[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 361 KB, 1920x2860, 1552244591343.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4468383 No.4468383 [Reply] [Original]

Does anybody have a source on who painted this? Google images isn't coming back with anything.

>> No.4468385

>>4468383
average krenz student value study of anime figurines
next

>> No.4468386

https://www.artstation.com/artwork/r3RmE

>> No.4468391

I honestly believe that most of /ic/ is filled with people who draw, but seek out study material that is "good" thinking it'll make them that good too in a snap

>> No.4468396
File: 309 KB, 667x1000, 1554416972660.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4468396

>>4468386
Sick, thanks.

>>4468391
I think you're reading too much into it. I'm fully aware the image is just a study of an existing figurine, but the artist's ao technique is good and I think most people can learn something from looking at their application.

>> No.4468405

>>4468383
Is that done with a soft brush or a hard brush with blending/smudging?

>> No.4468407

>>4468396
Uhh what is going on with her leg?

>> No.4468415

>>4468396
La creatura...

>> No.4468418

>>4468407
who cares look at her tummy bro

>> No.4468421

>>4468383
Hwaa
I really really like this picture

>> No.4468428

>>4468396
what an ugly figurine. Your artist has bad taste, the anatomy is fucked up. Is she supposed to be human?

>> No.4468430
File: 60 KB, 600x798, 190494.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4468430

>>4468407
>>4468418
Obstetrician M's figures are highly stylised.

>> No.4468433

where do i learn how to get values like this

>> No.4468436
File: 779 KB, 1280x720, 9408.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4468436

>>4468396
>these legs
That's a big yikes from me!

>> No.4468440
File: 172 KB, 300x356, tenor.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4468440

>>4468383
>painted

>> No.4468446

>>4468428
>>4468436
>doesn't know who Obstetrician M is

>>4468433
This is an ambient occlusion study.

>> No.4468453

>>4468430
>Obstetrician M

That's nightmare fuel. Big nope.

>> No.4468462

>>4468386
Can anyone access weibo? Has he done anything else?

>> No.4468468

>>4468453
You lack vision.

>> No.4468470
File: 135 KB, 801x1200, G00_1651.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4468470

>>4468430
I love the Devilman Lady figure

>> No.4468485
File: 266 KB, 1200x968, Djl6raPUUAAETQz.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4468485

>>4468470
All his shit is A+

>> No.4468491

>>4468462
scrolled through some of his posts and they seem be mostly just reblogs
don't seem to be anything else in their gallery either that's not already on Artstation

>> No.4468540

>>4468383
when drawing something like this is there even a point to a preliminary sketch? i feel like i dont even use my sketch when i start painting over, or the sketch is just wrong

>> No.4468548

>>4468540
Even a master can benefit from a good foundation.

>> No.4468550

>>4468383
don't underestimate the power of shapes, forms, and gesture.
i think it is the figure that is doing all the work here.

>> No.4468758

I think I'm in love

>> No.4468829

>>4468758
Draw her

>> No.4468835

>>4468396
ew

>> No.4468839

>>4468540
Plan your shapes and block it in, you'll save so much time and headaches if you have a good foundational sketch and block in phase

>> No.4468847

>>4468396
>I think you're reading too much into it.
I think you have shit taste.
Eternally ngmi.

>> No.4468849

>>4468847
Stay mad little brother.

>> No.4468920
File: 83 KB, 1140x700, kazuki-dcg-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4468920

reminds me of depthmap art(which I think is underrated as fuck with lots of potential)

>> No.4468962

>>4468396
>>4468470
>>4468485
Their tummies look like if a headcrab had a navel

>> No.4468998

>>4468386
LOL dong

>> No.4469003

>>4468383
>>4468386
>>4468396
>when the study is x9999999 better than the original

>> No.4469011

>>4468383
I wish I could art like that the op pic is great she looks so delicate and soft

>> No.4469093

>>4468920
this looks like those 3D books with invisible images, is that what it is?

>> No.4469119

>>4468849
Stay mad literally everyone is pointing out how shit your pic is.

>> No.4469123

>>4468418
She's bloated

>> No.4469129

>>4469119
ok.

>> No.4469160

>>4469093
Not exactly but they're related. It's a rendering technique where you illustrate the distance of a 3D object to the viewer plane by using values. So for example in that image lighter the tone closer the object gets to the viewer.

>> No.4469460

>>4468485
oh shit Panty and Stocking

>> No.4469491

https://twitter.com/obstetrician_M

>> No.4469922

>>4468920
this is really cool