/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4535563
please read a book anon, dont be a ignorant retard. he was one of the great thinkers who rejected what was traditionally known as art and was challenging the very meaning of what art could and couldn't be.

>>4535660
>postmodernism good

>>4535663
there is trash and there are masterworks. just like any other art periods

>>4535663
>reads le lobster man once
If you really think that the piece is valued high because of muh postmodernism, then you are a retard

James said everything for me
https://www.bitchute.com/video/OX8BHF8yZq2C/

>>4535660

>>4535660
>need to read a book to appreciate a piece of visual art
The only time "challenging the meaning of art" was good was when the first person did it. Everyone else is copying the first guy.
If he was a so called great thinker, please share what some of his thoughts were. It would be good discussion for this board.

"Le maître dans son atelier..."

So inspiring : )

>>4535671
>pls write a essay for me, regurgitating what you learned in art history so that I can be less stupid.
no

How many hours to reach his level? I'm already in my 20s, will I ever make it?

>>4535660
>take a shit on a canvas
>let pretentious hipsters search for a deep meaning and symbolism in it

>>4535684
>implying you learned anything in art history
sad

>>4535692

>>4535667
It's a shame that holocaust never actually happened

>>4535671
>The only time "challenging the meaning of art" was good was when the first person did it. Everyone else is copying the first guy.
The only time "trying to make something conventionally artistic" was good was when the first person did it. Everyone else is copying the first guy.

>>4535783

Why do smooth-brains always try to do this?

>>4535783
>conventionally artistic
All artists have been trying to make something beautiful or visually appealing in some way. It just happens that humans are attracted to similar things. Only dirty oven dodgers are interested in modern art and that's because they're inhuman demons. And the shitskins who make it are their servants who are only interested in cash. Sorry I'm not even /pol/ I've never even been to that board lol

>>4535859
Art must evoke strong emotions or convey thought. It may include aesthetics, or it may not. But knowledge of aesthetics will help in drawing any paintings. Even if you are drawing something terrible or unpleasant, you must know with what elements to cause this feeling.

>>4535563
Money Laundering.
Its been told a million times and people still post those retarded bait-threads.

>>4535897
>Money Laundering.
gib proofs

>>4535904
Those pieces of literal garbage are sold for ridiculous prices because in most countries art does not get taxed, the buyer makes an agreement with the """""artist""""" and the capital gets returned to the buyer with a very small cut for the """"artist"""".

>>4535897
Little boys always bite though so why stop?

>>4535660
SUBVERTED EXPECTATIONS

>>4535909
What if the buyer gets fucked over by the artist?

>>4535909
That's just a conspiracy theory though.

>>4535933
The """"artist""""" is not an artist, but a money launderer disguised as artist, he offers the service and it is always cheaper than actually paying for your taxes. Rich people stuff.

>>4535936
YOU FUCKING NEET WHEN YOU WRITE OFF YOUR EXPENSES IN YOUR ANNUAL TAX THOSE DONT GET TAXED THIS IS BASIC ACCOUNTABILITY YOU FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT

>>4535938
Any proof of such pseudo-artists being exposed? They all seem to have an actual modest background and they've all been actually struggling to make it.

>>4535941
>WHEN YOU WRITE OFF YOUR EXPENSES
Mum takes care of that, mate.

>>4535943
Google "money laundering art market" and read the first 500 results.

>>4535949
So no proof?

>>4535959
There's >500 proofs you moron

>>4535960
I'm not hearing any names yet, just theories and suspicions. It's all paranoia from poorfags who are ngmi.

>>4535660
Is this suposed to be bait?

>>4535965
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/19/arts/design/has-the-art-market-become-an-unwitting-partner-in-crime.html
Read and cry

>>4536106
>no guilty pseudo-artist is named/exposed
cope

>>4536117
You didn't read don't you? Fucking illiterate twat

>>4535671
I'm with you anon

Art is one of the few ways you can transfer millions of dollars/euros/pounds/yuan to anyone tax free. You're just a bunch of post modern hacks.

This is what making it looks like.

>>4536399
This is actually what it looks like when you hate art.

I did the same thing with one of the paintings in my house but instead of getting $13,297,500 mom scolded me :(

It would be sick if you put your head through it and there was some cool shit on the other side

>>4535666
true. its actually just money laundering

>>4536399
You may not like what it looks like but it do be like this.

>>4535660
Oy vey now I understand.

>>4536551
xD

deep meaning my ass

>>4535660
>tfw there are people here that might unironically think this

>>4535783
>No U

>>4535660
I can't recreate the Sistine Chapel in even a lifetime, but in a mere 30 seconds I can recreate this. Oh what a genius I must be to be capable of such masterpieces

>>4538486
the art is simple and stupid, yes, that is the point, its so dumb that somebody would do this and say its art, but that was his point, what he did pissed off lots of people and it got people talking and articles written, this art is not about skills or talent, it was about making a statement, and the retards who seethed at it only made it more popular and helped it grow,
its a lot like forced memes in a way.

>>4535685
You have 60000 hrs to live, what do you think?

>>4535666
>lobster man bad

>>4538581
>the art is simple and stupid, yes
stopped reading here

>>4538591
>Low IQ anon struggles to comprehend deeper thought.
OK retard

>>4538595
Analyse this chef-d'œuvre.

>>4535660
>read a book anon
which one?

>>4535667
can I get a quick rundown?

>>4535563
You just don't get it. It's a self portrait of a cunt.

>>4538595
>110 IQ brainlet feels smug about his superior intellect

>>4535859
Suspiciously specific denial.

>>4535563
First off, that price is ridiculous and obvious money laundering. Aside from that, I find the piece itself pretty interesting, I love how meta it is. Unlike most modern art, it actually has a clever idea behind it. It's clearly more than just baiting for shock responses.

>>4540886
https://www.widewalls.ch/most-expensive-lucio-fontana-works/concetto-spaziale-attesa-1965/
>This waterpaint on canvas and lacquered wood is one of the biggest of all of Fontana’s Tagli. The painting is dedicated to his wife, Teresita, and has often been known as Teresita throughout the years.

>>4535941
That's not how personal income tax works

>>4535904
https://medium.com/@MichaelMcBride/how-jackson-pollock-and-the-cia-teamed-up-to-win-the-cold-war-6734c40f5b14

Cia and communist jews made this shit stain modern art popular. Art sales are $50 to 100 billion annually today. There is no advertisement or mass purchasing, yet bigher than video games and most movies. Its free money laundering and ability to move millions across borders when most cou tries only allow $10000 cash out of country without going through tax related shit.

>>4541553
cope

>>4535563
Oh look, a sculpture of your moms fat cunt

>>4543287
Nah, it's clearly a young, barely developed cunny. That's why it was sold for so much, I guess.

>>4538581
>he got a lot of people talking
Fidget spinners and Birdbox got a lot of people talking.
What people talk about has zero merit.

>>4535563
>that smug froggy face in the last panel

>>4543528

>>4535660
thanks for reminding me why my community college professor was dogshit.

>>4542350
autistic retarded fucktard

>>4541022
>mfw

>>4544033
butthurt starving artist

>>4535563
I know it’s shit and a wank but pretty impressive that he made a perfectly plumb vertical line tobh

>>4535563
Money laundering, mocking child sacrifice/ cannibalism

>>4538581
Why not just write "NIGGER" on a giant canvas then. It'll be the best piece of art ever made.

>>4545142

There are definitely pieces of modern art which I find beautiful. Pic related for instance, the Running Fence or the sculpture shown here:
https://youtu.be/j9JD9W0n7gE
However, I think that their beauty is quite conventional, and since they don't challenge or reject the definition of what's beautiful, can they really be defined as modern art?