/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3558267

>>3558323
god i cant wait for that moron to leave for another month so i dont have to look at his finger paintings of people covered in mud

>>3558267

>>3558335
mommy mommy look at me look what i can do look at me look at me

1) Alfred Munnings

2) Joaquin Sorolla

3) John Singer Sargent

4) Carlos San Millan

5) Vincent Xeus

6) Anders Zorn

And finally, 7) my favorite artist and the main source of inspiration, my go-to place when I have a problem to solve in a painting, Richard Schmid.

>>3558362
>tfw no mustard covered gf

I no longer know what to think about a painting when I don't know if it was done with photo ref or not.

photo ref is like cheating and I have zero interest in paintings that were made that way. And that is my opinion, so don't argue it.

>>3558335
I didn't post this pfft

>>3558393
>photo ref is like cheating
that's your autism m80.

>>3558415
meme-painter is here. might as well delete this thread now.

>>3558371
schmid shouldn't be your favorite artist. there's literally thousands of artists with better or equal technical ability who are also artistically much more interesting.

i know he says he's the greatest in that book he wrote about how great he is but he ain't that great.

>>3558433

>>3558435
I saved your doxx from the previous containment thread. I'll post it everytime I see you shitting up threads in here. you're welcome to post as a normal person ofc.

love this dude

Read a book about this guy recently, great artist

>>3558602
eww early rembrandt

>>3558604

>>3558628

Watercolor

>>3558602
>anatomy lesson
>2 rights hands

>>3558643
dyslexic are you?

>>3558357
this is such a not-sargent sargent painting. I love it though, it's like a response to the future of painting

"Yeah I can do that crummy abstract composition-only stuff to. but fuck you I'll do it better than you guys ever will."

>>3558629
That's a good painting, isn't it?

>>3558642
>>3558644
Wonderful, love the high resolution and being able to see the fine brush strokes.
How big are these pieces (studies?) supposed to be anyway?

>>3558434
>says there is many better artists
>doesn't say a single name

>>3558371
>>3558364
>>3558362
>>3558360
>>3558357
>>3558349

Excellent taste. The rest of this thread should burn in hell.

>>3558643
>what is supination?

>>3558909
Rabbit: 25,1 × 22,6 cm

>>3558984
Oh wow, that is really small.
Now I'm more curious, how did he do it?

>>3559006
>Dürer lightly sketched the image and underpainted it with some washes of brown watercolour. Then he patiently built up the texture of the fur with a variety of dark and light brushstrokes in both watercolour and bodycolour. Gradually, the painting was brought to completion with the addition of a few refined details such as the whiskers and the meticulous reflection of a window in the creature's eye.

>There is some debate over how Dürer accurately captured the image of the hare: he may have sketched a hare in the wild and filled in the individual details from a dead animal, or captured one and held it alive in his studio while he worked on the painting. A reflection of the window frame in the hare's eye is often cited as evidence for the theory that Dürer copied the hare from life in his workshop, but this cross-barred reflection is a technique that Dürer frequently used to add vitality to the eyes of his subjects.

these are always some of the best threads on /ic/. lemme see what I got.

I probably don't have artist names, sorry.

this is my fav by parrish

I wish I knew how this guy achieved the crazy level of detail in his skies/streets. apparently he cranked out lots and lots of paintings because he didn't spend lots of time on them, which seems counter-intuitive when looking at the painting.

Forgot the name, but it'll come to me.

Bump

>>3558327
But it makes you feel something right? That's talent. It's not easy to invoke disgust through simple brush strokes. There's a fine line between cartoony portraits and realistic feces, this man walks that line with grace.

>>3558335
Is he doing that 'style' on purpose? I don't understand why he messes up the edges and values on the face so badly. He'd actually improve a lot since he paints a lot, if he actually cared to pay attention to just edges and values. Also focus on quality rather than quantity and spend more time on these and 'fix' them.

anybody else gets just really frustrated mixing colors?
I normally work digitally and I'm used to jumping all around the painting to work on different angles, but in acrylics it will all turn to mud on the palette cause I keep seeing cool color combos I want to try

>>3558339
That's crazy sharp eye for light and color.

>>3559398
I love how all of his paintings have this luminous quality to them.

/spooky/

>>3563443
lol i love it how people find these like mediocre art school pictures by famous artists, schiele would roll over in his grave if he new people all over the world could see this stuff

>>3558339
this is really good