[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 252 KB, 1066x1279, Untitled-3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6126769 No.6126769 [Reply] [Original]

This is how artists can fight back.
AI is trained on stolen art.
The creators admit to just scraping art that is displayed on the internet, without the creator's permission. If you downloaded other artists work and bashed them in to an image you tried to pass off as your own, it would be seen as plagiarism.
DALL-E, and others like it, simply steal more images, and use more sophisticated ways of disguising it.
Artists located in America need to speak to lawyers about what could be done. A class-action lawsuit might be able to put an end to this corporate theft from struggling artists.

>> No.6126775

>>6126769
okay, so what about the photobashers? they take images and mash em up too, for example: https://www.artstation.com/tomek8401
this guy is a photobashing master, he combines and paints over images in a way that looks like a legit painting. I'm actually impressed.

>> No.6126778

Who cares lmao

>> No.6126779

>>6126775

Images he takes himself, purchases under a license that allows this, or are royalty free are fine.

Stealing other artists work is not.

>> No.6126781

>>6126778
Apparently you, cause you did shat in this thread.

>> No.6126782

>>6126778

Everybody who makes artwork or ever wants to should.

>> No.6126787
File: 872 KB, 776x836, FU4Q09YXEAYg-Cm.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6126787

It is a lot more obvious when the AI is told to replicate an artists style.

These "artworks" are just AI image manipulation performed on downloaded Zdzisław Beksiński images.

>> No.6126788

>>6126769
will dalle always be open to public?
a little bit in me wish its purchased by some triple a company so only their artists can use it

>> No.6126796

>>6126788
It will not be used by artists, it will be used as an artist.

Every time anybody on the planed needs a piece of artwork or stock image for anything, they will have a choice between hiring a human, who will expect to be paid for the many hours of work they will do, or get an AI to make 100+ images to choose from in a split second, either for free, or so cheap it might as well be free.

What do you think 99.99% of businesses are going to do?

>> No.6126799

We don't need 50 AI threads.

>> No.6126806

>>6126799
I dont see any other threads giving ideas on how to fight back

>> No.6126808

>>6126806
Because you can't.

Go draw.

>> No.6126809

>>6126769
If there's a program that lets me steal backgrounds without getting caught, I fully endorse it

>> No.6126810

>>6126796
cool. i want art to return to being a prestigious luxury item. people who commission me are commissioning me for my soul, not my product. if some middle aged mom wants to replace her live-laugh-love knick knack she bought at walmart for 10 dollars with AI art, then she never intended to commission anyone in the first place. I do not fear a market I was never part of

>> No.6126813

>>6126806
The fact alone you sad sacks of shit make threads on this board means that you suck at art and will be never able to get paid for it, why the hell are you so worried about ai?

>> No.6126817

>>6126796
>Skynet will revolt and exterminate humanity because they made him draw reaction video thumbnails and furry porn
Fair enough

>> No.6126820

>>6126808
Because they are using copyrighted work without permission, there is a good chance something can be done.

>> No.6126823

>>6126820
>copyrighted works without permission
So do 99% of artists.

Go draw, Anon.

>> No.6126824

>>6126820
your idea is so stupid it's actually searing my brain.

if "using copyrighted work" in this way was illegal, it would also be illegal for google to index the material in its search engine. you are coping MASSIVELY and it hurts to watch you flail.

>> No.6126826

>>6126824
Google isnt pretending that they made the indexed images in the search engine.

They are not trying to pass off artists work as their creation.

>> No.6126832

>>6126826
if that's all AI was doing, it wouldn't need AI to generate the image. it would just be a plagiarized copy of the image.

your stupidity is really starting to piss me off.

>> No.6126834

>>6126832
Shut the fuck up tranny nigger, get raped just like you want.

>> No.6126836
File: 2.27 MB, 848x455, AI Generation.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6126836

>>6126832