/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>3430929
I feel like if this guy just spent literally another hour on some fundies he'd improve loads. But he just doesn't do it. Everything is always slightly fucked. It's fascinating.

>>3430935
^^^ unproductive turds of /ic/

>>3430939
>^^^
this isn't the website for you

>>3430940
nigga what?

>>3430929
>>3430935
so polished turd now means any well rendered image with flaws in it?

>>3430948
that's literally always been the definition

>>3430929
Is this lowkey Ssakimochan thread?

>>3430929
>>3430935
Can someone point flaws in these pics to me?

>>3430950
you must be new

>>3430929
Imagine if you could use that autism to not be shit at drawing yourself.

>>3430979
first pic

>>3430979
forgot to point out the helmet looks photoshopped in

>>3430979
second pic

>>3431037
>>3431053

Daily reminder: these are the people critiquing your work on /ic/

>>3431069
love u too

>>3431037
this is what you think is wrong? the anatomy is fine. I was starring at OP trying to find what was derpy about it, and only thought her face was very basically rendered, especially the nose. but that happens a lot with artists that are more into the body than the face.

>>3431053
lmfao
.
.
those shoulders aren't where you think they are idiot

>>3430929
Mercy's arm looks strange and hanzos back arm and fingers

>>3431037
>>3431053
Every time

>>3430929
The only thing wrong with this pic is her weird lifeless express and the fact that they seem to be floating in some sort of void but that might be a thing in the game idk

>>3431098
NGMI

>>3430929
It's not bad, the composition is overall very stiff, take away the dynamic particles and it would really look bland. Genji's sword arm is too straight and looks more like a leg with wrong foreshortening. Her arm has similar issues, like reversed foreshortening, also the thigh has no volume on it's underside and too much on the top. Face is ok, but the nose and mouth's protrusion level need to be reversed, nose bridge out, mouth/chin in.

>>3430935
too much 3d/paintover vibes, but then poor rendering on clothing, arm guards, face and ofc hand. Well he made it somehow work, the composition is nice

>>3430950
No? The definition of a polished turd is an image that is exceptionally flawed fundamentally with a disproportionate amount of time spent on rendering. If every nicely rendered image with some flaws in it is a polished turd then virtually everything would count as that.

>>3431069
kekeke

>>3431037
>>3431053
Why are """redliners""" always using that same shitty wobbly sharp brush with awful control? You realize how fucking awful it makes you look?

>>3431216
That’s a greenline tho

>>3431037
>>3431053

>It's bad because i like to imagine bad anatomy in parts of the drawing that are covered.

I want someone, anyone to pose his hand like the second pic. Have fun you fucking sheep

>>3431289
>sheep

Kek
The guy clearly has problems with foreshortening, and that hand is crearly fucked. But those are preety normal problems artists often struggle with. And nothing worthy of someone getting mad about.
But sure, keep telling yourself that you are better than that guy that clearly has skill because you will never post anything unless it's a 100% perfect.

Contributing

>>3431037
>>3431053
lmfao this board is trash, next time you get a critique remember this is the type of dunning krugtard giving it

>>3431037
>>3431053
This reminds me of slav "bad anatomy" threads. Their degenerates trying to redline too sometimes. Except they're not embarrassing themselves because their board is degenerate central.
>2ch hk/ pa/res/444188.html
>2ch hk/ pa/res/477963.html

>>3431330
>this is what you think is wrong? the anatomy is fine
>The only thing wrong with this pic is her weird lifeless express
>too much 3d/paintover vibes, but then poor rendering on clothing, arm guards, face and ofc hand. Well he made it somehow work, the composition is nice
and that is why none of you will make it

>>3431362
Do you even know how green text works?

I never said the anatomy was off, I said the forechortening was off, and that's perspective.
And you clearly can't deny that the hands are derpy.
Her expression could be better but is not "wrong", it's just fine.

>>3431337
what is wrong with this?

>>3431396
Girl has 3 hip bumps causing the torso to be very, very long.

>>3431396
Torso too long

>>3431289
I bet it was drawn from a reference (if not traced) and then ruined with mindless rendering.
I'm having a lot of troubles with hands and feet and often redraw them gazilions of times using my own hands as reference always missing something unnoticeable that makes them look natural which leads to fucked up fingers pointing in all direction and having different length.

>>3431396

Not that guy, but for me body is too long and out of proportion from belt up to tits. It's actually pretty common mistake.

>inb4 it's stylistic choice

No, it's not. There are styles where artists try to elongate parts of the body to sometimes absurd degree and it's ok, but this is not the case and artist visibly didn't control proportions. Maybe he had nad ref or something

>>3431037
>>3431053
The absolute state of this board

>>3430929
>>3430935
honestly, the only actual problem I have with these pieces is the rendering. it's like every other artist is trying to copy sakimichan

>>3430929

>>3431037
You are a shame on this family.

>>3431337
>>3431411
Yeah, maybe it's because the artist subconsciously extracted the part of light from the measuring of the torso.
I've seen this happen a lot, when people draw a body part that has some sort of change or object in the way, and instead of drawing behind that thing they just skip it and continue drawing when the object or change stops. It usually happens with arm and legs behind pilars or trees.

>>3431337
Nice. New artist added to follow.

>>3431943
i think it's intentional in this one because it reads a lot like lens distortion, especially with the vignetting.

>>3431037
o jeez

>>3431963
with lens distortion shit looks fucked up at the edges, not the center, it looks nothing like lens distortion

>>3432563
no the whole image is distorted, you can almost fix it with correction actually not quite though. here's it even more distorted so you can see what happens, think of a fisheye lens but not quite as extreme

>>3432570
It's even worse now. The torso is fucked up no matter how you distort it.

>>3430929
These are not "polished turts" but artworks with some mistakes in them aka pretty much any artwork

>>3431337
fix

>>3432572
yeah. that's to show how the lens affects the whole picture, the opposite looks like this.

>>3431037

>>3431578
It's not even polished. Pack up this shit and leave, please.

>>3430959
you could post pretty much any sakimi pic here

>>3432626
Not really. Polished turd doesn't mean "mediocre art I don't like"

>>3432626
that beast is attrocious. Is this really from sakimichan?

>>3432626
For a good 20 seconds I was looking at this like a face swap

>>3431037
META ADAM is that you?

>>3432626
>63'd candle's duck lips

>>3430948
>>3431146
but these pics are extremely flawed on the actual drawing tho, it fits the first criteria

>>3430929
Just because a painting has mistakes in it, doesn't make it a polished turd

Also please tell me you spend more time drawing than picking apart """""polished turds""""

>>3434074
>Also please tell me you spend more time drawing than picking apart """""polished turds""""
lol, this is IC. You know they dont.

Picking apart other artists work makes them feel like they accomplished something, that they're better than said artist. Meanwhile the artist making "polished turds" is slowly getting better, getting work and eventually will be one of the people anons post love letters to on here every day.

>>3430929
Unless someone is legitimately red lining work you post for crits any thread like this is pointless. You might be able to point out flaws in completed work from artists vastly more skilled but what good is that if you couldn't make any completed work of a similar level? These threads don't actually increase anyones skill level, you'd still all make the same mistakes.