/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4738403
anybody who answers should post their work so we can see if they know what theyre talking about

YEP
>>4736154

>>4738403
Couldn't tell you, I'm starting with Nicolaides

>>4738403
>He is way more complete.
>Has never finished a drawing in his life

I don't like his head construction

>>4738403
https://www.brainstorm-inland.com/fig1
FIGURE DRAWING
>Prerequisite: Perspective
Well, you need perspective for everything(figure drawing)
So Yes
and
He is always updating his content
http://www.figuredrawing.info/
http://figuredrawingdotinfo.blogspot.com/
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCgPj2jSpcJaN6C5xMi8ohfg/videos

My advice would be to study figure drawing along with perspective

>see Michael Hampton videos
>think he is old as fuck like Vilppu and Huston
>actually he is a pretty chill guy
>he watches south park
>he does demonstrations using video game characters
>he even mentioned anime during proportions
BASADO

Hampton is really good.

>>4738511

>>4738517
Masquerade violation

>>4738403
Why not both?

>>4738523
shh, my master is better than your master

>>4738403
People should watch Hampton's lectures instead of reading his book.

Loomis is a crash course for people who want to add figures to their drawings or want to be illustrators and. Hampton is for people whose drawings are going to be figures and want to have a better understanding of the human body to draw it more expressively. Just skim through Loomis after Hampton.

>>4738532
would you recommend them? i tried to read his book but i feel like he shut dumptext a lot of information in a little span of time and it's not clear at all when he explain things

>>4738499
>he keep even the filename
wtf bro
why did you save my /asg/ shitpost

>>4738544
I do think they're better if only because he actually uses pictures to show where the muscles attach to and what they look like from a couple of different views. There's also the fact that he works through some examples and he takes more time to explain things than in his book. I did struggle with drawing muscles once he got to leg anatomy, though, and had to supplement the lectures with Zarins' book. I'm not sure it's a good first figure drawing course for beginners but give it a try, and if you find it hard to follow consider Huston or Eviston, some people even find Vilppu more begfriendly. But do watch his gesture lecture, I think he explains and draws gesture very nicely.

>>4738517
>an image made a decade ago

For me, it's Michel Lauricella.

>>4738403
i like hampton, but none of it matters cause i still draw like sheit

i think being AWARE of construction/anatomy is a good way to understand what's going on, when you encounter it in figure drawing.

Vanderpool is nice too.

>>4738622
Can you post some of his latest works for us? Oh right I forgot. There is nothing.

all that anatomical knowledge for this.
really makes you think

>>4738646
What do you mean, none?

>>4738646
He has instagram under Steven Hampton. And he likes to paint dictators swimming like so >>4738759

i find hampton unappealing but the information in the book is good, i guess.

>>4738768

>>4738403
he's literally a confirmed pedo with a child rape charge so it would make sense that you'd want to study him anon

>>4738918
Ah yes here comes the shitposter.

>>4738918
Proof?
Pedos seem to draw extremely well
unlike him

I really don't get how his geture works. like does he still think about the spine even when he's drawing the front ?

>>4738992
Yes. Look at vilppu drawing manual book. The chapter on gestures. He learned from Vilppu after all. Vilppu wrote about thinking of the spine as well and shows a few simple examples.

>>4738918
>>4738939
You forgot your frogs :)

>>4738992
>like does he still think about the spine even when he's drawing the front ?
The spine exists regardless of the angle you view the figure, anon