/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

nobody ever posts in my threads.

>>3356446
It'll be fine.

work in progress, an OC of mine
Still trying to learn anatomy and form. Any tips for levelling up quickly?

>>3356454
That waist is absolutely fucked up. Its impossible to form that pose with a physical human body.
Use online references for some fix, or better yet, use your own body.
.3/5

>>3356462
Why dont you draw an example of how it should be?

>>3356463
Not him, but please read the OP.

>>3356463
Make it look more natural like this.
I'm currently doing commissions so I give up.
This is supposed to be a rating thread not some generic cc shit

>inb4 it's shit

>>3356617
You have the stylization down, but the positioning of the eyes and the anatomy of the neck and below is terrible in comparison. I suggest cropping everything but the head out. 8/10

>>3356650
I'm sure people have said this to you before but the chicken scratching detracts so much from the overall appeal of the piece. I'm not going to even talk about the rest of this piece. Too ambitious but you tried, 2/10

>>3356651
Pretty nice use of colors for the hair, highlights/midtones are a bit too unsaturated though. Given, the way you rendered everything (including the hair) and the fact that it's very unfinished, I'd give this a generous 3/10

>>3356402

>>3356402

>>3356670
Pretty decent faces, anatomy and shading feel somewhat flat, but if you work those out you can definitely get far. 6/10

>>3356671
Pretty good, got not much to say other than the gun looks out of place regarding the style. 10/10

>>3356402
I am proud of this page, especially since it's from imagination

>>3356402
Fight me>>3356446

>>3356689
So cute, although your water looks a little like melted panda bears.

>>3356402
rate pls

fucking kill me nigger

>>3356473
1/10 - post when its finished nigger
>>3356617
7/10 - best so far cuz atleast its finished somewhere, grind proportions
>>3356650
1/10 - it's shit
>>3356651
1/10 - finish first nigger
>>3356670
>overmeme
>>3356671
9/10 - its consistent in style, good overall (not my personal taste tho)
>>3356688
1/10 - OP said post art not shitty scribbles
>>3356689
6/10 - cool idea, very lovely, but grind some fundies (comp, value schemes)
>>3356701
4/10 - pretty kitsch
>>3356710
is mine, obviously 10/10 niggas

>>3356671
blog?

>>3356402

i only started 4 years ago, doing fundies everyday. please be gentle. *duckface*

[SPOILER] this is actually my 5th attempt[/SPOILER]

>>3356710
chia pet looking mf

>>3356714
unqualified to critique

>>3356724
it's not even critique. it's your standard /ic/ lobotomized basement dweller attitude. hence my entry : >>3356719

>>3356617
>>3356670
>and i leave my tools on the paper, because i use good tools
fucking instafag

>>3356402
Wait! an actual Critique Thread?

Props to OP

>>3356714
>being this much of a try-hard racist edgelord
No way you can be older than 14 years old.

>>3356746
hnnng!

>>3356746
Torso to horse looks off. Otherwise pretty good.

>>3356715
https://twitter.com/meatloafee my dude

>>3356724
unqualified to post

Quick and tired.

It's a shitty sketch but I'm not sure what to do with the background. Is this any good? Should I tweak it or should I scratch it entirely?

>>3356795
*snaps your neck while orgasming
Psh, nothing personnel kid

Dont hold back op

>>3357036
Poog you beautiful beast you

why not

>>3356672
Do i get anything op?

>>3356617
5/10
you rely too heavily on symbols, deviate from this and your mark making will evolve.
>>3356650
1/10
go straight back to fundamentals and visit the beginner thread and ask around about readings.
>>3356651
0/10
nothing here to critt.
>>3356671
6/10
looks like you are getting the finished image you are aiming for but the skill level to draw like this is a low ceiling, although it looks appealing, its not worth more than a 6 for technical value, its also heavily riding on a stylistic crutch of symbols.
>>3356689
3/10
and all three of those points come purely from the background, its the only place in the image in where you have applied yourself.
>>3357062
5/10
does you draw tumblr or does tumblr draw you, a timeless question.

>>3357449
post your work

>>3356977

>>3357449
You skipped over mine jackass

>>3356402

>>3357454
and that changes what i said how?

>>3357455
paying attention to that work would have cost time in where i could have actually helped someone else who has at the very least applied themselves.

>>3356402
pls be nice

>>3357477
while anyone can point the flaws of something when they are obvious enough, there is a point where you need to show that you at least possess the technical knowledge to know what you are talking about

>>3357480

>>3357480

>>3357521
i really don't have to prove anything, my words are either taken on board and the value realized, or they are not.

>here is something form 2 years ago

>>3357536
i think i recognize you from another thread but i can't remember when...

>>3357566
post-ref/10

>>3357574
>Judging work by its reference
You understand nothing

>>3357590
>this level of lying to ones self.
when something is obviously a study, to properly critt it, one needs to view the source material.

for starters, its obviously reffed, which detracts from the work itself.

>>3357536
>tripfag is still alive
>he's an actual faggot

>>3356967
Are you saying that because you recognise the character or because of something else?

Picking up from where others left off, im not op btw
Dont you fucking post your work you faggots im doing this for free

>>3357614
The coloring is really muddy and messy, everything is just "fine" and you didnt resize it so fuck you
2.5/10
>>3357566
I like the composition and colors, you really nailed this 60 advert style, but the subject at hand really isnt that interesting and youve messed up the coloring on his cheek, making its texture look out of place.
7.5/10
>>3357536
I like it, the colors you picked, the designs the composition is all great but your coloring/shading style is really inconsistent and all over the place, still its good coloring just inconsistent. You cant decide between flat shading, smooth shading, texture or no texture etc
7.5/10
>>3357498
I mean its done well but do you really except someone to be in awe of that?
5/10
>>3357463
1/10, classic human copying machine that sits on one piece for days and gets shit
>>3357441
1.5/10
>>3357438
0/10
>>3357121
I think I recognize your style...
These are very good for quick doodles, you definitely know your shit, the crocodile aussie made me smirk. Still they are just doodles
6/10
>>3357062
I dislike the style, left arm is fucked, breasts seem to be of different sizes
5/10
>>3357036
I like it but its bare bones
6.5/10
>>3356977
0.5/10, the pose is appealing somewhat
>>3356963
I dig it but the black bg could be spread wider or not have been there at all
8.5/10
>>3356962
The gestures are alright except for the guy in the back, composition isnt fucked entirely I guess
Resize your shit if you are posting no effort unfinished work jackass
1/10
>>3356795
Absolutely unappealing, good job of covering up the important parts while still making it look bad. You forgot to erase a few lines on the elbow. The leg casually sitting on top of the viewers shoulder is a miss
1.5/10
cont.

>>3357691

>>3356746
Nice chicken scratch
The pose is pretty good, the ass is drawn well, the waist is too thin and it makes the shoulders look gigantic, unappealing. The limbs definetely can be drawn better
4.5/10
>>3356710
Love it desu, I wish it was more rendered
9/10
>>3356672
3.5/10

I guess all the other drawings have gotten scored by other people

>>3357691
>> You forgot to erase a few lines on the elbow.
No, I did not "forget" it.
What would you suggest to do/learn in order to enhance its appeal then? Besides rendering, of course.

why I fail anon pls

>>3357702
>>3357702
>What would you suggest to do/learn in order to enhance its appeal then? Besides rendering, of course.
I think you should search for advice from other people that can SHOW THEIR WERK since you are asking for advice for going forward but
>Less is more
Pick your lines carefully, there is a reason so many shitty artist get ahead with simplistic doodles of big boobed ladies
>Focal points
Who are you trying to appeal to? This is very striking in your drawings, what am I supposed to be jacking off too? Shadman is shit but he puts big assess in the spotlight and he is making bank. You have gone in the right direction in your second drawing with that closeup of a kiss but still so much could be done. And so many occasions you missed when you could have done something sexy. In short you have to make it VULGAR, there is just no other way I can say it.
If you are referencing something then reference other porn artists you find appealing, doujins, referencing stills from pornhub might be a horrible idea.
Someone prove me wrong if you think im giving bad advice

>>3357705
lol, the guys chin mate

>>3357719
he has a chin?

xd, thanks!

>>3357725
np, xd

>>3357715
>> Who are you trying to appeal to? This is very striking in your drawings, what am I supposed to be jacking off too?
You know, that is actually a really, really good point. I'm not sure if I have ever tried to think about it seriously. I mainly want to draw appealing drawings that show some kind of emotion the characters are experiencing towards each other or the viewer, but I'm more conscious of the full scene that I personally want to see (or experience, when it comes to drawing my waifu).

The second driving force is satisfying my own desires. I like faces and legs (every part of them) the most, but I don't want to focus on body parts although I often give in to the command of my lower head and start drawing greedy fellatios or close-ups of feet. Instead, I want to (learn how to) present my characters as beautiful and loving persons, not some sex dolls. In short, when I'm drawing sex scenes or nude girls, I'm not always drawing them so that they could be used as wanking material by me or someone else. Pic related is an example.

>> Pick your lines carefully, there is a reason so many shitty artist get ahead with simplistic doodles of big boobed ladies
You mean the same thing as with the stickmen that are easy to associate oneself with vs a hyper-realistic portrait or, in rendering, with what this guy explains here
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nap7dwHjD9Y
?

>>3356402
>I cant draw for shit but I'll tell you how you should draw

wow thanks moron.

bet you thought of a food analogy to refute this too, stupid.

>>3357705

You fail because you do not know what you're doing.

This isn't an insult! It just means you look at your painting and things seem wrong to you, so you make some changes, and it doesn't feel like it is getting better, so you make more changes, and so on and so forth, untill you feel like pulling your hair out.

What I recommend doing is not look at the whole picture at once, but break your painting down and look at it's separate components:

- visual story
- composition
- values / lighting
- texture
- colours

Once you fix each individual component, you are going to have a solid foundation to build on.

I would suggest scrapping the whole background. Then:

- build a story. Why are the characters there? What are they looking at? Don't have them pose like a store mannequins, and if they are, why? Are they looking at something? Maybe they are looking at gorgeous sun-dappled valley that lies before them, but you can't see it, just the golden light that reaches them.
- composition is okay (but i would move archer a bit more to the left), but perspective is non-existent. I would suggest making a pespective grid to help build the environment so that the characters are actually in the environment, not floating above a green surface.
- the background is quite dark and the overall value range is very limited, which makes it look the entire painting is covered by a grey mask. It feels lifeless. So I'd suggest pushing it more.
- the jungle is actually just formless noise. Spend some time to actually draw the plants and trees to add form and detail. Then, with some nice lighting, you can really add depth and interest.
- the colours are pretty bad. A helpful trick to determine your colour palette (again, to break things down) is: pick one main colour (most dominant colour in entire image), pick a contrast colour (which supports the main colour) and one accent colour (to make details pop). Of course you can add more colours, but it's about establishing a solid basis.

>>3357761
>You mean the same thing as with the stickmen that are easy to associate oneself with vs a hyper-realistic portrait or, in rendering, with what this guy explains here
I just mean that you typically use less lines when drawing something cute/subtle/attractive (like anime, women and porn) and use more lines when drawing something gruesome/manly/rough (like horror superheroes or machinery), unless you are into extremely detaileted cocks with 10 inch foreskins and saggy balls you want to avoid details generally, let the mind fill the gaps
If you like faces shouldnt they be in the spotlight? You just draw two people fucking really

Man. The person rating the art is real shit.

>>3357786
Junji Ito

When you post a sketch, you can't have 5/10. Seems fair.

>>3356746
Good anatomy, nice style, nice pose, but it's just a sketch. 4/10

>>3356795
Once again, it's an uncolored piece. The expression and the lines aren't very appealing... 2/10

>>3356962
Why is everyone posting sketches? Very nice movement tho. 3/10

>>3356963
Nice study, good shading, but you could have separated the shadows and the lights a bit more.6/10

>>3356977
Stop posting fucking sketches. The pose is good, the anatomy is alright, the composition is fine, no face. 3/10

>>3357062
"Unique" style, good coloring, nice design, alright expression, anatomy is a bit off but it's ok. 8/10

>>3357438
For the love of god. Please post finished drawings. Anatomy isn's good, the face expression generic, unfinished work. 0/10 Start practicing anatomy and faces.

>>3357463
Looks like someone who started drawing realistic faces a few months ago. Keep practicing, what you draw it's already pretty nice. 6/10

>>3357498
Unfinished work again. The perspective looks off to me, but the colors are alright. 3-4/10

>>3357566
Nice expression, nice coloring, very pleasing to the eyes even if the composition is a bit boring. 9/10

>>3357614
Unfinished work but it doesn't count as a sketch. the colors fit the atmosphere well, nice characters, nice style, and alright composition. 6-7/10

>>3356671
Nice style, nice design, no background but the character really says it all. Plus good shading. 8/10

>>3356689
Nice composition, the colors are a bit boring but it fits well the character. 6-7/10

>>3357786
Because the faces are the hardest thing to draw appealingly for me (but I never considered drawing feet or hands as hard). I have a lot of pics and copy drawings that focus on the face, but... Even if I find a face cute, it's highly probable that someone will say it's creepy or post a vomiting reaction image. Pic related is a perfect example from December, which, in large part, has led to my reconsidering my approach to stylization. Please don't mind the blurriness. So far I have not understood why others consider it creepy.
While I have improved a lot thanks to all the practice and, starting three months ago, deconstructing and studying the styles that are appealing to me, I still spend a lot of time trying to make the face look right. Conditioned me to the point I can't finish a piece because something in the face bugs me but I can't see it.

>>3357615
stay mad jellypuff.

>>3356963
8.5 for an inconsistent still life, iv seen 1st years at art schools do better, your scoring is warped.
the mark making under closer inspection is c grade at best.

>>3357784
Thank you so much!

I wish Id get off my ass and start the next but games are too addictive

I knew this was that attention seeking fool from /draw/ and /alt/. Making your own thread for this crap? What some people's kids won't do for validation.

>>3357967
sky horizon and land horizon lines are out of sync

>>3358004
If the far mountain is supposed to be taller than the closer ones, then it works fine.

>>3356726

Is kinda old but meh

Rate?

>>3358540
you could use this for a jumpscare quite effectively I reckon

i tard

>>3357789
Of course, they rated mine low when I actually sell mine for cash. I bet they never left their basement.

>>3357691
>>3357802
for
>>3357062
if you dont mind, could I have some suggestions on how to make my style less basic and unappealing? i'm not really attached to it , im still kind of in the process of developing one.

Rate my thumbnail pls

Hi the real OP is here and jesus what the fuck happened. I turn my ass away for a split second and now this became a minefield of hatred and dumbasses who doesn't understand the point of this thread.
Posts here that already rated don't belong to me, but they're still allowed anyways.
Also I'm not racist
Just so you know
I don't have much time to respond but here
>>3357780
I clearly said I cant draw for shit but I'll tell you how you should draw
>>3356617
ugli 1/10
>>3356650
bad 0
>>3356651
what the hell 0
>>3356670
0
>>3356671
6/10
You probs got more than 100 favs on dA for this one
>>3356672
0
>>3356688
n0
>>3356689
2/10 i like that shine
>>3356701
don't know what that is and 2/10
>>3356705
ew that is so unhot
>>3356710
4/10 nice lighting
>>3356719
why aren't my spoilers working what the hell
>>3356746
add butthole. so far its a 5/10
>>3356795
im at work
>>3356962
neat sketches. 4/10
>>3356963
3/10
>>3356977
cant show that to my boss
>>3357036
n0t h0t
>>3357062
generic tumblr+dA style. no likey. but apparently a lot of people like stuff like this so 4/10
>>3357121
no
>>3357438
lmao what
>>3357441
1/10
>>3357449
ok wow 5/10 i hate you
also why do we have similar ratings this is fucking scary
>>3357463
2/10
Practice more
>>3357498
looks unfinished.
A reminder: This is a fucking rating thread BASED ON HOW CONVENTIONALLY ATTRACTIVE your art is, not your reg CC Shit.
If you think your artwork deserves higher than 5/10 then I want you to post your work online and lets see how many likes your shit gets.
To remind dumbasses: This is a fucking rating thread BASED ON HOW CONVENTIONALLY ATTRACTIVE your art is, not your reg CC Shit.
I DON"T CARE IF ITS A WORK IN PROGRESS OR IF YOURE A BEGINNER

>>3358724
foreground and midground blend too much together

Ye

>>3359051
>Also I'm not racist
No, you´re just a piece of... post your art.

I'm >>3357498
>>3357802
>Unfinished work again.
>>3359051
>looks unfinished.

I agree it looks unfinished, but idk how to keep it minimalistic and also make it look more finished. anyone got any ideas?

>>3359117 there, happy?
too lazy to edit
I hate all of you

>>3359139
>>3357498
Add more stuff like trees, buildings, clouds, windows, and whatnot to actually fill the void of a place you're trying to portray here. Similar artstyle, more stuff.

>>3359160
>there, happy?
>too lazy to edit
>I hate all of you
0

>>3359166
>:(

>>3359160
ur the guy that only draws with mouse right?

>>3359201
Yes. I made a post mentioning about mouse but I forgot which thread it was in.

>>3359205
>hurr i just paint with mouse so no harsh worlds pls

stop being a defensive little bitch

>>3359213
I clearly said hurr i just paint with mouse so no harsh worlds pls and was being defensive

>>3356402
She is the OC I never do anything with, although I have a whole world made up for her. But since I'm really insecure about my storytelling abilities (well... the lack of it) I just draw her every now and then and that's it.

kill me op

>>3359051
>>>3356701 (You)
>don't know what that is and 2/10
It's an oil painting, from which I earn decent bucks. OP outed as an ignoramus.

>>3358642
The classic RAYL
Reference
Artists
You
Like

>>3359351
Hey man I'm here for you because I know what a pomegranate is because I'm not a pleb. Don't they usually have a white rind though? I'd give it a solid 7 anyway.

>>3359303

>>3359364
I cut the pom as it was pretty old, I think the white rind has gone reddish. TY for internet support as well.

>>3356726
I used the tools for scale in the oni girl drawing.
Makes more sense than leaving a quarter.

bash me

>>3359459
*bashes ur head*

Can someone help me, I've been playing around with style lately to make my artwork more appealing but to little avail since nothing I've put out gets much attention at all.
I think technically, I'm fine, but to turn that skill into to something that looks good I haven't really grasped and I've kinda just been stumbling around to figure it out..

WHY ARE PEOPLE TREATING THIS LIKE IT'S A CRIT THREAD??!! IT'S LITERALLY A RATING THREAD, STOP POSTING HERE AND GO BACK TO THE THREAD GENS WHERE YOU BELONG

>>3359475
start looking at other people's art and finding out what you like and emulating them

>>3359699
That's what I've been trying but I haven't been very succesful thus far ==

>>3359710
it seems pretty clear-cut to me....what exactly are you having difficulty with?

>>3359678
Just a quick tip, you're values are mostly good you just need to strategically push your contrasts around your focal point a little better. In the original the pigeons wing is where the viewer's eye goes since the white on it is so strong.

>>3356963
I think this is pretty fucking gnarly my man

>>3356688
I just wanted you to know I liked this

>>3359059
Thanks anon

>>3359475
should construct your figures more, the whole bodies out of wack, especially that head and neck
yikes

Still much to be done, but something I worked on two days ago. Based on an inktober sketch I did that I'm redoing digitally.

>>3359351
Just because someone bought your work doesn't mean that LOTS of other people loved it.
Post that shit online and lets see if that surpasses 2k likes.

>>3359482
I KNOWW GOD

>>3359051
you are completely up your own ass and you should just stick to your instagram faggotry instead of clickbaiting on /ic/
nobody gives a fuck about your ratings. you aren't legitimate in any way.

>>3358446
This idea could also be used as satire of the photos of drawings where the artist put the pen or whatever tool their using on top of the drawing.

>>3360386
>nobody gives a fuck about your ratings
.
>you aren't legitimate in any way.
wat

>>3360396
Looks like a real life photo of a coin. Invalid post.

>>3360259
2/10
>>3359678
5/10. Lots of people would love this.
>>3359475
4/10 but tumblr would love this
>>3359459
2/10
>>3359365
3/10
>>3359338
wow I want you to convert that into digital and add more shine on them skin. Loving it and you'll get lots of people following you.
5/10
>>3359303
She don't look fun 3/10
>>3358724
Wow. 6/10 Got any art blogs?
>>3358609
Would love to see him sucking dicks. Nice anatomy so far, bad wip. 4/10
>>3358602
3/10
>>3358555
no
>>3358540
saccstry 2012/10
>>3358446
lmao nice anatomy. 4/10
>>3357967
>>3358004 was right. 4/10
>>3357825
What the hell in a bad way
>>3357705
jaw, post, and style looks weird. 3/10
>>3357702
Too much fabric folds. 4/10
>>3357614
2/10
>>3357566
face looks familliar and 7/10
>>3357536
2/10
>>3360434
Wow/10
You are now insta famous

>>3360444
post your work, faggot.
and stop commenting in words, since it's a RATE thread, you dickhead

not following your own rules? >>3359482
>>3359051
>A reminder: This is a fucking rating thread BASED ON HOW CONVENTIONALLY ATTRACTIVE your art is, not your reg CC Shit.
>If you think your artwork deserves higher than 5/10 then I want you to post your work online and lets see how many likes your shit gets.
>To remind dumbasses: This is a fucking rating thread BASED ON HOW CONVENTIONALLY ATTRACTIVE your art is, not your reg CC Shit.
>I DON"T CARE IF ITS A WORK IN PROGRESS OR IF YOURE A BEGINNER

>>3360444
You said my coin drawing looks too real to be valid :/

>>3360446
>>3356473
Its not a >Constructive Criticism< thread. Ratings are not entirely constructive and so are little words. Should've mentioned that explicitly
This wasn't me btw >>3359482
Also here's my art >>3359160

>>3360446
Also I drew these on phone. lmao don't got tablet cause im poor
Rate me plx. rate by art, not by effort.

>>3360460

>>3360460
>>3360462
And yes I used my fingers. this one is old but whatever

>>3360453
>>3359160
you have a terrible sense for composition. all your images fall apart in that sense. the candy color palette may be consistent in upper right and lower right and left pictures, but it's shallow and lazy. in my opinion. you are in no position to rate all of the works in this thread, since you don't seem capable of doing anything else but your candy pictures. considering your low rating in general - for instance, i hate this shit style >>3356671 but it's certainly a 9/10, no flaws, very consistent, obviously knows what he's doing - you are obviously full of yourself and only came here to rate others works in order to make yourself feel important of sorts. reality check: you're not. you're a candy drawing child.

>>3360462
this is honestly obnoxious in many ways. the hair shape, the proportions, the intersectioning triangles, the stupid edgy cuts …
it sucks balls. and you have the audacity to open a rate thread?

>>3360467
Clearly the majority of artworks here gain a lot of exposure per day to receive a 6/10+
>>3360472
lmao that is true

>>3360474
Clearly the majority of artworks here gain a lot of likes per day to deserve a 6/10+ * srry wrong writing

>>3360460
>Also I drew these on phone. lmao don't got tablet cause im poor
what's wrong with pencil and paper, millenial?

>>3360480
I'm not skilled enough to draw conventionally attractive stuff on it.
So odd how you try really hard to deny the fact that I'm roughly correct on my ratings. 5 and below are usually unlikely to be popular. 6 and up are likely. Instead you tell me that I'm not in a proper position of such actions.

>>3356650
I like it, because it is actually a scene and not just an anime portrait. Don't fall into the trap of just drawing 'conventionally attractive' stuff, but continue to tell stories with your art.

For the technicalities there are resources on this website. Aim high.

>Post regular dumb shitpost thread with the theme of "I'll rate your art based on how conventionally attractive it is"
>"This thread is not about how conventionally attractive your art is"
Smarty pants

>>3360481
roughly correct at best, how is that one dudes portrait ever going to beat out the green haired anime gurl in notes and likes or whatever, literally 0% chance of that happening. Then you rate things like >>3357536 really low for some reason,
Not to mention that one dude with the onigirl portrait getting a 1/10, even though that's the sort of shit thats also very popular on social media.

Also, to everyone in this thread.
Don't take any posts here personally.
If its true. improve yourself. Practice more and shit.
If its false, improve yourself. Practice more and shit.
No point in calling someone a cishet or whatever.
I make no attempt of trying to ruin anyone's life.

>>3360486
the dude is fucking full of himself and wants to make himself seem important. probably your 13yr old shits-his-pants pimple faced soy boi.

>>3360481
>So odd how you try really hard to deny the fact that I'm roughly correct
are you? oh, that's interesting. where can i fact-check that you are correct with your elaborate taste and skilled assessments?

>>3360493
>>>3360486
>Not to mention that one dude with the onigirl portrait getting a 1/10
link pls
>>3360493
ask social media

>>3360497
>inb4 "since when did social media determine the value of an artwork?"
This isn't thread about how conventionally attractive your art is

>>3360497
>ask social media
what if i told you that many artists aren't even on social media? are you a millenial? if you take cancerous social media as a measure of quality, you can't be helped.

>>3360500
>>3360502
Score!

>>3360503
>"I made a ridiculous statement and wrote inb4 in order to 'no u' everyone!"
lölölölöl you so goood !111

>>3360505
Indeed

>>3360497
>>3360503
>>3360505

hurr durr!

>>3360488
post werk

>>3360508
I can honestly feel that you actually took offense in my ratings. sorry about that

>>3360444
>2/10'ing tripfag
hes an ass, but your butthurt is showing.

>>3360512
I really am butthurt

>>3360510
I think you should honestly be locked out of /ic/ with your self-righteous rating and jack off instead. don't reach out for others to jack you off ever again.

>>3360515
>I think you should honestly be locked out of /ic/ with your self-righteous rating and jack off instead
>>3360510 I'm a psychic

>>3360518
yup, for these reasons: >>3360467
tell me you are anything else but an attention whore. you are the "i'm bored ask me anything" on 9gag.

>>3360525
you are anything else but an attention whore. you are the "i'm bored ask me anything" on 9gag.

>>3360529
go put a finger up your ass. has about the same effect as your rate thread.
candy drawing child.

>>3360541
I actually like that title. Candy Drawing Child.
Also I'm gay so I do finger myself from time to time. Actually feels good if you keep on doing it everyday for 2 months.

>>3360542
I suggest males to refer to this article for more information about prostate massages. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prostate_massage

>>3360542
>Also I'm gay so I do finger myself from time to time.
---> >>3359160
you're pounding up the cliché of the gay attention whore for me. it's such a fucking obnoxious personality trait to be so self-righteous, full of yourself and over-confident without having the slightest legitimate base to open such a thread. and then you go ahead and proclaim that hardly anyone deserves +6/10, because you and your >>3359160 pink clouds are the measure of all things.

>>3360565
I NEVER FUCKING SAID THAT MY WORKS ARE WORTHY OF 6+ HOLY SHIT

>>3360565
im gay btw

>>3360565
I also never said that I'm self righteous, over confident, or whatever shit you're assuming.
This is a thread about how conventionally attractive your art is. Can't you wrap that around your head? You don't have to care about my ratings. God I feel like I'm feeding a troll now.
I'm an atttention whore, yes, but I'm never over confident or even confident at all. I'm never self righ
im done

Mental note:
/ic/ thinks opinions = facts.

>>3357780
you are like potate

>>3359365
dude chill with the anime eyes, ruins a p good pic

How do I get better, give me your worst.

>>3360444
Better than a 0/10 or a 1/10

>>3360444
Nice trips bait

>>3359797
ty anon, it means a lot to me

>>3360821
do you actually construct your faces? they look pretty weird

>>3361429
he uses the classic tumblr technique of masking complete lack of fundamentals with STYLE STYLE STYLE. I hate all the ugly stroke-victim faces he draws

first 'digital painting'

>>3356402

>>3361462
I like your style. You're going places, kid.

>>3360565
Either dumbass realized that they're a dumbass or they're just a troll.
Either way, thank you for fucking off.
Remember: Conventional beauty does not equal to the value of an art work.
Opinions aren't facts. Beauty is subjective. The definition of the term 'subjective' is parallel to the term 'opinion'. (I might be using the wrong term to describe them but whatever) You don't have to care what others think. Unless you're aiming extremely high.
Don't take anything in the internet personally.
I make no attempt to try to ruin anyone's lives.
Keep on drawing. You'll get there.
Meta post >>3356402

>>3361883
Forgot to mention that this is the real OP speaking.
>>3361798
What the hell
>>3361797
Nice color palette 0/10
>>3361476
0/10
>>3361462
3/10 get sai insteead
>>3361460
3/10
>>3360821
Your other art is nice but not this one. not rating
>>3360782
2/10

>>3356962
Yo, was Ruiner worth finishing? The game was aesthetic as fuck. Also cool drawing, would love to see it finished

i put together two random images that looked like they could go together
worked out p. nice.

my fist ever attempt at drawing something i made up
what do you guys think?
what could i improve?

>>3361894
Aesthetic drew me to it to begin with. The game itself is kinda short (if you don't do side questing\collectables) and rough around the edges in terms of gameplay but I personally don't regret spending time on it. Surprised that the game doesn't have shitton of fan art. Kinda liked the story or rather the premise of the world.
>would love to see it finished
I rarely get to that point. Last time I've "finished" a drawing was like 3 years ago.

Sorry for spamming same picture. Any thoughts on improving composition? Did I fuck it up after all?

>>3360444
>Wow. 6/10 Got any art blogs?
nope

Real op here again
>>3362678
Make some. I and everyone need to see more from you.
>>3362426
Wow you surprised me. Please continue drawing.
>Did I fuck it up after all?
No. Well in MY opinion. so far
not rating. Sorry I don't have any crits on here. Don't have enough time. not even a crit thread
Unless you insist.

>>3362098
Absolutely have no idea what the hell is going on. not a CC thread. 0/10
>>3361925
nice composition of said images but that's a 1/10.
Polish it

30 mins sketch of 2 characters

>>3356402
please rate my painting, gay digital landscape man

old but i havent been able to finish many pieces. im changing jobs soon just to have time to.

made this for an art contest at my school.

>>3362426
loved the game but I agree, its very short and it couldve been a bit harder

>>3363822
its nice but a little flat. what was the criteria? i dont want to critique something without knowing the limitations

>>3363795
You need Loomis, that head, kek.

>>3363842
its old, ive just been studying heads for awhile sincei made this months ago

>>3363340
1/10
>>3363739
2/10
>>3363795
2/10
>>3363822
4/10. unsure about my rating. tumblr material