/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>5072725
It feels like you're a crab who can't paint at all and then blame the engine. It's a software dedicated to making manga first of all, so the default things are designed for lineart. Get better and stop poisoning the board with your useless crab opinions.

>>5072768
based gmi

Hard round brush.

>>5072725
painter, your pic related, lags like a bitch too. zoom out, use a round brush, turn up the spacing also >>5072768

>>5072725
AAWOOOOOOOGGGGGGGAAAAAAAAAA
BOOOOBBAAAAAAA
COOOMAAAAAAA
AAAAHFHUDHFDHFUDFUDFHDHD DELICIOUS FHFFDUDFDF AHH AHHH AUFFF UFF

>>5072725
IM COOOOOOOOOOOOOMING

>>5072725
NYAAAAAAAAAAAHHHNN~

AAHHHHHHHHGGGHHHHHHUIUGGHHHHHH AHHJ IM COOOOOOMMMINNGGG

>>5072768
BASED

I want to have sex so fucking bad.

AHHHHH I COOMED IN MY HAND NOOOOO

"Coom" is a bad meme and if you let it stay in your head then you have just lost the game.

>>5072768
It's not even that bad for painting.
If anything out of the box it's a better emulation of traditional methods.

>>5073245
NOOOOO I DONT WANT TO COOM AND MAKE COOM STAY INSIDE MY HEAD AHHHHH I FAILED NO FAPPPPPPPPPP WQAAAAAAAGHGHGHGHHGHGHGHG

I like the oil brush, and the air brush, and the India ink brushes. Just try more I dunno.

>>5072768
fpbp

>>5072725
What book is this?

>>5072725
You deserve these replies OP

>>5073557
Stonehouse

you’re not allowed to insult csp, it is the default /ic/ software, not as weeb as sai, but weeb enough and packed with crutches like stabilizer, 3d models, auto gradient generation and self mixing brushes
no one actually paints in it and if they do it’s too shit to post, which is why no one ever posted a good painting instead of falling into a hysterical shitposting spree to defend the honor of their chosen application when faced with criticism of the software

>>5073591
Fuck off liquify faggot.

>>5073591
CSP is the finest program considering its 25$ for life. The only issue is brushes lagging at big size if they're overly complex/low spacing/watercolor edged. Also a lot of professionals use it too. The only thing I miss from PS is the offset

>>5073677
all software is free, the asking price is a moot point

>>5072725
No person in their right mind would use CSP for painting

>>5073705
>This one was entirely done in clip studio, I've all but abandoned Photoshop at this point, clip actually feels like I'm using watercolor and gouache with pencil. Makes me so excited to work
https://twitter.com/daverapoza/status/1171473720684118016

>This poster was done in @clipstudiopaint, I wanted to see if I could do a larger fully painted illustration in clip and was super happy with the results, the brush engine is just great
https://twitter.com/DaveRapoza/status/1190356465908715520
https://twitter.com/DaveRapoza/status/1190392235818307584

Other pros use CSP, but keep on lying on the internet like a buttmad 12 year old while others actually paint with whatever they want lol

>>5073772
You can do everything on CSP when it comes to painting, but slower, awful for tight deadlines

>>5073815
nice mobile goalposts

>>5073772
Nothing against CSP but what you posted is not even a painting, just a colored drawing. Hardly a good example

>>5074152
so watercolor and gouache is just colored drawing, not painting? lol

you can look up anything he's done in the past year and a handful of months and it's been in clip. i posted things which directly contradicted "No person in their right mind would use CSP for painting"

>>5074152
Here's more CSP but maybe it's not actually painting
https://twitter.com/DaveRapoza/status/1339986497441726464

>>5073772
It's telling that Dave still primarily uses photoshop for painting. He has also experimented with procreate for professional work though to use that as an example that plenty of pros paint professionally in it would be disingenuous. A good artist can make professional shit using any software and CSP is pretty good but their brush lag is an absolute deal breaker and to suggest otherwise is pure delusion.

>>5074725
>It's telling that Dave still primarily uses photoshop for painting
Where did you get that?

>>5074743
literally the last few tweets are about him using and upgrading PS, all his files are in PSD. Granted he can still export in PSD using CSP but I would question where is the evidence that he still paints in CSP?

>>5074770
Probably still needs it for effects, processing, editing, and dealing with clients. The painting doesn't look much like his recent work. It's best to use each tool for what they're good at. I do 99% of my work in CSP but still go through PS for input if I'm scanning/taken from photos and maybe post processing.

>>5074798
>It's best to use each tool for what they're good at
yeah, that's why you paint in photoshop and draw in CSP.

>>5072768
>>5072768
>>5072768
>>5072768
holy based

>>5073705
i use it for painting all the time

>>5074822
100 times this

>>5072725
CSP can now use PS brushes so fuck off.
I only ever use PS now for graphic design.

>>5073702
>Why, yes, I have ZBrush, Maya, Photoshop, Corel Painter, CSPaint, Substance Designer, Substance Painter, SAI, and Marvelous Designer
>What do you mean how much I paid for it

>>5073591
You are right. When it comes to digital painting, photoshop and maybe corel painter are the only viable options. But /ic/ loves their weeb software to draw low quality weebshit in so they will defend it to the very end.

>>5076930
lets be honest, you weren't painting in PS before and you aren't painting in CSP now.

>>5074725
>A good artist can make professional shit using any software
I wish more people would understand this.

>>5076930
doesn’t have dual brushes, which is 99.9% of ps brushes worth anything

>>5072725
God I want to touch a girl SOOOOO BAAAADDD

>>5074188
>Hey that actually looks pretty go-

>>5074188
I think he used photoshop for this. He switched back to ps a few months ago

>>5074152
>what you posted is not even a painting, just a colored drawing

>>5074152
I don’t have a brainlet wojak that can accurately portray the stupidity of this post

>>5079146
Oh wait here.

>>5072768
fpbp

>>5076972
samefag

>>5079135
he’s right, illustration =/= painting

>>5079215
See this shit is why I don’t take critiques seriously here lmao

>>5079215
Exactly, look at that tiny ass brush size and think about whether or not it's even feasible to paint on a 10000x10000 canvas. It's not. It's a glorified coloured pencil drawing at this stage with some lineart fills

>>5079228
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/4836662.stm

>>5079218
>illustration is painting
>I browse a board I believe to be populated by people who aren’t worth listening to
>I am very intelligent

>>5079235
There are good artists here. You will never be one of us.

>>5079233
Is this a painting for ants