/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4192117
A5 size with resolution 600 px

>>4192117
do you adjust the size to something less retarded after you're done...?

>>4192117
>Minimizes tab
>Opens paint SAI
>Clicks file
>Clicks Open Recent
>Clicks on current piece
>Clicks Canvas
>Clicks Change Canvas Size
I can tell you with ABSOLUTE CONFIDENCE that any and all true artists will agree that 2480x3508 is the correct canvas size

>>4192117
Like 800x800 then I realize it’s too small

>>4192117
Go big or go home.
7500x7500

>>4192146
>less retarded

Why is that resolution retarded?

>>4192167
No real artist would work at that size, faggot, do you even know how digital art works?

4000x4000

>>4192117
I work 6,000x6,000

>>4192117
Depending on the picture, somewhere between 4000x4000 and 9000x9000 (my laptop tends to spazz out if I go beyond 10000x9000 for some reason).

>>4192117
A4, 160g smooth inkjet copy paper

>>4192117
2048x2048

b5 with 600dpi, its more than enough.

10222x5522 600dpi 16bit
Am I a big guy enough for you, ic?

>>4192167
>>4192398
I mostly just go with the standard size of a sheet of white printer paper.

2550 x 3300

A4 300ppi 2480x3508

>>4192117
My default is a bit over 2000x3000
Unless you plan to print something a large size, it feels like more is just overkill and more likely to get your computer to lag.
Also 300 PPI/DPI.

I use 1000x1000. Is that too small?
I mostly just look at my art on my phone so I never notice.

>>4192117
3000x3000, for the sake of memory.

used to be 3000x2000
now i have a strong ass pc so its never less that 10.000

>>4192733
I do too, then people ask me to put pieces on a shirt and I realize they're too small to do anything with.

If you work with canvas size under 5000x5000 you have brain damage, pro artist post their "resized" pics, the pic You find at 2000x3000 is just the down sized version of the original, this helps to make the pic look crispier and sharper, if You work at small canvas size and you keep ir deliver you art at that size it will look like shit.

this thread is honestly eye opening to me.....I use like 1200x800 and then i upscale with waifu2x and clean that image up.....
I had no idea you fuckers were doing crazy resolutions. Maybe that's why i've always struggled with clean lineart.

>all these absurd res anons
I've always drawn digitally around 800x800 or sometimes 720p. Have I been doing it wrong all this time?

>>4192117
40x40

>>4192984
Pretty much, lol, resolution is one of the first things you need to know, is not just numbers even if you draw just for fun.

>>4192955
Because you need to do it the other way around, bigger, then do lineart, then scale it down, then pasa a sharpen filtre, and you'll have the crispier lineart of your life.

>>4192117
3000x2000 300dpi

is there any real benefit to using 600 dpi over 300 or is it just about the same

>>4193275
Only if you print your stuff.

it's not about size, it's how you use it

>>4193025
using a sharpening filter at the end of a lineart pass seems like a no brainer. I wonder why i've never thought of using it. thanks for the tip.

>>4192117
1000x1000, sometimes even smaller if the piece is simple. i don’t plan on putting my art up anywhere yet so canvas size doesn’t matter to me

I like drawing on those big poster boards :P

>>4192117
2000x2000 here, draw on my phone. Shit sucks bro.

>>4192117
Yeah i did that too when i used photoshop, because the brush engine is so bad you need to use 10px for the thinnest lines.

After i seitched to Krita I work with like 150% the target resolution just so it looks extra crisp when downscaling.
Any normal art application allows you to just draw in desired native resolution

>>4193023
Why would I need to draw at absurd res if I never plan to sell or print my digital art?

>>4193366
Then dont do it, faggot, nobody is forcing you, do whatever you want, is just an advice.

>>4193379
Jeez ok lol

2000x2000 or slightly bigger with 250 dpi, I don't think much of it.

>>4192984
it doesn't matter, normies will eat up wii u sketches even and most aspiring artists dont work too absurd. frankly i hate when i open something my image viewer freezes for a few seconds to load. and then when it does load there is aliasing. at some point its just too much, nobody is even looking at your fucking micropixels that you yourself the artist don't even focus on at 100000x100000

>>4192398
No, pls help
What is a good size
help me out here

>>4192117
Something similar.
10-15k pixels on bigger side.
My main brush is textured so if I scale it below its default size it starts to feel like absolute shit. But with big enough canvas everything is nice and smooth.

>>4194140
That's part of the reason I prefer working at smaller sizes. I never cared for "in your face" gigantic digital art, I only enjoy seeing giant art pieces irl at art museums.
Having to constantly zoom in and out on a giant canvas also never felt natural to me, since I'm a mainly a tradfag who sticks to sketchbook sized stuff.