/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3710545
X Ray vision. Draw through and around. See it as glass.

>>3710545
Does anyone legitimately set all of this up when making a drawing that isn't just a study of the method itself?

>>3710550
You know is tard i just explained it.

>>3710552
Low IQ*

It's just showing you to think in 3 dimensions, not to go all autismo with diagrams.

you must become a human 3d printer

>>3710550
I used to overthink it like you. Then I realized these books are for literal retards who don't even know what "perspective" or "three dimensions" are. Remember these books are created with the lowest common denominator in mind, so a total dipshit retard needs to be able to read these books and learn how to draw.

So to answer your question, no, you don't need to do the demonstration in the pic.

>>3710550
>>3710552
Thanks anon, have a good weekend

>>3710550
Yes. It’s useful for 3/4 views if you understand pretty well how the front and side views of the object work

>>3710576
Post your work fag

>>3710545
Loomis is a meme.

>>3710545
It’s actually a little amazing how far ahead of his time this guy was. The OP image basically describes the ucrrent modern day set up for basic 3d box modeling. You would set up three planes with your source image from three angles and then create then create the basic shapes from each angle. When I learned to 3d model, it REALLY helped me start drawing from imagination. Anyway, cool image.

>>3710679

>>3710683
They probably did that for traditional sculpting to, but yeah. Sculpting and drawing have a lot in common.

>>3710679

Um, you realize that linear perspective is a couple of hundred years old right?

>>3710727
So why do globetards use the horizon as an argument when the horizon line is man made? Checkmate satanists.

>>3710550
Loomis approach to orthogonal projection is pretty damn casual

Scott Robertson takes it to pretty autistic levels. So yes, some people do set up all of this when making a drawing

>>3710727
>>3710727
This still blows my mind

>>3710728
wait, isn't the earth flat?

>>3710757

Looks like a still from a 80's techno music vid

>>3710757
like my version? : -)

>>3710842
Yes I do. Is that traditional or a print of some kind?

>>3710757
Isn't this the guy who got so obsessed with drawing these that he forgot how to draw people

>>3710809
no, it's an inverted taurus

>>3710842
kinda falls into the 'belongs on a t-shirt' category, which might not be a bad thing, when i notice it in my own designs i try to own it lol eg.