/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Cutesexyrobutts obviously.

>>4763277
Apparently, he'll block you if you mention Cutesexyrobutts on his Twitter.

>>4763277
Csr clones are appearing now? Coom art is unoriginal and have such low standards.

>>4763310
Another one has appeared, FoolTool.

They can't get away with this!!

>>4763303
Kek imma try this what a fucking hack

she doin the chicken stance? lmaoo

Men are pathetic

>>4763343
https://youtu.be/3Vpq5Q5x7As
I get laid every night cause I’m stronger than you

>>4763346
Sure thing bud

dude seriously what the fuck, shexy's art is almost 100% identical to cutesexyrobutts. how do you copy someone's style so accurately?

i'll say that shexy has slightly better faces and less fucked up body shapes, though.

>>4763357
Cutesexyrobutts used to sell tutorials and mentorship before tumblr nuked porn.

>>4763321
>>4763277
Imagine being always known as an inferior version of an r34 artist of all things and being constantly reminded by that because all your followers keep comparing you to said artist no matter how much you think you improve.
imagine willingly making it so your life is nothing but that from now on.

>>4763277
Robutts. Much more interesting composition and use of perspective. The pose is more interesting, sensual, and erotic since Misty is actually DOING SOMETHING and doing it in a sexy way, instead of staring stupidly at you over her huge ass like a dumbass moo cow. Her shirt looks wet and is tight against her breasts, her suspenders tied underneath them is also a nice touch. She just looks sexier overall, she's got a finely sculpted, sleek and curvy body. I'm not really a fan of coom art but Robutts is clearly the superior choice here by a country mile.

>>4763357
it's mostly color picking from his pieces and copying the face

way of rendering is different, and body proportions could be the same as any hentai honestly

>>4763277
both of these look awful so everyone loses

>>4763357
>i'll say that shexy has slightly better faces and less fucked up body shapes, though.
shit take all around
in the op pic Shexys made misty's forehead gigantic which in turn makes it look like her face is crunched and her facial features are too close together.
Her wrists are fucked up.
Prespective on her right arm is messed up, makes it look like either her arm is too long or her forearm is too short.
it looks like he drew the ass first then jumbled the rest of her body together.
The pose in general is dumb, she looks like she's doing the chicken pose.
I'm not a fan of CSR either but Shexy genuinely looks like a chinked soulless imitation of CSR.

>>4763277
What an unappealing heaping pile of shit.

>>4763377
redline the image(s) to demonstrate what you mean.

>>4763407
I only have a mouse and mspaint but fine gimme a sec.

>>4763277
I hope they both die painfully. Fucking pedos.

>>4763454

>>4763277
CSR is clearly better
CSR is decent at drawing, but he is just so fucking sloppy.

>>4763343
Why do you say that?

>>4763463
His nsfw stuff is p good. I think he just half asses the coom shit for ez bux

>>4763277
Both commission the same chink in the sweatshops to draw for them.

>>4763321
This is fucking sad.

>>4763407
>>4763450

>>4763321
That's not how you tie a ponytail

>>4763493
i was gonna defend that shoulder but upon closer inspection it really is fucked up

>>4763363
It''s been noticed in the Olympics that bronze medalists are significantly happier than silver medalists. So this guy probably feels good that he's better than most, so fooltool probably feels bretty good.

>>4763494
Fucking this. How the fuck would you thread the whole ass ponytail like that lmao

>>4763493
this is quite obviously about ass and tits. the rest is secondary and won't be noticed by most coomers

How comes everyone learns the same rendering? How can I learn this as well? Whats the secret?

>>4763493
based

>>4763518
I realize that.
I'm only pointing that out because someone implied he had better faces and body shapes than CSR which simply isn't true. unless you like your anime girls with megacephalia or something.

>>4763520
Hard round set pressure to opacity

who cares if porn art isn't 100% anatomically correct or the ponytail wouldn't work in real life? it's porn. it becomes more and more obvious by the day this board is mostly roasties.

>>4763526
it's not about caring it's about comparison.
one of these three artists is more popular than the others for a reason.

>>4763526
I forgot the name of the movie in gif related, what is it, I remember it was good wholesome kek and I wanna rewatch?

>>4763523
Please no memes I would like a real answer for once

>>4763526

>>4763531
That’s the real answer tho...

>>4763526
Stuff like that shows that the artist is fucking lazy and uncreative. I demand only the BEST coom art, because above all I am a connoisseur of art. Only the best will satisfy my lust.

>>4763544
>Hard brush
>Blending
Haha funny meme

>>4763277
They look high as fuckkkk

>>4763277
>cutesexyrobutts vs shexyo

>>4763562

>>4763557
Pressure is there for a reason retard

>>4763493
respect

>>4763578
Yes man very funny meme. Have another (You)

>>4763587
Do you seriously not know how to blend with hard round or are you just acting retarded?

>>4763591
>Parrot stupid meme culture non answer disregarding everything from workflow to blending and adjustment layers
>r u retarded?
You tell me.

>>4763493
i will never understand what it is about animu fags and bulbous foreheads.

>>4763578
What about flow? isn't that most important?

>>4763454
>pedo
>the guy that is known for giving every single female exaggeratedly curvy proportions

>>4763277
so shit
will never understand this unaesthetic zoomer nonsense

>>4763606
kawaiiiiiiiiiii proportions

>>4763493
it’s just a fanart drawing.
it’s not supposed to be accurate.

>>4763597
You just don’t know how to paint I guess

>>4763613
Set pressure to opacity
Use a low flow
???
Profit!

>>4763338
How’d it go? Did he block you? Lol

>>4763613
Depends on preference really. I set flow to 100% and rely on single passes with opacity pressure but a lot of people like building up layers of paint with low flow.

>>4763663
And you do? pyw

>>4763676
He's right, you dumb crab. You don't need blending modes or adjusment layers to render. You can use those to get certain effects, sure but to render? Hard round, pressure opacity, low flow. That's all you need.

>>4763676
I’m still learning but I do everything as if it’s one layer. I’ll make a new layer to kind of save the work underneath but not really to adjust anything. I kind of just brute force paint everything and it’s not that efficient I guess but I feel if I paint a hand twice rather than using liquify or transform, it’s like getting twice the experience of painting a hand.

>>4763277
both are unappealing and lacking in technical skill

>>4763695
SOUL

>>4763695
Oh I used splatter brushes in that one. This one was all hard round

>>4763695
Based

>>4763529
Open Season

>>4763493
Post your work tho.

>>4763739
those red lines are his work

>>4763695
>>4763700
I can respect people posting work but the results look very bad, messy and unappealing.

>>4763700
>>4763695
Ewww gross.
Iconic /ic/ level

>>4763663
You know how to blob values into shapes, you don’t either
>>4763695
>>4763700
Running Krueger

>>4763739
I'm actually working at a portrair right now.
i'll post when i'm done.

>>4763700
>>4763695
LMAO

Get good before trying to give advice, kid

>>4763695
>>4763700
ouch, maybe you should give liquify and transform a chance and your work wouldn't look so bad

>>4763510
that's just an artifact of a three tier win system. silver seethes at not beating gold and is plagued by what-ifs, while bronze is ecstatic to have made it to the podium at all since the difference between 'medal holder' and 'unknown olympic participant who happened to come in fourth' is substantial

>>4763695
>>4763699
>>4763700
>>4763728
samefag. this is bad.
>>4763763
is right. dunning krueger at its worst.

>>4763637
You have shit taste I guess

>>4763778
SOUL is an insult idiot, we say SOUL at drawings that are technically bad

>>4763363
I think getting a quarter of that 9k a month in patreon bucks CSR rakes in is tempting

>>4763520
Cutesexyrobutts sometimes posts gifs of his painting process on his twitter. But I think that his main rendering brush is the flat marker brush on Sai. And I think his clone uses photoshop.

>>4763695
>>4763700
I don't care what everyone else says. I think they look cool. They have decent composition. You'll be great if you keep improving after a few more years.

>>4763792
Already lost me from step 1 to 2. Also the fact that the hand magically manifest themselves on the last step just makes things more confusing

>>4763277
literally thought these were drawn by one artist

>>4763739
>>4763770

>>4763843
Use a mirror to check your drawing

>>4763847
i never tried that actually.

>>4763654

>>4763576
Kek

>>4763654
>it's just my style
get lost scum

>>4763843
Cute boy

>>4763545
Here you go familia

>people actualy posting their work
you're not supposed to do that

>>4763494
well, the author is a fool

>>4763277
wow wtf why do they look the same

Who copied who?

I hate shexy's art. It's really lacking in anatomy and incredibly amateur but he gets enough parts to look right for normies not to care, he'd be ripped to shit here. He covers the lack of skill and execution with rendering like CSR.

I don't get why people hate CSR either, he puts in enough effort in a loose way. He comes up with interesting color schemes or sometimes his backgrounds are more interesting to me than the girl like pic related. Only thing I'd accuse him of is sameface sometimes. He always seems to be challenging himself with lighting and painting. He greatly appreciates the old masters and tries to learn from them and it shows.

>>4763520
ctrl paint and learn the basics of digital art. it's all the same, doesn't matter what program you use.

>>4763321
pretty bad and doesn't look anything like the others.

>>4763277
Right is the more competent artist, I can tell by the small decision they make all over the piece.

...Hello?
And when and why this war started?

>>4763952
>Ctrl paint
All of it is about doing extremely basic stuff with a very specific program.
>Just paint a spatula and know you can do complex rendering of full scenes
It really doesnt help me one bit in understanding color theory and consistent lighting. Only how to put colors on a layers

>>4763952
At this point who cares about the anatomy when it just looks good

sometimes getting right the anatomy can fuck the entire appeal of the piece. And if you have followers for your fucked anatomy, what will happen when you make the big change? attract more?

I hate when the artist has an appealing style and suddenly change to something that looks exactly like every other mainstream artist for the sake of "get it right".

>>4763998
But it doesn't look good. I don't need anatomy to be perfect at all. There are a lot of weak points in shexy's art that completely detract from the work throughout the whole painting, anatomy being one part. People don't have to know anatomy to know that someone is doing it wrong and thus leads to a weaker or awkward image. Normal people I know, if they know coom shit like csr, they think shexy is a cheap knockoff. They can't always say what it is but something's off.

It would be suring up his foundational skills, not a complete change of style or lack of appeal. Making it better would attract more and he wouldn't lose anything in the process. In a few years they might have their own style that diverges from CSR but it's really hard to tell. The account is very new but they've clearly been drawing/painting for a bit. They don't have a style other than "cut-rate csr" and it's not always the most appealing. Hardly anyone would probably call him their favorite artist.

>>4763777

>>4763362
He did it for free, dumbass.

>>4764484
well who's the dumbass now that he has copycats cannibalizing his fanbase?

>>4763728
>>4763746
>>4763761
>>4763763
>>4763775
>>4763776
>>4763778
>>4763792
Wow, just woke up, didn’t expect to see such a response to these lol. Like I said, I’m still learning and if you could give me any specific tips I’d appreciate it. I didn’t post to say I was good, but to show how I render with hard round, which I think is fundamental to digital painting, and the step I’m starting to branch out from. I post kind of regularly in the draw thread please feel free to give me tips on how to improve there or here. I know there is a lot of baseless crabbing in /ic/, but I know some artists I respect post here and have learned to filter out bad advice.

Why are pinup artists like CSR hated again? They make art that is perfect for you mindless coomers.

>>4764781
Oh and thanks to the people that liked those drawings, composition is something I’m just starting to pick up so it’s good to hear that I’m heading in the right direction.

>>4764783
Kill yourself you fucking Redditor.

>>4764795
So you all got nothing, got it. This place really is the pits.

>>4764815
Yep, so when do you leave

>>4763952
i like csr's painting part, but his figures are honestly kinda weak, if he just put in a bit more effort to make them look more solid and consistent he'd be the best coom artist out there

>>4763277
Is it too late to get into being poorman's cutesexyrobutts?

>>4763606
cunny. its cunny

>>4764815
Go back where you came from.

>>4764950
How's 30k followers starting sound?
>>4764852
Absolutely, but considering his output it just seems like a case of sacrificed quality for quantity

>>4763280
fpbp

>>4763277
I’m the only one very bothered by the background on car’s piece?

>>4763695
learn proper lighting

>>4765678
what don't you like about it? saying it bothers you is meaningless.

>>4763343
Did you get lost on your way to crystal cafe?

>>4763700
look, your drawings aren't terrible, better than what i can do, but it's still quite flawed and it's not appealing to look at. you shouldn't criticize other's work in a mean-spirited manner when your work isn't all that good itself. shexy0 has way better coloring and rendering, for one. and shexy0's boobs are also way more natural looking than your fem-cable drawing.

inb4 coomer.

>>4766517
>quite flawed and it's not appealing to look at. you shouldn't criticize other's work in a mean-spirited manner
When the fuck did he do that? This reply chain was about using hard round to render, not about anyone's art.
You sound like you have a chip on your shoulder.

>>4766568
i must have gotten that guy confused with the other guy who "redlined" shexy0's art and criticized the shapes. unless they're the same anon.

my mistake.

>>4766517
>>4766609
Cable/Berserk drawer here, I'm not the redline guy. What art do you find appealing? I know universal appeal is impossible, but I'm always looking for ways to improve.
>>4765727
Any tips or resources? Other than doing more studies, which is how I'm learning how to light.

>>4766609
Man, that post wasn't mean spirited either, it was a badic redline. I think you shoulf take it easy.

>>4766630
He’s probably Shexy0 butthurt about all the anons that posted Cutesexyrobutts on his Twitter lmao

>>4766625
your art is alright but it's missing something. i think you need more contrast in your coloring, or more solid lines.

something about the way the knight and fem-cable are colored looks a bit too much like they're actual painting rather than people that's been drawn in painting.

i find CSR's coloring and rendering very appealing (and to a lesser extent, shexy0's). maybe it's just the boobs and butt though.

>>4766630
that anon said "her face is crunched and facial features too close together" "chinked soulless imitation". obviously he's being a crabby douchebag. he should've posted his work if he can talk so mean-spirited.

this was the post:
>>4763377

2 gods

I hope one day I will achieve their success :)

>>4764852
>>4765259
I really think he would have benefited from just a little more time put into either the drawing or the rendering. I still feel like this oni pic is one of his best works.

>>4763343
you'll never pass, tranny

>>4763277
How about Sakimichan? I'm not an avid fan but her renders do catch the eye

>>4766948
She has her own set of clones.

>>4766659
Stop being such a sensitive little bitch, it's annoying.

>>4764852
>his figures are honestly kinda weak,
no way

So going back to topic how do you render like this? Its odd the 3 authors are pretty much the same technique where do they teach this?

>>4767059
If you can't figure this out on your own you don't know the basics of digital painting. The rendering isn't anything special. Someone posted ctrl paint which is the fundamentals of online. After you understand the fundamentals, you can do this no problem.

>>4767059
It has been stated ITT already.

>>4767243
Hopefully you don't mean mr dunning kruger

>>4763636
Imagine thinking "aging up" minors by slapping big tumors on their chests and asses isn't in any way pedophilia.

>>4767273
Better yet, imagine. Literally just IMAGINE.

>>4766659
none of what he said was wrong though.
what part of /ic/- Artwork/critique made it sound like a safespace to you

>>4767261
What are you talking about, you dumb fucking parrot?

>>4767273
Imagine thinking any child could ever have a body like that.
Imagine getting this triggered over drawings.

>>4763321
this is trash though

>>4767273
how else are you supposed to do it though? unless you're talking about putting tits on a body that has a child's proportions. hmm, still weird i guess, but not as condemnable

>>4767299
imagine getting triggered by a bunch of words on your screen. its just a 4chan post bro, dont you know pixels arent real?

>>4767335
What are you talking about?

>>4767261
Brian’s in this thread?

>>4767371
You have got to stop being so obsessed with one retard, this isn't healthy.

>>4767261
Multiple people have been saying hard round with pressure set to opacity and you’re using dunning krueger wrong brainlet

Did this really quick using whatever the default brush procreate gives you on New Brush is, which I’m pretty sure is hard round with opacity. I think a better artist could do a better job at this than me, but from what I’ve seen it’s totally doable to render like CSR using hard round. I’d probably modify it with flow and some smudge if I kept using a brush like this though.

>>4767525
>>4767261
BTFO

>>4767261
It's literally just hard round and soft round/smudge/blur. Is this you who is too retarded to understand >>4763991 how it works?

>>4763520
>>4763991
Seems like you're asking for painting fundamentals and not brushes if I got it right? Marco Bucci's 10 Minutes to Better Painting as well as his other related videos about lighting and painting are a good way to start, as well as these 2 videos from Sinix -
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-Nt9fa8jZUE
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zC3OxonJcXQ

Beyond that you're gonna have to put in the mileage, paint and study how objects look under different kinds of lighting to really have a good understanding of rendering. A huge chunk of this imho is understanding lighting and values, so I'd focus my attention there.

>>4767525
No, you're pretty spot on with the rendering. CSR has a better sense of form and lighting, but your rendering here is basically identical.

>>4767556
Finally a good non braindead answer. Thank you.

>>4767597
>non braindead answer
>it's "use a hard round, retard"
lol

>>4767597
Multiple people explained it to you and even gave you resources. Do you just like video links or something? lmao

>>4767642
>>4767603
>>4767597
Honestly "hard round with opacity" is an overused answer, though it is only because "how do I render like X" is an over-asked question. Not sure why I've been seeing it pop up so much recently.

>>4767653
The right answer doesn't stop being the right answer just because multiple people say it.

>>4767653
>>4767666
>How do I calculate an isothermal reversible process in thermodynamics?
>Use numbers!
It is the right answer. But it tells you nothing.

>>4767689
there are countless resources on how to render with hard round and you're so retarded you can't use any of them.

>>4767689
>being so low level you can’t even use the most basic brush

Lmao ngmi

>>4767689
We can't tell you precisely how to move your hand and arm, at some point you're going to just have to grab your tool and make an effort.

>>4767715
>>4767712
>>4767709
Anon who did >>4767525 here. I don’t think we need to hold the hand of everyone who asks “how do I render like X”, but maybe have a slightly more helpful stock answer than “hard round with opacity”. I won’t lie I don’t have much of a dog in this race one way or another.

>>4767720
kek, they are checking this thread

>>4767720
Asking the question shows you haven't even tried to find resources of how to paint digitally. It doesn't deserve more than telling them to fuck off to ctrl paint and actually do the lessons.

>>4767723
>Asking the question shows you haven't even tried to find resources of how to paint digitally.
You know what you’ve got a point there

>>4763606
2.5d hydrocephalie

I also noticed that they both try to avoid anime "dog snout syndrome", because it will fucking creep the normies.

>>4767768
>also noticed that they both try to avoid anime "dog snout syndrome"
what

>>4767788
uhmmuhihiaiaskreeee

>>4767792
All faces are front view either 3/4