/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4909745
Just buy it.

>>4909745
that is a high quality scan.
the figures are low quality because they use printing technology of 80 years ago

>>4909754
Amazon wants $70 in customs and import fees and I can't find it locally

>>4909771
That is one page of a high quality scan posted by an anon here a year ago, he never finished scanning the whole thing, the commonly circulated version looks like this and looks even worse when printed out

>>4909745
marco bucci has a course explaining the loomis head and how to add value to it

>>4909778
http://www.alexhays.com/loomis/

These are all scanned much better than the OP image. They're perfectly sufficient for studying the material.

>>4909782
Don’t you mean asaro head or is this a different course?

>>4909831
its the same shit, >>>4909820

>>4909825
That's the same low resolution scan as >>4909778

>>4909745
let me guess, they're so awful you can't use them and now have an excuse to not grind.
fuck off.

>>4909837
It’s not really though. The course is great but the asaro head course is focused on recognising the planes of the face, the loomis head is just a simple method for constructing a head, its more a first step thirds-of-the-face thing where the course goes into much more depth about the structure and anatomy of the face. Not trying to be pedantic but they are two different things

>>4910859
I personally dont see the problem, why do I need to see more grain in the pencil lines exactly? It’s perfectly clear, both the drawings and the text

>>4910933

>>4910859
The drawings are fine but I like to print the books out and the low PPI makes it so blurry I have to strain my old eyes to read anything

>>4910956
Oh. Not too proud to admit when I’m wrong, didn’t realise. Why would asaro make this and call it an asaro head then? What an asshole

>>4911089
there's are different takes on head light planes. asaro's has a ton of smaller planes compared to others i've seen, whether that's a plus or minus is up to you.