/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5165444
It's not rotoscoped

>>5165445
that doesn't prove it's not. You know what rotoscoping is, right?

>>5165444
even the positioning doesnt make sense, the approaching girl is supposed to be behind her, but when she got up , she is in her left side.

>>5165444

>>5165445
This looks so good
>>5165444
I think because it was cleaned up badly. The head/hair is very stiff and looks more like cut out animation compared to the fluid natural moves of the body, so it gives an uncanny feelinb

>>5165444
It's rotoscoped hard. Looks terrible because it's normal real life human movements put on an anime girl. Imagine somebody trying to do a pixar movie by mocapping people, shit would just look similarly awful.

>>5165444
Their bodies are fully rotoscoped but their heads had to be animated independently of that because rotoscope actors don’t have anime faces.
There are moments where their heads look superimposed onto their bodies, a little bit like South Park characters.

>>5165444
Complete disregard for key frames. Motion is too smooth and doesn't have emphasis on any specific action, everything just flows into the next aimlessly.

>>5165444
i mean only looks bad because anime is usually like the same frame for fucking 15 minutes with only eyes blinking. Think it got some charm even though theres close to no differienting spacing inbetween the frames to make the movement make sense.

it's sakuga

>>5165445
This literally doesn't prove anything lmao. Also, it looks rotoscoped as hell since it barely follows any animation principle that is why it looks weird and uncanny.

>>5165444
not only this is rotoscoped as they must have said to the actors to exaggerate their movement, because they move like a retard. like that swallow motion. they walk like an ai that taught itself how to walk.

>>5165445
if this isn't rotoscoped it moves exactly like a rotoscope would.
is it rigs being moved by a whack as fuck AI?
is it drawn by some kind of Mega Autismo?

something's fucking up here

>>5166022
you can use references in animation too

>>5165445
this proves absolutely nothing you brainlet

>>5166026
reference =/= tracing

>>5166026
Bro, it was a big scandal when they figured out he rotoscoped these scenes. Everyone knows it for a fact.

>>5166002
anon, that's just japanese live action acting. Yes, they suck. Their entire entertainment industry is primarily influenced by manga, then anime. Hence the exaggerated movements.

>>5166349
well, I don't remember watching any japanese movie, so you could be right, but the animation still look like two retarded ai trying to move.

>>5166397
watch tokyo sonata, it’s an award winning movie that’s supposed to be a drama but comes across like aliens made a movie through an algorithm or something
then if you want more, watch love exposure from the same year

>>5165444
>drops chips
>immediately picks them up
>

>>5165444

>>5165444
Rotoscoped with bad acting. It's like the whole thing is one continuous squiggly line of exagerated movements without emphasis on any specific position

>>5165444
Bad color composition.

>>5166436
I thought they were chips at first as well, but they're buns in packaging, I guess. You can see the girl eating something out of a wrapper in the first few seconds.

Why do Japs like mocap? Just animate like Disney ffs. Even if it's on 3s for budget it's always better looking for anime than roto shit, ESPICALLY for jap video games.

>>5165444
But it doesn't?

>>5165444
the perspective of the faces changes too infrequently, look around the 5-8 second mark, the face is sort of locked in the same direction and is just weirdly sliding around

>>5165444
because it's in an anime style.

>>5169203
here's your rotoscoping in westoid style bro

>>5165444
The sense of space between the characters is completely off, i thought i was looking at two different pictures side by side for the first shot. The animation looks like half assed rotoscoping of bad actors, and the faces don't match the bodies in terms of either level of movement or perspective.
Also the charachters manage to look like they arent actually in the scene at all. Like they've been poorly green screened in somehow. Not sure exactly what is causing that.

>>5167354
I hate how bouncy and theatrical disney shit moves. It works for a comedy or light hearted stuff but i cant take it seriously when everyone is bouncing around with theatrical pantomime movements

>>5169232
>Not sure exactly what is causing that.
I think it's the fact they seem to walk unevenly on even ground.

>>5165444
>Individually wrapped potato chips
do japs really?

>>5170235
Yes. They really do.

>>5170245

>>5165487
this. they completely fucked up the composition and framing logic. character with the white shirt is on the left in the frame, but then girl in black shirt looks to her left. then white girl comes in from the left at the reverse view and black girl is facing another direction than before.