[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 404 KB, 1920x1200, 5682034197.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3653115 No.3653115 [Reply] [Original]

How did Rockstar go from this...

>> No.3653118
File: 111 KB, 589x960, 43654254_10156768273100097_1696604075824513024_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3653118

to THIS?

>> No.3653119
File: 99 KB, 589x960, 44805859_10156768273500097_4226445529493536768_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3653119

and THIS?

>> No.3653143

It's cheaper to get rookies in for dirty work projects and then dump them rather than hiring seasoned professionals for everything.

>> No.3653146

>>3653115

I can see what you mean, the first Image shows good detail but the other two examples when I look at the hands and other parts they look kind of unfinished, what happened seriously?

>> No.3653147

>>3653115
They are both equally as bad.

>> No.3653219

>>3653146
That's not it at all though. OP image is the iconic Rockstar aesthetic, effective composition with very clean and smart shape design. It has a lot of character. There's no real "detail" at all especially in comparison to the sterile examples for RDR2. The newer illustrations look like an attempt to emulate the simplified Rockstar aesthetic without being informed enough to understand what's actually appealing about it. It's also a really shitty choice to slap the simplified characters against a much more detailed backdrop in my opinion, especially in >>3653118 where it almost looks like they just stapled two completely different environments together down the middle. The lower right just looks so much more fucking saturated than the rest of the picture I can't understand why anyone working on this would think "Yep, this looks good" unless they wanted it to distract you from looking at the rest of the piece.

>> No.3653235

>>3653115
not enough money to hire good, competent 2d artists, indie studios gotta prioritize you know

>> No.3653240
File: 500 KB, 1920x1080, Red-Dead-John-Marston.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3653240

You mean to this right?

>> No.3653243
File: 171 KB, 1200x675, QnoRrwW6sTq2S5rMa4CmRB.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3653243

Op is misleading you fucks.

>> No.3653244
File: 387 KB, 1920x1080, lLlbpJ6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3653244

>> No.3653248
File: 1.55 MB, 1280x719, molly-1536242897668_1280w.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3653248

Next time someone posts a bait thread maybe make sure OP isnt full of shit before you take it.

>> No.3653255

>>3653118
>>3653119
aren't these supposed to be emulating real 19th century trading card illustrations or something

>> No.3653265

>>3653255

Yes, and theyre concept art from a different artist, op artist and the artist work I posted are still doing promotion art for rockstar.

>> No.3653491

>>3653255
This

>> No.3653495

>>3653118
> Belle

They called "her" like that sarcastically, right.

>> No.3653717
File: 2.03 MB, 3941x2001, 258. kimdecision.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3653717

is this shit out at midnight tonight?

gonsta really fuck up that whole productiveness thing I've had going all week

>> No.3653718

>>3653240
>>3653243
>>3653244
>>3653248
This. Why would you post shit ones OP?

>> No.3653862

>>3653244
>>3653248
HAHA what the fuck is this gay shit? please tell me these are not playable characters

>> No.3653890

>>3653244
>>3653248
not historically accurate outfits reeeee

>>3653862
why do these blandly attractive women horrify you so

>> No.3653893

>>3653890
>literal manfaces
ngmi with that aesthetic sense

>> No.3653907
File: 53 KB, 1280x720, C8BE42A4-01A9-45EE-B52B-AC468F669230.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3653907

>>3653118
Fucking thing looks like Gregg Tarkington

>> No.3653918

>>3653240
These are probably live model / 3D model paintovers.

>> No.3653938

>>3653717
your paintings always crack me up

>> No.3654516
File: 211 KB, 527x504, 1536884005260-1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3654516

>>3653893
>>literal manfaces
Yellow fever detected.

>> No.3654527

>>3653918
>These are probably live model / 3D model paintovers.

you're probably right, sadly. everyone is just a 3D technician / photobasher anymore. nobody can draw.

>> No.3654577

Concept art is not what it used to be. Nowadays people use real photographs and 3d modeling for figuring out concepts. It's more cost effective and less time consuming, which is important for game development. Illustrations are just afterthoughts.

>> No.3654598

>>3653244

>lol just make the wamen do the same thing as the man because muh equality

feminist pandering garbage

>> No.3654606

>>3654516
Roastie single mom detected

>> No.3654613

>>3653240
>>3653243
>>3653244
>>3653248
>>3653115

Roxie Vizcarra is so fucking good. It's kind of interesting how her sketches look compared to the fullblown illustrations.

>> No.3654622

>>3654613
>Roxie Vizcarra is so fucking good.


>ooh, a good artist I haven't heard of
>find her Twitter
>endless posts about how Justice Kavanaugh is a rapist and BELIEVE WAHMEN

being an artist is legitimately embarrassing sometimes.

>> No.3654643

>>3654613

I kind of feel like she has a european mid 90's to early 2000's hipster illustration style. I won't deny she has skills but it looks dated. It's like every drawing of hers screams "LOOK HOW MUCH OF AN ILLUSTRATOR I AM"

>> No.3654684
File: 50 KB, 582x481, 1378405617722.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3654684

>>3654622
>>ooh, a good artist I haven't heard of
>>find her Twitter
bet you thought you made a point there

>> No.3654730

Rockstar games have always sucked ass

>> No.3654747

>>3654730
I honestly agree with this.

>> No.3654768
File: 62 KB, 421x421, 1518783655468.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3654768

>>3653115
This shit look so confusing. It tries to look realistic, stylized, detailed, well-rendered, cell-shaded and painted over 3D at the same time.

>> No.3655030

>>3654730
Gta 4 was great and RDR 1 had fun multiplayer. They haven't made anything good since then, but my copy of RDR 2 comes in the mail today :)

>> No.3655033

>>3654768
GTA V's art is worse. It looks like photographs with a filter to make it look like a painting.

>> No.3655137

crab thread

>> No.3655391
File: 380 KB, 2048x1024, 7e6a0343b50ad4a37f2f4ee1db5c0b08.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3655391

>>3653115
Probably around the time the went to this.

>> No.3655431
File: 95 KB, 620x797, 3A35267E-7B5B-4234-AE8C-D8D44240FBDC.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3655431

>>3655391
I still think some of the earliest GTA V art had the classic rockstar design, except with more detail. It seemed like the logical next step. Now everything looks like either adobe illustrator or really amateur digital painting.

>> No.3655632

>>3654622
for real

don't worry though, like 60% of artists are pretty normal but muh lgbt feminism is what gets all the attention

>> No.3656086

>>3655431
>>3655391
That's some facebook/instagram tier shit. perfectly fits this abortion of a game though.

>> No.3656121

>>3656086
What does this even mean. All good artists are on social media. Literally every single one.

>> No.3656146
File: 89 KB, 399x382, 1455695745127.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3656146

>>3654622
>literally every thread on here turns into "AAAAAAAAA SJWS"

why does traditional art attract reactionary dipshits

>> No.3656154

>>3656146
Traditional art, and especially realism, are inherently conservative. Realism is also judged by a relatively objective standard, which means artists can be placed in a hierarchy, another trait attractive in conservative ideaology.

>> No.3656173

>>3656121
I mean trash specific to facebook and instagram exclusively. Like some half-assed traced photos of Hollywood actors.

>> No.3656239

>>3656146
Gas yourself or go back to Tumblr if you don't like it.
>>3656154
Although "conservative" isn't the best word to use here(as it's associated with fucktards like Bush or McCain) I completely agree with the sentiment.

>> No.3656378
File: 819 KB, 2560x1440, 20180507_230038.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3656378

>>3656154
Traditional art is not inherently conservative, putting pen to paper has nothing to do with ideologies, and just because Disney's slaveworkers were racist motherfuckers doesn't mean the style has it ingrained within.
If i picked up my pen one day and suddenly grew a neckbeard and ejaculated onto a waifu then i suppose you'd have projected yourself into the medium itself, but until then it's just a fucking style and I can draw myself taking a hot dump onto Nelson Mandelas chest and it wouldn't mean anything politically you fucking moron

>> No.3656383

>>3656378
Good job not understanding what he was even saying