/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4439207
> art

>hiding foot

>>4439207
What's the fuckin difference?

>>4439207
I agree and I think anyone who isn't just trying to be contrarian will know too.

A three-dimensional brushstroke made of actual substance is more expressive than a two-dimensional brshstroke made of pixels, so yeh.
As >>4439297 said, no one with any genuine interest in expressionism would disagree with you.

>>4439207
I think it's just jerking yourself off if you restrict your style to one medium

>>4439325
pls explain.

>>4439207
Like all digital art, its main benefit comes from the reduction of overhead cost in materials overtime. When you live in Johannesburg, South Africa like this artist does, I imagine it's cheaper to make prints than it is to churn out countless paintings. Plus with them working digitally, they can more easily scale their works up in size; quality be damned. Of course it doesn't feel right; assuming the artist doesn't actually paint traditionally, that may be precisely the point.

>>4439207
>modren
>done traditionally
choose one grampa

>>4439339
no I don't think I will

>>4439207
Doesn't matter. It looks like shit when done traditionally, it looks like shit when done digitally.

>>4439326
people can do what they want and innovation is nice sometimes. I've never thought of art as something that had an explicit way that things are /meant/ to be done. And you can't say that either ways better because it's subjective.

>>4439207
This person’s work is not well executed and wouldn't look good in any medium. The drawing style underneath is reminiscent of editorial illustration and in that context digital would be fine - as fleeting and temporary as the piece being published. But there isnt much sense to the brushwork and so it’s just distracting.

Also, no serious piece should use the two-middle fingers-together trick. It’s hacky.
So... yeah.

>>4439207
I literally could not give less of a fuck. If it looks good traditionally, it will look good digitally. Tradfags are fucking cancer, some of the worst, most entitled pieces of shit in existence.

>>4439454
Entitled?

You don't fool me, it's time for another two.

>>4439454
They are like the fucking vegans of the artworld. Don’t take those retards seriously.

>>4439207
It's trash either way.

>>4439207
What's the point of this kind of thread when you already know OP is a retarded faggot?

>2020
>still going on about muh trad art vs digital
Absolutely unbearable, this shit should have ended in the early 2000's.

>>4439207
what's the point of scanning and posting traditional art in a digital internet forum?