/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5203456
ANGRY BEG

>>5203456

Eternal /beg/.

Loomer >>> coomer

>a schema simplified for beginners
I sure hope OP isn't trying to bait.

>>5203456
pyw, i know you wont

>>5203489

>>5203456
that's what a real life woman looks like anon.

>>5203456
>draws women like this

>>5203456
And how do you draw women?
Oh right, you don't, because you're still doing the basics of basics of fundies

Let's get back to this in some years. Show him better

>>5203493
wowee

>>5203493
she cute

>>5203456
Why the heels though?

>>5203509
Wow... he's actually amazing... those football shoulders... and male hips.... she's practically falling over.... I'm reading FWAP now..

>>5203527
gmi

>>5203456
Andrlewd Coomis

>>5203509
Where is the penis

>>5203456
>titties not bigger than head
>hips not twice as wide as waist
>no dick
I get that it was a different time but 3/10 is the best I can do.

>>5203605
Glad to see someone else with a brain here

>>5203527
> football shoulders
> male hips

Turn off the screen and go out more often please, Anon

>>5203456
>Shoulders wider than the hips
That's pretty much what's wrong with this

>>5203648
Real life sucks, art should be better

>>5203652
>t. poorfag

>>5203527
>grasping straws
lmao

>>5203655
Random words

>>5203456
Loomis draws really sexy/handsome men, but his women are lacking by comparison imo.
It’s like he’s Michelangelo where he tries hiding his preference for drawing men by making his women somewhat masculine.

>>5203714
its actually in line with beauty standards of the time, which emphasized fairly thin and defined yet not muscular women, which generally means that they had less prominent hips and legs due to having less fat to distribute, although we should also take into account the current ideal for women online is certainly more curvy than what most women will naturally be able to

How the hell is it possible for zoomers to be so culturally out of touch with the recent past that they can't wrap their minds around 1950's aesthetics even though they spend all their time on the internet and have access to pretty much all of the media from past decades? I mean I was only born in the 80's and am not remotely someone who personally experienced those times but it still looks normal and quite fine to me.
Do you not watch movies made before 2000 or something?

>>5203787
It's supposed to be the ideal and people are not seeing the ideal in it.

>>5203456
This is the ideal female body. You may not like it, but this is what peak performance looks like.

>>5203853
That ideal was literally everywhere in his time. He didn't invent it.

>>5203787
they just want attention. Everybody knows his proportion chart is fine.

>>5203754
>>5203787
>>5203861
>i-i-it was his style
COPE

>>5203787
>How the hell is it possible for zoomers to be so culturally out of touch with the recent past that they can't wrap their minds around 1950's aesthetics even though they spend all their time on the internet and have access to pretty much all of the media from past decades?
There's more ways to distract yourself than ever before.

https://youtu.be/kbXIOHFAOOc?t=758

>>5203456
was this a stylization from that era (since bloussed had huge shoulder pads), or was a real model with those proportions?

>>5203714
The women in the piece you posted look pretty feminine to me. Have most of the guys here been around real women? Or just ones like the attached pic?

>>5203540
coomis, indeed

>>5203924
>sao
Gross

>>5203456
>ideal proportion
Eh.

>>5203456
His portraits are amazing though

>>5203519
embarrassing

>>5203456
ic btfo.

>>5203493
soulless

>>5204683
pyw

>>5203493
BLOG BLOG WOWEE

The absolute virgins of this board lmao, only know woman through porn and anime

>>5204827
Only places women are good

>>5203924
real women have ass implants and a dick you fag

>>5203493
Bing bing wahoo!

>>5203456
Shoulders wider then hips is a man trait

>>5203456
he literally drew an anorexic man and slapped some heels on him, what the fuck