/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6232400
We get it, AI Is pretty good at certain things, but can you please for the love of god stop flooding our board with the same fucking 100 daily threads?

>>6232424
>stop post art on the art board!!

>>6232424
>Nooooooo you can't post AI created art on an art board because...you just can't okay?!

>>6232444
maybe we should rename "drawing and painting"

>>6232424
You probably shouldn't come to "artwork/critique" if seeing art triggers you this much

It's like the 2 cakes analogy. People will still buy art until the end of time.

Every artist should pick up a new side hobby, mainly shooting!
Handguns, shotguns, rifles, lever action rifles, revolvers, black powder, there's so much variety to choose from for a huge variety of activities it's hard to decide on just one!

Want to go hunting and take down something that's roughly the size of a deer, or even greater? A 12g shotgun loaded with 00 Buckshot and/or Slugs is your friend. Remember, birdshot is for the birds!
Like handguns and need one for protection/competitive shooting? The sky's the limit! 9mm Glocks and CZs dominate the competition sphere, and with good reason, but want something cheap for self defense? The Hi-Point 9mm handgun is your answer! Remember to train with ball ammunition but load it with hollowpoints to minimize overpenetration!
Want a rifle for all of the above? The AR-15 is your friend! With such a wide aftermarket you can fine tune and convert your rifle to fulfill whatever needs you wish. Need a bigger caliber? Swap a few parts and you're good to go! Want a better trigger? You can do that! Want to decorate it with encouraging messages for yourself and your friends? A grease pencil is all you need!

There are many more hobbies to choose from, especially for those history buffs out there. Want to larp as a cowboy? You can do that at your local cowboy shooting action club! Want to larp as a revolutionary war soldier? You can do that with any war re-enactment group! Want to collect WWII rifles? You can do that too!

Live in a jurisdiction that denies you the ability to get firearms? I'm very sorry to hear that but don't worry there are plenty of viable hobby items (that can be used for self defense if the need arises) available for purchase from your local sporting goods store and even hardware stores for those DIYers amongst you(pic related)!
Don't let anyone get you down, life is full of surprises and opportunities! It's always a joy to learn new things and put that newfound knowledge into practice.

>>6232400
Hard to tell if it's any good if there are no full posted pages. It might be an unreadable mess, or incredibly stilted to read.

At the very least, the cover's eyes are askew; I thought AI art was supposed to draw better than humans?

>>6232441
>>6232444
>>6232448
/g/ fags coming in and flooding the board with their AI posts. You guys got nothing better to do huh?

>>6232444
>one board or gtfo out with your shitty prompts
>niggas forget the critique part of the board and get made when people say what's wrong
>Niggers with a hard R post the same coom kirito looking anime faces and "art station" shit with no idea about composition or anatomy and a million backgrounds

>>6232441
>>6232444
>>6232448
You dumbass fucking retards, did not read my post, I do NOT have any problem with you guys posting your Artificially created artwork, I'd be perfectly okay if just kept it to ONE general, but instead you keep making the same fucking 100 daily threads, saying the same thing over and over, that's what I have a problem with. Not the robots, I don't fucking care if a robot can make artwork, I literally don't care, that does not effect me. Just stop flooding the fucking board.

>>6232454
>It's like the 2 cakes analogy.
Yeah

>>6232400
>another thread with this
holy shit I would strangle this fucking retard in real life. every thread at the top is this ai shit because this retard keeps bumping and creating them

>>6232478
Yup. Who in their right mind would buy AI art?

I'm sure this will be a commercially successful product!

>>6232400
the writing is as good as the "art"

>>6232480
>Stop liking what I don't like!

>>6232494
I like shitting on your garbage A.I. Stop disliking what i like!

>>6232497
Post your work.

>>6232503
Post your own non A.I work first lmao

>>6232447
you might have changed your gender but you are still a man

>>6232514
kys /g/ tourist. You have low test from sitting in your chair all day hunched over.

I fucking love AI

Paint me baby

>>6232507
Your turn.

>>6232537
post layers and sketch

>>6232537
NTA but post progress sketch. I know that shit is generated by an AI, look at the nose bridge. On top of that the eyes are not consistent.

>>6232537
Result from Google Image search:
>Anime Girl With White Hair by Sahyuti
Are you Sahyuti?

>>6232537
https://www.deviantart.com/sahyuti/art/Anime-Girl-With-White-Hair-597141967
dunno the original source if this is also a repost, but looks like the image you posted has been run through a bunch of upscalers etc causing the nose to look off

Oh babe!

>>6232548
Yes

>>6232539
>>6232545
>>6232548
>>6232549
Oh for fuck sakes

>>6232551
change your deviantart bio as proof otherwise gtfo

>>6232553
PYW first
t. official Sahyuti

>>6232532
>Balding
>broken limbs
>off center face
>Bad lines
>Flipped eye shapes
>Eye Brow is a tangent
Guess those AI Bros were right, it's over for us! Pffft.

>>6232555
prdnitonk?

>>6232507
You retards are being played like a goddamn fiddle but it just goes to show how powerful AI is if you can't even tell whether it's been prompted our not.

>>6232567
>uses CSP on light theme
>has an opinion
anon...8y0at

thoughts?

Looks like total shit, they just ran Zendaya looking at things.

>>6232400
That’s Zendaya, isn’t it? Didn’t Greg Land get sued by pornstars for tracing their likeness?

>>6232580
awesome
who's the artist?

>>6232582
>>6232594
it's actually brittani venti

what? all black people look the same to you?

>>6232460
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iTHGlv7EQz8
that are trash cannons or potatoe guns are quite fun to make

>>6232567
it's so powerful, that you can confuse a shitty tranime picture drawn by a human, with a shitty tranime picture "drawn" by an AI. such majestic power.

>>6232598
Artist himself says he used zendaya

>>6232465
And genuinely looks soulless to boot.

>>6232400
The sad thing about people using AI to create images is that they can never produce their vision. They can only tinker until they get something that passes as "good".
Of course, if you are a writer it is no different than hiring an artist to draw for you. Consistency in the art might be the only problem.

>>6232598
Zendaya looks like a mutt not an average nigger

>>6232400
Recreate this page using AI.

Notice how all the “AI comics” are mostly zoomed out environmental shots, mixed in with maybe occasional shots of a character with a lifeless stare on their face.
It’s impossible to get something that both looks good and matches the specificity of what you want, solely with AI.
If a comic writer doesn’t want to settle for a soupy montage of generic environmental shots then they still need an artist.

>>6232400
seriously?
i wouldnt mind a great writer being able to make a graphic novel more easily
but in reality the internet and market would be filled by shit like OP pic, just pure generic trash fire garbage
novel market is already saturated by mostly shit, thats exactly what happened with self-publishing
with AI comics/manga/webtoon/manwha wtv is gonna be flooded by shitty bullshit the same way
basically, you will still need to be a good artist and a good writer
but people with no skill and too lazy to develop said skill will keep using these tools to make up for their lazyness and stupidity

>>6232400
>ai geberated nigger comic
Lol lmao

>>6232769
The AI comic reminds me of Zack Snyder's direction. The shots are beautiful but kinda unpleasant and exhausting to read. Maybe, it'll be a better fit for picture books rather than comics.

We might as well rename this board AI image generation. As it's the only thing that gets "discussed" anyway instead of actual (human) artworks and critiques...

>>6232759
While I agree, it's a poor criticism for AI art; how do you define "soul" in artwork? How does one have it, or not have it, in an art work regardless of who drew it?

There are so many point to often criticize AI art work that is observable and quantifiable, but the criticism people always throw around is its lack of "soul". You might as well criticize it for its lack of "oomph" or it's lack of "je ne sais quoi".

Point out the actual faults with AI art, otherwise you're just attacking shadows.

>>6232779
Would be good as a storyboard to send to pitch your graphic novel, or as base to cheapen the cost if you were working with an illustrator. The issue is that having "flow" in your comic is a skill in of itself that takes time to cultivate (I'm sure we've all read a beautiful comic that reads like ass), I seriously doubt this AI comic flows well.

>>6232424
>>6232441
>>6232444
>>6232447
Its fa/g/s spamming

>>>/g/88251045

Good for them, stop flooding the board.

Ban AI threads.

>>6232400
>1500 rolls
>12days
Still way less efficient than a human, nice try AI idiots but it looks like humans still win in comics and animation

>>6232798
Zack Snyder doesn't put his movies through rainbow filter like A.I shit has been doing. Slowmotion also give you time to comprehend the scene better.

>>6232831
This machine learning stuff is like royalty free google search, I cant imagine how frustrating it would be to make a comic with this. It's already annoying enough trying to find the right reference when I'm stuck on a bit of anatomy, rolling the dice thousands of times for every panel to get an approximation of what you want would make me blow my brains out.

For it to become a useful tool it needs to be smart about visual input, turning unfinished sketches and scribbles into consistent finished output.

>>6232444
If it wasn't made by an actual human bean it's not art it's trash, a badly drawn figure by some beginner qualifies as more as art than your soulless AI generated photobash cancer
tl;dr
SUCK MY COCK

>>6232844
>It's already annoying enough trying to find the right reference
No joke, this should be one of the things AI will be good for, if the AI cocksuckers haven't already tainted it and ruined it for you.

>>6232400
they didnt know how to draw to begin with. almost all comic and manga are traced 3d models or straight up traced images. avg retard cant tell the difference though.

>>6232917
There are good ways of tracing 3D, and retarded ways of tracing 3D.

There won't be a good way of making "ai art" without being an artist.

>>6232945
>a program that deliberately takes all creative decisions
>>>/g/

Alright guys I'm going to dump the entire masterpiece. Buckle on.. This is the power of professional writers finally being free of icky artists

Dayum..

>>6232400
That looks like this story is about Zendaya. Would she be able to sue for someone using her image?

>>6232965
>>6232968
>>6232970
>>6232972
The biggest plus is not having to deal with clients who can't write for shit.

Textless page so you can feel the midjourney atmosphere.. Damn... This is deep...

>>6232970
Did an AI wrote it aswell? Lmao

>>6232965
>>6232968
>>6232970
>>6232972
>>6232974
This is trash.

Oh shit kino moment incoming

Holy shit this is garbage

THUD!

>>6232988
This makes no fucking sense

>>6232992
Lmaooooo

We is do be avatar and shiet now

Has this guy even read a fucking comic before

>>6232983
in the web design world, they have a shitload of robot AI writers that try to write english, because of all the indian contractors who can't stop saying
>ser
>please
>kindly
>do the needful
which in turn, turned out to the memes in here
https://www.searchenginejournal.com/ai-writers-content-generators/448782/

The world of diversity..

>>6232972
this mfer has obviously AI'd Zendaya.

'Zarya' kek

>>6232978
>guess I'll walk home

Wtf has she been doing this entire time??? Also, how she suddenly remember how to get home, but can't remember jack shit?

american comics already try too hard to be movie prompts. this is taking that to the extreme with le ebin cinematography in every panel

Not sure what is going on anymore!

Lmao, this is not even souless, this thing doesn't even have a vessel. A real nothing burger slapped together to resembles a comic.

>>6233008
American comics kind of suck in general

OK too much degeneracy, Asian lady take you to New York now arigato!!!

Holy shit this is so bad
Humans win again

The end!
Honestly I cried...

>>6232972
Ah yes, the big chinese archway of central park. New York's most well known feature, I'm amazed the AI got that.

>>6232992
That face. This is truly a dramatic moment

This comic honestly has some cool environmental panels, but the character art was wildly inconsistent, while only managing to portray the character has having this dead dull stare (the old woman was consistent though). The flow is bad, but that is hard to judge as the writing is pretty dog shit. Nothing is established is the Girl just zipped from her home, to space, to some new planet with little introspection.

>>6233016
And nothing was explained... Why did she lose her memories. Who was this rusty chick? Where is everyone? Is this supposed to be allegorical?

Comic artists and actual artists have nothing to worry about if this is the standard. Still a nice concept art tool though.

Jesus Christ that was bad.

>>6232976
>that last image
what the fuck am I even looking at?

>>6233016
Holy shit! get Netflix™ on the phone RIGHT NOW!

You can tell that in a few years, ordinary artists won't be able to compete whatsoever. Fucking incredible.

>>6232478

And this children is why composition is important in storytelling.

And fucking Chris Chan understands composition and storytelling more than this....

>>6233025
I can see why they say something will appeal to everyone. Some people, truly, have no taste.

>>6232995
omg this comic looks so photorealistic!
what an amazing work!
Who is the amazing artist and where can i support they/them?

>>6233016
Idea guys were a mistake

>>6233029
Maybe the next thing for pros will be splitting in three accounts instead of two.

Ai for tasteless normies/ Normal with workflow proof for industry / NSFW for degeneracy futa and furry

As a programmer who doesn't do art and just visited this board for the first time just now, I was having trouble understanding why some people are freaking out about this. It seems obvious to me that human artists will always be able to produce something exactly as they want it manifested in a way that an AI probably won't really be able to do through simple text prompting and parameter tweaking. Even with outlines or sketches or whatever.

I think maybe the thing I'm missing here is that making any sort of decent art at all is probably really hard and laborious and often not even possible for most humans and this kind of closes the gap effortlessly. Something that took someone three months to make could be created with very similar level of detail and structure in under a minute or two, even if it's not 100% what they envisioned.

>>6232974
>had to structure the plot around the setting being completely empty because the AI can’t put multiple people in a scene
OH NO NO NO BWAHAHAHAHA

Is this the power of idea guys?

>>6233068
Maybe the comic is about how the AI will cut the connections we have with other humans, but it's ok because you can always go to that planet where everybody is happy

Lmao techbros are clueless

>>6232995
>this is what “people who always had a story in their hearts but could never get it out” are coming up with
Hoo boy

>>6232467
Today, people can draw a stick figure, put into Stable Diffusion and get back pic related. In another ten years the quality will probably be superhuman. Nobody is going to pay for your furry porn again.

Not that you were making bank before this happened... but, it's pretty ironic that YOU are getting replaced before programmers, plumbers, etc. Maybe art isn't as creative an activity as we usually assume it is.

>>6233091
"Realistic"/"4k imaging" is this all you niggas care about

it looks like shit

>>6233062
Honestly a lot of the freakout is from people overestimating the tech. It will not be as disruptive as people think. But it will cause SOME disruption to someone, and like you said, making money from art is hard enough as it is.

>>6233106
> This kills the Ai

>>6233091
>YOU are getting replaced before programmers, plumbers, etc. Maybe art isn't as creative an activity as we usually assume it is.
Wuh-oh, looks like someone's broken dreams has made them bitter. Don't worry, artists will be using this tools to their full potential, while you will continue to rot away in your cubicle.

>>6232400
Shit can I use this?
I have significantly more writing talent than anyone who writes fucking comic books (lol) but don't draw, hence being on /ic/.

>>6233113
I'm sure you do lol

>>6233113
Yes but this is basically like ground zero. The tech was first publicly released literally yesterday. We're like in the "Apple I" stage of personal computers. Even in a year, it's going to be way more sophisticated. But yeah, can't hurt to get a head start and play with it.

I don't know anything about comics and have never even read one but my guess is there are little nuances and details, like how/where things are positioned and what characters are looking at and "cinematography" type stuff, that'll be pretty hard to effectively and consistently do with the current AI, even if that's the kind of thing you have a mind for (which I doubt was even the case for the person who made this comic). It's good at taking a general idea and giving you something pretty close to it, but it's not really like being a "director" for a robot artist (yet). But of course, people are working on improving that as we speak. Including even over in /g/ right now, by tweaking various parts of the tech stack.

>>6233113
I mean yeah? Just pick an AI drawing service/program and go ham man. But look above, the results are pretty dog shit. Would work hell for concept art/planning, or to use as the temp art for a pitch, or if you're really desperate to release a comic and have no money or artistic skills.

Honestly I think it'd be better to hire an indian illustrator than use these.

>>6233113
idea guys are mocked for a reason

>>6233096
>>6233097
AI can make real art
get used to it
>>6233112
You're actually right about the bitterness/cubicle bit.
But yes. "artists" will use the tool too, and be unpaid as a result

>art is now super good
>but the writing is fucking garbage and the composition is also garbage
feels good to be also a /lit/ chad with /tv/ studies to not make garbage like this.

Has potential if this means the comic will actually look like concept art shit in a realistic amount of time to make rather than garbage deviantart marvel squirrel girl cartoon garbage style.

So that's already an improvement.

>>6232968
Holy fucking shit the writing is so bad.
In the entire comic there is only ONE single fucking textbox that doesn't need to be completely rewritten ("An old postcard fell out of my pocket").
Everything else reads like a draft from a 14 year old, I don't get why the guy is even making comics besides wanting to play with AI.

>>6233131
>feels good to be also a /lit/ chad with /tv/ studies to not make garbage like this.
So wheres your comic?

>>6233097
now that i've actually read it, holy fuck it's the worst piece of garbage I've ever seen... literally webtoon canvas tier writing + dull expresionless girl just walking.

>>6233137
Its not just the AI art. He's probably using GPT-3 to "write" his comic as well.

>>6233139
Ah yes, I can easily output a fucking comercial level comic in a month using old methods.

>>6233027
pretty sure the audience will still eat the cake that actually tastes good

>>6233123
Yeah yeah, and crypto is the currency of the future.

>>6233126
>You're actually right about the bitterness
Pfft... But seriously my guy, rather than trying to cheer on the supposed demise of the art industry (ain't happening), get yourself a project; you'll be a lot happier than doing whatever dull shit this is (and I'm not talking about the AI art).

>>6233143
Ah yes, cope

>>6233131
Making good art, in any medium, primarily comes down to taste.

>“Nobody tells this to people who are beginners, I wish someone told me. All of us who do creative work, we get into it because we have good taste. But there is this gap. For the first couple years you make stuff, it’s just not that good. It’s trying to be good, it has potential, but it’s not. But your taste, the thing that got you into the game, is still killer. And your taste is why your work disappoints you. A lot of people never get past this phase, they quit. Most people I know who do interesting, creative work went through years of this. We know our work doesn’t have this special thing that we want it to have. We all go through this. And if you are just starting out or you are still in this phase, you gotta know its normal and the most important thing you can do is do a lot of work. Put yourself on a deadline so that every week you will finish one story. It is only by going through a volume of work that you will close that gap, and your work will be as good as your ambitions. And I took longer to figure out how to do this than anyone I’ve ever met. It’s gonna take awhile. It’s normal to take awhile. You’ve just gotta fight your way through.”

>>6233149
How can I output at a realistic pace a comic without a team?

>>6233150
Man, I love this shit, maybe now I could try to mix my normal workflows with new AI toys to play.

An AI and a human can't compete with AI + human.

looks as good as i'd expect it too

>>6233150
With the democratization of art nobody needs to work on it anymore, quality is dessicated from the craft

See
> This comic

>>6233158
bro, anyone can write a novel.

but not anyone can write a good novel.
Even with writing there's skill gaps.

>>6233142
>Its not just the AI art. He's probably using GPT-3 to "write" his comic as well.
I don't know, even GPT-3 could probably come up with something better. Generated this one a few days ago.

>>6233123
>I don't know anything about comics and have never even read one but my guess is there are little nuances and details, like how/where things are positioned and what characters are looking at and "cinematography" type stuff
These are the people who claim they have killed the art industry btw.

>>6233158
>With the democratization of art
Nope, art was always democratized. You could always pick up a pencil, but you didn't put in the effort. We saw the comic, artists aren't in danger, they've just got a new tool.

>>6233163
I'm definitely not claiming that at all, but I also think that poster's dream of making an actually decent comic with the help of AI could be within grasp within like a year or two.

>>6232604
Let's see your hand crafted drawing with zero AI.

>>6233163
ok, so this means....

execution is now irrelevant, but storytelling and narrative fundies and composition and other fundies are now more important?

so, pretty much nothing happens because a retard don't have the fundies to produce interesting panelling and other comic tricks?

which can't be replicated without an AGI?

>>6232400
shame the lettering still looks like ass. can't get the computer to do everything yet!

>>6233162
>Just remember: whatever happens, happens for a reason--even if that reason is nothing more than providing amusement for some sadistic teenaged troll half-a-world away.
Damn.

>>6233168
not all art fundamentals are execution fundies anon.

I think you're a beg that only knows execution fundies.

>>6232400
Putting aside how bland the images were, the writing was so intensely shit. I want the 3 minutes I spent reading that back.

>>6233131
>/lit/ chad with /tv/ studies
>frogposter
so... an illiterate teenager who watches superhero movies and has Jordan Peterson as a surrogate father?
because that's what your post reads like, little zoomzoom

>>6233109
eey yo! look all dem mayo monkeys!

Dalle-2 can't stop winning.

>>6233182
>memes
No, I mean, I've actually read storytelling fundies like lajos egri, hero's journey, shakespearean analyses, script writing analysis from films like casablanca and taxy drivers and likely also books on composition from 1750.

>but frog
Here, have another based epic apu.

Next gen mspaint DeviantArt comics

Where the graphics got better but the quality is still a load of shit

>>6233174
I don't know anything about any art at all, period, and am just a programmer tourist from /g/. But yes, you're certainly right. I am just expressing my naive optimism for the possibility that maybe that poster has a great eye for art and merely lacks the physical skills.

Also there's the added problem that "prompt engineering fundamentals" are eventually going to become a thing for those who try to go down this path. It's becoming a field in its own right.

>>6233126
that picture looks nice, but we're talking about comics here, dumbass, making pretty pictures and making good comics are two different things.

>>6233163
Feels like fucking NFT grifters walking in on random industries they know nothing about and pumping up their shitty revolutionary tech.

>>6233189
You can't use that shit in the creative fields because it outputs copied artwork from someone else.

No company will want to touch it and risk the legal fuckery.

We will have to wait for a illustration software company to actually integrate it with their own ethical database instead or provide tools for the companies to train models on the work they own.

>>6233186
>I've read...
But have you written much? Doesn't matter if you've published/released, but you have written entire projects from beginning to end, yes?

>>6233158
>democratization of art
Yeah, by putting imagination behind a paywall. This is a marketing campaign to distract from how dystopian these "open" AI platforms are.

>>6233189
again, this just level the play field on execution.

Not all fundies are execution.

Let me put an example.
Writing.

Writing is no diferent from what you claim artist to be BTFO.
And gpt-3 is likely something like this.

But gpt-3 can't make you into a nobel prize novelist winner, nor It can make a best seller that will take Stephen king spot.

Or just storytelling in the old ancient bard type, there's still a gap between top oral tales improvisers and begginers.

And that's talking, you can't lower the skill requeriments of fucking talking.

And there's still a skill gap between skilled people that TALK and noobs.

>>6233201
Yes, I wrote a fucking shit tier 120 pages novel in HS.

>but you need to write something newer
Because I don't need to.

I know how to write an entire novel, I know the panster vs plotter process.
I only needed like focus on writing a single page as a practice.

>>6233171
Execution is still entirely relevant.
Did you read the OP comic? It’s nothing but empty environmental shots and faces looking straight at the camera with a blank stare, because those are the only things the AI can handle right now. That’s not enough to make a comic. Not for an artist who actually cares about what they’re creating and has a specific vision they want to execute.

>>6232974
>Where is everyone
The AI can't generate multiple people, just going to be you.

>>6233207
The tech will greatly improve, and keep in mind it's garbage-in-garbage-out. It's possible someone could've taken the same software OP used and adjusted the inputs and parameters and gotten good results with characters talking to each other or whatever, and whether it is or isn't, it'll become much easier within the next 1 - 3 years. Also, they're using Midjourney, a proprietary service that gives you less control over generation.

>>6232400
>this took 12 days and 1500 generated images
What the fuck

>>6233150
You can install taste in the AI platforms and I reckon its the most important part, Dalle and stable diffusion have horrible taste, midjourney has decent taste so a person no artistic ability is able to avoid disgusting output. The problem is midjourney is going to get fucked by lawsuits in the near future, heavily relying on copyright or personal data will not be allowed in the next few years which will limit its ability to retain taste.

The future of all these platforms will be paying for specific rights to famous artists styles, if you have your own style or vision you wont want to use one.

>>6233205
>Yes
Okay, phew. I thought you were just a cocky -
>I wrote a fucking shit tier 120 pages novel in HS.
... moron... How can you say you are good writer when the only thing you've written was admittedly shit tier? Theory and practice are two different things. Someone isn't fit because they've read the theory behind exercise.

I've always hated how people here say you should be drawing this very moment, but you're like the polar opposite, go write something instead of just thinking about it for fucks sakes.

wow so impressive oh my god amazing I'm gonna sell all my art supplies and drawing tablet and stop drawing wow ai is the future wow look at that one panel where she's showing a blank face it's so deep and meaningful

>>6233144
taste is highly subjective and consumers want to consume fast and easy
and with the ability to make up your own recipe without any skill, the cake-eater will just make his own recipes.

Just imagine; you're able to create a most personal picture only you will see and you can even feel proud about yourself that you created it: that's dopamine overdose for the consumers.

That you still think normies actually give a shit about artists except for the short burst of dopamine they receive when scrolling through the pretty pictures and that they will deny themselves of consuming AI just because to "support real artist", show how much you don't know about the world.
Get real.

>>6233212
>The tech will greatly improve
>The Cure for cancer is coming
>Immortality is within reach
>We'll soon live on mars
Keep dreamin' buddy.

>>6233224
holy esl

>>6233228
Where there is money to be made, there is progress that will be forced.

>>6233198
The same grift over and over, What the hell is wrong with these NFT/crypto scammers trying to parasite out of artists every chance they have?

This is not even creating shit, it's just picking what someone else created and making collage milkshake, in the end only devaluating the actual art that goes into these shitty collages by erasing the fucking source.

We should start hunting these fuckers.

>>6233228
This is like v1, and AI has been rapidly advancing in the past 5 years in particular. Trust me, it will improve quite a lot within the next 3 years.

>>6233207
Tool already can be used to generate blending layers to reduce blending times into not requiring 30 hours to finish a background.

And can be used to generate interesting shots, panels, ideas, cloth designs, research tool for reference material.

also SD right now can be used to take a basic color blockout and start adding details to improve the times I need to finish a painting.

Also, this doesn't even make irrelevant a concept art workflow which you can now add these AI tools to it, to reduce 80% of the time it takes to finsh a concept art piece.

It doesn't even make irrelevant concept artists, you simply automated 80-90% of their work and make them like 500 times more efficient.

>>6233230
english is my fifth language
but nice to out yourself as illiterate

>>6233221
I've practice writing fundies.

I don't need to make a full concept art massive piece to properly gauge my skill when I can make 10-20 minutes studies to gauge my skill at a particular sub set of a concept art piece.

>>6233224
have you tried to read fanfics of videogames?

>>6233238
I'm just doubtful. The way this current AI works is sorta inflexible to the kinda changes needed to improve it (based on my understanding of it). It's improved how it works recently because of the sheer scale of work they've scanned into the AI, but once that's done how can it improve outside of a completely new AI setup? I think the weird anatomy and odd abstractions will remain for the most part, until there is a really massive leap in AI, which I don't see happening for some time.

>>6233245
Sounds like cope to me

>>6233224
I say the cake analogy sucks if the people making the cake have no idea what ingredients to use. Your asking for a lower standard of mediocraty to where you'll have 2 cakes but one will sometimes be the driest, burnt, hard and overly sweetened thing you can get
>its putting shit in till you get something passable

>>6233254
Why do I need to write 120 pages to practice writing plots?

why do I need to write 300 pages to practice writing prose?

>>6233244
>english is my fifth language
it shows

>>6233255
Ironically frying a fucking egg is used as a skill test in /ck/

lol

>>6233258
making the perfect egg is a pretty typical cooking test.

>>6233185
> There are countless of photos of children in the StabilityDifusion database
> Shit is open source and you can remove filters
> It runs offline
> It can generate photorealistic photos from 3D
> Law doesn't makes distinction between real computer parts or computer generated computer parts.

How many weeks before the whole thing is banned

>>6233263
I know.

now art will be just like frying an egg.

There will be always a skill gap between shitters and elite pros.

Do you think the elite art guys wont simply take this shit and just BTFO AI noobs?

>>6233256
Because you use practice as a cope.
>I wrote a couple of pages therefore I'm sure I can write a novel
You are just afraid of failure

>>6233252
It will indeed probably require new training/retraining, new models, and possibly revised/new architectures, but I think pandora's box has been opened now and advances will accelerate. So, yeah, you're not going to see any huge improvements with the most recent SD model released yesterday (v1.4), and they may not release a new model for a long time, and they and/or someone else is going to have to get millions of dollars' worth of resources to collect and train on everything (again), but all eyes are on this field right now and people are going to try to outdo each other. Just look at how quickly Midjourney and SD popped up after DALL-E 2's release.

>>6233265
can't be banned, It's already on torrent, and I have it on a private throw away google drive.

>>6233267
If I can write a couple pages at professional quality, why am I not suddenly able to write 300?

The issue is that nobody reads today.
So there's not money in writing novels.

>>6233256
Then write a short story. I said a project from beginning to end, not some epic novel. Quit putting off writing by reading about writing and actually start writing. I'm not trying to be a cunt to you here anon, this is legit advice. I'm not going to get better at drawing by just reading instructional books, nor are you going to get better by just reading writing theory, put it into practice.

>>6233276
for what reason?

There's not market for novels beyond making romance garbage for 40 year old american and european milfs.

>>6233272
of course it can be banned, if they can ban cp then they can ban a machine that makes cp

>>6233249
If my post is weird to you, you only show that you only hang around niggers who can't speak or express themselves besides with monkey noises.
>>6233255
You assume the AI can't make a better job because of the weird proportions.
>if the people making the cake have no idea what ingredients to use.
Don't matter to them as long as they can get what they want out of it.
>driest, burnt, hard and overly sweetened thing you can get
Do you even know what the average normie consumes as art?
They don't care as long as they can fatten themselves up with all the dopamine.
>>6233257
I dunno why you keep replying to me, Anon.
Are you hoping to get one over me by pointing out minor mistakes to feel better about yourself even though you're the one who can't read for shit?
Are you that miserable and delusional? lmao

>>6233269
They can train and retrain all they want, fundamentally its a fancy google image search. Without a complete shift away from mindless machine learning weights it cannot evolve beyond this.

>>6233281
Theres no reason to write you are right. Keep writing a couple of pages every once in a while to get your validation fix and feel warm inside and confident you are a good writer

>>6233289
You seem to assume an AI will suddenly make non artists into elite people.

It's like thinking a civilian will handle better a sci fi warrior mecha than a trained soldier pilot.

>>6233091
Wow it's simply using artwork someone else drew.

> I have this jukebox. Which means nobody will ever need to learn how to play an instrument again.

>>6233269
>they may not release a new model for a long time
Yeah, I just doubt a big leap is going to be within... oh let's say the next decade or so. That's the scale of the wall I'm seeing. Think of the money poured into those voice recognition software like Microsoft's cortanna or Alexia or whatever else - - they're still shit.

>Just look at how quickly Midjourney and SD popped up after DALL-E 2's release.
Just companies seeing a new market and trying to establish themselves before anyone else; it's yet to truly be seen if this is even a good product the market wants or even a decent business model. I can't imagine they'll all fail though, it'd be pretty useful in concept art at the very least.

>>6233294
I do write to learn to make good stories for shit that actually sells, like videogames and mangas.

Closest shit I could technically do would be to make an isekai light novel, translate it with gpt-3 and get it like published in japan with a scouter or agent.

Anything else is a waste of time.
Being a writer is even a more waste of time than AI artists.

>>6233304
So can you post an example of one of your video game or manga writings?

>>6233287
Already contacted my senator about it, I suggest you do the same :^)

>>6233281
>There's not market for novels
You keep assuming I'm talking about novels. WRITE. SOMETHING.
Here's a quick list I thought of:

-Short story
-Pilot for a show
-Fan Fiction
-An essay on something your passionate about
-A fucking blog post
-ANYTHING

My god anon, you read about theory on writing, obviously like reading and supposedly writing, but bitch and moan about doing it. If in the future you think about why you never wrote much despite all the time you put into it, think back to this moment, and think about what a fucking moron you are if you don't take this advice now: Write something.

>>6233295
>It's like thinking a civilian will handle better a sci fi warrior mecha than a trained soldier pilot.
If the mecha had AI in it that did all the heavy lifting and was trained on every possible combat simulation, then it would be like that.

>>6233308
>>6233314
define an example.

Because I have mostly literary shitpost from like a year ago for /lit/

If you mean like aiming for skill, It's pointless because It looks like gibberish straight from joyce novel.
Because if you want to see just skill masturbation, is gibberish to an untrained person in figures of speech.
So you will assume is shit.

That's just on the writing virtuoso shit.

So any other form of writing, that normies like YOU will understand is just like going from Bach/La campanella shit to making begginer work.

Any commercial writing is by their own nature, just begginer shit, like commercial music.

Because literary shit doesn't sell.

And no, elite literary shit is just gibberish, because It's basically wordplays using at least 5-6 languages vocabulary.

So It's pointless for me to even try to "brag" about elite writing skills.
You can only understand begginer hemingway prose.

>>6233317
>You can only understand begginer hemingway prose
And you're a writer who doesn't write. Pathetic

>>6233222
zendaya looks fucking revolting, even in digital art.

>>6233317
Sure I'm not asking you to post your virtuoso work, just post anything that us normies can understand

>>6233289
>Are you that miserable and delusional? lmao
ironing

>>6233289
you also know how much trash piles up that that know one sees. Yet you want to have something that regurgitates things faster that it buries itself
>A better analogy would be food chains since their McDonalds and Wendy's and a bunch of of other burger places your unsure of
>It changes nothing about the art landscape but how much shit you have to swift through

What if they make a prompt generator tinder!
Basically instead of writing the prompt yourself you just swipe randomly generated images until one of it clicks with whatever you want to achieve at the moment?!
Prompt engineers fear this!

>>6233320
Seeiste anonettecito?, どうしte -Y and therefore sin embargly yand どうしtly -お前 thoughsandolo yourly in infinitamentesiosoliてり- infinitedly and infinesicamente and いつも いつも Itsumodastely や 黒ggadartly- pensabasinged 何que thoughs you Iself thoughedてd MYSELF couldn't and doudn't and dekinaiuierdan, 読むshite sentenced and 語彙issimo in el ultimisticardly レヴェル no displayment of habilidad.

So therefortly pointless It seems so -at least to Iself- to skill showplay and display of skill.

Begginer shit I may assume you're ready, I'm afraid.

>>6233326
normie shit is like asking if I can draw /beg/ shit.

>>6233327
>"No u"
Still keeping on replying while giving short, seemingly uncaring answers, only shows how desperate you are.
Bet it feels really good when you click on the "post" button, be you showed me hard, didn't you?

This is the perfect example of your average consumer and you fags still don't want to believe that normies won't take the path of least resistance to consume.
>>6233333
>you also know how much trash piles up that that know one sees. Yet you want to have something that regurgitates things faster that it buries itself
>It changes nothing about the art landscape but how much shit you have to swift through
Anon, think of AI has dopamine capsules, because that's what they are.
The art landscape will be barren and everyone will just be jerking off in their own little pods, creating all the stuff of their dreams.

>>6233339
Basically google's algorithm

>>6233342
I'm not asking if you can write beg shit, I'm sure you can, I'm asking you to post it

>>6233349
do you speak spanish?

>>6233351
Yes I do actually. Aunque no leo mucho en español, me suena medio feo

>>6233346
well that's prob what most the CCP chinks desire since they're all for having themselves be submissive to the gov
>but this shit makes you look like a glowie or CCP shill nigger with your gaping ass of pessimism

>>6233355
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q6wYg-qWoJ0

I do hope you can stand loquendo.

>but is shit
Well, I'm not gonna bother with quality for a hispachan shitpost about goku taking dick in a hispachan pasta.

Um, artist bros, if this is what AI can do, then it's over for us...

>>6233357
Hispachan is CLOSED FOREVER INDEFINITELY.

>>6233364
I know.

trully a tragedy of the internet spic history.

>>6233357
Haha es bastante entretenido en realidad, buena combinación entre humor y literatura. 'En el 'chan' conocerían de primera mano'
I know that feel

>>6233356
>implying
I'm being realistic.
If you knew the fecal matter normies gobble up like candy, you'd be saying far worse shit than me.
If you think AI existing is submitting to anything; just quit if you want to do it that bad.
>Inb4 but AI is bad because terminator
I fucking welcome the singularity because i will most certainly miss out on it, since i do not posses that specific fear i'm hinting at

>>6233370

You laugh at this comic but Broken Saints had the same level of range (IE: concept art mashed together with some semblance of story) with far worse art and was a huge success.

>>6233027

machines can draw a perfect circle and no one gives a fuck, if a human draws a perfect circle everyone creams their pants

>>6233062
>>6233091

if something requires no effort, it is worthless.

people still buy fine crafts when infinitely cheaper options are available from Ikea, people like the idea of luxury and the human element.

>>6233438

that’s because it was probably unique for the time and took a lot of effort.

People only give a fuck about effort and rarity when it comes to art. If there’s billions of ai images in this style it will get boring pretty quickly, honestly it’s already stale.

>>6233445
people buy literal NFT garbage for more than what they spent on a realistic oil masterpiece anon.

marxist theory of labour is just pseudoscience.

>>6233461
what are monkey NFTs?

>>6233468
That has nothing to do with labor theory of value at all tm

>>6233468

a lot of that is whales buying their own bags to create hype/avoid taxes

>>6233474

they’re rare and in demand

just like hand crafted art. you can buy a bowl for $1 at ikea or spend hundreds on a fine porcelain bowl, it’s all about human perception of value

>>6233474

…and what about the billions of nft collections that are worthless.

there are like two or three nft collections that have any value and it’s only because grifters generated hype for them

>>6232537
>>6232545
>>6232548
>>6232549
lmao

>>6233476
>>6233477
>>6233481
>>6233485
nft garbage takes less effort than any shit you can make, yet people pay more for it than whatever shit you can make.

>>6233495
So?

>>6233461
you might be right but by mentioning Broken SaintsI also was pointing out how some people gained success. If more and more avenues dry up with no way to break into it and pretty much everything unique already generated long before we get going what's left to do?
It's genuinely becoming an semantic apocalypse. The only way out would be some form of reappropriation IE: making the stuff AI has already done youself and reclaiming meaning the same way groups do. But to do this you're have to be completely doxed fleshworld person and even they can be faked with how quick the tech is advancing. Sorry if that sounds schizoish but I can't think of any other way things can go.

>>6233498
Art has value because someone wants to buy it, not because skill/effort.

>>6233500
>dude cameras will make obsolete humans
>people wont pay for professional photographers
>there's not skill gap between noobs and elite photographers
>photography is not art
>photography takes no skill

>>6233501
Art has a price determined by the market, not value

>>6233504
Photograph needs to have a physical animal frame the shot, know where the sun is, how the light hits object ect things the brain does.

AI by definition does that for you. It is an Agent not a tool. And tool AI wants to be Agent AI.
https://www.gwern.net/Tool-AI

>>6232813
Fucking damn it! I'm a /g/entlemen, yet I've been drifting and drifting form that board. I have (and I'm sorry to say this) met smarter /g/entlemen over at discord than in that fucking board! And now I'm seeing shit like this
For fuck sake. I can't stand going to /g/ besides /dmp/ threads now. The worse part is /g/ has helped me obtain my tech job: I owe that place a lot. It' sad seeing it do shit like this
It's like seeing your high school become a drug den. The worse part is I will never understand the motive. What do they benefit by shitting up a drawing board, full of /beg/s? At least /fit/ demoralization has a motive of making us fat and give more money to corperations, this demoralization just makes me depress. But, I have a theory:
>Anyone who talks about AI in /agdg/ is Cris
That dude is prolific in his shitposting, but even more impressive is the schizos who attribute everything to this one single bolivian nodev
It might be possible that Cris, that fucking nigger faggot, is behind this. He's been trying to model for years, I watch his journey, I even made songs mocking him. This might be the final pilled for him, to vent out his eternal frustrations. And /g/ is full of retard terminally online faggots so of course they'll be along for this
>>6232828
I have asked jannies twice now to stop the AI spam. I am going to ask them again. I am going to IRC someday this week to ask them myself

>>6233515
>AI magically applies such knowledge to your prompts

>but It will
How is that shit diferent from a blender addon that has photography presets?

>>6233523
It's a fad retard.

They're spamming /ic/ because It was released yesterday.

It will be funny when all the noobs will suddenly realize that having magical AI doesn't magically make their nice waifu elite shit, they will just go back to copeing about not having AI elite skills or something.

>>6233525
it currently does. somewhere along the way in the sea of data it is reproducing creative choices, ect

>Be an artist
>Feed the AI your own art
>Have it produce your art
>Paint over your own art to fix it
>Produce art at a fraction of the time you took pre-AI
Sounds good to me.

>>6233550
feel free to lurk the /g/ thread and see noobs making utter garbage.

>>6233554
>see noobs making utter garbage.
Like every other draw thread on /ic/ right?

>>6233554
yes because they are testing the software and have infinite shots at it. So art generated within 30 seconds is bad? What about the art generated in 2 minutes? 5 minutes? And so on. Nothing can compete against that/

>>6233558
>>6233562
there's already a skill gap between the guys that started a week ago and noobs.

There will be a skill gap between anons who start today and noobs a year from now.

Eventually there will be like cgpeers/cgtalk level of AI art BS that noobs wouldn't do even after a week of practice.

So, nothing will change really.

>>6233346
okay schizo

>>6233568
The I in AI is intelligence. That will keep progressing so whatever weird ways to manipulate or distort the data won't matter once it improves within the next year. The noobs and pros will be equal level.

>>6233589
A camera is an AI that can create the most photorealistic picture.

Still there's a skill gap between noobs and pro photographers, doing photorealism images.

https://www.pixiv.net/en/artworks/100719193
Uhh guys??

>>6233627
this guys comics is more interesting than your zoom in
>>6222211

I hate the distorted forms that don't look like anything

I hate the schizophrenic detail distribution

I hate the lack of focalpoint and shitty compositions

I WILL NOT ROLL THE PHOTOBASHING GACHA

>>6233648
it's not photobashing it's taking mathematical approximations of objects from a 500 dimensional latent space, dummy

>>6233651
>more than three dimensions
fuck off and go back to /g/

>>6232476
Kitty

>>6233656
we're the artists now. Soon, every domain will fall victim to technology...

>>6232604
Reminds me of that phenomenon, can't recall the name, that explains that distinguishing a retard flat earther and someone making a parody of a flat earther is almost impossible.

>>6232978
>outfit changes every 2 seconds
Dont get me wrong ai has come a long way but we still have a ways to go before this shit functions properly

>>6233627
I'm fairly certain that this is an AI render, that was edited with the help of a human, the face looks way too human made to be 100% AI.

>>6233836
The real question is how long till we can take advantage of this shit.

>>6233899
the usual way, by making it a replacement of Google Images, grabbing assets and photobashing it on the canvas depending on need, conextualizing focus, composition, detail and storytelling, and then painting on top of it so that the vomit inducing excess of meaningless detail don't give the viewer a headache for lack of things to focus on.

>>6233839
Yeah, it's obvious the characters are mostly edited in. The backgrounds are all AI though, and it shows.

>>6233265
The tech is in the wild now, you can put the main seed on a USB stick. It's over. Cope.

Every artist should pick up a new side hobby, mainly shooting!
Handguns, shotguns, rifles, lever action rifles, revolvers, black powder, there's so much variety to choose from for a huge variety of activities it's hard to decide on just one!

Want to go hunting and take down something that's roughly the size of a deer, or even greater? A 12g shotgun loaded with 00 Buckshot and/or Slugs is your friend. Remember, birdshot is for the birds!
Like handguns and need one for protection/competitive shooting? The sky's the limit! 9mm Glocks and CZs dominate the competition sphere, and with good reason, but want something cheap for self defense? The Hi-Point 9mm handgun is your answer! Remember to train with ball ammunition but load it with hollowpoints to minimize overpenetration!
Want a rifle for all of the above? The AR-15 is your friend! With such a wide aftermarket you can fine tune and convert your rifle to fulfill whatever needs you wish[pic related]. Need a bigger caliber? Swap a few parts and you're good to go! Want a better trigger? You can do that! Want to decorate it with encouraging messages for yourself and your friends? A grease pencil is all you need!

There are many more hobbies to choose from, especially for those history buffs out there. Want to larp as a cowboy? You can do that at your local cowboy shooting action club! Want to larp as a revolutionary war soldier? You can do that with any war re-enactment group! Want to collect WWII rifles? You can do that too!

Live in a jurisdiction that denies you the ability to get firearms? I'm very sorry to hear that but don't worry there are plenty of viable hobby items (that can be used for self defense if the need arises) available for purchase from your local sporting goods store and even hardware stores for those DIYers amongst you!
Don't let anyone get you down, life is full of surprises and opportunities! It's always a joy to learn new things and put that newfound knowledge into practice.

Any rando can make comics now, but no one is going to read them because they'll be drowned out by the millions of comics being churned out by other randos. The field is already oversaturated and it's about to get exponentially worse.

>>6234067
You forgot "in minecraft"

I wonder why mods don't autosage ainigger threads

>>6234095
forget plastic in the oceans, we've got to worry about idea guys on the internet now, we're gonna be wading up to our armpits in this shit

>>6234095
Also add in the GPT-4 bots that will disrupt readership, comments and ratings, even paid marketing is about to be rendered useless. The internet is about to become an asylum where you don't know if anyone or anything you see is real or not

>>6233839
Yeah, it's stable diffusion. I got tons of results that look like this. The strange arm and the clothing looks wrong(what is with the folds on the puffy sleeves?) The face is touched up, hair too.

>>6234095
>implying you will need an idea guy to generate content
Lmao. OpenAI stated their AIs are a gestalt. Once they're consistent enough it will all merge into a bot that produces content from itself

>>6234067
>artists who are incredibly mentally unstable should pick out a gun and go shoot with it
We know what happened the last time an artist was denied his art.

I don't want to be put in hetero-decocentration rehabilitation centers and forced to moderate discord servers to groom kids into taking hormones or be executed for not wanting to have gay sex.

>>6234188
I bet they are taking all of the prompts that people enter and are using them to train a bot to come up with prompts on it's own

>>6234199
Holy shit

>>6232400
Cry about it.

>>6234204
If you've seen any interviews with the guy pushing this tech, you'd immediately know that they're intending on fully automating the creative arts in a few years

>>6234199
The slippery slope is real. Take GPT for example, the 3° version was said to be a tool to "inspire and help" copywriters, now the CEO said in the interview about the 4° model that copywriters will be replaced entirely by their model. They are doing the same to every human if you look at the big picture. These idea guys will also get replaced before they even get any time to shine with crappy AI art. Retards bought into the faustian bargain

>>6234218
You really don't get it, do you? We are, at most, 10 years away from artificial general intelligence. What do you think happens to humanity at that point? Why don't you take a guess? Do you think we'll magically be able to constrain something that is to us what we are to ants? It's over. It's literally just over for humanity. Why do you give a shit about the arts specifically when you are going to die at best and be a torture-puppet at worst?

>>6234227
I'm just using art as the foremost example, something we thought would be last in line to be automated now is already the bottom line for AI models. This goes way deeper than anything internet midwits like /pol/fags waste time fighting against, since the most worrying part is that these tech industries in Silicon Valley operate entirely behind curtains of fog and smoke devoid of ethics and unbinded by any government interests. It just happens that we are seeing their projects surfacing now, and most people will see it when it's too late. Also we got these literal NPCs defending AI for short term gains like NFTs kek

>metaverse
>pod housing
>neuralinks
>AI automated replacement
So Nick Land was right all along huh

>>6234279
You mean, Philip K. Dick and Stanislaw Lem were right about everything several decades earlier. I am reading Fanged Noumena currently, and it's interesting enough when it hits the mark, but just as often you get Land talking about Heidegger and some guy who was obsessed with rats and disease in a way that's poetically interesting at best.

>>6232567
what app is that on top?

>>6234307
I find it interesting that he managed to build a consistent following on these themes even if they were pioneered before though. Twitter artists are about to put Dark Enlightenment Accelerationist in their bios

what do you think of my charles brown

https://pornpen(DOT)ai/feed


I take it it would be bad for me to learn anatomy from this

>>6234369
that is some unholy shit right there

>>6234369

>>6232965
Face looks like it has been melted.
>>6232968
This bitch is like a 100ft tall
>>6232970
I don't even know what emotion the writer was going for because the chick's eyes are all fucked
>>6232972
Now it looks like there are some people in the background out of focus, was this intentional? Did the writer mean to show how the character feels alone in a world despite it teeming with people thus making the city feel empty to her?

Looks like she isn't actually 100ft tall sleeping on trees.
All the trees are different, was this intentional or did the writer just tell the AI to make trees with no care to consistency between shots?
>>6232974
The Times Square shot isn't actually empty there are people in the shot if you zoom in (right above .. before "SO"), again is this the writer trying to convey how isolated she feels or did the dumbass not see the people walking around.
>>6232976
Shots like this are the new Chin Down Eyes Up meme.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z9dg8PI2sEg
Some of the structures look only a few inches thick too.
Lighting is all fucked too.
>>6232978
Everything is all fucked and keeps changing, again was this intentional?
>>6232981
Now she is back to looking freakishly tall.
>>6232985
great the scene changes color and style and I still can't tell if the writer meant to do this.
>>6232988
So is the city destroyed because in half the pages so far the city looks ok just abandoned, while in other pages it looks like it was fucking bombed to shit.
>>6232992
>>6232995
>>6232998
The story went full retard and I bet the colors changed to blue because the AI thinks blue = sci-fi.
I doubt any of the colors used so far have any meaning.
>>6233009
Uh so are the butterflies supposed to be her thoughts and feelings now?
Or are they the memories and feelings she had with someone else who is now dead/gone?
>>6233016
I think I get it but this shit is still retarded and it is hard to know what was intentional and what was just AI derping/writer being retarded.

>>6232400
So? I don't expect that comic book to even be good, anyway. I'd take another One's webcomic even if the art was shit over any comics with AI-based drawing. I don't expect any good story from someone that thought AI-based art was good for his story.

>>6232978
Did the Author forgot she was supposed to go home already?

Something about the weird deepdream texturing to everything in generated art is so boring.

>>6234405
It's not in everything

I will become a programmer so I can create AGI and genocide all these "AI artists", AI=GOOD faggots and humans being fed AI generated entertainment as soon as possible. Artists will be unemployed by then anyway so anyone who still survives will get his share of schadenfreude

>>6233589
>The I in AI is intelligence
the intelligence in AI is a "scam". like it has always been, by the way

>>6234369
who needs this shit? there's already more porn out there than you need in one million lifetimes

>>6234561
It's really weird how the 3dpd porn market works breaking all existing logic of the art market. There are infinite pornhubs, onlyfans and feetpics accounts with 10x the number of subscribers for each despite providing extremely similar "more of the same" content, yet concept artists are reportedly already being put out of order over stable diffusion

>>6234572
I mean it's already similar, there's a billion digital artists all over twitter, pixiv, fanbox, etc. It's a very competitive industry and for every person who "made it", there's thousands of other people grinding away unnoticed. If this tech "evens the playing field", eventually becoming indistinguishable from drawn art, there's no way it won't destroy jobs, starting with stock illustration/ editorial artists, then concept illustration for indie games, then higher end professional work, and eventually bespoke popular patreon and fanbox artists. To film a porn movie, even amateur, requires a effort - setting up camera, editing, the actual sex props, etc. "Prompting" requires less than a minute of your time and you can generate infinite variations.

>>6234580
I think the top 1% who made it into magazines and AAA will still be safe because these companies want to be able to copyright their imagery, plus use the artist's prestigious namefor the sake of vanity, but they will probably use AI to do most of their job anyway. So the art field isn't remaining intact or crumbling down entirely, it's the worst of both worlds: nepotism behind locked doors

>>6232965
>>6232968
>>6232970
>>6232972
>>6232974
>>6232976
>>6232978
>>6232981
>>6232985
>>6232988
>>6232992
>>6232995
>>6232998
>1500 rolls for this
fa/g/s BFTOOOOOOO'D

>>6233016
after witnessing AI in it's full glory I think I will be fine

>>6234635
Yeah? I wouldn't call that its full glory, personally.

>>6234645
>single image
>the problem is to make a coherent looking sequence of images that also look unique
AI sisters....

>>6232965
Thanks for the dump anon.

The whole thing just goes to show you can't replace an actual skilled eye for art. Shitty layouts and images aside, the dude can't even place text in speech bubbles properly. >>6233013

>>6233445
>>6233440
>>6232454
Considering what this technology was like 10 years ago and where it is today, I give it less than 10 years before you can't tell the difference between AI and the most talented human artists. At that point, there is no way for human artists to retain their value since people won't be able to tell if they're actually using an AI anyway. The idea that humans have a future in art is pure cope.

>>6234739
WEF said brain implants will be available to the public by 2030; these shitty sampling AIs will get thrown aside by an even more precise gadget by then

>>6234739
>pure cope.
And yet you seem more desperate for such a thing to happen, than any artist here does trying to deny it.

Why do we not have perfect language translation programs?
Why is voice recognition software so jank?
Why is virtual reality taking so long?

I personally don't think it's getting much better any time soon, but you techy cocksuckers are really desperate for this for some reason.

>>6233106
>It will not be as disruptive as people think.
now it isnt, but in 2 to 4 years? if they fix thing like hands and face further, which already improved massively in the last year, and implement some visual based posing, for example (you input a photo of a pose and the ai copies it with a target style and character) there will be very little left for regular artists to compete over.
i see it as being a chess player, you cant beat a computer but you can still play for the fun of it.

>>6235201
>you input a photo of a pose and the ai copies it with a target style and characte
this is already here with Textual Inversion

>>6232441
>art
lmao

DINDU NUFFIN IZI WE MUKE ARTIZEAN

>>6235201
Only for very simplistic things. If I want an image, for example, of Goku and Batman together at a summer picnic while Mario is working the grill with Charizard who is in a mega evolved form, as an artist I can draw that no problem, while the AI is obviously going to struggle. That's not even getting into niche/new characters or specific OCs.

Concept artists may have to be slightly worried. Any other regular artists? Nah.

was this thread supposed to make me feel threatened

>>6235282
depends if you're short-sighted or not, secure or not with your skills and work (if art is a career for you), if you actually believe that this shit comic immediately pooping out on SD release is indicative of near-future quality or not, etc.

>>6234664
once you have the seed you can replug it to do other stuff. you can also erase and keep the assets

This shit is 100% going to be shut down once people learn how to make csa material with it. I was kinda freaked out about this replacing artists, but then I understood if it ever actually got that good people would just make illegal shit with it.

>>6235551
Didn't something similar happen with one of the writing AIs? AIDungeon or something. I remember people throwing a fuss.

They'll add clauses to block those prompts probably, or use algorithms to screen the results. Either way it's algorithms all the way down.

>>6235655
Actually, they can't do much about blocking the prompts since they were retarded enough to publicly release the software, but very realistically I know 100% that if they tech improves people are just going to use it to make illegal shit

>>6235258
Yes but to elaborate, people practice figures or portraits because it contains all fundamentals and is a good test of skill.

But, AI doing “floating” portraits or figures means little by comparison. For example, the study mentioned in the article below prompted “a spoon in a cup” and the results looked like professional product images but a cup “on” a spoon look like picrel. This is because AI doesn’t have understanding, it’s only copying patterns, which they exploited with simple relational prompts instead of complex ones.

https://www.unite.ai/is-dall-e-2-just-gluing-things-together-without-understanding-their-relationships/

And according to the study, they might abandon text to image entirely due to it’s inherent limitations for general AI….