/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Oh my god, you're so fucking retarded it's unreal.

>>4049911
it's 2.5D you retard, of course you wouldn't get it, fucking pleb
go draw your semirealistic merc wips you fucking fag
this is the perspective you need it you want to achieve peak anime aesthetic
Everyone knows that if you go 2 far into 3D the anime aesthetic is lost
This is glorious NIPPON perspective, it was discovered 400 000 B.C. IN GLORIOUS NIPPON NATION
UNDERWATER

I want to put a pole through your face so that you never post this again.

>>4049936

eh

>>4049969
Congratulations, you won

>>4049909

the correct perspective is wherever you put it because its YOUR perspective

that being said being informed of the golden ration and objectively good perspective is required knowledge first.

>>4049909
I expected a thread about practical exercises to learn. Instead I got this.

>>4049909
i gassed all the other poles and soon i will gas these two too.

>>4049909

>>4049969
Fuck you for knowing this
Good job

>>4049988
Ok how about this, rotate a box along the three axes

>>4049909
This makes no sense, these two poles are just two different sizes since they both lay on the horizon line.

>>4050121
Not if the eye level aligns with the
ground level

>>4050148
what do you mean? This is like a mountain or a building at the horizon
Pic related, some building are taller than others

>>4050158
Can't really find any good example right now since the setup is hard to do IRL, but imagine if the camera is right on the ground, except that it clips right through. In this scenario, the ground level becomes the horizon line. You can find scenes like this in comic books often.

my interpretation

>>4050166
You mean a worm's eye? In that case the camera isn't clipping the ground, it's just resting on it. And it makes no difference at the horizon, since taller things will be taller anyway.
You're confusing this with objects that are closer looking taller, but in that case they wouldn't sit on the horizon.
But I honestly have no idea, every time I see a thread about perspective I wonder if I understood nothing and everyone is talking about stuff I have no clue about like >>4049969 >>4049973 >>4050009

>>4050169
fuark i thought it said hole

>>4050172

>>4050170
Not worm's eye, he means it's literally clipping the ground
Imagine you dug a hole that's precisely deep enough for the middle of your lens/eye to align with the ground level
Or pic related

Stupid question on perspective: is there any difference between your eyeballs looking up/down and tilting your head up/down, in relation to perspective from the station point?
Its relevant for drawing from life, if you keep your head still but look up as far as you can, are you distorting the perspective the same as if you just tilted your head up?

>>4049969
what's the name of this technique? like, what's the science behind this technique? the top of the closer objects goes to the bottom of the further one and vice-versa.

>>4050174
Alright. Since this situation is retardedly abstract and specific, I will just call OP a faggot for making the two poles the same thickness and ignoring things like atmospheric perspective.

>>4050182
what's atmospheric perspective?

>>4050178
Yes, tilting your head and your eyes logically will produce the same kind of perspective distortion (except your eyeballs have a more limited movement). It's a part of the challenge of drawing from life. Your true field of vision is actually extremely narrow IRL, and your vision is actually just your brain stitching together small pieces of imagery as your eyes dart around at the scene before you. Which is why you need to be very wary about perspective and correct distortions as needed when you draw from life.

>>4050180
Its the mystical art of connecting the corners of a rectangle to find the centre. Try it now at home!

>>4050178
>is there any difference between your eyeballs looking up/down and tilting your head up/down, in relation to perspective from the station point?
Not at all. You can test this by looking at a fixed point and moving your head up and down, nothing changes. The only case where this matter is if you move your head dramatically sideways, in this case you will be limiting your field of vision because your eye orbits get in the way.

>>4050183
Pic related. Particles in the air will create a screen over objects in the distance, making them blend with the color of the sky as they recede.

>>4049984
>the correct perspective is wherever you put it because its YOUR perspective

lol what the fuck is this "my truth!" shit? Oh yeah correct anatomy is YOUR anatomy you can make it whatever you want it to be because you are the artist right... kys

>>4050190
Actually your perspective will change slightly but only if you're looking at close objects. Because your head position will be offset. If you're looking at anything distant the perspective change is negligible. All in all it's unimportant.

>>4050187
nice thx!

>>4050190
oh like when i see a mountain in the distance it's blue-ish and the bottom is more white?

>>4050190
btw is there any scientific explanation for why the bottom is whiter? i know the explanation for the blue (hydrogen particles and others who reflect blue light) but what about the white?

>>4050195
It's in the book by Scott Robertson. There's a few attached techniques to it like duplicating rectangles once you find the center, I recommend reading the whole thing.

>>4050196
>>4050199
This could be related to local color (different environment at lower altitude) or things like fog collecting at the bottom, so I'm not sure what you're talking about. Post a picture where this is very dramatic maybe?
But generally if you look at things in the distance they will look more desaturated and bluish (because the sky is blue. If we were on Mars, or in a very red sunset they'd look yellow/red)

>>4050201
ok thx for both the info.

>>4050180
>>4050006
"Just do this one crazy trick with any rectangle to find the center."

>>4050183
>>4050196
>>4050199
https://youtu.be/F_9Qip7mBC4

Check this out

>>4050206

what do you mean by bottom is whiter?

>>4050251
thx boye

>>4050258
notice the "whiteness"

>>4050272

I don't notice any whiteness.

>>4050272
I see it, it's probably fog. Denser air at the bottom of the mountain.

>>4049969
Proof of why perspective is a meme in one image.
Can you imagine if someone tried to draw something more complex with this horrid perspective?