/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4249936

We're just relatively intelligent animals. That's why. We tend to like paintings of broad landscapes and forests as well...

The human form itself is the most aesthetically pleasing object. Everything from the graceful gesture, defined muscles, delicate genatalia. Seeing a beautiful human in it's pure form has always been a sight to admire ever since the Greeks realized how cucked it is to pray to gods that dont even look like you

>>4249936
Did the kid bite his dick? That’s why you pull out the milk teeth to train them before the real ones grow out.

>>4250067
ok boomer

>>4249936
Why DID Rubens paint his women so fat?
He bitched about fatties IRL, and it wasn't fashionable as many claim, see the Rokeby Venus for another version of feminine beauty from the same period.

>>4249936
fatties
>>4250955
qt

This is not comfy, feels ike I'm looking at gay porn.
I hate drawing and seeing all these hairy small-dicked men.
If males didn't have more prominent musculature that makes easier to learn, I'd have gone full female from the start.

Also this >>4250958

>>4250958Mr. V clearly posed a real life lady for this, and enjoyed it.
Internet tells me Rubens used male models posed for his women, with presumably cushions added for the squishy bits. Is this where he went so wrong? His two wives were both quite normal in size and appearance, nothing like these marshmallow creations of his paintings?!

>>4250969
If the first thing that comes to your mind when looking at a naked male body is sex stuff, you might be a closeted homo, sorry.

It's like involuntarily looking at peoples' dicks in the gym shower, it's a telltale sign.

>>4250992
Shut the fuck up you brainless parrot.
Maybe I'm also a closeted lover of Indian women, since all I feel is disgust looking at this picture.

Retard.

>>4251016
You have it saved on your hard drive, though. Hmm kinda weird. It's like if I claimed to not be a pedo but had pictures of little girls on my computer. Very strange.

You wanna tell us something, buddy?

>>4251016
You have to go back to /pol/, your kind is not welcome here

>>4251086
>imagine being so retarded that you can't help but want to shit on others even though you have an obvious possibility
>imagine being so retarded that you can't even imagine that possibility
ammofaggots are fucking insufferable.

>>4251086
>You have it saved
I just googled "Indian woman" for this post, it's one of the first results.
>>4251089
>feeling disgusted at the sight of an ugly woman = /pol/
Artists are supposed to have an aesthetic sense. By the same logic, go back to /lgbt/.

>>4251116
You don't even know what the fuck aesthetics means you ignorant cocksucker, go rope yourself.

>>4251122
Poo in loo, pajeet.

>>4250071
This is "The Death of Adonis." He bled to death in Aphrodite's arms after being gored by a wild boar. Jeez, don't you ever go to church?

>>4250955
It may not be fashionable but it sold so why stop?
It's the same with furry artists nowadays, raking in the commissions and it certainly isn't fashionable.

>>4249936
>>4250955
How did they get those tots to pose?

>>4251644
Toddlers are fucking easy to draw, You just draw them once and if they are wonky nobody cares because they are babies and babies are ugly as sin.

>>4251646
But babies are cute. And how did get the tots to stand up? Did someone hold them?

>>4251654
I have the feeling they posed them while sleeping.

>>4251116
>I just googled "Indian woman" for this post
Then why does it have a 4chan filename?
:^)

>>4252239
Your newfag is showing.
What do you think of this picture I had previously saved from 4chan as well?

>>4252281
>been on this hellsite on and off for 9 years
>just because I don't know all the weird intricacies of the settings some assfuck calls me a newfag
why did your autistic ass even bother to randomize the filename? who does that?

>>4250977
>wives were both quite normal in size
y u lie to me anon? She wasn't much different than the lardbags he was in habit of painting.

>>4252292
He probably fed her up a bit over the years.
Besides, how are we to know whether she really had all those fat rolls or whether a few were shopped in? He might only have painted the hands and head and copied the body from a previous drawing, we'll never know. Rubens was notorious at doing very little of the actual painting in his workshop. Bit like a Warhol.