[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 1.46 MB, 2048x2048, source.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3447358 No.3447358 [Reply] [Original]

Is stroke economy and layout the most underrated factor in having your work look professional?

>> No.3448342

>>3447358
Rendering is more important

>> No.3448349

>>3447358
If by stroke economy you are referring to clean looking linework and quick long strokes then I agree. IMO a good line drawing done wit minimal strokes often looks better than a fully rendered painting. To me this is because the line drawing looks effortless, and the rendered painting looks tryhard. Just my opinoin though

>> No.3448501
File: 143 KB, 625x773, 1525953424359.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3448501

>>3448349
>stroke
>linework
Deviantart brainwashing people into thinking that capeshit comic books manufacturing process is the only way of drawing is the main reason why most of you weebs are ngmi.

>> No.3448748

>>3447358
stroke economy is kinda pretend in a way. there are many people who have good stroke economy but their are many more that look like they do

>> No.3448762

>>3448342
Doing both makes a good painter. Rendering impresses normies, economy impresses painters.

>>3448501
Despite this guys mocking tone, he's right. People here have a very narrow concept of painting processes. An under-drawing really only needs to exist for measuring and marking. To paint on a canvas covers your under drawing anyways, so besides digital art, a tight under-drawing isn't necessary and most progress is painting what you see over guide marks. It kills me that people here are so digital-centrist. Why not make something you can hold in your hands and feel under a brush.

>>3448748
There's hardly a difference.