/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>4045599
Anatomy is the ultimate test of construction skills, cars are cubes.

>>4045599
Eh, depends on your goals. Scott Robertson is a master at mechanical construction but his characters are kinda weak.

>>4045601
and people are boxes. whats your point?

>>4045599
Do you actually think cars have more complex form than humans?

>>4045636
You don't need to be super precise about construction when it comes to humans. Plus most human shapes are organic forms. However, with vehicles, precission is key, especially when it comes to things like the wheel, if the ellipse is off then its going to fuck up the whole image.

>>4045646
Vehicules also come in various shapes and size dummy

>>4045599
Ahhhh....yes.
I think wich yes.

>>4045617
Robertson’s drawing skills are undisputed - but his designs are mostly shit. Just like OP’s pic. Why do technical autists want to draw such ugly cars?

>>4045646
If you’re off with a face then it won’t look like your reference.

>>4045619
Boxes are cubes

>>4046265
He actually excels in design more than anything lol. Says a lot about your skill level if you are unable to see good design in his work and in OPs pic.

>>4047412
Maybe you should look at some real car designer’s work instead of shilling shit on a Mongolian horsearching forum.

>>4045599

I've seen the video where those cars are drawn, they're off, perspective is all bad on the wheels, be careful where and from who you get your knowledge from.

Anything mechanical is a test of construction and perspective. I was drawing a soviet artillery gun the other day, and it took me 3 hours to be able to find the forms in space

>>4045599
no thatd be mechas

>>4047412
to be honest i dont like scott robertson desgins either. His ilustrations are fine, but his designs to me lack of imagination

>>4045599
even if we are talking only about vehicles, I find plane and boat way more difficult. a precise drawing of a full sailboat (sail included) is quite the challenge.

>>4046265
>his designs are mostly shit

LOL

>pic related, op's art

>>4048025
Here’s your great Robertson design bro

>>4047967
Lack imagination, lack aesthetics. Scifi versions of hot rods, wow such design skills.

>>4048029

The designs are fantastic man. If they don't quite suite your taste, that's a different story. They don't quite fit mine either. But they are still incredible designs.

>>4048089
No they aren’t.

>>4045599
Mechanical design of Robertson's level requires quite a lot of skill but I'm equally impressed by good anatomy drawing. There are many ways you can improvise when drawing vehicles but human proportions pretty much have to be perfect or they will look way off. I think drawing animated characters is probably what requires the most skill because you have to be very consistent throughout the whole animation.

>>4048151
Ok retard, they arent, now fuck off and don't come back.

>>4045599
cars are easy to draw now get back to learning anatomy

>>4049458
Pls elaborate on his designs

>>4049458
Stop seething, Scott Robertson

Here's some cars I drew recently, what do you think senpai?

>>4049462
Let's see your cars buddy.

I better not see any football shaped ellipses.

>>4046265
In my opinion Akira Toriyama is a master at drawing appealing cars