/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

fuck off with your twitter posts and zoomer speak, nigger

>>4966896
Cringe? Yes, but you get the premise.

>>4966896
This is an oversimplification of the problem.

>>4966896
reposting twitter posts is cringier

>>4966911
this

>>4966896
1 and 3 are totally fine, perspective wise, if the feet are in those position and the eye is at feet's lvl. not good for design because it won't show as much, but it alone doesn't tell someone reviewing portfolios that the artist doesn't understand the principle of perspective. i would fire her over that nonsense post

>>4966896
When considering an employer, I will always look at how good of a command the management has over the English language. Spelling and grammar are clear signs on how well one understands the principles of communication and how it will apply to the workplace dynamic. Spelling "yes" as "yas" is a huge red flag which you should run, not walk, away from.

>>4966896
and 2 is the same as 4 but simplified

>>4966926
It’s also a sign that they may be a nigger, or be infested with the annoying nigger virus known as “Ebonics” that plagues the world today

>>4966923
Yes this is basically my thought.. I was just wondering if I was taking crazy pills or if anyone else thought the same thing
>>4966911
Yes it's so oversimplified I'm not even sure what 1 for instance refers to there are atleast 3 plausible feet I can stick in that sketch box.

>>4966923
graphic design fag
>>>/gd/

>>4966899
FPBP
>>4966914
FPBP

>>4966896
1 and 3 are correct if your point of view is either at the infinite (telescope view) or at the floor. 4 would only be correct at a particular distance and height. nobody would ever draw 2

>>4966923
Yeah this. Feet won't ALWAYS look like #4. Feet will look like #4 if the character's body language is like that and their head is at eye level. But you know /beg/s would take this as gospel and thoughtlessly apply it.
Alternatively, if I'm designing a super cartoony, Dexter's Lab type of character, using proper perspecrive doesn't always make sense. Sometimes it's thrown out for simplicity. Mickey Mouse ears etc...

>>4966921
Is that their art?

>>4966974
yes

>>4966974
*her

>>4966974
Yes

>>4966896
>Yas!
Why should I listen to this literal goblin

>>4966987
enjoy your flat feet

>>4966896

YASS QUEEN SLAY

>>4966974
Looks like Annie Lenox. I assume that it's her?

>>4967024
I will.

footfags will inherit the workforce

>>4966987
Actually seething cus he was called out on his flat feet

>>4967295
Dilate.

>>4966896
I didn't open this shitty twitter thumbnail and I assume the retarded lesbian who made the tweet doesn't know what the fuck she's talking about and can't draw for shit, but showing depth in a character's stance is always a good thing.

I want one (1) competent foot pic by everyone seething in this thread.

>>4967160
Yes, you assume that. Any other questions?

>>4966896
All 4 of them are wrong.

>>4967379
>everyone seething in this thread
Uh so no one, except maybe you?

>>4967379

>>4966896
The advice is so broadly applied and devoid of context that it's borderline useless. A truly terrible post for someone who reviews portfolios.

Middle-aged HR women, when looking for jobs I will always look at how well you use language. Language is a clear sign on how well you've got a hold of your mental health and how it will apply to the work environment.
Practice being professional!

>>4967539
Aye!

>>4966921
Shoulda known

>>4966921
Is this really her work? lmao

>>4967560
Idk, probably. This is her work. It was painful to search her media on twitter. She only draws dinosaurs and retweets dumb stuff.

>>4967568
Icon

>>4967569

>>4967571
Woops forgot the picture hehe

>>4966896

>>4967539
are you HR in the art industry or something similarly creative? Not necessarily disagreeing but if you're hiring an artist/creative person I feel like some amount of humor used appropriately in art should be fine. I can't imagine an artist not being hired just because they had the words 'Nope!/Yas!' on a character call out sheet or something

>>4967573
>>4967568
>>4966921
Not the best of the best or anything, but still very good and mogs 95% of people here.

>>4967569
putrid is the word that comes to mind

>>4967597
Luckily for you being literate is not part of the qualifications required, or you'd have been filtered out already.

As for "humorous language is required", I could agree, but "Yas!"? That doesn't even count as human to me.

And I'm getting really tired of companies trying to be "more human" by using soi language, there's never an "Ok" button, just a "Gotcha!", no "Go back", just "Take me out of here!", we need to stop this.

>>4966896
>Yas
>can't draw themselves
This is why I don't listen to women nor "women".

>>4966921
That's looks like shit on purpose right?... Right?

>>4966921

>>4966974
yas

>>4967568
Looks good

>>4967601
Nah, for sure not 95℅

>>4967568
wow a fatty bdsm fetishist riding a cat, how progressive.

aren't 2 and 3 almost the same

Is cringy

Stupid as shit "hey I throw out your portfolio based on some arbitrary shit because I don't want to actually look at more than 4-5 people but somehow not wanting to do my job is a 'you' problem"

>>4967573
This is actually really good

>>4969488
/int/ tier

>>4966930
Rent free

>>4967631
>"Yas!"? That doesn't even count as human to me.
i work at the whiny faggot department and i'd hire you on the spot just based on that

>>4966896
>"YAS!"

FUCK OFF!!!!

>>4966896
>female
Opinion discarded

>>4966899
shouldnt you be at a nursing home and getting treatment for dementia

>>4966974
>their
Dilate

>>4966896
wow I hate this. All of those are correct depending on the character's design and viewing angle.

>>4970363
I'm starting to do this lately. I have tried my best to stay unbiased, but there is so much filth that gets a pass solely based on gender that if I see the article or post or anything made for public exposure is written by a woman I will not read it.

>>4967519
Scans never ever

>>4966899
FPBP

>>4967568
>>4966921
>>4966896
why does /ic/ defend this stuff, these are the people who are responsible for setting the standard for the industry. i can only think it's because you're all twitter trannies and you defend your ilk to the death even when it harms yourself

>>4970629
on the internet, noone knows you're a tranny