/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

how is that traced? show me one woman that disfigured.
the real question is why all her faces are always so blurry

>>3531730
Is Sakimichan actually improving? That rendering looks legit better than 90% of Ruanjia's newer work.

>>3531730
Not defending Sakimichan but I'd like to see what the original pic is if this is actually traced.

>>3531768
this or OP is once again a faggot.

>>3531730
Damn how can we even compete?
Sakimi is too good

There is nothing unethical about tracing if you have permission from the original creator to sample it.

Have you fools never heard of stock images?

Oh wait I'm talking to the know nothings who do highschool level manga drawings and haven't grown to something better yet.

>>3531784
You don't grow out of manga, it's the APEX

>>3531730
>/ic/ Thug #2: She's tracing.
>Bane: So show me the source of the tracing.
>/ic/ Thug #2: The internet is too huge. We'll never find it!

>>3531775
well you could give her 300 buck per month for like couple tutorial and personal feedback videos per month to pratice
And if you practice hard enough for like the next 20 years maybe just maybe you are as good as her now

why does it look like she’s regressing

>>3531730
>six finger technique
What does that even mean?

>>3531990
it doesnt

>>3531995
This composition and her other recent ones are ugly compared to stuff a couple months ago

>>3531997
>ugly
why

>>3531994
>being this new

>>3531730
I'd never seen Sakimichan's work before, does she do nsfw?

>>3531999
This one? You want me to sound like a faggot?
The knee is cut off that’s a basic no-no in composition. The focal point should be the face but she positioned the leg to make the pussy visible which throws off the path of the viewers eye. Even pinup should have good composition but even if it’s pure fap material the pose isn’t appealing, it doesn’t look unnaturally broken to be sexy like she might do in other art, it just looks uncomfortable. People on ic get real spergy about sakimichan but at least she knows how to make appealing, comfortable art. This doesn’t look appealing or comfortable, to me.

>>3532005
>it just looks uncomfortable.
well it does look good to me, I can't stop looking everytime I see the thread in the catalog. maybe I should masturbate quickly

>>3531730
How do I into digital painting? I always try to learn but there aren’t any good resources that I can find so I’m stuck with /ic/ tier “painting” that the rest of you do

I wonder if should start blending all my works into a liquid soap, annihilating every single trace of brushwork, so people would consider my turds """"APPEALING"""".

>>3532046
Let’s see your “works”

>>3532046
I'm not going to post my work in a cursed 6-fingered thread.

>>3532066 → >>3532048

>>3532000
Ok sure, but what does it mean?

>>3532046
>you just dont get my """"""""ART"""""""""" mom

>>3532046
at least old sakimi work had some actually nice brush strokes, but you wouldn't notice that in op's thumbnail

you can criticize her for whatever, but her rendering technique is superb

>>3532071
hand

>>3531994
lmoa really?

>>3532046
well show your work, it could very well lack any soft edges that it badly needs.

>>3532114
holy fuck why is her left butt separated from the body

>>3532114
Sakimi is probably a way better artist than I am, but how the fuck do you not notice a 6th finger after drawing it, inking it, and painting it?

>>3532128
>inking
brainlet detected

>>3532114
this painting is fucked with or without the 6 finger

>>3532044
Ctrlpaint has everything you need to get started.

>>3531730
that pose and proportions are way too stiff and inaccurate to be traced.
also the rendering looks pretty amateurish

>>3531730
this bitch had potential. too bad she went full jew

>>3532140
>stiff

>>3532140
The thing with /ic/ is I can never be sure if this is bait, or you're an actual retard.

>>3532152
>>3532160
just because it's a half naked female with shiny colors it doesn't make it a good drawing, imbeciles

>>3532140
What's wrong with the rendering?

>>3532245
look at the folds in the clothing and the frills for example. amateur stuff.
the airbrush also makes it look very cheap. pretty much only beginners use the airbrush as their main brush. experienced artists grow out of it after a while

>>3532265
With fear of sounding completely obtuse or amateurish, I'm not seeing what's supposed to be wrong with the folds and frills, even after I tried to google some examples of frilly wedding dresses for comparison.
Could you spell it out for me?

>>3532265
this nigga thinks loose means amateur

plenty of incredibly competent artists use airbrush
now post your work

>>3531794
Where's that ass man again?
We need him

>>3532284
>drenching your drawing in airbrush is considered loose now

fuckin shit man

>>3532329
by loose I was talking about the undetailed edges of the lace and frills

id love to know where you think airbrush was improperly used because it seems like you just don't know what the fuck bloom is

btw post your work

>>3532265
Lol, don't pretend like you know shit. Use actual concrete terms in your criticism, and not "cheap", "amateur".

>>3532333
the clothing is 'undetailed' (what kind of buzzword is that anyway) simply because the artist doesn't know how to draw them.

>>3532347
use concrete terms to tell me why it's so fucking good instead of 'you're baiting' or 'you're a retard'

>>3532364
do you understand what "focal point" means (this is rhetorical, its clear you do not)

the absolute state

>>3532367
i'm starting to believe i'm the one being baited

>>3531730
>tmw your reputation flops due to the six finger technique
>This artist makes all of these things better than me, but they made a hand with six fingers once, so we are almost at the same level!11

Seriously, how you guys think that a mistake like that is what discualifies her as an artist just goes to show how retarded you are and how little you must have painted, because that kind of shit always happens when you spend too much time painting without taking breaks.

>>3532366
I'm not the one being a prima donna about this, idiot. Now do it or shut the fuck up.

>>3532372
because theyre flatbrained larpers who don't even draw

>>3532379
says the idiot who judges art with his dick

>>3532364
But she has other paintings where the clothing is fully rendered and detailed.
What kind of retarded cope is this?

>>3532380
im a female and I also critiqued sakimichan earlier in the thread because it looks like she regressing

im just not flatbrained and can see her rendering technique is perfectly fine

keep larping

>>3532381
i didn't say it was unfinished, i said it's bad

>>3532379
True. Reminds me of that autistic thread where idiots were criticing concept art made by pros because "the helmet of the armor was from a different time period"

>>3532380
Nice deflection anon

>>3532372
>that kind of shit always happens when you spend too much time painting without taking breaks.
more like this kind of shit happens when you spend too much time drawing boobs

>>3532383
You said it was undefined because she didn't know how to draw them, but she clearly knows how to draw clothing because she has already made so in other drawings.

>>3532382
>her rendering technique is perfectly fine
nothing wrong with the technique per se, the artist is just not very good at it

>>3532390
Yeah, drawing boobs makes you forget how many fingers a hand has, anon. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

>>3532392
>her rendering technique is perfectly fine
>nothing wrong with the technique per se, the artist is just not very good at it

Confirmed for autist that doesn't understand lenguage.

>>3532391
>because she has already made so in other drawings.
and it's above average at best

>>3532394
utilizing a technique and being good att are two completely different things

>>3532396
enlighten me as to what technique shes "utilizing" and failing at

>>3532397
>frogposter
yeah i've lost interest in this argument

you're never gonna make it

>>3532399
AHAHA oh my god yeah that's what I thought get the fuck off this board, roleplayer

>>3532399

This guy >>3532397 and me >>3532394 are different people, sperg.
How does it feel to not even undertand what the word "technique" means in context?

>>3532402
playing nazi grammar doesn't make you a good artist. if you think the big tiddy anime girl art in the op is "perfectly fine" i'm terribly sorry because you'll forever be stuck in a hole of mediocrity

>>3532167
>stiff

>>3532405
nice buzzwords xDD

>>3532114
Oh fuck I totally didn't notice at first

Melting tits

SakiGODchan is really making /ic/ crabs go MAD
>100'000$ per month
>top 20 most popular living """artist"""
>got the asian spark
>probably got asian ligameme too
>draw anime waifu better than you will ever do
>a cute girl btw

I understand the envy but you keks should stop seething, it's bad for the hair, you will go bald.

>>3532372
this. anyone that has had a real deathline knows about this.

don't ever deliver a piece the same day you finished it. people that doesn't paint will think less of your work because some obvious mistakes that could be fixed in 5 minutes

>>3532405
>nazi grammar
Kek, understanding what words mean is not grammar, you retard.
And it's not nickpicking either, you were responding to someone while failing to undertand what the phrase "having a good technique" even means, and you were rightly made fun of for your being an autist. Just own your austistic ways and stop trying to deflect.

>>3532421
But anon if I don't convince myself that Sakimi actually thought that a hand had 6 fingers, how I am going to convince myself that I'm better than her for knowing basic human anatomy?

>>3532367
>not knowing how to render clothing is now explainable by focal point

wait what

>>3532418
Stop projecting.

>>3532433
that's not how you use the "projecting" argument

>>3532431
not doing tight rendering down to the pixel is now the same as not knowing how to render
post your work btw

>>3532433
>>3532435

Yeah anon, stop proyecting, it's clear that you are just envious of that one anon because he makes 100'000$ per month.

>>3532435
>you will go bald
>stop seething
>draw animay better than you will ever do

idgi what's traced.

Give an overlay of traced image.

>>3532458
stress and seething provokes hair loss so yes you will go bald if you keep SEETHING. implying you aren't already
>he thinks he will draw better animeme than sakiGODchan
here is my mail, maybe in 50 years you can send me a message "I told you so, faggot" with your work
but for now I'm laughing

>>3532372
>>3532379
>>3532421
>how little you must have painted

So artists who paint a lot tend to draw six fingers and dislocated butts at some point?.. instead of actually improving and constantly internalizing anatomy, proportion and perspective, since after all, don't they paint every single day, grinded and nurtured it until it became second nature.

Actually, I think you guys spend to little time painting, and too much time whiteknighting some incel queen by making up silly excuses which don't apply to anything other than your own delusions.

You are a shame to actual artists on /ic and anywhere else.

I got 190GB of Sakimichan tutorials, psd's and other files. Of all things you can accuse her of, tracing is the one thing she definitely doesn't do.

pic related: very early in her video process of the hinata drawing

>>3532114
doesnt this basically confirm sakimichan is a bunch of people

>>3532469
>punished ruan

our lord has spoken

>>3532469

>>3532469
Niggerfaggot

>>3532469
>whiteknighting some incel queen by making up silly excuses which don't apply to anything other than your own delusions.

OH NO NO

>>3532469
>So artists who paint a lot tend to draw six fingers and dislocated butts at some point?
When you have been painting for prolonged periods of time you become amost blind to some parts of your painting bacuse of eye adjustment. I have returned to painting to find out an entire stroke that runs across the painting, made by mistake, and that I didn't notice when i saved. This compunds when you are tired.
That's all there is to it. So yeah, if you had painted you will know that that sort of thing happens all the time when you don't take breaks.

>Lol you don't unreasonably hate Sakimi, that means you love her work and she is your god.
Just die already, you sperg.

>>3532471
>I got 190GB of Sakimichan tutorials, psd's and other files.
Does it bear fruit?

>>3532469
>my senpai is best

>>3532469
>tfw u came

>>3532490
>implying I actually watch tutorials rather than just datahoarding them together withh all the artbooks that get posted here all the time

non sarcastic answer: if you've seen one or two of her tutorials (mostly those on colouring) then you've learned everything worth learning from her - her video processes are too long and unstructured to learn much. Also she's not that great at explaining the things which come naturally to her.

>>3532505
>her video processes are too long and unstructured to learn much. Also she's not that great at explaining the things which come naturally to her.
>people paid up to 300 dollar per month for this

>>3532519
yeah, it's pretty obvious - unless you want the videos for other reasons (I guess there's an overlap with the people who like ASMR and all that listening-to-people-to-simulate-human-interaction), or if you want to learn to draw EXACTLY like her, then there's not much reason to sub to her.

Oh, and porn I guess - lots of NSFW versions of her artwork.

>>3532372
complete begginners have the crazy idea that you don't commit mistakes anymore after some magical, mythical point in your ever learning career. if anything, low stamina and long working hours make you fail much easier

these vocal retards are surely in for a shock, but you can't really blame them: nobody learns from others' experiences

>>3532529
can you upload 1 video so I can check it out? just curious

>>3532265
Not trolling here
but please post what you think is a good example, because I don't look at OPs pic and think "amateur"

>104 posts
>34 (thirty-four) posters
You guys are retarded, stop wasting your time getting mad at each other.
Also I posted >>3531768 and there's still no source picture of the alleged tracing.

>>3532610
I agree, let's stop nitpicking other artists making a living of thier work, and get back to drawing, posting our own work, and constructive critisism

>>3532505
do you have a video where she draw 6 fingers hand?

>>3532265
It's intentionally blurry and airbrushed to give that sensual ambience. There are plenty of brushstrokes visible in places like the veil and its fringes.
>>3532431
The focal points are meant to be her face, tits, crotch, legs, where the most thought is put into rendering. This is not some baroque painting where clothes are expected to be meticulously rendered, and having more rendering in other places would make the image look busy and unbalanced.

Is /ic/ just butthurt about sakimi's popularity (I personally hate her art style but am not seethingly obsessed with her to the point of making threads aboot her whenever there isn't one) because you are too lazy to find better hentai/erotic/pinup artists so you resort to looking at her images or because her art is the equivalent to capeshit movies and pop music and getting more attention than your art which features the same subject matter but lacks the normalfag appeal?

>>3532737
op is so small that i barely can make out any brushwork at all, let alone appreciate good or poor one. does anyone have a hi res version, or are you all judging her by another works?

>>3532471
Do you have her newer stuff? CGpeers only goes up to Term 44

>>3532753
It's low contrast but it exists. Here I pointed out where it's clearly not meant to be the texture. Her rendering style is boring but somewhat cerebral, probably works on a fuckhuge canvas like Ruan then scales it down.

>>3532505
Share them

>>3532469
>Actual artists on /ic
C'mon man...
Everyone knows no one on /ic/ draws

>>3533180
No No No No No

>>3531730
How does Sakimichan do it everytime? How does she create such sexy art each and every single time?

>>3533227
smudge tool

saves time

>>3532854
she works on a 2500px-3000px canvas dude..

>>3533227
haha, nice one

>>3531730

She always make tits look super unappealing. Like they're the kind of small deflated tits without the sufficient connective tissue to maintain a perky shape on a obese woman with a masculine apple shaped body.

>>3531767
how can you even compare a blob of over used soft strokes to someone like ruan jia, are you a newfag?

>>3532114
Is she wearing a diaper?

>>3533405
SakiGOD's work is more appealing

more like SuckyGod, amirite. fanbois normalfag should be lineup and shot 6 times because of the 6 fingers

why is everyone so buttblasted about this artist and who cares about what technique this person uses
even if this is traced from a photo literally who cares

>>3532471
why does this drawing looks like garbage while the end product looks amazing

>>3534287
because shes a painter
many many digital painters' base sketches look simple and "shitty"

>>3534287
her painting was pretty damn simple, a random girl (sometime dude) posing in the canvas I don't see how her sketches need to be complicate

>>3534294
but /ic/ told me you need to absolutely master the fundamentals before you move on anything else

>>3534303
construction and gesture?

>>3534311
probably she was so used to draw and paint these shit she didn't need to that anymore
Also I bet she didn't master fundamentals figure drawing very well that why in some painting the anatomy is fucked

>>3532114
look at that torso
look at that waist
those tiny legs

wheeze

>>3532471
Share when?

>>3531994
Exactly.

>>3532005
You will never touch her skill so stop thinking you have any authority over what her work should look like.

Dumb manga drawing weeb.

>>3532072
Well a lot of dumb people think all cubism looks like a childs scribble.

>>3532418
Everyones art has flaws in it sometimes and I mean everyones.

/ic/ like to bash other arts on the internet to make themselves feel better about doing high school level manga.

Sakimichan doesn't have time to give a shit what you think btw and this will have little effect on her.

>>3532471
post a couple one for me pls

>>3532469
Is sakimichan here to read your comments and take the criticism constructively?

Were you able to point it out to her before she published it?

If not then you are just a no talent artist bashing someone who is better and more successful than you to make yourself feel better.

This negativity is effecting you more than it will ever effect her.

>>3534360
look at that money
look at those followers
look at that praise

>>3534407
funny enough her followers did point that the knee is too small in that pic

>>3534417
pretty sure everybody notices that but I don't see why someone needs to nitpick it and try to devalue it

it just shows you can make nice looking stuff even if your fundamentals are flawed
nobody drools over vilppu's, hampton's or proko's shit even though their fundamentals are pretty much perfect

>>3534116
>Sakimichan
To a 12 year old, sure.

>>3531730
this is art

>>3534404
>>3534420
tone it down rice boy, you're a dumb bitch for evaluating her and her work to such an extent. Or are you saying that you find her work unironically aesthetic? In that case it's pretty clear that her followers are fucking inflated brainlets.

go draw you faggot

>>3534610
Based 12 years old able to support sakiGOD with 100'000 parteon bucks per month :^)

>>3531730
>>3532114

Her actually drawing skills are shit. Awful body propositions, awful anatomy and perspective.
I bet if you only saw her linework, without any color, it would like like a 4/10 at best.

What saves her, and what saves a lot of another shitty artists, is her capacity for coloring and rendering.
She is good at rendering, texturing. She can hide and distract the average actually drawing and composition with a fairly good rendering method.

A good drawing can't save a shit rendering. A good rendering can save a shitty drawing.

>>3535052
yes, it's called polishing a turd

>>3535052
What the fuck, lmao

>>3531730
>six finger technique
what's this?

>>3535957

>>3532114

>tfw concerned that /ic/ doesn't look at enough naked people to know traced homo sapiens

I want to trace my tongue on sakimichans pussy while she draws

Wow, well this thread is bunch of nobodies arguing with each other. While I don't like her style I can still see that her exaggerated proportions and poses are very deliberate.
I rather look at something interesting like this then a completely realistic works.
I just wish she did more then tits and ass but guess you need that $$$

>>3534871
aesthetics are literally dictated by the majority. If 1 million people find Sakimi's drawings aesthetic, and 10 people find your drawings aesthetic, then Sakimi's drawings are objectively more aesthetically pleasing than yours.

>>3532472
that would be really sad

>>3536621
but those millions of people have poor taste

Lol funny seeing a bunch of retards getting jealous because they will never draw anything half as good

>>3532066
kek. fair enough

>>3539826
You're right. People start these threads and say things like, "How will we ever compete" ironically
But unironically, I have never seen anything posted on this board that could compete. Maybe that merc WIP comes close?

>>3532114
She fixed it in her DA, but look in this piece's comment section, and you will see that people are starting to realize that she's not as untouchable as the average people think.

>>3539999
I say it unironically you know? nobody here will ever beat those 100k$/month