/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

next saturday

>>3990620
give it a decade or two

>>3990620
Something that is not a viable career for 99% of people trying is already a hobby.

>>3990632
this. most anons here think they are gmi but it is a statistical impossibility for most people to make it.
The ones who truly have made it are people who draw and paint for their own curiosity not to fit a certain market that only has place for a small number of people.

>>3990620
>28 years old technology
>still in the diapers in terms of actual creativity
nah, we are good. it will always be just a tool to help to increase productivity

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F2AitTPI5U0

pardon the xkcd format

Artificial intelligence is a meme. By the time an AI can draw full animation of high quality that is actually better than anything man has created, humans would all be zogs with 50 IQ trapped in Amazon cages sipping basedmilk out of a straw and glued to a VR headset like cattle.

>>3990663
oh so is the word s*y in the filters now?

>>3990667
hello newfriend

>>3990663
In a sense AI doesn't really need to be better, human standards just have to get low enough.

>>3990659
>makes a living teaching people x
>has failed to make a living doing x
every fucking time

>>3990620

how many times will we have to discuss this here?
Every few weeks some ngmi anon makes one of this stupid uninformed threads. Every Professional i know is happy about AI development, because it will get rid of the most tedious parts of their work, which nobody wants to do anyways. It just assists creativity.
And anyways, when we reach the point where an AI is capable of creativity most jobs (including STEM) will be obsolete anyways. But even Experts say, that this, if at all, is to be expected 50 years plus in to the future.

i just want a technology that serves as an output for the images i see in my head. trying to represent them on paper is an insult to my imagination.

>>3990671
I checked the authors of these award-winning bestsellers on screenwriting, one guy didn't get a single screenplay adaptation in his whole life, the other made one screenplay for a shitty comedy movie that has 8% on rotten tomatoes.

>>3990670
Given that nowadays all is about how fast you can obtain and digest information, and how easily you can look up and compare the quality of different products, the bar for "standards" has been risen by x50, and keeps continuously rising.

Thus the only standard that is getting lower, is the price for products, but also entertainment since the market for streaming,yt, and on-demand services is oversaturated and they have to increase quality/decrease cost to even be able to compete.

Maybe digital art. Who cares about that.

Nobody's gonna build a robot that brushes paint onto a canvas.

>>3990682
>the bar for "standards" has been risen by x50, and keeps continuously rising.
I wasn't sure what to choose, pic related or capeshit movies

>>3990678
I get it, you are the ideas guy

>>3990678
>i just want a technology that serves as an output for the images i see in my head.
there's a technology called Paypal, you send money to an artist with it and he makes the images for you

>>3990700
Made me chuckle. Then i was curious. Then i realized it's stupid because it's hard to explain what i want to the other artist with words

>>3990684
No reason that wouldnt be possible. But also no reason to care since it's not happening in our life time

>>3991852
It's not stupid, if you are a director you have to pick actors, a director of photography, set designers etc.
You have to choose people that suit your vision or complement it. It's always good to be humble.

>>3991901
This

By the time AI becomes capable of creating art without major human input, society won't look much like it does now.

you'd call me my fren?

>>3990620
seems like a good tool to speedup the workflow

>>3994960
egazkly

>>3990658
Did you mean to post Michael Jackson? I don't mind, but just wondering?

>>3990620
All tech prospectors thought we'd have full VR and actual functional anthropomorphic robots by the end of the decade based on 2005 tech. In 2007 the iphone came out, in the following three years Apple sold the same fucking phone again and again for increasingly demanding prices and tech stagnated for 9 years and counting.

We're never gonna have transhumanism, VR, true thinking machines or flying cars.

>>3995424
>flying cars
I heard we don't get em even in a fucking cyberpunk videogame kek

>>3990658
>>3995353
5:26 - 6:15

>>3990620
>from scratch
nope

>>3994952
Ha, nice marketing faggot