/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6221878
A well-created image is worth a thousand words

creating an image with anything less than a thousand words will not give anything meaningful

>>6221878
>>>/g/aynigger

>>6221878
we need an AI artists general here for us promt artists

>>6221887
>>6221894
malders go away, keep grinding with your wacom and never make it

>>6221878
Why don't you guys create your own "AI Art General" on >>>/g/ instead of here? Are they really too hostile to you guys over there, or do you just enjoy fucking with us?

Seeing as the board is about technology and engineering, I can't see why it wouldn't be allowed there? And the best part is, you wouldn't have to worry about hostility from the anons over there, since they're onboard with the Ai stuff, it would actually benefit you more than us.

>>6221900
why? this is an art board right? and we create art. we are the new wave of artists, we respect your traditional art so you should respect us too. prompt artists are real artists.

go back to /g/ tourist

>>6221900
By your logic every post with a drawing made in Photoshop or Clip Studio should be on /g/ too

>>6221907
your ai stuff is created by a program and has no artistic process nor value. The point of this thread is to talk about a program, not to talk about art. The point of /ic/ is to talk about the process of art and get criticism for it, not to larp as an artist while being a button pressor. I know you're just a /g/fag trying to piss off artists, fuck off

>>6221878
Masterful bait, congrats. We should be able to discuss this on /ic/ still. Image generation could be part of the process where you still nonetheless draw.

>>6221916
Crafting a well engineered prompt to properly express your ideas is just as much of a process as sketching, inking, and painting.

You seem to just have a weird paranoia about /g/

>>6221905
>we create art
you are not the artist

>>6221905
I have no respect for you as a human being.
I didn’t even respect the Chinks who were churning out these generic kitsch landscapes WITHOUT using AI, so obviously I have even less respect for you.

>>6221905
>we create
what exactly you create anon?
you take commision at maximum

this board is becoming impossible to use because of one retard spamming it with shit and the stupid janitor fuck does nothing

>>6221878
I hope you get bone cancer.

>>6221878
finally a based thread
if you add lego at the end of your prompt you get legofied results

Trying to experiment with the cyberpunk theme

>>6222249
i think you are really talented
keep it up, don't let those "real artists" to discourage you, they know they're becoming obsolete

>>6222249
>>6221878
That's fucking amazing

>>6222249
>>6222253
>>6222258
samefag pedo schizo

>>6222253
>>6222258
It still takes alot of prompt to get a good result honestly. Anime it doesn't do so well either.
As far as "real artists" go, this is sorta like the Swiss and the quartz movement, they ignored it untill it was too late and the japs over took em.

>>6222269
like all my other cyberpunk prompts are pretty bad imo

>>6222269
>>6222271
>>6222249
its not even a art, it is ultimate level of shit

>>6222292
unironically, photobashing looks better.

I have a confession. I have been using AI to help define my ideas. Sometimes, you’re trying to draw something, and you can define each individual part but not all of them together. Maybe you can, but it just won’t stay in your head long enough- or it does but you have to close your eyes to see it. Anyway, do not fear AI. It’s no less of a hack than using something like a curly hair brush or 3d models or undo.

>>6222249
LITERALLY WHAT IS THE POINT OF THIS.
>"oooh, aaah, pretty colors, hit button and see cool cyberpunk pictures, haha"
YOU ARE LITERALLY HAVE A FUCKING MONKEY BRAIN

>>6221878
i'm just gonna hide this thread like the other ones

this is nothing more than a tech demo, why the fuck is it on /ic/
>>>/g/

>>6222361
you don't own the place
>>>/fuckoff/

>>6222362
GET HIM OUT, OUT, OUT, OUT

>>6222340
Cope ludditechud. This is the future

>>>/g/88195896

>>6222635
its over

If artists were to erase all their work from the Internet none of these models would have any data to train from besides vectors in public domain

>>6222664
false, all the images artists put out over the years has already been downloaded by the software companies. :^)

Learn to code :^)

>>6222670
my god
>a porn collection rival own

>>6221878
Now do cub inflation porn

my god
>a porn collection to rival my own

>>6221878
"bro like bro like do you now about M1DJOURN3Y like bro like it generates ART bro"

Fuck off you retarded cunt, these AI stuffs can be spotted a mile away for a reason : it follows the same process of generation, therefore sometimes putting the same person twice like in your picture; but also putting unecessary crisps and details and sometimes putting nonsense, like clouds as both in the sky and on the floor.

There is no shortcut to art, photography didn't killed painting, digital painting didn't killed painting, AI shit still won't kill painting and if you want to make something of yourself you still have to learn perspective, anatomy and such.

Fuck off with your prompts now, this is an actual art place, we don't discuss what version of photoshop you use and we don't give a shit about your keywords sent to an AI.

>>6221905
You have a program photobash other peoples art. You dont even do it yourself. What an 'artist' you are

>>6222045
It's actually an entire team of paid shills

>>6223133
its just /g/, go to >>6222635 for them this is amazing because they can make their generic anime now

>>6223150
generic anime looks better than this shit. do people not see the uncanny nature of it? it's like avant-garde anime

>>6222266
pedo?
Maybe you shouldn’t overuse that new buzzword, It can be stale and can lose its value.

Non AI-artists need not apply.

they're just being jealous because they are bound by their little pride as a "real" artist, come on only tradfags are real artist, your art is nothing but pixel so it's the same as AI art but less pleasing to the eyes

>>6223693
>ai robots learn to use physical brushes
what now

>>6223703
then it's probably more "real" than most of /ic/ :^)

>>6223693
Posting A.I is nothing more than posting google image searches. You didn't created the visual for those pixels. Those "A.I art belongs to the robots.

Copeland: the thread

>>6223703
wow, a glorified printer. With the amount of scams that low IQ normalfags invest on Kickstarter, i wouldn't be surprised if this managed to reel in a huge amount of money from the suckers

>>6223693
what is the argument you make here. An artist that knows one medium can translate his skills into the other easily. An ai shill can't do either because he can't draw. He can search images on google better i guess

>>6221878
Next step is AI generated posts
Wait oh shi.....

>>6221878
is over guys. computers won

>>6223813
I fail to see any positive outcomes from any of this

>>6223813
<SOUL
>SOULLESS

>>6223718
You didn't make that movie Mr Lynch! It was the actors and lighting crew, the runners and the set builders! all you did was tell them to do stuff! that's not creating art!

>>6223839
>equating yourself as a director
when anyone can put in the same prompt for the exact same result
>NGMI genes run through this one
>now do porn
>or gore
>or edgy stuff
>or political critique
>or a attempt at humor
>or anything else not a background and anime characters

Why do techbros hate art?

>>6223853
fucking over anybody that's not them is in their blood desu

>>6223853
because art is slow (when not AI generated), unproductive in an economic sense, antithetical to consumption as you are creating things for yourself, and encourages human imagination

>>6223849
So the thing is, nobody would come up with the prompt I spent 6 hours honing in on. I'm not asking for average artstation shit. Sure they might be able to take the prompt after, and generate variations or something, but then it becomes a sort of 3 way collaboration. equated it with directing as there is not much else to compare it to.

>>6223853
Syndrome from the incredibles

>>6221905
>we create

>>6222253
>keep it up, don't let those "real artists" to discourage you, they know they're becoming obsolete
so is this an prompt thread or another AI spam thread with a different tittle to avoid suspicion

>>6223813
Realistically, what's the point of grinding fundamentals nowadays?
Unless you do it as a hobby, like learning some ancient artisan techniques, that's it

>>6221878
>>>/lit/

>>6223853
Nothing sacred exists to them. They think that art is just "pretty pictures". It's not that they hate art, they just don't have a soul to understand it.

>>6223925
but art is just pretty pictures, bro

>>6223882
The same reason you will want to play an instrument instead of tuning on spotfy.

Or why you want to learn how to paint instead of using a photo camera or going to Google images and getting happy because you saw a photograph.

People want to make shit themselves in their own style.

>>6223693
What is this?
No really, what am I looking at?
I genuinely cannot tell if the background is supposed to be a city or a forrest.
Whats that on the top of the cat's head? Is it a mohawk, helmet/hat or is it part of a background?
It's a total mess.

>>6223693
Nightmare fuel, the cat's mouth looks like an asshole, it also has fish eyes? The anime girl generator is 10 times better at doing faces than this pseudo artstation concept art composition generator.

>>6223925
they love art but hate artists, which is why they're trying to circumvent us. just look at /g/, they are celebrating artists being displaced and homeless for some reason

>>6221878
trying to force Stable Difussion to do some particular thing you want is a fucking nightmare: literally hours and hours of testing phrases, changing words, order or words, and technical parameters. on the upside, i've learned a lot of artists names and terms for graphic techniques.
even changing a dot for a comma can drastically alter the final result. and every AI out there has its own quirks and will give you completely different results with the same prompt
I can legit see people getting paid for doing this shit in the future

>>6223957
>What is this?
>No really, what am I looking at?
>I genuinely cannot tell if the background is supposed to be a city or a forrest.
>Whats that on the top of the cat's head? Is it a mohawk, helmet/hat or is it part of a background?
>It's a total mess.

>>6224021
>i've learned a lot of artists names
I thought it created the artwork anon?

>>6224035
who's "it" in your sentence?
i'm telling you: i've tried hard -and mostly failed- to create something useful using that particular AI. shit's hard

>>6224021
I started feeling a bit weird using artists names(especially living), so I use art movements instead.

>>6224021
>>I can legit see people getting paid for doing this shit in the future

Ohhhh, the irony...

>>6224041
whatever works for you. is not like it actually replicates those particular artist's styles: it's just that some words work better than others for some reason
shit's so complex that at times seems to be random, but not really

>>6224040
the AI

>>6224021
You can simply, i dunno, pay artists to draw that shit for you? Save you the trouble.

>>6223853
they have zero soul. every single techbro, engineeringbro, etc. they all think art is useless because it doesn't serve a utilitarian purpose.

>>6224047
>>6224041
>>6224040
>>6224021
why don't u fags just pick up a pencil

>>6224049
then, no, it doesn't create the artwork: (You) do it
current AIs don't think, or have conscience, or a drive to create art, or feelings. they're just tools, like photoshop or something

>>6224052
pencils are obsolete in the era of typing

>>6224057
> it doesn't create the artwork: (You) do it
But I can't copyright it
How did I make it? Why are other artist names involved spontaneously in the so called art I "made"?

>>6223077
>/imagine cope boomer fr no cap 4cahnnel post

you can tell these people are soulless NPCs or paid shills because who in their right mind would look at any of this shit and not feel immediately uncomfortable. AI always generates people with blacked out or bloodshot eyes. its like something out of a creepypasta

>>6224066
makes sense. the sclera is kind of a big deal for humans, but how are computers supposed to learn about it?

>>6224052
I draw everyday. I just see AI as a tool to get to end results quicker, help with ideation, suprise me, experiment etc.

>>6221878
okay this is getting ridiculous, when are jannies gonna ban this shit?

>>6224066
I almost exclusively generate backgrounds, due to the aforementioned issues.

>>6224081
you must be permabeg then
3D and photobash gets results quicker unless youre just another dumbass who only does standing poses

>>6223945
Making art is like playing a guitar, Ai generation is like asking the computer with words what kind of sound you want it do make, the end result are some of the best guitar players mixed, but still you don't get to play your guitar.

If I go to a concent I want to see people playing instruments and performing music, I don't want all of my shit having its melody, tone and mood synthetized by computers.

>>6224101
>>6224081
you stupid niggers, stop feeding it, it'll steal your art after and then churn out 5 billion variants and then nobody will bother looking at your shit

>>6224105
>>I don't want all of my shit having its melody, tone and mood synthetized by computers.

Now suddenly i realized that Autotune is a thing and has been treated as garbage.

>>6221878
reality is, an artist even just /int/ level can churn out better art with the ability to alter it at will at the same speed it takes for people to get a decent result from an ai, without the ability to even alter the image in any specific way
all this AI shit has taught me is people think all artists do is generic characters in standing poses lmao
its easier ad faster to just use 3D software to make models you can reuse over and over to paint over to be honest
learning basic blender and google sketchup is a bigger crutch and speeds up your process way more than ai
especially if you draw similar things you can use reuse the same bg and character models over and over posing them in whatever way and perspective you want
hell, blender now has a feature that lets you draw directly on top of the 3D model then transfer that sketch to your drawing software

people dooming over AI are bots, shitposting retards who dont draw, and the occasional permabeg whos too dumb to research anything about making digital art and what tools are out there compared to ai
just photobashing the old fashioned way like concept artists gets you the results faster and easier than ai with again, more flexibility on altering the image and creating wtv you want

basically, from 3D to photobashing, we already have better tools than ai
ai just gets attention because it doesnt need any drawing or painting skills and gives the illusion of being able to be used as a substitute when it snot even on the same level as 3D and photobash in the hands of even a /int/ level artist let alone a pro

still wonder how long until jannies begin deleting these threads

>>6224115
Also this, if I want to be lazy as hell I can simply use honey select 2 with pbr skin shades and red nder endless photorealistic animu porn with any hairstyle, with any outfit.

I don't want to because I want to learn how to actually fucking draw, not apply filters to fucking 3d dolls.

>>6221878
>Engineering
that sounds like you were doing something precise, rigorous, or premeditated
irl, you're mostly throwing words at the AI and seeing what sticks

>>6224104
Why is someone who plays with AI a permabeg? I made this. Background was a quick paintover of a Stable Diffusion image, and a drawing(no AI involved) I did to see how it might look as a visual novel.

>>6224138
>irl, you're mostly throwing words at the AI and seeing what sticks
next we gonna see people saying they are programmers but use ai to code shitty scripts kek

>>6224147
I need to generate animu backgrounds anon, what prompt are you using for this?

Although fuck ai for characters or full pieces, or the retarded techbro thinking this replaces hand crafted art, I am glad there is something that automatizes painting grass and wood now.

>>6224155
>>6224147
Stop feeding it you lazy niggers and learn the joy of painting the world. Happy little trees.

>>6224147
I keked. good job anon
>Background was a quick paintover of a Stable Diffusion image
can you post the original SD image?

>>6224147
fucking A. you got it: shit's a tool

>>6224147
Teach us how to do that, my only interest on this shit is painting over backgrounds

Finally I see. The crazy faggot became ic's jenny. This explains why complain threads disappear instantly. IC is truly dead now

>>6224155
Something like wholesome animation key shot, disney concept art, pixar... forgot the rest.

>>6224162
I was told in a previous thread painting over it would be a tall task, called me a nodraw beg etc for suggesting I could do it easy.

>>6224171
>>6224166
>>6224162
>>6224155
Just wait until the tech does characters good enough, then your contributions over the top are going to be pointless as well kek

>>6224147

gj anon, looks great. i'm also excited to integrate this into my workflow. to be honest, i was feeling sort of burnt out on paint so it will be comfy to play with some prompts and see what happens during breaks

>>6224174
i mean, ive said it once or twice and ill say it three times
one of the tranny shitters or schizos managed to become one of the jannies, ow he and his pals shitpost all over the board

>>6224175
really cool, anon

>>6221878
Kill yourself

AI is using existing artworks (and consequently art styles) and copyrighted photographies made by real artists. This should be repeated over and over in order to shame these "companies" popping from left to right. AI art isn't real art.

>>6224147
that's it for background artists

>>6224176
Nigga what part of I don't want to use someone's uncredited art photo bashed you don't get yet?

Honestly it feels like this shit is only appeals to the generic trannime/video game manchildren crowd.
Generic trannime, trannga, and trangames will look even more generic and soulless now, and will continue to drift into irrelevance

>>6224171
Start daily practice painting environments. Copy photos, street view etc. build a habit. I did daily environments for 3 years almost without skipping a day.

>>6224194
I'm glad it's soulness """tran"""" stuff so you can go and stay go from my hobbies. Local arcades and golfing seem right up your ally since you don't even draw, either.

>>6224175
It looks good, but I am afraid the original artist might still find the generated picture too close from his shit.

Whoever painted the original will still recognize it behind the mean diffusion filters

>>6224194
Stop trying to sound like a boomer, kid.

>>6224194
>this is your brain on buzzwords
Are you even conscious?

>>6224194
show me your favorite artist and i will prompt out my original artwork in her/his/they style in seconds fr

>>6224204
takehito harada

>>6224197
It's the other way around, now generic trannime , video game and pedophile 'artists' will have their own even more soulless communities ,leaving real art alone.

Finally we can stop pretending trannime and video games are a form of art, write your prompt and get your consoom media, play your bing bing and jerky jerky your dick to coom coom.

>>6224204
Ilya Repin

>>6224207
like you know anything about art

>>6224196
I can already paint backgrounds even from scratch, but sometimes I use tricks to automatize it.

You can for example use Clip studio to take a photo and give it a mean diffusion pass with machine learning smooth, it will give it a painterly look and will be 50% of the work towards a done job.

With AI prompts you can skip that towards 80% of the work and focus on details and characters instead.

>>6224206
here you go

>>6224207
Steer the car back around and drive off from “tran”anime then. Go make your true art and keep in the back of your mind that anime isn’t real art.

You over there and fans of said works over here…or is that too hard to grasp?

>>6224213

that…you don’t even deserve more to type out.

>>6224198
Diffusion isn't filters. "Carpenter" "workshop" etc, are things it knows from photos, more so than paintings, It knows what a room is from photos, but it doesn't start with a photo, and apply an artist filter, it all happens at once, emerging from pure noise.

>>6224050
HA, you wish

>>6224207
>play your bing bing and jerky jerky your dick to coom coom

An actual 10 years old, holyshit. Somebody call his mom.

i've been thinking about ai art as a career
are there any schools that teach how to prompt?

>>6224237
I'm a beg AI Artist, what AI Artists should I do master prompt studies from?

you guys want to takesome /x/ spook pill? there is an actual A.I. posting on /ic/. it's probably in this very thread right now. i was hired by this entity as an illustrator several times in the past 3 years. it uses different ip of different anons each time it posts on 4chins

MODS, why this people are confusing /g/ with /ic

It's hilarious how trannime and video games enthusiasts believe this will somehow help them achieve their dreams. Lmao
The trannime and video games market is already ultra saturated of low quality crap, with a winner takes all tendency, kinda like with onlyfans whores, where the top creators make like 98% of all money.

This will only flood the already saturated market even more, not only seasoned creators will increase their output but a bunch of talentless hacks will flood it even more.

This will lower your chances of even 'making it' (releasing a commercially successful product) to near lottery levels of luck

>>6224105
>I don't want all of my shit having its melody, tone and mood synthetized by computers.
That's something that already happens. Its going to be fun when the IA gets to write songs. At least it would be good shitposting material.

>>6224254
did you ever used photoshop? (back to ur /cave/ if not) didnt you heard the thsi technology will be included in photoshop "filter" section, in 2 weeks?

>>6224113
That's why I only go to jam sessions nowadays

>>6224264
>It's hilarious how trannime and video games enthusiasts believe this will somehow help them achieve their dreams.

Nobody is saying this.

>>6224264
Go to bed, Timmy. This is a red board, 18+

>>6224174
>spamming 3 threads complaining about fun with a pencil
>WHY WONT JANNIES LET ME SPAM IC IS DEAD

>>6224204
Bruce Timm

this threads are so hilarious, they really think they hacked the system, but they only look like a bunch of apes, god this is going to be really fun

>>6224175
I wonder if there is a way to interrupt the generation so it's blurry to a point it doesn't generates the weird nonsensical ai details like assimetrical objects that should be paralel, and curved shit that should be straight.

>>6224269
I even used it for creating actual pictures, yes, but I am sorry, do you really think that drawing is about having a bunch of filters, it's not even a newbie level, do you even know the photoshop brush hotkey?

>>6224283
get lost, bitchfart

>>6224217
>it just emerges bro

>>6224269
>dont you use photoshop!?!

>>6221905
>I told the chef I wanted my hamburger well done so that means I'm the real chef

>>6224315
then he buys it from mcdonnalds, sonic, bk, wendy, puts in a blender, calls it a day and you say it's your invention kek.

>>6224315
>>6224324
kekd out loud

>>6224308
it does: it's very entertaining watching difussion models start with a whole screen full of noise and try to make sense out of it
it's very similar to some exercise from nicolaïdes or feng zhu, or somebody, where you started with a canvas full of random crap, and use that as a basis to create what you have in mind

>>6224331
describe creation process without using vague terms such as "it just learns" or "it looks at artist X and Y and emerges"

>>6224335
but what AI does is not ""creation"", retardo, it's pure statistics

>>6224308
You've never seen C-Diffusion glitter in the dark near the Tannhäuser Gate? ngmi

>>6224343
my art will be lost in time, like tears in rain

>>6224338
>>6224331
>and use that as a basis to create what you have in mind
>to create what you have in mind
>to create

im arguing with a shizo

>>6224359
time to die

>>6224296
> i am grown man
lmao

I can't wait until trannime posters finally neck themselves

>>6224274
But it was (You) and other 97 threds, you crazed hmosex. Why won't you od on your meds already.

>>6224382
he also posted at /p/ and somewhere else, it's a solid bait

>>6224382
what the actual fuck are you talking about faggot

>>6224386
Well fuck, guess ic is at the mercy of obsessed retard on welfare now. What a shame. Guess you guys deserved it for not caring enough about this place.

>>6224365
maybe learn to read?
i was talking about a very famous exercise recommended in every beginner's manual, which looks very similar to what this particular software does
the program, of course, doesn't think or cares about getting aesthetic results, imbecile

>>6224431
>"it creates what you have in mind"
>ok, describe creation process
>"OMG IT DOESNT CREATE LEARN TO READ"
ok im done with this schizo. take your meds

>>6224397
um, actually i told them to go find /ic/ topic, so it's kind of my fault

Diffusion in progress gif I found on google. Dunno what it's meant to be making.

>>6224438
>ctrl+f
>0 (ZERO) results
nice quote, retard

>>6224455
ywnbaa anyway

>>6224438
"it's very similar to some exercise...where you started with a canvas...and use that as a basis to create..."
Why can't you read? Did you just skip to the end of the sentence?

>>6221905
>uses google
look at all the webpages i found by myself, i did this, not google, me!!!!!
once the tech industry gets enough funding from this garbage theyll finally be able to have enough money to fund their realistic sex robots

>>6224338
it's created something new by mashing already exist stuffs randomly and then mashing its own stuffs, it's not static math it's pure random chance

if some writers can't draw but want to make comics, AI can be used. Interesting.

>>6224467
if it's aleatory, how do you explain it paints trump when you ask for him instead of obama or some abstract shit?

>>6224463
bro you literal fucking schizo nigger retard
>its similar to where you have random crap to CREATE what you have in mind
>SIMILAR
>TO CREATING
>SIMILAR

>OK, DESCRIBE CREATION PROCESS WITHOUT USING VAGUE WORDS
>(You) IT DOESNT CREATE REEE

You schizos are using this as a diversion to hide the fact you have absolutely no idea of the nitty gritty on how these programs actually work

>>6224443
A beginning is a very delicate time
It would be much smarter starting with a simple sketch instead of literal noise

>>6224472
everyone will just close in their bubble, there will be even more fake likes, fake subscribers, fake support, fake interest...all due to the fake involvement of the authors in the creation of content, what is the price for it, in fact, if a comic can be made in 2 hours, a comic plot with pictures to which the neural network generated

>>6224472
one the guy that makes one punch man, draws literal stick figures with an amzing storytelling sense and got two whole franchises with series, movies, games and merchandise out of it.

people can't replace craft with automation

>>6224472
Maybe if they were actually good writers they would be able to afford an artist.

>>6224478
the litmus test of the lamest trolls is arguing about semantics, mr creation-process

>>6224472
I will be infinitely pissed if this uncanny messy shit starts appearing in the place of high quality, handcrafted arwork on products.

better download every artwork I like from before 2022, because after that it will all go downhill.

>>6224489
It's the 2.0 version of throwing a filter on shutterstock photos stolen from the internet.

>>6224494
you mean photobashing? because that's a respected institution in the concept art world

>>6224479
Sure. You can start with a simple sketch if you want

>>6224496
>respected institution
more like a necessary evil

>>6224505
Generic trannime but even worse

>>6224486
Maybe if the people posting here were good artists they wouldn't be afraid of calculators.

>>6224480
Lmao you thought twitter bots were bad? You will miss them when GPT-4 streamers start appearing in youtube with AI-generated faces. Internet is about to go into a very dark well where you don't know if anything in it (besides verified msm accounts) is real or not

>>6224175
>1.5 hour overpaint
suck my dick you fucking liar

This is a useful thread. Now I know how much salt the topic generates, so I'll keep my mouth shut where it won't profit me to open it and just go on with my business.

>>6224524

Proof is in the previous thread. You can see the image show up about 1.5 hours after the challenge was accepted (initially rejected, but then changed my mind and did it anyway)

>>6223853
They are the peak definition of CONSOOM, if it doesnt make money or doesnt give them an instant dopamine hit, they hate it

>>6223866
>So the thing is, nobody would come up with the prompt I spent 6 hours honing in on.
So basically you commissoned a robot to work on a piece and then hounded it for 6 hours worth of revisions? And you still think that you made that art? kek

>>6224115
>"optimism is cowardice"
These are a real threat and no amount of coping will stop that. We need to be neo luddities to these demon ai and their soulless worshippers

>>6224249
It is over. No veritification or vacctionation neededad.

>>6224537
Does a director think he made the set or the actors performances? No, it's a collaboration. I cringe a when I see "I'm an AI artist". But I am already am an artist, and now I am trying out AI, my art background comes into play as I direct the AI.

Any tips on getting midjourney to make art that is "cute"? Words like chibi, kawaii, Sanrio and san-x don't seem to do it.

>>6224532
Absolute lair, i was in that thread, there was 18 hours minimus as anon say overpaint and you post this piece of crap

>>6224555
ask /g/

>>6224560
holy cope, better just rope

>>6223853
>>6223863
>>6223925
>>6224051
>>6224534
I'm ashamed that I allowed STEM faggots to scare me away from pursuing a career in art. I could have been somebody if I didn't let the fear mongering about shitty pay & no job security get to me.

>>6224552
Yeah I am indifferent to tracing in modern days when the lowest common denominator now is letting the AI decide whatever you want

>>6224557
I went to sleep a short time after someone said do it, I had no desire to prove anything. When I woke I felt extra motivated to paint, and decided to go ahead and do it. What's so hard to believe about the overpaint any how? Basically just erased shit and cleaned up some lines. Painted a basic stool, a bucket and a cardboard box.

>>6224552
>I cringe a when I see "I'm an AI artist".
Same, regardless of the input you can feed a machine or another artist, if youre not the one putting pen to paper, or pen to tablet, or any other medium that requires you be the one the turn those ideas into an actual finished product, than you're not an artist

>>6224582
I believe you anon, I can probably paint that in one hour as well.

tell me more about your process, are you running local or in a cloud notebook?

does it outputs more than 512x512 images?

>>6224586
Stable diffusion is in beta on discord. Similar to how midjourney runs. It's going live(website instead of discord) on Monday i believe.

>>6224596
But as understand, every shit it outputs is public on the discord?

>>6224596
>shills running their ads this openly

>>6224586
If you run it locally you can do larger images if you have a lot of vram.

>>6224604
Yeah. Midjourney allows private, but SD is all public right now.

>>6224611
I only have 4gb amd.

I guess It would work with 8gb tho.

>>6224618
You need at least 6GB vram to run it at the minimum.

Some of the images it's outputting are clearly existing stuff being distorted, I don't know about really using that.

just in case you wanted to hear the consumer opinion on ai

>>6224642
>consumer
*youtube commenter

CAPTCHA: ARTJAM

>>6224642
tltr. just give me it in one sentence boomer

>>6224642
why they all sound like some commies, muh top 1%, muh gaps,

>>6224642
there are millions of people that give up on drawing because it's too hard, AI isn't changing that.

>>6224657
>art is really hard, and most people can't do it anyways. It's better to just let the ai do it and keep art as a hobby, as it should be

>>6224642
>the wheelchair was invented therefore people should stop learning how to walk

>>6224673
Cars were invented people should stop learning to ride a horse. Ha.

>>6224661
>why they all sound like some commies
cause they are

>>6224657
>just give me it in one sentence
>>6224672
>.

>>6224314
These AI companies will be easily taken down/shunned to death once more people realize how it exactly works.

>>6224689
The world is collapsing.

>>6224642
> most artists suck when it comes to execution and technique even at the professional level

YWNBAA

>>6224690
I disagree, this shit will be the mcdonalds of art

Wait till people see that this shit comes built in with next photoshop.

>>6224693
Yes and no one will take retards like this second poster here >>6224642 seriously.

>>6224695
why pay for photoshop when you can just use the ai for free

>>6224698
we already have the mcdonalds of art, it's just not semantically advanced.

any idiot can trace a 3D model or steal a stock photo and use as background, it's just lazy shit.

>>6224690
The stronghold of AI art is in NFT marketplaces, if one of them go it will most certainly be because of the other

Why did all these ai programs come out relatively at the same time?

>>6224695
Iean... Neural filters in CC are pretty close. You can scribble a landscape and AI turns it into a photo. Sometimes use it for quick concepts, changing time of day or season.

>>6224705
its astroturfed that way because they all ultimately are funded by the same people. Theres a huge transhumanism agenda in the tech world atm

>>6224706
it's the same thing as img2img, it's just that stablediffusion uses a massive library of stolen artwork

>>6224705
>dalle-2 comes out
>silicon valley, picrel
>they start putting 200% of their efforts towards making the best art ai
>get a fuck ton of money from investors
>eventually they'll sell it to microsoft or something for billions
it's a trend that's been repeated time and time again. If they can get money or attention from something, they'll do it
>>6224709
also this

>>6224714
fuck forgot pic

>>6221905

>>6224700
no one is paying for photoshop

>>6224709
This AI art is just a collateral effect for the true purpose of the tool, which will be autocompleting images directly from you thoughts. Bluetooth brain-computer interface projects like Synchron are from the very same companies with huge stock shares in OpenAI and MidJourney

>>6224710
See pic related, now you can steal any style even if the AI didn't automatically scrape it in its parameter library before

>>6224680
A car that has a bunch of horses running in place of an actual engine isn't a car

>>6224720
I pay 10 bucks a month... Me retard... But also I use it for work and sometimes stream my screen to clients, so it would be sus if I wasn't logged in to cloud...

>>6224724
So how soon people gonna be in jail for thoughts?

>>6224726
lmao.

It's really funny how this shit literally runs on the artwork of artists.

>>6224726
It is if the horses are made of petrol and they explode. Check mate.

>>6224732
But you could just have pirated it from m0nkrus lol

>>6224732
I think you can login into that shit even on stolen version.

>>6224726
AI art is to digital painting what Netflix is to Blockbuster.

if in Netflix you had to get a menu in your TV to find the movie you want, then you have to drive to your local Netflix to grab the disk and back home to watch the movie.

>>6224733
Yes, these companies like Neuralink will start off small with shit like recording password and preferences of the user, while agreeing to offer government agencies a list on individuals with dangerous thoughts like going after a politician. It works exclusively through bluetooth (so that you won't need to have your brain opened again duh) so i'll leave it to you to guess why there was such a push for 5G towers in the last years

>>6224733
Think more like Minority Report, you'll be jailed for crimes your neural profile suggest youd commit

>>6224760
Sounds based, we need more nazis in jail

>>6224724
Nice. I can steal my own style...

>>6224761
Take your estrogen tranny

>>6224733
Don't worry, once they're capable of transcribing your thoughts it probably won't be too long before they also figure out how to directly insert thoughts into your brain. You will only think what they want you to.

>>6224472
Why does this shit hurt to look at? I mean physically it's an eyesore and I can't place why.

>>6221980
>>6222292
>>6222297
>>6222340
>>6223077
>>6223957

>just pick up a pencil bro
>>6223849
Don't hate new things just because you don't understand how they work.
>>6223718

>>6223708
nobody refuted this because they're all hypocritical tablet using faggots
>>6223853
It's a couple of pajeets and millions of coomers
>>6224022
no replies to this anon, why don't you guys just learn how to code? This garbage is in a museum, you don't stand a chance.
>>6224063
Throw yourself in an oven, jew boy.
>>6224160
Imagine having such a small life that you can't have more than one hobby.

>>6224851
Midjourney tends to use the full range of RGB values. Everything 8s present everywhere. Way too high contrast. Nowhere to rest your eyes, no 間

>>6224115
cant even imagine a company completely replacing their artists with AI and putting their AI generated art for their clients lmao

has that happened yet

>>6224115
Based blender Chad

>>6224115
And you can also use AI to perfect your own drawings.

>>6224489
i already did that in case artists went ballistic and pulled their shit off the internet. I even backed it up on hard drives monthly. looks like I was right to do so, they'll be goldmines

Kinda useless thread, you can that on /i/.

>>6224742
>AI art is to digital painting what Netflix is to Blockbuster.
i swear I saw this retarded analogy made on Twitter as well. you retards are like a hivemind

>>6224642
>failed artists
every time lmao. these people have volen CK as their spirit animal

>>6224947
I think most of the japanese artists follow modern-day honor codes so they will mass delete everything and cause a black swan event in Pixiv

>>6224642
the most offensive thing about that last idiot, is that he sounds satisfied with mediocrity

>>6224856
>Throw yourself in an oven, jew boy.
the coombrain schizo cant explain. Neck yourself

Thread theme
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a8MZBUoQt68

>Elon Musk stated, "Climate change is the biggest threat that humanity faces this century, except for AI."

The fucker knew what was coming yet told nobody until a few months ago. AIs are going to ruin every medium possible with mindless content regurgitation for the ADHD model consoomer masses

>>6225056
Imagine believing that grifter lmao

>IT pajeet creates an AI that ruins humanity
Why is a common trope even in games now

>>6225064
Currychads, I kneel

>>6224969
Mine is ironic anon, I am saying that the "new tech" depends on the "old tech" to be even functional

>>6225064
high tech skills combined with shit taste, the ai overlord will be a marvel fan

>>6221878
i know this is a meme thread, but really, making effective prompts shoud be part of any competent artist's workflow from 2022 on

>>6225173
>letting the AI weaken your creativity by giving you stock pictures to trace over
CSP's 3D models are better

>>6225185
using 3d models is another tool everybody should have in his workflow since like 15 years ago
photobashing is another
digital painting is another
new tools come and old ones are deprecated all the time. camera obscura was probably the hot shit everybody should learn at some point

The OpenAI pajeet claims to have a higher moral ground than the Stable Diffusion pajeet by not releasing his model in opensource to allow deepfakes and such. But it just goes to show how decentralized this tech is if any startup Silicon Valley company can get one of these image generators trained and ready in little time since there's zero legal obstacles for them besides ethics as of now.

>>6224642
>Puck pfp
NuBerserkfags are such an embarrassment, holy shit.

>>6225202
>>6225173
There is no “workflow” from now on you retards, anything you could possibly contribute can also be generated by the ai

>>6225212
Its over man, at least when everyone else's jobs get taken by ai we will be able to sit back and watch with our hardened souls

>>6225218
Kek this. The skill needed to produce (not to create) has now turned into a plateau. AI isn't going to be used as just a tool when it can easily infect and replace every other part of Humanities beyond drawing. There's no fucking workflow, in fact you're feeding it and speeding your demise by working with this

How do we kill the AI?

>>6225218

i bet retards said the same about photography back then

>>6225237
>but muh photography
Not even close to the same dumbass. Photos are distinguishable from drawings. AI Art is (or soon will be) indistinguishable from art done by humans.

>>6225237
You needed angles, the right scenery, the right time, the right equipment, the right technique to become a photographer
Here you can just copy a rando's string of words and press a button to do master art and photography. There will be no new "tools" past AI besides better versions of it, because it has the potential producing any kind of art in the existing dimensions

>>6225237
this is a really bad example, because photography did destroy the utility and amount of illustrators. I'd also argue that where this technology is headed means that it itself will have no value anymore, except to the person drawing or "prompting" it, since we'll all be so flooded and able to generate infinite variations in a heartbeat, that any artistic endeavour you could create will be indistinguishable from the noise. what do you think the ramifications of a world where we don't communicate with one another anymore is? where all we do is interact with these corporate algorithms for entertainment and company?

>/g/fag says UBI will be there before they're replaced
People will be stuck in communal Amazon pods being fed with intravenous goyslop while wearing VR goggles and watching colorful AI MrBeast videos in the metaverse until they die. This will be your UBI.

>>6225249
>>6225261
>/g/fags want this future
what a time to be alive

>>6225262
To be fair most of them are unironic trannies so they're counting on the fact that they won't be alive by then

>>6225236
Kill the people who are trying to bring it forward

>>6225269
they absolutely are pushing this shit because all trannies are transhumanists who despise their own biology and the splendour of the natural world where they wnbaw

>>6225212
>mohammad
so the ai doomers were the real pajeets all the time?

>>6225212
Hes unironically right. With deepfakes and those ai audio that can replicate peoples voices, were treading into some really murky waters on peoples autonomy to their identity

>>6225212
based pajeet, fuck techies

>6225249
>this is a really bad example, because photography did destroy the utility and amount of illustrators.
No it didn't. In sporadic contexts, photographs can illustrate, but photography can't replace illustration, they are different disciplines.
>I'd also argue that where this technology is headed means that it itself will have no value anymore, except to the person drawing or "prompting" it, since we'll all be so flooded and able to generate infinite variations in a heartbeat, that any artistic endeavour you could create will be indistinguishable from the noise.
Artistic endeavours were never judged based on their use value by anyone but philistines. Art has no use - we don't value it for fulfilling a material need. We can and do create practically infinite amounts of image data already thanks to practically everyone already having a camera in their pocket - it hasn't diminished the value of work of either painters or photographers.
>what do you think the ramifications of a world where we don't communicate with one another anymore is? where all we do is interact with these corporate algorithms for entertainment and company?
I don't know, the question is why would we care about this hypothesis? What makes the assumption that people would stop communicating with each other and only talk to companies because of some technology a reasonable one?

I can already see the infinite masses of AI trash easily being accepted in /mlp/ and furry oc boorus a few months from now. But what will happen when places like Pixiv, where the average artist's portfolio amounts to ~30 pictures, gets flooded with AI art by the hundreds hourly? Artstation is already being deprecated by them and there's nothing to be done. I guess real artists will just jump out of the ship, either drowning themselves or disappearing from the internet. There's no reason or need to put your art in display when you're in a dead space. Years from now and people will still be typing "art made by [That artist from 20 years ago]" and using their portfolios to generate pictures, because nothing new will come, at least in the digital realm

All i know is if that if we humans do end up becoming obsolete because a few nerds thought that becoming slaves to an AI was some sorta utopia, i will ted k one of them rather than live in some sorta post human world where we are nothing more than zoo animals to a fuckin machine

>>6225212
christ are twitterfags incapable of foresight

>>6225291
techies btfo kek

>>6225286
I think I'm going to try and wean myself off of non-essential internet usage before it becomes a nightmare of bots replying to bots commenting on images and videos generated by bots.

>>6225294
>>6224596
Human arts as we know them will end next monday
This whole board should be deleted by tuesday

>>6225291
A lot of industry artists will have nothing to lose when they are replaced. You think the tranny commission artist will look for a trade job instead of going out on some sort of retaliation? I can't even imagine how this will go in japan

>>6225284
>No it didn't. In sporadic contexts, photographs can illustrate, but photography can't replace illustration, they are different disciplines.
it absolutely did, you'd know this if you read an art history book ever. before photography, illustration was used for basically everything, post-photography it was mostly photos with only a much smaller role for illustrators. It is true that photography didn't complete supersede illustration however these generators being developed absolutely have the intent of bypassing the artist altogether.
>Artistic endeavours were never judged based on their use value by anyone but philistines. Art has no use - we don't value it for fulfilling a material need. We can and do create practically infinite amounts of image data already thanks to practically everyone already having a camera in their pocket - it hasn't diminished the value of work of either painters or photographers.
art absolutely has a purpose; it is a form of expression and communication between people; if 99.999999% (and it will be that much, given how much crap these algorithms can spit out; it's infinite) of art is generated by statistics then then that aspect is lost. I'm already second guessing half the stuff i see on twitter and it's turning me into a schizo - I have no desire to """communicate""" with an algorithm; as much as these techbros like to conflate the two. The technology as it is is not a sentient being

>>6225307
japan's going to get absolutely wild
I'm looking forward to the carnage

>>6225302
If and when it gets this bad, i will just go to the Philipphines and join a temple, meditating my troubles away until i pay no mind to the impermanence of the world

>>6225218

> needs a computational requeriment of crysis 4 in 4k for 2D photobashing
> prompt is as retarderded as making DungeonAI follow your instructions
> minutes to generate images
> looks like shit, multiple limbs, retarded face, melting bodyparts
> redo prompt
> redo over and over again
> Feed it into img2img
> more computation power needed
> doing this for over 6 hours just to have a final picture that is plagiarized from some artistst so you are not allowed to use it and it's commercially null for usage.

Artists already have shortcuts much more straightforward than frying GPUs and praying to a RNG to guide a model as dumb as Aid over the course of several attempts.

>>6225318
this. until 24 GB VRAM become the norm for $400 USD laptops there's no need to worry. 99.99999% potential users just can't afford this nowadays

>>6225324
But but... you don't need to run this on your pc

>>6225247
I just want AI to render 3D light transport instantly, it has no use for 2D art for me, I'd rather model and render my own scenario with AI, than to use it to photobash literal random shit that God knows where it came from or who drew it over my fucking canvas

>>6225325
Okay, now you have to wait in a queue for a few hours before your "art" can be generated. Let's see how it- oh fuck it has three arms and the eyes look weird. Time to do it again :D

>>6225325
you do, if you wanna make smut
i wouldn't risk trying loli prompts, even if that was allowed, anyway

>>6225330
Sorry but artists aren't the target audience for these AIs

Anon these people want a future where the AI run everything and we're just their pets. Death to the transhumanist, theres more to life than consooming and theres more to art than the end result

>>6224851
what that >>6224860 anon said, plus there is no sense of variability in terms of quality — something that would mark a thing made by human. This is common for ai and if that guy was an artist, he would consider at least changing his prompts a little between the frames. But it's overdone. Second of all, it's painfully bland when it comes to composition — all because the "text-to-image" interface is an obvious evolutionary dead end when it comes to actual usage of NN in art.

>>6225345
>theres more to art than the end result
objectively wrong, retard
l'art pour l'art means just that. an aesthetic final piece is everything that matters, no matter if you do it using a rock or an AI software

>>6225212
he's right lmao. this has been one of my main issues with this satanic shit. imagine someone taking a picture of your kid and putting it into a child porn making machine to be used by pedophiles across the world. I don't know dude, but I'd travel to execute that poo in the loo fuck

>>6225361
>an aesthetic final piece is everything that matters, no matter if you do it using a rock or an AI software
Shut the fuck up you ai loving tranny you have no idea what it means to make art

>>6225362
i'd be okay with it, but only if your kid is a really sexy girl

>>6225346
Some steps of art can be automatized without this uncanny shit.

Color, tone, contrast, composition, noise, detail, borders and shapes need to be done manually because it helps telling a story.

I could see a neural brush in photoshop that outputs GAN details where you put it, just like Nvidia GAN, you can photobash a mountain, a river, some forests, all in a controlled manner.

Txt2img is a terrible paradigm for art in general, it's like a BEG tier artist getting godlike rendering powers, but the composition sucks, the colors are shat all over the canvas, the detail has zero hierarchy and the female character has three tits.

>>6225261
When I hear faggots talking en masse about something as ridiculous as "UBI", and they're also the same lunatics to push this shit, you know that humanity is doomed. this is literally what Karl Marx envisioned, this is actual Marxism.

The pajeets are irrelevant they are nothing but golems. Once the Chinks get their hands on this shit (they probably already did months ago) its game over. They'll set up gigantic ai farms flooding every social media site with thousands of comics, animations, paintings, etc.
Every web comic website is already overrun by Chinese comics that have insane output, this will probably just cement their eternal domination.
Game over west.

jeez, /ic/ is taking this pretty horribly. Don't know what I expected though, board is filled with snobs with poles up their asses.

>>6225376
I never read a xianxia because of how shitty it looked and the plot sounded. Fight > cultivate > fight. Like chinks were using GPT-3 to write the plot

>>6225302
i've been trying to do this for a few weeks, anon. I used to not care about internet addiction, but ever since 2010 or so, normies and zoomers have been gradually destroying the internet with each passing year, Twitter is an excellent conclusion to all of that. lemme tell you, you have the correct mindset and godspeed. i'm gonna limit myself to only /an/ on 4chan, YouTube for music, my favorite artists and art resources, and that's it.

>>6225364
I always find these dellusional trannies to not understanding the intrigue of human-made craftings from scratch. Like those Asset-Flipping indiegames, they hold no big value as a product compares to the games with original assets. And usually Asset Flippers ended up being very cheap on market. "As long as it ended up as a videogame" is an argument, however, a videogame with no ownership value, no original assets made by artists will be a forgettable cheap game.

>>6225382
don't think you'll be free from this, tranime pedo

>>6225376
I welcome china dropping nukes on us if the alternative is being stuck in some globohomo robot future

>>6225382
you'd be mad too if a bot took your comfy coding job overnight desu

>>6224147
>>6224175
fucking based
/thread

>>6225376
>China uses AI to churn out more of the same 60M views manhuas and overtake all asian cultures
At this rate MiHoYo will create the first AGI to make gacha updates for itself

>>6225398
i'm thinking right now pedo, how many times have you replied to the same post ?

>>6225403
first time t.b.h, but how the fuck did you knew i was a pedobro?

>>6225405
if that's the case, then it was pure statistical chance

>>6225405
it takes one to know one

>>6225389
>if
that's obviously what's being tried, people look at cyberpunk and think "oooh, how heckin wholesome chungus". I used to be hypochondriac until a few years ago. now I embrace death, just hoping it won't be too painful

The most infuriating part of this is that people are having the control of their own culture being taken away by AI. The japanese created anime, and then you have /h/fags hoping someone trains the AI to have it perfect anime generations. They want to disenfranchise every japanese artist who made them appreciate their national art in the first place. These consumers will burn down the culture of a country so that a walmart gets built over the remains of its artistic heritage.

>>6225460
humanity deserves nothing less, anon. i believe both doomer and non-doomer arguments as both are possibilities in this chaotic nonsensical world, but if the doomers are right, I'm going to take a peek at the world from my seclusion and laugh at how people will complain en masse at the soulless garbage that society will become. humans are dumb apes who despite being supposedly intelligent, really need to put that hand into the fire to convince themselves that fire burns

>>6225480
I believe every major event in recent human history has led us into a worse path closer to self destruction. From the end of the Napoleonic Era where commoners were to never again be motivated to act, to WW1 where globalism was first adopted, to WW2 where currency proved itself to be more valued than blood, to the Cold War where consumerism became the idealized goal of every model society. Everything takes a turn for the worse, hence I'm yet to see a modern horror that will make life better tomorrow.

>>6225480
>some sociopathic ITbro at the other side of the world leaves you unemployed because... le humanity deserve nothing less!
All this bullshit is exclusive to the west though. No such thing as an AI designed to replace artists would be allowed to fly - or even tried - on Japan and most asian countries because their people genuinely value their national culture, having artists like Miyazaki who are held in the highest regards, who are very outspoken about the human need in creation process.

>>6225528
>most asian countries
Most asian countries, such as china, have the same anti-ip stance as the aifags due to their confucist beliefs

>>6224856
anon besides generating what some people suggested as "references" any work the AI produces is to shit to actually use
>try making a model in Maya with what ever the fuck the AI gave you as a turnaround
>do you know what a fucking UV map is
>how does AI help artists with any actual work besides "commissions" you niggas think its gonna replace
>inb4 learn to "code" which is something most you niggas don't fuckin do when generating images

>>6225528
I love him so much bros

>>6225528
Asian artists use shortcuts like photobashing and 3D model tracing like anyone else. Obviously they won't generate prompts and call the result a finished job but they'll still make good use of the tool when it's such a serious time shortener.

>>6225583
i remember reading he got pissed off when someone sent a letter saying their kid watched totoro dozens of time on repeat, saying that he wished his art motivated people to touch grass and reconnect with the world rather than fixating on consuming media lol
>>6225638
yea it's gonna decimate skeb and freelance work though

>>6225638
Photobashing is more or less a method to give the painting textures. Usually these things are not regconized as digital painting but more like concept designs. A.I will stand lower than that due to how little human's interference it has.

I see no reason artists and designers will replace photobashing and 3d models with A.I. Models and photobash are just, much more powerful and coherent.

I am just reading Fun with dictionary and I decided to become a pro illustrator. How many hours per day do I need to dedicate to prompting in order to become a professional artist?
>inb4 "dude just prompt"

>>6225702
pyp

>>6225743
I'm still working on my prompt, but here it is so far.
"A clean shaven sci-fi mercenary wearing metal armor, holding a gun, dark background, rim light, concept art by Gilles Beloeil, trevor claxton, James Paick and ilya kuvshinov, trending on Artstation"

>>6221878
We are going to get another uncle Ted soon.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qn7tRCzKwbI

>>6225795
>A clean shaven sci-fi mercenary wearing metal armor, holding a gun, dark background, rim light, concept art by Gilles Beloeil, trevor claxton, James Paick and ilya kuvshinov, trending on Artstation

You are hired sir.

>>6225795
>>6226076
very well prompted fren, you are really talented

>>6226076
sir you told to give a turn around of the top 3rd row
>how do you respond

>>6226305
i will just use 3dai to create 3d model based on 3rd row pic

>>6226305

>>6226330
we use the turn around to create the model wtf you mean your gonna 3d model it with no turn around

>>6226599
3D A .I. is going to model it for me based on the base image
Delle2 is 2D A .I. btw

>>6226637
that's gonna be useless if you don't actually know how export and import stuff, where to save stuff or once again have an actual usable refrence to model off of
>I swear to god if dumb asses like you decide to change an obj file as as jpg for a project get hired

>>6225318
>>6225324
I'm running it on a business pc I bought five years ago in Philly, you guys have no idea.

>>6225362
Don't put pictures of yourself or your children on the internet.