/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Loomis brush

>>4898649
This is another slide thread but I’ll respond anyway
It’s painting, anon. Learn form, perspective, and lighting, and paint. Literally do studies by painting your subject matter. And for the artists, yes I mean digital painting.

You should check out a guy named Peleng- he's got a very similar style

>>4898657
That's not what I'm asking; I want to know if there are certain art masters or resources to learn how to create these kinds of appealing geometrical shapes. I'm not a beg. (most of these guys are Russians, so I want to know if there is something they all studied that could lead me to develop a similar style, instead of having to reverse engineer it from their work)

>>4898672
the crisp sharp edges are created by a hard eraser, basically it's a direct painting method with little to no linework, then the forms are sculpted with either a selection tool or hard erasers. To contrast, there are edges that remains untouched and very soft.

>>4898657
>slide thread
you spent too much time in pol and forgot the meaning

>>4898649
You need to hit the artist responsible with a blunt instrument, like a hammer ,in the head until it cracks. A thin red mist will slither out of the open skul and this is the person's essence. It is necessary for you to inhale this mist to absorb their powers

>>4898654
hard round?

>>4898672
>instead of having to reverse engineer it from their work
What do you mean by that? Do you know of any other way to develop a style other than reverse engineering it from the artists you look up to?
Some may be so kind as to offer classes, gumroad tutorials, PSD files on their patreon - all of which are basically them reverse engineering their process FOR you.

There's literally no other way. You made the collage, so you know exactly who the artists are, so get off your butt and give me six direct copies of Kolesov' pieces, followed by two studies from a photo reference done in the style of Kolesov, as if it was his fingertips holding your pen.

>>4898672
>thinking there's some magical resource that grants you style and creativity of subject matter
>"I'm not a beg"

>>4898672
famous artist course. duh

>>4898865
That isn't what I'm asking. Two people by studying Loomis end up with similar looking faces for a while.

>>4898672
What you are asking about is the study of "design" which is one of the most difficult topics to teach. You don't have the same background / visual library as the artist so your work is never going to come from the same place, but you can get close by A. doing lots of studies to try to understand exactly what they're doing and why you think they're doing it and B. doing lots of pieces "in the style of" where you try to deduce how that artist may approach a subject you haven't seen from them.

Unless they happen to have tutorials where they delve into their own reasoning, there's no other way to figure it out.

>>4898649
Rule 4 Be experimental.
https://youtu.be/ZsY9HO08_MQ

>>4900687
Stop shilling your shitty video

>>4900688
It is to share info. I made these videos because they are answers to all the same god damn questions being asked for more than 10 years.

>>4899733
>Two people by studying Loomis end up with similar looking faces for a while.
Yeah, because they have copied his drawings. Why do you think it would be different with any other artists you'd want to study?

I get what OP says. I asked the same weeks ago in one of the Alternative Art/Stylization General threads. (pic related)

>Im looking to learn the "east" europe style of ilustration like Sergey Kolesov, Kacper Swat or Luca Boni (and many others). They seems to rely a lot in basic forms, geometrization, design and moody colours. Is not purely stylization but abstraction too.

>I guess I just had to apply all the terms above, but sometimes I feel I miss something or Im just comparing my works with theirs. Anyway, if somebody knows any resource or practice related with the art mentioned, would be great to know.

>>4900320 seems to be right but also you probably had to experiment and break the rules/get influenced by studying and replicate their pictures until you get your style and be happy about it like >>4898781 said:

>>4898781
>There's literally no other way. You made the collage, so you know exactly who the artists are, so get off your butt and give me six direct copies of Kolesov' pieces, followed by two studies from a photo reference done in the style of Kolesov, as if it was his fingertips holding your pen.

>>4898671
Peleng (Sergey Kolesov) has a great style, he is focused right now in abstracting his work a lot more. He has a interview in his Patreon page for someone interested (and maybe this could help us): https://www.patreon.com/posts/interview-22347432

Thank you, you gave me the answers that I needed. >>4900320 Yeah, I had already assumed so, I needed someone else to confirm it. Thank you for answering! >>4900789 Thank you! this interview includes some of the artists that he studied from, and from looking at Arkhip Kuindzhi's paintings, I can see a similar use of colors and composition.

The level that you are on most of these beg anons are giving stupid advice for. You can freely move on to studying actual aesthetics and that will help you achieve what you are looking for at least partially. Good luck OP

Learn art history, you can trace where their work came from.

Look at Phil Hale's work (pic related)
also European artists like Mr.Aryz: https://www.instagram.com/mr_aryz/?hl=en

>>4900687
These advices are good but I would add: don't have fear to destroy your paintings in the process of experimentation (even if you are using more layers or not)

If you are not afraid you probably get things right after a while (and a lot of practice)

>>4900687
>>4900688
Lets ratio this faggot lol