/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

you first nerd

Sure, why not.

Alright. This time posting an actual drawing.

Arright

>>6173267
I kind of dont like pointing at others and call one of the three (four?) skill ranks on the board, but this one sure is nice to look at, I like the overall composition and details. Great work!

Why yes I color dropped a sunset photo, how could you tell?

>>6173263
>>6173267
>>6173283
>>6173307
beg

>>6173263
/pro/ i really like this
>>6173267
dunno how to tell since it's such a simple sketch but it's very cute
>>6173283
cute /int/
>>6173307
/beg/ but peak soul
>>6173319
/int/ this oc would do super well on twitter
>>6173320
/beg/ with soul, though the white background is burning my eyes

>>6173263
int for sure
>>6173267
chaotic /trad/
>>6173283
background looks int but the character high beg
>>6173307
/soul/beg
>>6173319
low int but nice colors even if picked from photo
>>6173320
high beg
>>6173333
high quads

Is anime allowed?

>>6173245
ok let's go

>>6173337
>>6173333
Christ how can you retards have such bad takes, to leave beg you have to understand most if not all of the fundies, at least understand 75% of them and mastered the rest

>>6173658
/based/ I love you, and I love that you didn't kill yourself

I'm thinking I badly need to work on my process/brushwork above all else but I'll welcome second opinions

My last digital piece and I'm gonna reply to this with the sign I made yesterday in trad

>>6173675

>>6173679
The face is good but your hands look like empty rubber gloves

>>6173661
pyw

Am I/ beg/ yet?

>>6173756
not only a beg, but also SOULFUL
unironically saved, will add a dog snout and turn it into furry porn some day

>>6173756
based

i just cranked this out in four hours

if u kno whats being depicted hella props to u

>>6173796
here is something i did the other day

>>6173799
Good execution. Needs more gesture. Low int

>>6173801
>low int

????

>>6173799
your greyscale version looked much better, i assume you only did a gradient maps pass on this? need some overpainting to make it look good
it looks way worse that it actually is because of that

anyways solid /int/

I'm not good enough to rate, but I'll give opinions
>>6173263
This is very well done
>>6173267
I've seen your non abstract stuff, which is highly impressive
>>6173283
Cute and pleasing to look at
>>6173307
This looks pretty beginner, keep going
>>6173319
Great stylization, linework and rendering/color
>>6173333
I like this a lot, minus that hand of course
>>6173649
You did a good job polishing, keep working at the basics and you'll get good
>>6173673
I like the rendering and color choices
>>6173675
Nice composition and color choices, but the dude's face/head is a bit off. I also think he could stand to have a bit more detail since he's not as cartoony as the other characters
>>6173756
Cute, but just a bit too clean. Maybe vary the line weight a bit more
>>6173773
Def beginner, nice work though

>>6173799
In my opinion my dude, this isnt int. You chose a boring as fuck pose because you dont know perspective and mannequinization. Hands and feet are bad as well. High beg tops.

Enter: /Beg/

>>6173807
Posing is garbage and there's no real gesture, something that really needs to be fixed asap if your finished product is a dude on a white screen.
Rendering is decent but pretty samey across al material.
In general the feet and hands aren't that well made and hte face is lacking any real expression, its very general in a painter way.

Its mostly there but the overall lack of definition and character hold it back from being true int.

>>6173263
high /int/

>>6173267
/beg/ but the good kind with that appealing cartoon style

>>6173283
will give honorary high /beg/ the vector looking style is too ambiguous to really decide overall drawing skill it may be hiding skill or lack of skill can go either way

>>6173307
/beg/ but could fetch thousands of dollars if you convince some rich idiot youre a surrealist genius

>>6173319
high /beg/ wont give /int/ because its the most generic and static pose in existence so its hard to figure out skill level

>>6173333
low /int/

>>6173649
low /int/

>>6173658
high /beg/ youre only a few months to a year of grinding and study to be a solid /int/ but something tells me you rather draw for fun >>6173673
/int/

>>6173675
high /beg/ like comment i gave above you are also close to solid int skills but seem to enjoy drawing for fun more than attaining skill

>>6173679
hard to say but honorary high /beg/ the hands give away that you only focus your skills on only a few things so it hides your lack of knowledge well and this img shows that by the difference in skill between the face and hands
plus if you are the same market poster anon ive see before then ye, your good for the normie marketing but it masks lack of actual art skills

>>6173756
high /beg/ but that shitty style of lineart makes it looks worse than you actually are

>>6173773
you need jesus, i mean Loomis, or hampton or vilppu or houston, basically pure symbol drawing and in serious need of 3D forms

>>6173796
>>6173799
like other anon said your greyscale stuff looks way better than this, /int/ but needs better colors than just quick gradient maps or wtv weird coloring you doing

Sure why not

Something i'm working on rn

>>6173844
looks cool as shit. Dope brushwork my man

>>6173263
low int - terrible values and brushwork
>>6173267
post a real drawing.
>>6173283
mid beg - symbol drawn doodle. decent line quality.
>>6173307
beg - good comp and execution.
>>6173319
low int - zero anatomy knowledge
>>6173320
post a real drawing.
>>6173333
low int - flat, zero forms. learn values
>>6173649
low int - generic pixiv shit. learn proper fundies.
>>6173658
beg - stop chicken scratching
>>6173673
mid int - great shape design. bad lighting.
>>6173675
low int - bad anatomy, perspective, composition. decent stylization.
>>6173679
low int
>>6173756
beg - symbol drawn begshit. learn fundies.
>>6173773
beg - there's potential. learn facial anatomy.
>>6173796
mid int - very competent. big guy's head and face are very stiff.
>>6173799
low int - stiff pose. bad rendering. learn to block in values.
>>6173830
low int - failed perspective everywhere. bad lineart.
>>6173835
high beg
>>6173844
mid int - I've given you crits before, you didn't listen
>>6173847
high beg - bad anatomy. watch the proportions. terrible lineart and values.

>>6173843
>Generic and static pose
That's fair, I mostly just drew it for a profile pic anyway

>>6173863
mid-beg - really fucking messy and that neck freaks me out but keep hammering at it and it might be good
>>6173869
what the hell am I looking at
>>6173871
/int/ but very schizo
>>6173835
high beg but could do with some cleaning on where your strokes meet

>>6173830
>>6173843
>>6173859
Ty for the feedback anons
I'm gonna try to focus more on perspective and hand practices
(I'm >>6173675 & >>6173679 to not be confusing)

Curious where this one lands me, fuck me up famalams

>>6173881
sorry

>>6173891
ahhhh yeah that makes it much easier to look at, thanks.
personally i'd say mid-/int/, big fan of the face but i'm not entirely sure what the bottom half is supposed to portray

>>6173859
>mid int - very competent. big guy's head and face are very stiff.

lol hes a ""robot""

>>>6173799(You)
>low int - stiff pose. bad rendering. learn to block in values.

coming from not having drawn in two years this is fair

>>6173871
is this ink?

I like how the more critical anon is, the less likely he is to post his own art

>>6173901
yeah

I know it's shit but those threads are fun

>>6173904
bruh its a shooting gallery what do you expect lol its not like kim jung gi is going to be shitposting with us

>>6173911
def /beg/, maybe mid probably closer to low.

>>6173904
its a skill level assesment thread not a hugbox pls give me praise no matter what thread

plus plenty of anons give some tips or decent feedback aswell as being realistic with their assessments, its easy to distinguish the crabs from those who are giving a skill assessment in good faith

this is still an art critique board afterall you want a pure hugbox go to discord or wtv

>>6173926
>b-but hugbox!
put your money where your mouth is and be open to critique if you're going to be extremely critical toward others.
why are you scared of getting a critique?

There's a massive gap between a hugbox and being a crab. And the fact you and others aren't posting work with it shows that you yourself know that you're just being a crab because tying your art to it just opens you to equally unfair criticism.

>>6173889
want to say /int/ but this single image seems to be the only one ive seen from you posted 3-4 different times and i get the vibe you are better at painting then drawing and may using it as a crutch, the fact this img has a mix of trying to have realistic proportions and simplified ones like those weird stick arms and hands and forward facing simple pose dont help i trying to figure out if you fall into the camp of the /int/ that grinded only a specific thing or small number of specific things, or you are solid /int/ overall but the limited subject matter hides your true power level

def /int/ but what level of /int/ can only say after seeing more work from you

>>6173911
high /beg/ keep grinding you show potential

>>6173915
resolution hurts my eyes and want to give high /beg/ but theres enough indication of understanding of form ad anatomy to give low /int/ but again, shit hurts the eyes man post better pic

>>6173919
/beg/ , you need more 3D forms in your life, you show understanding of it with the inking on the dress but the face and bg cast doubts

>>6173844
high /int/

>>6173847
low /int/ some work on coloring/painting would bring you to solid /int/

>>6173863
honorary high /beg/

work more on gesture and figure drawing especially the 3D forms and anatomy and youll be /int/ in no time

>>6173869
low /int/ maybe solid /int/

>>6173871
schizo tier but /int/

>>6173835
you are correct, but on the bright side, theres no way from here but up, grab some resources and draw

>>6173830
low /int/ exaggerated proportions still show understanding of anatomy and form but stuff like the hands and wonky bg/perspective make me not give you a solid /int/

>>6173904
i think you are lost, discord hugboxes where no one wants to improve are that way -->

>>6173959
what makes it schizo
how can i improve

>>6173941
ok

>>6173959
>>6173843
tell me how these posts of mine are crab behavior and not me actually trying to be honest and maybe give some tips based on my own limited knowledge

but here, a few drawings ive done, i rarely do digital so dont have much to show besides this but i hope its enough to make you shut up and stop trying to derail a thread with your retarded tourist bullshit

>>6173964
Dunno dude your ratings honestly felt like they fell on the nicer side.
>>6173835
Are you the guy that animated that guns shooting animation?

>>6173964
they're not overly critical at all. and you posted your work, so clearly you're not the type person being referenced.

>>6173959
post work, poser

>>6173859
>post a real drawing
WAAHH YOU CAN'T STYLIZE OR BE SIMPLE
post your work right now beglet (I'm neither of those people btw)

>>6173859
pre-beg

>>6173971
Yes, I do post a bunch of gun anims here.

I may not be the guy you're thinking of tho. Heres another one of mine.

>>6173985
I'm thinking of that colored one with the turquoise soldiers, where the camera is looking at them. Anyways, the one you posted is charming. I don't have anything to comment on technically, but the style is cool as fuck.

>>6173263
>>6173267>>6173283
>>6173307
>>6173319
>>6173320
>>6173333
>>6173649
>>6173658
>>6173673
>>6173675
>>6173679
>>6173756
>>6173796
>>6173799
>>6173830
>>6173835
>>6173847
>>6173863
>>6173911
>>6173915
>>6173919
>>6173964
>>6173985
BEG

>>6173871
>>6173876
>>6173844
Int

>>6173988
Yeah thats me :)

I appreciate you remember. I've been working on an animation with those 2 soldier characters all summer. I'm almost done story boarding, I have 12 of the 14 min storyboarded. Hope to start actual animation animation here in 2-3 weeks.

>>6173971
>they fell on the nicer side.
i dont think its really nicer side, just that different people view levels of skill differently and i take into account more than just pure technical ability

like for alot of /ic/ yoshitaka amano or el greco would be /beg/ or /int/ when in reality they are masters in their own way

>>6173993
A fair. Cool stuff, will keep an eye out in the general.
>>6173997
Yeah that's a good way of putting it.

Been doing digital for like 8 months now and total 1 year

>>6173876
Please can you post some more of these in higher res?

I should draw more heads desu

>>6174080

Here's something I did recently

>>6174083
high beg. mostly good, but work on those proportions especially if they're forshortened or overlapping, like the feet. not really anything interesting going on to push it to int and the flaw in basics keeps you in beg.
>>6174101
low int. mostly good but rendering needs alot of work and often ruins anatomy and flow of other things, like that leg being way too sharp of a shadow. lighting needs some work too.
>>6174097
high beg, good mostly and some of the detailing is nice, without the character i'd actually call it low int if you were just pushing out fun card designs, but the person especially is pretty low quality.

a butthurt schizo ( >>6173320 ) who i probably upset with criticisms toward his pedo scribbles is impersonating me now. I will be posting with a lame ass tripcode from now on, rev up those filters I am annoying

>>6173283
kinda don't like this
>>6173263
Gross but I like the rendering a lot, jealous
>>6173267
Simple but cooler than your other posts I've seen
>>6173307
still beg sorry

have at it

have at it

>>6174122
Thanks for the input. Yeah anons on /fag/ told me too to work on the foreshortening. Maybe i should study Hogarth dynamic figure drawing. I heard the book emphasize on foreshortening

The last thing I completed before giving up art. Was I ever GMI? (Censored to avoid getting deleted for being furry smut.)

>>6174134
/int/ lighting, /beg/ everything else.

>>6174103
>>6174106
>>6174109
/beg/ to high /beg/

>>6174101
/int/

>>6174098
low /int/ to /int/ cant decide, figures got problems but the hatching and form are very good and carry the image

>>6174097
between high /beg/ and low /int/, a lot of detail distract from the fact theres some fundamental flaws like how the cloth works in certain parts and the shading/coloring that seems a bit all over the place
studying painting and rendering, especially values would easily bump you to /int/ levels

>>6174092
>>6174093
>>6174094
/int/ to high /int/

>>6174083
/int/ but hands are a weak point

>>6174080
high /beg/

>>6174063
/beg/ but shoes potential, more practise of figure drawing focusing on the 3D forms, cuz your main problem is symbol drawing the anatomy

>>6173985
>>6173993
i change my previous opinion of your work as /beg/ and put you in based tier, i enjoy your little animations and courage to do them instead of doomposting or perpetually grinding non animation before starting

>>6173963
the img you posted lookedl ike typical /ic/ schizo posts, it can be bad or good, depends on if you want to fill the eccentric niche or not

you clearly know form and anatomy, and are at a stage where its mostly just refining what you already know which is a massive grindfest

but what might help is get out of the comfort zone and try some pure line drawing giving more definition to everything instead of leaving things implied by value and tone
this will automatically show you both the knowledge you really have and the lack of knowledge and flaws that were being hidden behind the implied and abstract parts of your style of drawing
from there its just studying those areas that see you lack ability

>>6174134
>giving up art
but...why?

eh

>>6174149
/beg/ you clearly have no idea how anatomy works.
sharks have neither breasts nor legs. much less hands.

>>6174150
I think you're right

>>6174139
>i change my previous opinion of your work as /beg/ and put you in based tier, i enjoy your little animations and courage to do them instead of doomposting or perpetually grinding non animation before starting

thanks anon :)

>>6174149
Is that airbrush?

>>6173245
Why not

Kek at you drawlets

Shading isn't done, I had done soft shading initially but then redid it

Shading isn't done, I had done soft shading initially but then redid it. I could post the soft shading as well, but it looks like shit. Also I clearly need to adjust saturation of colors because while this looks great on my Ipad it looks like shit on my PC.
>>6174224
Woops, thought I cancelled sending

>>6174186
Only a little, predominantly marker

>>6174252
Solid int. Good appeal.
Need to do more with composition though. The saw looks really dull too compared to what should have a strong metallic sheen.

>>6173799
>>6173796
Where do i need how to render like you? You look /pro/ to me

>>6173904
This boars is full of faggots thatdon't draw but like to pretend they are above everyone, i recommend not taking any form of critique seriously unless they post work

>>6173245

>>6174314
int

>>6174321
>int
get out of here

>>6174257
Yeah I have not worked hard on getting better at art in about a year now, need to get back to stoodying. Thanks anon

>>6174473
Would have been good if it wasn't for those hidden hands.

>>6174257
>Solid int. Good appeal.

>>6173263
>>6173267
>>6173283
>>6173307
>>6173319
>>6173333
>>6173649
>>6173658
>>6173673
>>6173675
>>6173679
>>6173756
>>6173796
>>6173799
>>6173830
>>6173835
>>6173844
>>6173847
>>6173863
>>6173869
>>6173871
>>6173876
>>6173889
>>6173891
>>6173911
>>6173915
>>6173915
>>6173919
>>6173963
>>6173964
>>6173985
>>6173993
>>6174063
>>6174080
>>6174083
>>6174092
>>6174093
>>6174094
>>6174095
>>6174097
>>6174098
>>6174101
>>6174103
>>6174106
>>6174109
>>6174130
>>6174134
>>6174149
>>6174152
>>6174191
>>6174213
>>6174224
>>6174252
>>6174314
>>6174439
>>6174457
>>6174473
Beg
>>6174128
>>6173320
perma pre-beg for impersonation

>>6174495
>>6173320
blog?

>>6174473
int
>love the painterly style
>fiddle with the intensity/saturation of your colors to better lead everything to her face
>add some kind of motif or more objects to make a better story out of the scene or multiply the moodiness like a broomstick on the tree, leaves on her hat, or maybe crows in the treetops. instead of regular crows, they could be made out of light or ghosts

>>6174191
Mirin gains post moar

>>6174573
Sorry, the majority of my drawings are just studies, i almost never do finished pieces, unfortunally
I do have this digital drawing ive made
Anything u want me to draw?

I dont know why the fuck I enter to this thread, just to get demotivated.
Fuck.
Im a dirty beg who can only copy shit talented people have already drawn.

>>6174595
It looks good, now stop being a doomer fag and go draw

>>6174583
Draw Mamizou

>>6174721
Huh....already did it, some time ago.....

>>6174753
Yes because I'm the person who suggested it previously.
I just simply like tanuki.

>>6174764
Yeah, thought it were u, kek
Fok u fren

>>6173245

>>6173876
so what's the blog?

>>6174080
>>6174092
Thanks, they are really good

>>6175118
there is an interest? this is unprecedented im very happy about this. made my day - thank you
https://twitter.com/DuffillFinlay
https://www.instagram.com/finlay_patrick_duffill/
>>6175143
np sir and thank you kindly

>>6174288
study gustave dore and caspar david friedrich + look at thos crazy ass asian concept artists because once in awhile they are keen to remix shit in a way u never seen before

in terms of rendering its deadass just a greyscale and then i go over with color grading; if i am trying to be fast and work towards a deadline (such as these two works) i typically don't get too nuanced with an additional overpainting, however if u do this, shit pops and looks really good.

just keep studying ur anatomy and real life shit, but also research things you like and enjoy, and research the things that influenced those artists, and so and so on until you build up a 'visual library' in your brain to pull from when required.

>>6174583
>>6174753
Low int, clean your lines and you can definitely become pro
>>6174595
High beg
>>6175075
Cringe but low int
>>6174570
high int
>>6175104
If you already know you are pro, then you are only posting to flex
>>6175109
mid int for mecha stuff
>>6175110
Another pro flexing his dick, fuck you honestly

>>6174144
Because after three years I’m still /beg/.

>>6175257
>after three years I’m still /beg/.
try 10 years faggot

>>6175261
Cut your losses.

>>6175246

Nigger what you call pro is far from pro.

>>6175246
Honestly, you're not good enough to be rating yet

notext

>>6175104
This is really appealing, post blog pls

Finishing up this one. Still need to detail the platform, griffiths head, etc. Background is nonsense but whatevs.

>>6175333
Mid beg. Some parts are cute but major anatomy and just general forms are failing.

How do I escape PERMAPREBEG?!?!

>>6175490

>>6175470
Kouji Mori? Is this really the ending Miura told you about?
High beg, but i belive in you.

Garbage drawing ,garbage construction, garbage shading , garbage edges.What a stupid hobby

>>6175517
>please tell me I'm good

>>6175468
https://twitter.com/Smaragdus11/status/1533173216818208772

ruining the thread

Lets do this.

>>6175517
Stop SMEARING your shit.
Take inking/hatching pill or ngmi souless pig.

>>6175531
Cotton Hill Spawn

Reminder that ratings here are meaningless. You’re being rated by /beg/s and the actual pros that come here shit post and sabotage new artists.

>>6175544
Reminder that critiques even from beginners can be very useful and that being complimented by others can help you with your impostor syndrome :)

>>6175583
AMOGUS AMOGUS ALERTA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAASUSAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA
IC UNDER AMOGUS AAAAAA JANNIES PLAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

>>6175583
>>6175588
IC WHYYYYYYYYYYGG!?????????

most recent painting
little over 3 hours total

>>6175598
Low mid. Not try to add some long weaving hair.

>>6175598
Now*

>>6173993
fun perspective and colors, lots of sovl. reminds me of dead leaves a little bit. not rating necessary here

>>6174134
I remember you posting this. It's pretty bad but for me it just comes down to the subject matter. Maybe if instead of some weird fetishized smut you tried drawing something with a meaningful narrative or more general appeal and purpose? You could make it, I think furry ism is holding you back.>>6174134

>>6174495
are you salty about something specific?

>>6175606
/beg/

>>6175599
kangaroo tier

>>6175598
high /int/

>>6175532
between high /beg/ and low /int/

>>6175517
sigh, sounds like you are fishing for someone to compliment you, despite me being nicer than the average /ic/ user ill still you to fuck off with that self loathing shit

anyways high /int/ but if all you can do are portrait i lower it to /int/

>>6175490
by practice but you already know that and are just part of the group that draw for fun, memes and shitposting otherwise you would improve fast

>>6175470
low /int/ improve the figure perspective and proportions and id give you /int/

>>6175333
between high /beg/ and low /int/ the shitty soft edge shading ruins it and need more study of how clothing works

>>6175110
high /int/ better values and edges with the coloring/painting and youre golden, this kid of soft brush look always makes things look worth than they are with some little exceptions

>>6175109
low /int to /int/ cant decide

>>6175104
high /int/ add some krenz style painting or any rendering honestly that isnt airbrushing color in and youre golden

>>6175075
reluctant to comment but, between high /beg/ and low /int/ despite the weird and wonky af anatomy you do know form and show some semblance of edges with the shading

>>6174595
low /int/ and like i told the other doomer anon fuck off with the self loathing that kid of thing wont prevent crabs form trying to bully so just put on your little honorary chad hat and own your shit

>>6174570
between high /beg/ and low /int/ keep working on the anatomy especially the back and study light and shadow along with your coloring technique, it feels like you are kinda shading and coloring based on feel instead of being based o how light and shadow would work

>>6174473
high /beg/ could be low /int/ but hiding too many shit behind the pose ad impressionistic painting to know for sure

>>6174439
/int/ dont rely on hair texture brush to paint hair, it never looks good and tighten up your painting

30 minute drawing/pose

Pls r8

quick portrait

>>6174495
this man is STILL mad at last thread. stop posting your millenial scribbles you B-B-B-B-BAD 2 the BONE fedora shitter.

I think this is the best I can do at the moment

>>6175819
Pro, i dknt care what anyone says
Youre amazing fren, love ur stuff

>>6174130
mid int

>>6174130
Have a tit

This one is kinda old but not too far from where I am right now, I feel like I'm not a complete /beg/ but also not good enough be to /int/ either

>>6175904
I also like drawing like this relatively often, which is really different from the style I use for painting

>hate anime and loves hatching
see so many art students here that suck the teachers dick

>>6176010
i like anime and hatching!
only because i hate painting though

>>6175907
>>6175904
beginner

>>6176017
>i hate painting
How can it be" Isn't it normal to like paining more than drawing?

>>6176064
not sure if you're being sarcastic.
but it really feels weird to me how common painting is among general artists over drawing. but on /ic/ it feels like the reverse. even most big youtuber talk about how too many people are good painters at expense of drawing ability

>>6176078
Grew up poor = drawing
Grew up rich = painting

>>6175796
Int

How you getting those neat face colors?

Someone r8 me on picrel and
>>6175701

Current project.

Beg here so take it with a grain of salt
>>6175904
Mid-high beg

>>6176059
Mid-beg

>>6176686
Not sure about this since you didn't post completed works but just quick sketches. But int at least

>>6176689
Mid beg but I really like the coloring so could be high beg

>>6175819
Your lineart and 3d work is tops btw, love the lil gondola. Studio level concept good.

>>6175104
Cool and stylish

Forgot to include the replies >>6176689

>>6176689
what is yours, left or right pic? im confused

>>6176722
Both bitch

>>6175665
>didn't post work
>didn't read critique ;)

>>6173799
Sovl

>>6175665
Permabeg

Hmmm I see I see, still nobody in this thread is good enough, what a pity.

>>6176732
i already posted for the other retard complaining wont begin to dump my art here as if its a blog

take my critique or dont i dont care

here ye go

>>6176754
>>6176762
Beginners

>>6176749
Legendary Master

>>6173245

>>6176775
/Beg/one

>>6176777
Guess I'll never improve

>>6176689
focus on 3d anon, I'm not saying to give up on drawing, but put your sights and expectations on 3d, you're gonna waste too much time on 2d, keep trying tho

>>6175598
That looks impressive. At least /int/.

>>6175850
>>6176700
thank you, that's really flattering
I still have a long way to go before I can call myself a pro and do what I want to do

First time posting my work here. I just finished this color study this morning. I posted it on Twitter earlier.

>>6176853
Кoнчaй ныть и нaчни yжe нopмaльнo пpaктикoвaтьcя. Cкoлькo мoжнo...

>>6175598
gay furry/10 I don't get how you can larp as some trad right winger in your little disdain for plebs group on faceberg when you literally make furry porn for a living

>>6176722
Left is 2d, right is 3d model. It really is kinda confusing because of the orthographic shot lol my bad

>>6176868
Hmm something I've been considering, but yea, I'll feel it out. Feel like even the past month or two spent on drawing helped my 3d so I'll probably keep at it for that alone, maybe just not post anywhere hah.

>>6176924
Look at that humility, you were born gmi anon.

This is my latest drawing, it's one of my best

>>6177336
>Look at that humility, you were born gmi anon
ok bro now you're sucking up
also
>>6176868
>focus on 3d anon, I'm not saying to give up on drawing, but put your sights and expectations on 3d
don't do this, don't even think about focusing less on your drawing skills; i've seen way too many people die after falling for the "I only need 3d" meme.
>Feel like even the past month or two spent on drawing helped my 3d
that's because it does; drawing, painting and sculpting benefit from one another because they boil down to the same fundamentals: cool shapes and cool shading (ie cool forms).
you don't get better at sculpting by drawing but by drawing your sculpting becomes more "purposeful" and vice versa.
>maybe just not post anywhere hah.
I think you should post your work, nobody's going to get mad at you anyway, it's a well put together drawing with confident lines, nice shape design and good colors.

>>6173245
playing with rulers a month ago, spent the last month drawing nothing but sketches

>>6177497
>ok bro now you're sucking up
Just pullin' your leg a bit haha

Definitely agree, learning about all the different disciplines in art is important as they all buttress each other in some way. Something I've been trying to spread the word about ever since I saw James Gurney sculpt dinos for reference working on Dinotopia.

>I think you should post your work
Yea but I feel that I should just keep at it for my own purposes, at least until I feel like I've got it down more. Still shooting for crazyjn, he's just insanely talented at both.

Last month's digital (since I'v barely done any with effort since), what's my rate?

My most recent piece, I've been trying to draw stuff in perspective

>>6177704
High pro

>>6177711
Thank you! And sorry for the gigantic image, I mistakingly uploaded the .png

>>6177704
I'd say mid-low int.
In general its decent, but while it is a highly foreshortened pose it doesn't really fit with the perspective of the rest of her body, at least not in a way that's compositionally satisfying. (*and in general there's a few wonky perspective things going on)

If your working on extreme foreshortening and perspective work, make sure the pose as a whole follows and not just shoving a giant foot in your face.

>>6177704
Shit, probably the best in this board so far you should leave this place

>>6177664
she can fit her entire hand inside her mouth

>>6177491
That is a long ass skirt

>>6177733
yep, proportions kinda look like shit

>>6177704
Good taste and big skill, love how dynamic the pose is! High adv/pro.

WIP
first time heavy painting over 3d

>>6177838
paint-over ruined it, stick to 3D

>>6177704
too good for ic

>>6177845
nah i actually need to get better at painting

>>6177704
Beg

>>6177704
You made too many mistakes in this one.

>>6177858
>>6177866
Kek seething crabs
>>6177704
Don't believe the crabbing faggots, your work is pro tier, foreshortening is extremely precise and the anatomy of the foot is spot on.

>>6177871
>pro tier
you have very low standards ad i doubt the anon who posted the artwork would take you seriously even

stop being a reverse crab with your hugbox shit, being overly positive to the point its dishonest is as detrimental as crabbing

>>6177874
NTA but it looks high pro to me too. It's literally flawless and has style.
I'd like to see your work.

>>6177877
Exactly, well said
>>6177874
Pyw

>>6177871
As anon said, your standards are extremely low. Look at the old masters again before saying some fucker is pro level.

>>6177880
Why does /ic/ think master = professional? There's thousands of excellent professional artists from the past that you wouldn't know the name of because they weren't fucking legendary and remembered by history.

literally just finished 10 minutes ago

>>6177704
mid int

>>6177704
Low - mid pro

here's doodle sketch

>>6177704
beg. not all that appealing.

>>6173245

>>6177704
easily pro

>>6173245

>>6175110
The most boring character design I`ve ever seen, no soul high /beg/
>>6175333
Bad buttcheeks anatomy, overall low /int/
>>6175470
low /int/
>>6175517
ok tier
>>6175532
/int/ first frame, /beg/
>>6175598
high /int/ If not full copy of a reference
>>6175606
high /beg/
>>6175701
/int/
>>6175796
/int/
>>6175819
high /beg/ but SOVL
>>6175904
/beg/
>>6175907
/beg/
>>6176059
/beg/, try to rid of chicken scratch
>>6176689
/int/ execution, but I like your approach to drawing, GMI
>>6176762
High /beg/ - low /int/
>>6176775
Good render, weak understanding of anatomy and form, do more sketches, low /int/
>>6176909
>>6177491
>>6177653
>>6177664
/beg/
>>6177704
high /int/ - low/pro/
>>6177920
This looks like something that gets 100k likes on social media, mid /pro/ for sure

more doodle work

There seems to be so much confusion about the difference between pro and permaprebeg. I’m still permaprebeg though, right?

>>6174595
I finished it.
Remember its a copy of an already existing art piece, I couldnt come with something like this on my own.

>>6177724
The correct answer.

>>6177704
>>6177724
As anon said. I also think a some of the shadow shapes aren't as properly thought of. I dont understand how the midface is in shadow but somehow the lower part of the eye is catching intense lighting.
The sword on the foreground is also distracting. In my opinion it isn't as cohesive and some elements can be simplified to have an all-round better viewing experience.

Overall I think people are overestimating too much since you have a bold and flashy style that looks pretty good.

>>6178119
Every drawing you make to post here is a waste of time. You always draw unappealing character compositions sketches and stop there, it's like you don't even plan them out, it's like you think "oh it's just practice, i don't need to go all out"
Start drawing different stuff, and most importantly, go for finished stuff, if you can make it past the sketch stage, and think before you draw, world isn't made by disney faces, racoone and goblins
You may think you have a niche, you may actually think that, but goblins, racoone and fantasy is just such a schizophrenic subject to draw over and over again that it's just perceived as lack of creativity

>>6177838
I wouldn't say it's a paint over if all you do is add round hard brush streaks here and there.

Like you could have at least explored some shapes/curves with the paint instead of whacking a line on top and going "done".

>>6177704
Fucking awesome, blog?

need to practice painting more

>>6178119
Your stuff is so un appealling that I close the thumbnails as fast as I open them, I just don't want to look at your stuff

>>6178279
Literally troonyme.

>>6178119
I remember you from your /ss/ stuff. I think you need to break out of your comfort zone and explore more fundies with your style. work on expressions and face angles, dynamic posing, clothing and drapery, etc. your worst issue is the scribbliness, you need to clean up your lines. still 100% better than the retarded weebshit that infests this shithole.

>>6176775
The more I look at this the better it gets. Unironically.

>>6178108
>This looks like something that gets 100k likes on social media, mid /pro/ for sure
Youre such a fucking fag dudey holy shit Permanent loser, you catch my drift?

>>6178305
>>6178180
How do I learn appeal?
>>6178342
I think I’m branching out with expressions.

>>6175819
Mid int

left is flats, right is final

>>6178108
What even are your criteria

>>6178443
Man, just think before you draw, literally that. Draw a lot of thumbnails, go for quality instead of quantity. Plan your stuff through and through.

I've been in a similar spot, where i just sketched over and over without thinking, with the mindset "Ok, this isn't gonna turn out to be great, but it's just practice. I'm 100% sure can do better if i push myself, but i don't need to, because this is just practice".
If you plan things out, you will push yourself more. If you push yourself more, you will begin planning things out to avoid wasting time on something that's not worth it. By doing this, you will learn how to make appealing stuff as you get more and more experienced, and you can learn this fast since you already have a good grasp on draftsmanship.

-EXAMPLE-
You want to draw goblin porn, like a goblin girl being raped and cummed in the ass. Instead of rushing into the composition and drawing some random sex position, think of the situation.
>Why is the goblin being raped?
>Was the goblin village attacked? How? When? By who?
>How did it happen?
>What happened before the moment you are depicting?
>Who is raping the goblin?
>What will happen after?
>What is the mood of the scene?
>Is it horrific?
>If the goblin gal is enjoying it, why would she?
>Maybe her husband has a tiny goblin dick? Maybe she's witnessing the carnage of her kin and hopes to be spared if she pretends to like it?
Write down stuff like that, answer it yourself, thumbnail it a bunch of times, draw. If you practice this, you will be able in the future to do this in a much more free-flow manner.

Figure out what you want to achieve, and think deeply about it. And be careful not to fall for the anxiety meme, m8

>>6177704
I love the styling and colors. Maybe /pro/, I'd say.

>>6178108
>cartoon stylized copy of a frame from a movie with little expression of form
>mid /pro/

Get your eyes checked. Most of your other assessments are accurate though.

>>6178119
I would actually like your work if it weren't for the abusive, rapey content of your nsfw stuff. Any appeal you manage to pull off is ruined by the repulsive subject. If it comes down to either raccoons or goblin rape, stick with the raccoons.

>>6175532
I fapped to this.

Why is the racoon anon a permabeg? I don't understand.

>>6178851
cuz crabs gonna crab

oil painting. Roast me lightly, guys

>>6178895
this looks like my buddy dan

>>6178901
Danny boy, yeah, I know him

>>6178901
i know dan, hes a fucker

>>6177704
>this is what /ic/ thinks is pro
kek

Something

not sure if something like this can be rated

>>6179019
sick of seeing that study. Blenderguru also tried to pull that one. "learning 2D art in a month". Reference-traces this exact piece. Makes me sick.

>>6179039
Oh wow I wasn’t aware of that. Not surprised it’s a popular one that people study. I just found it on Pinterest and liked it a lot so I did a study. Can say at least mine wasn’t traced. Lots of liquify was used though

>>6179053
Could you post the reference? Thanks

Bump limit is almost reached but I might as well post my trad scribble here anyways because I had fun making it.

>>6179065
Apologies about the shitty cropping it was just screenshot on my iPad. You may be able to reverse image search and find a better version

>>6178851
They say it’s because I haven’t improved at all in three years and have in fact gotten worse than when I was a complete novice. It’s because I never did studies, read Loomis, or heeded their valuable feedback like “you’re a schizo,” “haz no appeal,” and “just stop.”
Although this time I got some pushback more relating to composition. That’s feels like a little more advanced than “fundies.” Nonetheless I’m permaprebeg.

>>6179106
That's a nice photo for a study, I might make one

>>6179115
Do studies. It should be a natural thing. You see art you like and try to imitate some or all adpects of it. Its not a det, boring process. Its a natural urge and you neef to rediscover it. Even if you want to draw from life, theres a life drawing out there that looked cool to you and you try to make something similar.

>>6179115
The path out of permabeg hell is clear, racoon fren:

>accept Loomis into your heart
>draw 10,000 boxes
>copy bridgman
>copy bridgman again
>hard
>round
>brush

The path is lit for you by anons who've gone before you. Take it and you just may escape

it's not done tho

>>6179171
nice

>>6179026
is this digital? if so, what software are you using and what brushes are you using?

Anons ?

>>6179249
yeah, its digital made in procreate. i use a ton of different brushes. really just whatever i feel like using at the time with no real strategy other than for the dots spatter brush that i used for the foam. i think for that i use avvart's brush pack, although pretty much any brush pack you get will likely have that sort of brush

some of my favorite brushes for texture though are found in greg rutkowski's brush pack for photoshop that i imported into procreate

>>6179336
Pic related is another favorite brush of mine. I circled the areas that were created using that brush

>>6179336
>>6179356
damn, i'm on pc so i can't use procreate. it's a shame, because those brushes are beautiful (and so is the work you posted, very very atmospheric)

>>6179374
thanks anon, really glad you like it! as for the brushes i screenshotted, those you can actually get for photoshop. i believe this https://www.artstation.com/artwork/XWDl0 is the brushpack i imported. you can see the texture from the brush i mentioned in a few places in pic related

>>6179412
i don't use photoshop, but i'll see if i can port this on krita or something. thanks!

>>6179422
oh i see thats too bad. i hear great things about krita though. its even been praised by craig mullins and dave rapoza. sadly havent ever used it since i no longer have a tablet for my pc.

>>6179422
you can import only the brush tips the settings you have to set manually so you at least need to know the specific brush settings

but krita defaut brushes are already pretty good so you may get good results just making copies of several of the default brushes and just giving them this brush packs brush tips>>6179422

>>6179422
krita RGBA brush set is already a very good trad looking set if youre too lazy to do what the other anon said

I was trying to do this under a time limit - but couldn't finish for tonight. Going to paint more tomorrow.

Am I stupid if I post my work in a power level thread?

>>6179737

>>6179836
9/10, almost pro

I haven't posted any of my work on the internet for like two years. I have been trying to get a job as a concept artist at the time, but had no luck. I kind of gave up, but I've started to work on my portfolio again.

>>6180086
>most of the art industry is overrun with cal arts pre-begs
>this anon can't get work

Why is the world like this bros?
Really nice work btw. Hope you find a gig soon, anon.

>>6180113
Thanks, Anon. It means a lot.

>>6178279
Low /beg/. Anatomy needs work, rendering is garbage, forms are flat. Don't use blacks for shading, use a higher saturated red or maybe a blue. Really work on your forms and anatomy.
>>6178472
Low /beg/, cute character but anatomy and proportions are horrible. Shading is even worse.
>>6178895
Maybe /beg/, I don't know trad but the face is flat and boring, anatomy needs work. Nice colors though.
>>6179026
Can't rate, but assuming this is supposed to be a wave or the ocean (?) I'd just say it needs to be more clear if that's the case. If its just abstract then meh, could be more interesting with more color variety.
>>6179082
maybe upper /beg/, could be getting there if you worked a little harder.
>>6180086
I'd say you're at a professional skill level, enough for a job.
But if this is supposed to be a character, I'd say it lacks as a concept artist from a character perspective.
On the one hand given his luggage, he looks like he's a gatherer, the shrooms and stick, etc. I'm not sure what the tool he's holding is but I'll assume its something that makes sense for gathering.
But on the other hand he's an older guy with a well groomed beard, his clothing is nice and embroidered with symbolism, he has delicate trinkets like feathers. His bearing doesn't really fit as a gatherer or someone doing physical labor.
As such I'm at a loss at what the character is supposed to be exactly. Is he an intelligent mystical sage or is he a dude who gathers mushrooms for a living? Neither design point really tells me and they're contradictory.

>>6178633
>>6178342
>>6178305
>>6178180
Does anyone have more examples of their stuff? I'm kinda new here so I've never seen any of their other works

>>6180582
id say almost high /beg/
fun gesture and nice painting. but the edges need a lot of work and there's some other random wonkiness here and there like the eye.s

biggest thing i'd point to is edges, better define those and it'll be great

>>6180639
Yeah I agree, this was my first attempt at making a piece without hard linework and as you can see I def had some trouble like, working that out once I got to painting over my initial sketch and stuff

>>6180754
int without being able to see more. I like it, got any more?

>>6180785
Kinda messed up on the arm in back but I was trying to do different bodies
I use pencil the retrace in pen but sometimes the pencil smears and I have to wing it

>>6180785
I generally tend to color some of my sketches just because they tend to fade and it let's gets some practice in>>6180785

>>6180086
what do your figures look like anon? Also any paint or render works? Thats mainly what the industry looks for afterall

>>6180266
>I'd say you're at a professional skill level, enough for a job.
>But if this is supposed to be a character, I'd say it lacks as a concept artist from a character perspective.
>On the one hand given his luggage, he looks like he's a gatherer, the shrooms and stick, etc. I'm not sure what the tool he's holding is but I'll assume its something that makes sense for gathering.
>But on the other hand he's an older guy with a well groomed beard, his clothing is nice and embroidered with symbolism, he has delicate trinkets like feathers. His bearing doesn't really fit as a gatherer or someone doing physical labor.
>As such I'm at a loss at what the character is supposed to be exactly. Is he an intelligent mystical sage or is he a dude who gathers mushrooms for a living? Neither design point really tells me and they're contradictory.
Thanks for detailed feedback. I had a background story for this character, and had a reason to make all those decisions, but reading your feedback I understand that some were a miss. For example beard was meant to be unattended, but after reading your comment it looks like it was well groomed indeed. Thanks once again, it will help me to get better in the future. Character design is my weakest subject matter by the way, but I forced myself to include some to show I can draw characters too.
>>6180839
>what do your figures look like anon? Also any paint or render works? Thats mainly what the industry looks for afterall
Figures- I am not a anatomy master by any stretch of imagination, I actually don't enjoy designing characters too much. I love props and hard surface design in general, so my figures are... well- pic related. Not great.
As for rendering- I prefer lineart by far, that's how I design but I can render reasonably well. I spent last couple months learning how to photobash to speed up process. I have grinded fundamentals like crazy couple years ago and it paid off. Thanks for feedback!

>>6181219
beg here, could we see some of your preferred work - not figures? the one you posted earlier showed, i dont know, a lot of time spent? all those lines. very cool to see.

>>6181231
Hi, I don't want to share too much of my work, I think being associated with posting on 4ch could get me in trouble when I try to look for work again. Maybe I am paranoid, but forgive me. I love hard surface, mechs mostly. But I can design fantasy themed props too (arguably those are easier because materials are more organic, so you don't need to be anal with your lines being perfect). Sorry for not posting rendered stuff, but I don't want to get reverse image searched.

>>6181238
no worries dude. really good shit.

>>6181239
Thanks, Anon!

>>6181238
Is it really that much of a problem? That sucks because even if you have to dredge through garbage, you sometimes get good drops of info here and there from people above your skill level. I guess it's the reputation the site carries in the normie world, but I don't see this site being any worse than modern day discords and private chats. Redditchan have become the main purveyors of memes and general internet culture for the past decad(is it two now? Yeesh) so I don't think it's too much of a worry. Just say someone stole your work pretending to be you lol.

>>6181244
beg here again. unrelated to /ic/, i've had autists go to great lengths to try to dox me over extremely petty things on another board. hard surface anon may be wary of something similar.

>>6181244
I don't know, man. I don't want to risk it. It's not like me posting my Artstation would help anyone here, so it is not selfish of me to be careful, I think. I remember Dan Luvisi accidentally leaking some Battlefield concept by accident (he got trolled and wanted to post some of his current work after people made fun of his early stuff- and somehow he posted some NDA pic he deleted immediately, but you know how 4ch works). I don't think Dan got into any trouble over that (it was many years ago), at least there was no public drama coming out of that incident. But times have become crazy and people get cancelled over really silly stuff. Why risk it?

>>6180086
I find extremely funny that you completely have up on the hands

>>6180086
I find it extremely funny that you completely gave up on the hands

>>6181258
I am shit character designer and I don't have enough motivation to change that, what can I say. I have no excuses.

>>6180086
Perspective chad.. I kneel..

>>6181247
Damn that's rough.

>>6181253
Hmm definitely fair, not accusing you of being overly protective, better safe than sorry for sure. Just something important to consider as we progress as artists, so I appreciate your thoughts on the matter. I agree that anyone can get cancelled for anything so I get it, just have a feeling the tide is changing on that front, which is good. People are getting tired of the crazy screaming all the time I think. With work at your level though, yea, definitely wouldn't risk it heh.

>>6180086
keep posting fren, I'm in a very similar position- do you have somewhere you post your work (twitter/instagram etc?)

This is extremely good

>>6181253
I feel you. In a similar position, also looking for concept art positions. A link to my portfolio shows up on an /ic/ thread if you google search my name and go down far enough. I've never posted anything untoward, but I do wonder sometimes if i've messed with my chances by "associating" with the site in a traceable way.

>>6181757
I dont know about the art world.
But as a computerfag, while I would never advertise openly I come here it's not exactly a secret either. And most other compfags blatantly come here as well. As long as nobody spergs out its pretty much accepted as the norm. Or at least it used to be since most people have moved on to reddit.

I figure as long as nothings tied directly to you being a shitposter there mere fact you're the hacker 4chan won't keep you from most jobs.

>>6179082
i really like this, do you frequent any threads in particular? i'd love to see more.

>>6173263
WHAT THE FUCK