/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4771816
Before worrying about subtle differences in facial expressions and how lighting, color, and angle can be used to communicate a certain mood, you should learn the basics of anatomy and construction.
Then color and light.
Then the more complicated shit I just mentioned.

/beg/ exists for a reason, we don't need a new thread for every single drawing (although at least it isn't some dumb fucking frog thread).

lightning or facial expression, expriment with the but the easy road is a hard light over the head or https://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/main/kubrickstare

>>4771816

>>4771836
While this guy is right overall, learning what you need for a piece is actually a great way to make things stick, I Entourage you to keep making lots of pieces like that (while studying on the side)
Why don't you take this opportunity to copy a bunch of evil guy drawings and try to notice which things make them look evil?

>>4771816
There. I just made him 1000% more evil.

>>4771816
Ted bundy doesn't look evil though. He looked like a normal guy you'd pass by at the grocery store or on a walk. Thats what made him interesting to so many people.

>>4771996
He wasn’t just good looking. Women described him as charming and handsome which is why he duped so many of them into his car.

>>4772003
Yep, exactly.

>>4771942
Sure, swing above your weight class, but if you try to go straight for the most advanced techniques without comprehending the things they are based on, you will flounder.

horns