRENTLY 14 ACTIVE THREADS ABOUT AI IN THIS PIECE OF SHIT BOARD.

FOURTEEN

14

十四

XIV

>>6249236
>>6250175
>>6250635
>>6251024
>>6250446
>>6245092
>>6246848
>>6244480
>>6245315
>>6245562
>>6247885
>>6249129
>>6249213
>>6249201

Here is a picture of a Janitor walking around an AI museum instead of working that I made with AI, to participate in this wonderful thread.

Have a bump, why not?
These threads are 100% approved and allowed by moderation, after all.

>>6250103
you're a nihilistic tranime pedophile who fails to realize that this won't change shit for skilled artists

>>6250176
>The algorithm is making progress every single day.
it's about the amount of trash that's thrown at it. and as you said, it's an "algorithm" you brainless retard. it has no self evaluation skills, all it can do is throw suggestions at you. even with stable diffusion where you direct it, it will still give you random crap in that spot. get your head out of your ass you tech obsessed bugman

>>6250242
>>6251393
Artstyle is not an IP