/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>>/aco/

How many panels do you anons do In a day?

I did 2 draft pages in a day and I'm already hesitating/procrastinating in my porn comic

help, wat do

do I muscle trough it? I don't want it to end up looking bad

Help me dudes. Every time I TRY to draw porn, i get too aroused and either end up fapping to my terrible far-from done rough sketch, or just leave it and go off to search someone else's drawn porn and fap to that. then of course i lose interest in drawing porn after orgasming. the same cycle repeats every time i try.

>>3345397
Problem should solve itself in a couple of years after you're done growing up.

>>3345397
Put spicy stuff on your hands so you dont feel the need to make your dick cry

>>3345397
Try losing your virginity

>>3345365
im going to upgrade from cs3(pirated) and i wanted to know which cs6 is the one used for drawing. like..actually pay for a legit version, when i made it to the site it showed me a million versions of cs6 which one is the one you draw with? the standard version?

>>3345402
even if i don't touch it, it'll go off by itself eventually, this happened once. I also can't leave it and come back to it later because upon just opening the file it'll start again. i have a certain fetish and this happens whenever i see literally any content involving it, even very shitty drawings

>>3345412
pls help.. i know its a dumb question but im lost

>>3345418
photoshop cs6, you idiot.

>>3345422
then why in the hell do they have a million versions of the same thing? why two copies? what does extended version exist? this is why people pirate.

>>3343466
i think you're probably right. i'll keep that relationship in mind for the next one.

toned back the expression, added a bit of a twist and tilt

>>3345423
They're not different versions. After Effects for example, is for videos. Just get the regular Photoshop CS6 or the extended, more or less same shit, it won't affect your drawing.

>>3345375
Is the rest of your comic already planned out yet? If not you could script out the rest of the comic first.

school me on the boobies, friends

you know these anime charts that compare different bust sizes? do artists plan out exact measurements when designing characters, and is it common? how does the math work out for the various body types? googling bra sizes will be awkward enough as it is, so i need to do it right.

>>3345595
Ribcages.

>>3345595
>do artists plan out exact measurements when designing characters
LOL no

>>3345595
I promise you that shit does not matter.

>>3345595
one studio like once did it

satoshi urushihara may do this but I don't know many goys outside of him that do that

>>3345595

You're overthinking it. Drawing is mostly eyeballing and going by feel.

you guys ever jerk off and then go back to look at your lewd drawings and just become ashamed that you're drawing porn and just wish you spent your time drawing regular shit

>>3346133
no, not really

>>3345595
They plan out everything including the blood types.

Here's a request I did for some anon. Crit pls.

Here's a request I did for an anon. I might clean this up more later.
Crit pls.

>>3345397
>I'm a dickbrain
NGMI
And I'm not even shitposting or memeing here. That's just the reality of things.

Its not porn, but I have an unhealthy obsession with Terra, and its technically a bit risque? I don;t know where else to post this

>>3345397
Used to have that problem, just focus your attention on the art process itself and treat it like any other SFW piece.

>>3346295
>Used to have that problem
it shows

>>3345397
I wouldn't ever want to lose arousal while drawing porn.

What's the OP image from? I love that pinup style.

>>3346339
Gil Elvgren
This site as high resolutions of his paintings

https://www.ha.com/c/search-results.zx?Ns=&Nty=1&Ntk=SI_Titles-Desc&N=0&Ntt=elvgren&ic4=SortBy-071515

>>3346212
It's fine, the only change I would make is with the right calf. Based on your perspective it seems the fat/skin overlap should be in favor of the upper leg, whereas you have the calf "in front" or in higher priority than the upper leg making it look flat.

Rather than play with full perspective at this point I would try to establish your horizon line and base your forms off of it - see pic for what I mean.

>>3345365
Can you post the whole pic? I already tried looking it up on google

>>3345365
I kinda want to draw more r34 of another character and even do my own take of the comic the character is from. All while keeping true to the original artists style. If possible I would love to then animate that character from a chapter of that same comic.

>>3346713

>>3341983

>>3345365
WIP

>>3346719
Then do it

>>3345365
>that op pic
tits dont work that way lol

From the last thread

>>3346893
ngmi brainlet.

Here are some very rough sketch ideas.

Do the forms on the abs look right? I'm not reading "abs" looking at them, looks like chub

>>3346992
I don't see abs in that, however I don't really see it as chub either. The stomach looks toned.

>>3346991
Anyone have guides or information on proper staging?

>>3346887
>stylized porn
everyone disregards the source art-style when making big tiddies

>>3347021
>tfw an artist manages to make a character sexier by modifying the original style with such finesse that it still feels like the original art style

>>3346916
tell me in what instance do tits point forward like that

>>3347035
You know tits have different sizes, shapes, and levels of perkiness and firmness right?

>>3347035
when it makes my dick hard thats when

I'm going to steal your spark

[spoiler]source?

>>3347021
So true. The show has such a great style, thats why I tried to stay as true as possible

>>3347025
Thanks so much! Which character did I make sexier iyo?

>>3347014
I guess toned was the word I was looking for, want it to look something similar to pic
Either way I think the shading is giving it some kind of ugly cellulite look

>>3347040
yes but you do realize there is never an instance where tits are completely parallel where u have the nipples facing the same direction like a set of eye balls

>>3347097
You do know it's alright to alter anatomy to your liking/style, right? Like every master before and after him does.

>>3347097
In neither of the images being discussed are the nipples or breasts parellel. In both cases the nipples and breasts are pointing away from the ribcage, following its curve. You can leave the thread now, brainlet.

>>3347097
The nips in OP don't even look vaguely parallel. Are you braindead?

>>3347115
>>3347120
>>3347121
did't know this many kids have never seen tits

>>3345423
Adobe CS6 is not the program you moron, Adobe is the company, which sells many programs like After Effects, Illustrator and Photoshop. Photoshop is the one used for drawing.

>>3347134
Hello faggot, nice to see you again. Why are you so dead set on derailing the porn threads? Is it because you're jealous of the anon's who make an actual attempt to draw, while you sit there shitposting, unable to even draw a single breast?

>>3346992
>>3347014
did some changes, hopefully looks better

>>3347153
It does. I want to see you make more progress on that face, anon.

>>3347153
fucking hell forgot the correction layer
also does anyone know about this? Whenever I have a correction layer visible the colour-picker acts like a complete retard so I have to paint with it off, then check every once in a while

>>3347134
jesus you're a faggot

>>3347175
>what is her lifting up her arm

>>3346767
Thanks. You can't imagine how pleased this drawing makes me feel. I think it is my new favorite, It is just perfect

>>3345424

>>3347174
Might be picking the color used in the correction layer rather then the color you see.

>>3347210
My only suggestion would be to make the rope around her waist/hips dig in more. Her boobs look like they're being squeezed, which looks good and I think it's what you were going for, but there rope elsewhere looks a lot less tight.

Otherwise pretty decent overall.

>>3347175
you cant be serious

>>3347210
The torso is supposed to be 3 heads long

I'd appreciate a critique of this line-work commission.

>>3347175

>>3347247
girl has a straight pan face

maybe a little of make up running trough her face would fix it

also looking at a tentacle rather than nothing

also that's a nice line-art

>>3347251
I'll see what I can do about her expression.

I am also in the works of blocking in the values for this piece, but can't quite figure out how to map the shadow cast on the ground by the wings.

If I made any anatomical mishaps, let me know so I can fix them. After that, I will finish everything else.

>>3347249
The difference between your picture and the reference you are critiquing is the angle of the shot.

>>3347257
I tend to use references for the ligthing whenever is giving me trouble. Just copy the shades from something like in pic and apply it to your drawing

also belly should be lower

>>3347263
>*bellybutton should be lower

>>3347260
I'm confused here, >>3347249 is trying to show that the original image is correct, right?

>>3347260
Forgive my post. Only been following the last couple of posts.

>>3347035

There is large variance in how one individual's muscles insert and degree in which fat accumulates in the body. This is why you have variances in body types.

Much in the way a mens' pectoral and bicep insertions vary greatly, leading to short and long muscle fibers, so are women's breasts diverse in which way the fat deposits are affected by genetics and (in their case) gravitational pull.

>>3347247
You missed a little spot of black background, I'm not gonna tell you where.

Does the tentacle on the left have a condom on?

>>3347280
I detect a minimum of four (4) missed gray spots

>>3347257
palutena face...

you made her into pau-lacretuna

>>3347289
I saw three of them, but I didn't point that out because they don't really affect the image. The spot I mentioned is ununseeable once you see it.

>>3347294
Plain-speak, please. I did the face after studying David Finch and Frank Cho, and how they constructed the face. Once anon commented I had an anime-esque style with a David Finch inspired line-work. Want to build upon the East-West fusion.

Here is an update.

Here is a non-porn piece. Plan to render it and deliver by Saturday night, Sunday at the latest.

>>3347314

Let me know if you see any more.

Since several months ago I made lewds of the girls from Shirobako that were relatively dull and flat and lifeless and were basically just pure traces, I decided to go back and redo them all using the methods of trying to do original things/not suck that I've picked up in the past few months.

I wanted to present this because I wanted to call attention to the torso and area between the collarbone and breasts, as I have a bad tendency to draw one or both of these areas too tall. Naturally I am inclined to believe that other things are anatomically wrong so I would appreciate if someone could dissect this.

>>3347325
There's one on the left above the knee.

>>3347317
it means your face is ugly and doesn't line up to a 3d model construction

is fugged

>>3347347
Is the one between the left hand's index and middle finger intentional?

>>3345365
Does anybody has any references for fat women?
Like, fairly overweight but not morbidly obese.

MILFs are OK too.

>>3347353
>>3347347
Update.

>>3347352

>>3347376

So new to this board and new to this thread. I have been drawing porn in my little notebook for a year and something that has been bugging me is:

Should I use a reference from porn? Or should I draw a model of my own and try to pose it in whatever pose I desire?

I do pretty okay for going off of references in my fap folder but am I limiting myself or is that what all skilled porn artists do?

>>3347403
I don't know from porn, but I'd say getting model would be far too expensive for 99% of porn artists, especially in the quantities that some of them work.

>>3347405

Oh I didn't mean an actual person I guess I meant like an original character or a blank figure or something.

>>3345365
is it too abstract

>>3346991
Took one of those rough sketch ideas and built on it. Trying to make it read easily with plenty of the girl being visible instead of hidden.

If anyone can point to resources on staging/layout design for this sort of thing it would be most appreciated.

>>3346484

thanks friend

>>3345401
Unironically good advice

>>3347322
pretty lright

good job

>>3347342
Use some references if you are unsure about the measurements m8

>>3347342
>>3347695
Hope it helps

>>3347695

I lean pretty heavily on reference already. I start with a pose that I like from another hentai and then use it to form a base (Tapered box, circle for the head, etc.) that I work with from there.

>>3347377
Her face still has some of that Bogdanoff left. Just use the his image as a reference and go out and learn how to make qt girls once and for all if you're gonna make porn of all things. Also, Pit's hand still looks kinda fucked, he's got no knuckle joints at all. Try laying out the basic bone structure in-perspective before you start with the rendering.

>>3347774
Is motly the way the eyes are close

the distance between the eyes is the lenght of one of the eyes

>>3347377
>>3347783
Also head and belly is too big

and belly button is still way up

Update. Will edit the blood and incorporate the hood's floral print, then will be going from there.

>>3347378
looking good

>>3347783
The biggest offenders of all are the bulging chin and bloated cheek structure. If you cover the darker side of her face with your hand, it actually looks pretty good.

>>3347805
Much better, but still a bit wonky, >>3347352 hit it spot on.

>>3347805
>>3347774
>>3347805

Let me know your thoughts. Flipped to make some adjustments, but I did notice some issues with her left leg.

>>3347875
better

top of the head is still kinda big though

also the weight of the lines in some bits is way to THICC

like the one in the penis or the ones dividing the muscles in pit

also isn't pit a shota and not a chad? lil guy has body builder muscles

>>3347875
>>3346212
blogs?

I've been painting this for about 2 hours now, I'm having a really bad day and can't figure out why I can't seem to give this image any sense of form no matter how much I paint over it.
Why does it look so flat? What am I doing wrong?

>>3348206
You need to think about your light source and paint the shadows/lights, rather than trying to paint the form. Think about the spots on the form where light doesn't reach, as well as what areas protrude and receive the most light? What about the texture of the form receiving light? Can you hint type of surface at what may be interacting with the light? Skin? Polymer? Wool?

There's other stuff to work on also, but hopefully this helps with that feeling of "flatness" in your image.

>>3347875
The noodle hand

>>3348274
this is a joke right? the original poster did a much much much better job at painting the values than your shitty contrasty paintover.

Have you ever heard of a limited value range? and the leggings arent made of metal, wtf.

here i am, commenting on a fucking guy that cumming in leggins at 4 am. what am i doing.

>>3348157
Hardstonesmcflintcock.tumblr.com
@MrMcFlintcock
ABitofCrumpet (HF)

>>3348274
Oof you made it 10x worse.

>>3348274
That's terrible ahahaha

>>3348274
It looks like you rubbed a bacon burger all over a hippo's ass.

>>3345365

>>3348157
azav.tumblr.com
I haven't updated it in a bit though.

>>3348422
Where is bellybutton

>>3348443
is a robot

>>3346992
my friend, i would spend some more time studying

Hey I've been looking through resources mentioned in the guide but wasn't not able to find the kind of references I want.

What I need are the references where the view would be from below. I want to draw persons in perspective with a viewer looking above at them. Like the models are waiting for viewer to take some action.
I don't know how to better describe it and google was not able to help me either.
Hope you guys can help me out.
Oh I also need this for male references.

>>3348274
this is utter shit. you need much much more help than the anon you're trying to help.

>>3347174
switch to eye dropper and check whatever option it's sampling: all layers, current layer, monitor display, etc.

>>3348519
view from below, but viewer looking above at them. What.
Maybe try out something like Designdoll or just take a photo yourself if you can't find anything?

>>3348206
Have you tried working with grids/planes?

>>3348274
dunning fucker kruger strikes again, what a priceless sight

Not explicitly porn (yet) but also still kinda trying to make the legs make sense

>>3348274
the absolute state of ic

>>3347441
I know another one. Was really trying to figure out how to properly lay out of otherwise showcase a low angle shot while showing the girl (in particular as much of the head and upper body perspective may allow). Ultimately it came down to just before penetration.

I ended up attributing to negative space between both the male and female in order to get any semblance of a proper "layout" or "staging".

Very rough and not relying on reference outside of that lip bite.

>>3348274
>/ic/ can't even tell that this is much better but obviously not going to have a ton of time taken on it because it's not their own artwork

>>3349517
I'm glad someone finally said it. I didn't want to get in the middle of it but fuck. It clearly shows the idea of using a bigger value range and how to indicate light, shadow, and form despite how rough it is. But more and more I'm seeing that all everyone reacts to here is shiny rendering.

>>3349517
>>3349526
the soft brush it's what made it look like shit.

other than that it looks kinda good.

>>3349516
>blahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblahblah
draw less difficult subjects. your current skill is shit tier. if you want to acquire skill as fast as possible go do some proper base studies. you don't study perspective and construction drawing porn. you don't go into art head first drawing porn.
time to stop being a retard, retard.

>>3349517
>>3349526
fucking crabs kek. the idea behind it might be alright, but the execution is complete utter garbage. and this is very important, yeah.

>>3349526
a wide value range does not automatically mean something is good you fuckwit

>>3349517
well...no, people (i assume) aren’t expecting it to be fully rendered or anything bc it’s obviously just a suggestion for changes to the first anon’s work, they just don’t think it’s very good set of suggestions. The extreme, tacky contrast would make it like the guy has a flashlight pointed right at his ass if the original anon took this person’s advice

>>3349700
The execution doesn't matter. It demonstrates the point he wanted to make. He doesn't have to do anon's work for him. Giving him an extreme example where the differences in value and light+dark areas are very obvious is good enough to to make anon see how muddy his values are and there's no sense of form which was the correction the OP asked for and what the paintover anon was demonstrating. It doesn't matter that it's not pretty it does the job it was meant to.
>>3349703
I didn't say anything about it automatically being good or even use the word good at all. I only said it was functional.
>>3349706
Not him but I disagree. Redlines and paintovers shouldn't be answer sheets to copy. All they need to do is convey an idea of what is wrong and they *may* suggest possible solutions, but in the end the artist needs to take the idea and execute it correctly on their own. Nobody else should be expected to invest that time in someone else's drawing.

>>3349700
The execution doesn't matter. It demonstrates the point he wanted to make. He doesn't have to do anon's work for him. Giving him an extreme example where the differences in value and light+dark areas are very obvious is good enough to to make anon see how muddy his values are and why there's no sense of form which was the correction the OP asked for and what the paintover anon was demonstrating. It doesn't matter that it's not pretty it does the job it was meant to.
>>3349703
I didn't say anything about it automatically being good or even use the word good at all. I only said it was functional.
>>3349706
Not him but I disagree. Redlines and paintovers shouldn't be answer sheets to copy. All they need to do is convey an idea of what is wrong and they *may* suggest possible solutions, but in the end the artist needs to take the idea and execute it correctly on their own. Nobody else should be expected to invest that time in someone else's drawing.

>>3345365
Not very good at butts, trying to draw a milf butt.

How does my butt look? Thighs, too.

Supposed to be on a THICC milf, for context.

>>3350077
Left buttock is slightly more square than it should

Still a nice butt, though, would fug

>>3350087
Is it THICC and milfy, though?

Thanks for the reply!

>>3349697
thank you for the reply

>draw less difficult subjects

eh

>>3349762
(I’m the last anon you replied to) I don’t understand how that’s a response to what I said. I agreed with you that it’s fine that it’s not a fully rendered fancy thing bc it’s just a suggestion/redline, but the suggestions themselves are what people are disagreeing with/calling out anon for, because the suggested lighting is very extreme and awkward.

>>3348274
This is clearly better and you can tell from how the thumbnail reads compared to the original.

>>3349762
>It demonstrates the point he wanted to make
that's the problem. it absolutely doesn't cause the original has better defined shapes. which is what the original artist was asking for. please stop posting.

some ideas for a character i'll only use for porn

>>3350218
boobs too big.

>>3348206
>>3348274
Both have flaws, but I like the second one much better. I guess you're all blind or something.

>>3350143
I'm disagreeing with you indirectly then and more disagreeing with people calling it out for the suggestions not being totally fitting for the picture. My point was it shouldn't be discounted because it doesn't give all the answers. It's not painted and blended as nicely but it does show how to separate values and a rough idea of using those different values on each side of the forms to show light and shadow and give it dimension.
>>3350211
The original had barely any definition due to the extremely limited value range. The paintover gave an example of increasing the value range to help define forms *and* light and shadow better. And it doesn't matter if someone only asks for help on one thing. If someone sees more problems with it and comments on that too it's no reason to throw away their advice entirely. It's so hard to get any real advice around here anyway and I can't stand seeing people attack the ones who do unfounded.

>>3347441
Still have some issues I need to fix. Notably the length of the girls left arm and the proportions of her hands as well. Too small.

How can I improve top's pose?

Going to touch up the lines a bit more (particularly in the fourth frame), but the key frames are in place and I am liking how it's coming out.

Comments? Critiques?

>>3350750
Slight adjustment. Had a reference frame in place at the end of the timeline, hence the flash.

>>3345365
how do u draw non-con?

>>3350218
boobs too small

>>3350475
>change the expression
>make it look lake he is preparing for a good spanking, his arm looks like the guy is just waving
>his other hand is just over her back relaxed. try pulling some hair or like is pushing her down with force

>>3350750
>>3350752
Fix the feet soles

a good rule of thumb to make good art is to think about the body parts people have a fetish over, like feet

I tried again. This time I'm fairly confident in this from an anatomical standpoint because the pose wasn't particularly difficult but there are other things I'm less confident about.

>The hands. I have never been good at drawing hands and I doubt that the man's hands in this case look correct or pleasing. What do I need to focus on in order to draw them better?
>There were certain points, particularly with the tracksuit top, where I felt I got arbitrary with the shading. This is a recurring theme where I'm not quite sure how light hits clothes or how they fold naturally. I tried minimizing folding but I could certainly use feedback on how things were shaded
>Less priority here, but how does that breast look? I haven't really drawn them from the rear before so I'm not sure if it looks too flat.

>>3350863
>The hands. I have never been good at drawing hands and I doubt that the man's hands in this case look correct or pleasing. What do I need to focus on in order to draw them better?

Hands look more wrinkly and you are able to tell where the bones are. Hands tend to be more skinny like, should add more detaisl to it.

>>3350863
>>There were certain points, particularly with the tracksuit top, where I felt I got arbitrary with the shading. This is a recurring theme where I'm not quite sure how light hits clothes or how they fold naturally. I tried minimizing folding but I could certainly use feedback on how things were shaded

reposting this:

I'll be a bad boyo and I'll show you a shortcut for shading.

Basically use the lighting of a photo as a reference for the lighting

/repost

basically try to reference a photo lighting and apply it to your drawing

>>3350881

Is there any particularly useful mechanism for drawing a base for hands so I can tell where each joint is? I'm thinking something like a stick figure.

>>3350886

I can tell where the light is coming from (Presumably in the setting I chose it's coming down from the ceiling and spreading through the room). I tried using the original reference photo I worked off of for help but ultimately had to use my imagination on the back especially.

>>3346329
how so? i get it's rough but i could refine it if i wanted to spend the time to.

>>3350863
nipple seems symbol drawing

>>3350891
You mean if I have a reference for the hands?

Nigga just google them

>>3350897

That's what I meant, thanks. Couldn't quite put it into words for a moment.

>>3350891
I mean you should copy the lighting of some reference

doesn't have to be the one you were using

I have some ideas for porn comics I want to draw but how do I monetize them?
I don't want to have to worry about Paypal's bullshit and I want some way to protect against pirates. Should I try to go through one of those porn comic collectives or what?

>>3350905
patreon and paywall

>>3350910
Patreon doesn't seem all that secure lately.

>>3350912
Why?

>>3350931
Didn't you hear about those guys who went on a campaign pirating and undermining a bunch of porn artists? They specifically said they were trying to put the artists out of business because 'porn shouldn't be behind a paywall'. Then on the other side Paypal keeps getting finicky because they don't want people selling adult shit even using Patreon as a proxy. That was why for a minute Patreon was about to kill the nsfw option.

>>3350957
Didnt hear that. They have an option to charge upfront so i dont see how that could be possible.

>>3350969
They made their own website where they were uploading tons of artists' work basically making it so instead of having to subscribe to the patreon to see it people could just wait a little and get it there for free. Charging up front wouldn't help. If they subscribed they still had to wait a month to get it. Going to the pirate site they could let one guy pay for it and still wait a month but get it free. That was shitty enough but I think the worst part is the pirates started their own patreon to support it. It's pretty fucked up to claim those artists' work wasn't worth being paid for but destroying their livelihood is.

One other thing I'm worried about is the subjects. Nothing fucked up like kid shit or rape or anything but I want to have traps and crossdressers and transgender people in some of them and I don't want psychopaths trying to shut down my patreon or tumblr or whatever claiming that I'm phobic or fetishizing real people or some shit.

>>3350982
If you mean yiff.party and their faggy poorfag communist 'troll' crusade over at cripple chan you can bypass their bots by PMing the rewards to your followers. Paying followers can still leak it but that's less likely to happen.

>>3350992
Oh thanks, that's good to know. They weren't the only ones doing it though so I guess it's a risk anyway. I'm still worried about the Paypall and subjects issues. How do artists like Incase and Blogshirtboy do their comics independently?

>>3350996
Most image hosting sites(sadpanda, boorus,etc) will take down your art if you can prove that you're the creator unless its run by edgy niggers ala yiff.party/paheal.

Big NSFW artists never use their online handles anywhere near their paypals and they also never reveal any personal info that can be traced back to it. AFAIK incase is completely anonymous besides him revealing that he's a polish 27 year old guy that has been drawing/painting porn for like 8 years. If he has had issues with paypal he keeps quiet about it, with good reason.

Paypal has always cracked down on NSFW but there are ways to bypass this regarding commissions and Patreon officially doesnt allow NSFW to be distributed in their main site but they just turn their eyes to 3rd party sites linked there since it brings loadsemone.

>>3351008
Huh, it sounds like I counted Patreon out too soon. I didn't know all this.
I can definitely handle putting sfw things on the page itself and sending the other stuff to patrons privately. Thanks for the info anon, I think this just might work out for me.

I al working on this one, any help or suggestions you have for me?

>>3351110
wtf how did you clean your lines smooth like that

>>3350957
>>3350969
BS.
I'm a Patreon creator. There's no problems with drawing NSFW as long as you stay away from pedo, bestiality and incest.
Stop spreading lies, crab.

>>3351125
Hey, suck a fucking dick. Don't call me a crab, asshole. Everything I said was what I've seen other people talking about and what I was worried about. Which is why I'm here ASKING about it.
And you fucking replied to my post about the yiff pirates like all of that isn't true and easily verified.
Fuck you and fuck off.

>>3351125
Same anon
>>3350992
yiff.party is harmless.
1. You can do as you said and send rewards via PMs
2. Paywalling all of your art (even web resolution stuff) is a stupid counterproductive practice since outputting all your art is the best promotion.
3. people that don't want to pay for your art won't pay for it no matter what. yiff party helps your notoriety.
>>3351038
Do you even have a following? Don't think that just by creating a Patreon page you'll suddenly get showered in money and fans.

>>3351130
You basically have no idea what you're talking about, but you like to be smart.
STOP SPREADING LIES AND STFU.

>>3351134
God I fucking hate troll ass idiots like you. How am I pretending to be smart by coming here to ask about something I openly admitted to not fully understanding? Or by explaining why I was concerned about it? You can't even follow a simple straightforward conversation and are spewing hate at me because of your own stupid assumptions and misinterpretations.
You're not doing anything useful here.
Fuck off you brain dead half-germinated fetal fuck up.

>>3351131
I have a little bit of a following. I'm not expected to get rich off of it I just wanted some way of making at least a little bit off of it to offset how much time it's going to take me to make them.

>>3351141
*not expecting

>>3350982
Link to site? I'd like to see what the most popular and frequently pirated artists are so I know what's in vogue.

>>3351140
>by coming here to ask about something
Your first post
>>3350912

Will you just STFU already?

>>3351149
>asking for a friend
>for research
GTFO, kek.

>>3351118

I use cheap mechanical pencils to trace over very faint sketches I did with an 2H or so pencil, then I try to erase every extra line with a vinyl Eraser.

>>3351110

This drawing has me worried over her right arm (left), I don't know if it is bent properly, I tried to do this with no reference except for her head.

>>3351110

I also think her breasts are to low positioned in general. But I am not sure.

>>3351434
no they are definitely not too low.

>>3351434
not really
>>3351399
her nose looks like the head of a ninja turtle, your reference doesnt have a wide nose. Make it smaller and less detailed.

Has bimbo lips, and while I like bimbo lips as well they feel too big in that face, like is cramped.

Eyes are a little too close

get a scanner or use the retinex and curves filters in gimp

>>3350218
She has the best hairstyle.

i need feedback on this

more pixel stuff

>>3350218
she has the worst hairstyle

>>3351933
she looks angry

>>3351933
Looks pretty good anon. I can totally tell who the character is supposed to be, but her face looks weird to me. I find it strange when people take Adventure Time characters and give them more realistic faces.

Post your favorite references when working on this smut

>>3351523

She looks weird from the front though, I think her mouth is big so she resembles tara strong.

But thanks, you made her look more feminine.

A base colors expression sheet for a commissioner's Draenei avatar. Comments? Critiques?

>>3345401
can't tell if serious
Try drawing porn that doesn't arouse you and you might solve your issue?
Mind over matter?
Please don't put spicy things on your hands!

>>3345595
I doubt the measurements are exact ? Generally a character will have the same size and it's eyeballed like every time you draw the same character.

Just please draw them right if you do, don't make them pointy and have clothes suction cupped to their body unless it's that kind of fabric! Boobies are just chest fat and lay like so.

>>3346133
hell no I embrace my lifestyle

>>3352110
>browse front page
>scroll down
>see thumbnail
>the fuck?
>see porn thread
>double take at thumbnail
>Is that Dolphin pussy? That looks like Dolphin pussy. I think it's Dolphin pussy
>open image
>mfw

>>3352116
you made me google dolphin pussy and compare it to my own

>>3352090
looking good

That one on the bottom center though...

>>3351399
>>3352062
I like the art-style.
Is that show any good?

>>3352124
Good eye. I'll fix it up in the morning.

>>3352130
>>3352090
also that arm

>>3347369
When did Gabe become a tranny?

>>3352121
so? how do they compare?

It's been a while.

>>3352468
practice drawing hands.

>>3350218
Hips too wide

>>3352486
MODS!
on a more serious note, KYS.

>>3352470
very nice.
Gives me the stiffy uh

>>3350218
Torso too long

>>3352486
Fucking homo.

am i still /beg/?

Thoughts? Looking for serious critique on pose

>>3352714
That's a very tiny dick.

>>3350752
Fill fix the feet soles when I flesh out a few more in-betweens frames. Let me know if anything else sticks out.

>be me
>utterly loathe every degenerate porn artist ever
>learn how to draw
>can't stop drawing porn
I see.

>>3352899
Welcome to the club, just wait until you start drawing feminine dicks.

>>3352832
is that he used his own as a reference

>>3352714
humm yu cee
This is bad fren

>>3352899
>learn how to draw

>>3352732
Guy looks like sid from ice age
Girls eyes are fucked up, no understanding of perspective or foreshortening
Those expressions are not erotic at all, the girl looks kinda pissed and the other seems confused on what is he doing

>>3352468
>>3352470
Nice strokes

what software and brushes do you use my fren

>>3352899
On the good side, the box looks apprealing, and the fingers are looking alright. Plus, you distract is from the girl.

The bad? Well, that thumb is missing an entire joint and bone, the penis looks terrible.

The ugly? One question: Why does your shota have a vag?

>>3352899
You lack gesture and perspective

not very happy with how the bee part turned out, just gonna finish the face quickly and deliver it
>>3348579
that was it, thanks
>>3348459
I will do more of that once I'm done in a bit

>>3352921
Those tits are backwards fren

the big one goes to the right

also there is no gap between the tiddies, tiddies are 2 separated muscles, they are not like sonic eye

>>3352894
the wrinklies in the feet still change in each frame.

here is a good example:
https://youtu.be/yJutO3D_EF8
(0:34)

>>3352468
>>3352470
Blog?

i need advice on the anatomy.

>>3352914
Thanks for the input. I like flat chested girls. Tried to fix it.
>>3352907
Draw for fun.

>>3353015
your previous face was better why did you change it

>>3353021
no gesture
no dynamism

>>3353027
The direction of the eyes in the original was more appealing. Now it just looks like she's ignoring the viewer.

>>3353041
also the size is not weird in the original

>>3353027
I think the artist changed it because the jawline indicated her lips shouldn't be pointing up, but it makes the face look sexier absolutely.

>>3352935
u kno what a gap is?

>>3353048
gap

noun
1.
a break or hole in an object or between two objects.
"he came through the gap in the hedge"

opening, aperture, space, breach, chink, slit, slot, vent, crack, crevice, cranny, cavity, hole, orifice, interstice, perforation, break, fracture, rift, rent, fissure, cleft, divide

>>3353028
i like how in the cartoon version of this it's a cat hitting things and in the anime version it's a teengirl waving. classic degeneracy

>>3353058
that degenerate draws better than you

>>3351933
Id say change her face when she pulls down her dress, like she could blink, or ay least change her expression to a poat or a angrier expression? Having it same makes her look like a doll, she could get embarrassed that would be logical.

I really admire your work though anon, keep it up!

>>3353062
but not better than preston j blair, so you agree basically

>>3353074
>B-but he is not better than him thus anime is degenerate thus you agree with me thus I'm right ahaha

are stupid my m8

kill yourself retard

>>3353062
>>3353077
die in a fire you weeb

>>3353080

>>3353027
why did you just keep making the line thicker? i dont understant the purpose of this, is just a sketch, i have to clean it, that why the lines are inconsistent.

>>3353045
that was the purpose.

>>3353041
i know i have to change the size and the positon, she look a bit retarded.

>>3352456
not even close friend

>>3353081
can you not be a cancerous cunt for like 5 minutes

>>3353099
My criticism is not the lines but the face fren

>>3353107
>"degenerate"
>gets told why is wrong
>"ugh could you like not?"
kys

>>3353102
so if you are the actual artist did you stand model for yourself?

>>3353139
I should, but I just use porn stills from videos I really like, porn images, or horrid renders from my imagination of positions I like to see

>>3352904
wit

>>3352832
I agree even for a 14/15 year old girl that dick is like the size of a tampon

>>3352913
Thanks meng, Manga Studio

>>3353001
Don't got one, haven't really been on the internet in a while

>>3352714
is this still /beg/?

>>3353243
yes

>>3353244
how far from leaving /beg/ am i?
where are its major flaws?

>>3352714
So I'm just gonna say it right here that you're ambitious with your art. Kudos.

That being said, I'll just focus on the anatomy. It's all kinds of wrong and the shading makes little sense. At the very least, please use a reference.

>>3353247
you are like 1/5 done I would say
>where are its major flaws?
nigger there is no flaws because you didn't attempt anything, there are no fundies or construction in that picture.

Which books or courses have you done?

>>3353255
everything you said makes sense, can you point out some anatomy flaws? i think it would help me if you could mention some

>>3353275
Sure, one thing you can work on is the ribcage. It's very flat and weirdly shaped as of now.

>>3353279
thanks very much, its because i use a box for it. i need to remember to round it off.

>>3352714
I can't believe those pinhead size nipples i'm dying
That being said, gotta agree with the anon who said you were ambitious. You have a lot to learn but I believe in you, godspeed, anon.

>>3345365
>>3345365
Who drew op’s image?

>>3352489
take your own advice

>>3351978
it's intended as a "begrudging reward" scenario so her face is supposed to be sort of angry. I understand what you mean though about adding realism to super cartoony characters.
>>3353073
I like the idea of her getting more embarrassed and changing her expression after the top comes off, I agree that would make her more realistic and less doll-like.

>>3352714
no but try to start thinking differently about shading. One of the most important thresholds to cross when you want to go from beginner to intermediate is that you have to stop thinking of shading as something to add the end and start thinking of it as a tool you can use to show form.

>>3353143
>01 >>3345402 >>3345404 >>3346271 >>3346295 >>3346332
>Help me dudes. Every time I TRY to draw porn, i get too ar

E-excuse me I am a newb and I have a question... What did you use to draw the image (this looks like a scan, just wondering what kind of paper how big and such) Thanks!

>>3353397

I'm sorry I don't know why it pasted all those numbers. I meant to reply to >>3353102

>>3353397
can't tell if serious
neither images are literal paper
the ass one is on SAI with a textured brush

>>3353275
>can you point out some anatomy flaws?

eyes are unappealing, probably the lack of eyebrows and eyeslashes, they are way too thin

That neck holy shit

Ear size and positioning is proportional to the top of the eyebrow and the bottom of the nose

Jaw has more square than a yaoi manga

Arm is fucken tiny m8

Left arm was eaten by the void of "drawing hands is hard"

Lastly you have absolutely no understanding of wrinkles and drapery which makes your clothes look painted over and Those nipples poking trough the shirt are hysterically laughable and don't make me mention those shoes or wathever those things were supposed to be

also that dick is small

tl;dr: You are bottom /beg/, no offense

read about clothing:
>>3351538
>>3351887

Understand foreshortening (read perspective books like the scott one: "How to Draw" by Scott Robertson (HIGH quality scan)
>https://mega.co.nz/#!iB81WbxK!eNSWCFuDinDeSXib_e0s6ZpfPIAMEGEPpz8otwRiIoQ
or Andrew Loomis - Successful Drawing :
http://www.alexhays.com/loomis/Andrew%20Loomis%20-%20Successful%20Drawing.pdf
)

PS: sorry for the bad redline, I'm bad with the brushes

>>3353398
when you click a post number it adds it to your reply, that may have happened!

>>3353398
ahaha

Critique me

>>3353406
kek

surprisingly good without constructing

>>3353403
Or if you highlight text. Anyone know how to disable that?

Found this and started working on it again
Im really high so i can't tell if if i've ruined or saved it

>>3346896
that is one billion percent traced

>>3353414
Damn that's some tip top line art. blog?
>>3353415
The guy said they where deconstruction studies or life drawing or wathever

>>3353415
true

>>3353414
I think with the bulge of the balls the underwear should be a bit more wedged between them since they are fluid and dangling, not tight and one mono-ball
What's the other hand going to do? The one close to the face I feel you should also be able to see hints of the other fingers even though it is in perspective they would be foreshortened
Everything else looks pretty okay to be so far!

Critique me

>>3353424
is he crying or really old

>>3353422
ty

>>3353424
it looks like the heads are swapped and it's hilarious

>>3353424
don't draw on your phone

get a note or sketchpad

>>3346991
ah god dammit man I can't read shit from this
try to focus more on making clear decisions and avoid chicken-scratching. Put down a line and move on. If you need to adjust it later, adjust it later. Stop trying to get every line perfect, because you end up turning every line to shit.

>>3347232
where is your god now?

>>3353442
Still there

>>3353442
>censoring nipples and vag on a red board

Sorry to post a third image in such short succession but I'm trying to do essentially what's a five image set.

For the first time, I actually tried drawing a hint of a man beyond the pelvis given the pose and scenario (Casting couch). I feel okay about the man's legs but I'm honestly not sure how I did from the pelvis up.

Is there anything else here that I should pay more attention to? I did better with the hands this time but honestly relied on very heavy reference for them.

>>3353523
I'd pay more attention to the genitals if you want someone to nit pick.

>>3353531

Male, female, or both?

>>3353532
I hope this helps friend

>>3353550
>>3353532
whoops, I had moved the vagina up a bit on this one and wrote the text on the wrong reference my bad!!

>>3353532
>>3353550
>>3353551
ok just fixed the image to avoid confusion lol

>>3352714
>am i still /beg/?
yes, absolutely.

>>3352899
you actually didn't learn how to draw yet. this is garbage.

>>3352935
>tiddies are 2 separated muscles
LMFAO
stop giving advice, you absolute imbecile. tits come in all sorts of sizes and shapes. some have bigger spacing between them, others smaller.
this is a 18+ board, GTFO.

>>3353359
the world doesn't need pedophiles.

>>3353523
pose is stiff af. learn what genitals look like.
porn is way too advanced for your current skill level.

>>3353594
>the world doesn't need pedophiles.
Do you also think videogames make you violent?

>>3353609
let me guess. you are one of those idiots that think a pedophile is the same as a sex offender, right?
again, the world doesn't need you. stop trying to push your degenerate agenda.

>>3353613
drawing lolis doen't make you a pedo anymore than drawing violence makes you a psychopath

>>3353623
if you jack off to drawn children, then that makes you a pedo. sorry for breaking it out to you, famalino.

>>3353448
>starting from the neck
are you just pretending to be an idiot?

>>3353655
here we are producers, not consumers
sorry for breaking it out to you, boyo.

>>3353670
I wasn't addressing people that create that content for money, even tho that's almost as deplorable. sorry for breaking it out to you, dumbass.

finished the lineart with adjustments

>>3353685
lineart is really nice. face is very unappealing, mostly because it's overdrawn. study line economy.
also learn how to construct hands, and study some perspective and foreshortening.

>>3353692
your face is unappealing

>>3353682
You are pathetic at arguing. Drawing anything does not make you deplorable. People that draw children probably are the cause that a lot less of pedos molest actual children.
That doesnt even matter though because if youve seen what counts as loli, then you would realize that first, they dont look look like children and thus dont even appeal to pedos, and second that if you like the 2D anime style, that that translates 0% into reallife. Even fat anime chicks can look fucking fantastic, that doesnt make the real life fat people any less disgusting and undesireable.
Sorry for bursting your bubble but your strawman doesnt exist.

>>3353716
>People that draw children probably are the cause that a lot less of pedos molest actual children.
LMAO, I'm sure there are tons of studies about this out there.
what I'm saying is that pedophilia is cancer and as any cancer it should be eradicated. PERIOD.
I didn't even read the rest of your post, cause it's probably a bunch of blahblahblahblah.

>>3353694
I'm glad you at least agree about all the rest. that's a start, dear butthurt scrubbo.

>>3353751
>blahblahblahblah.
back to tumblr

>>3353751
>what I'm saying is that pedophilia is cancer and as any cancer it should be eradicated. PERIOD.
As if my post implied anything different. Are you just acting stupid or is your reading comprehension really on the level of an 11 year old?
In any case stop shitting up the board.
You are like the radical left arguing that nazis are bad something which everyone else agrees on but they somehow still have to insist on telling everyone everytime they come up.

>>3353765
as long as people in here will keep glorifying children as sexual objects, I'll keep reporting and shitting on you and your dear lolis.
keep ablooablooing as much as you want, pedo.

>>3353761
>I'm a pedophile and I can't deny this with any good argument.
that sucks, sicko.

>>3353771
and once again he shows that his IQ is sub 80. Well done, id rather talk to a pedo than listen to your 8th grader level of arguing.
You are like Hilary Clinton thinking that shiting on the people not as far left as you somehow makes them want to vote for you.
ITT a brainlet tells people bad stuff is bad but is such an asshole that people disagree with him.
Congratulations

>>3353772
He says after literally posting blahblahblah as an answer to a previous post even stating that he hasnt read it.
Well done, also good for you that you know how to use ad hominem and insult me as a pedophile, sadly I am not a pedophile no matter how much you want people that disagree with you to be child molester.

>>3353771
and we come back to the argument that just because you draw gore zombies killing innocent people doesn't mean you are a psycho

>>3353780
no one said that if you draw pedo stuff for profit this makes you an actual pedophile.
if you enjoy drawing it, then you are probably a pedophile, yes.
just like if you enjoy drawing gore zombies killing innocent people means there's probably something wrong with your head.

>>3353777
do you fap to drawn children having sex?
then you are a pedophile. if the thought disgusts you, then you aren't. It's very very simple, anon.

>>3353776
>id rather talk to a pedo
then I guess the problem is not that you are a pedo. you are just a shitty person.
I'm glad.

>>3353824
>just like if you enjoy drawing gore zombies killing innocent people means there's probably something wrong with your head.
there it is guys, the good ol videogames make you violent argument.

>>3353834
>grasping at straws
pedophile detected.
I hope karma gets you, absolute human garbage.

>>3353844
>ad hominems
go back to bed famalino
maybe you can come up with better arguments next time

>>3353850
my only argument in this whole conversation is: if you fap to children, you are a pedophile. I don't really think I need other arguments.

>>3353861
>drawing, fapping
>drawings, children
>>3353844
>does not have the exact same opinion you do, pedophile

>>3353829
>do you fap to drawn children
>implying loli look anything like children or have any resemblance to actually reallife children
Ive talked about this before but you wouldnt listen.
if youve seen what counts as loli, then you would realize that first, they dont look look like children and thus dont even appeal to pedos, and second that if you like the 2D anime style, that that translates 0% into reallife. Even fat anime chicks can look fucking fantastic, that doesnt make the real life fat people any less disgusting and undesireable.

>>3353865
>bla bla bla
so you fap to drawn children? Yes or no?
and don't come up with retarded """arguments""" like lore and shit like that.
all that matters is if it looks like a child or not.

>>3353866
same goes for you. if it looks like a kid, then any normal person will consider it a kid.
I'm not talking about skinny flat 20somethings.
please get your head out of your ass. anime style emphasizes cuteness, and there's a lot of ways to prevent your characters from looking underage. if someone decides they are going to add child-like proportions to an already overly cute style, then it's only their fault if they're being called out for drawing pedo shit.

>>3353876
>if it looks like a kid
you stupid fucking idiot. Its saying that it doesnt look like fucking children.

>>3353876
>all that matters is if it looks like a child or not.
it doesn't
so yet again, nice strawman

>>3353881
>you stupid fucking idiot.
pedo getting real mad LMAO

you probably have no idea what post even started all this debate.
let me refresh your shithole memory.
>>3350218
>>3352486
>>3352489
>>3353359
>>3353594
you are basically arguing over a half-joke. keep it up I guess.

>>3353884
I rest my case. I think you're just a pedophile in denial.
hopefully I'm wrong.

>>3353876
i'm curious. given that drawing is just a form of art expression, do you consider writing, another form of expression, can also be "pedo shit"? i.e. do you think GRR martin is a pedo because he wrote rape scenes of underage characters in his books?

>>3353885
>pedo getting real mad LMAO
Ad hominem you fucking 10 year old. Again.
I am not a pedophile no matter how much you want people that disagree with you to be child molester.

>>3353890
context is important imo. if the rape is not glorified, then it's okay. on the other hand if you write an erotic novel containing pedophiles abusing children with the sole purpose of arousing the reader, then you're either a shitty human being for trying to make money off that, or in case you enjoy it, you're definitely a pedophile.

>>3353887
rest your fucking what.
You give litereally 0 points other than pedos are bad.
And we say loli does not look like real children at all. And you repeat your statement like a parrot who only knows one line.

>>3353891
then it's all good, anon. no need to reply if you have a clean conscience.

>>3353896
loli can look as flat adult women, or they can look like kids.
if they look like kids and you like that, I have bad news for you. if you don't like that, then it's completely fine.

>>3353876
>child-like proportions
Whats childlike to you? Short? No Tits? Those are all indicators of them being children and yet they arent indicators for them being chlildren.
Is it how they act that makes them children? Weird, because most loli dont act like children at all but like grown ups.
So that doesnt seem to be an indicator as well.
And this is the biggest problem in your argument. Because you say if its a child then its pedoshit, but there are so many ways something can be conisdered a child. That you either end up with a stroke that wants to censor small breasted drawn women, or you cant censor basically anything stylized.
Dont get me wrong there are drawings that really look like children but those have a realistic style and those arent up for debate.

You know when I look at a Hachikuji Mayoi porn my peepee get hard. Real children are disgusting though and I have literally 0 interest in them, much less sexual interest. Does that make a pedo? One doesn't like children but that one loli porn was hot. Does that make one a pedo?
I like looking at stylized fights with gore. I'd puke if I were to watch real people getting sliced up though probably. Does that make me a psychopath?

>>3353895
so i just have to come up with a story and i can draw all the loli i want?

>>3353925
if you need an excuse to cover your pedo ass, that will never change you being a pedo I'm afraid.

>>3353910
it's anatomy. underdevelopment of the skeleton and musculature most of all. size of skull vs size of the rest of the skeleton. etc, etc.
if a character looks like a kid and you fap to that, then you have issues. the more realistic the style is, the more fucked up you are.

>Hachikuji Mayoi porn
I had to google that. I think that if you seriously fap to sexual depictions of pic related, you have problems, anon.

>>3353935
>fap to sexual depictions of pic related, you have problems, anon.
The problem being me fapping to somethings sexual that doesnt include huge tits?
But im really not a pedo. Ive checked, i though long and hard about this myself because just like you I thought that liking obscure drawings that might resemble someone whos not grown up makes me a epdo, but I am not attracted to children, not at all.
Its weird its almost like liking playing violent videogames doesnt make you like murder.

>>3353935
>if you need an excuse
how can you tell one using as an escuse from another actually telling a story

>>3353945
someone that gets off to murdering people in a game, doesn't make them a murderer.
just like someone that gets of to children, doesn't automatically become a sex offender. they are still a pedophile tho.
I'm sure the fact that you get off to drawn children and you THINK you don't like real children is just a defense mechanism. lying to oneself is a legit thing to cope with stress.

>>3353948
by the way they speak.
>>3353925
>so i just have to come up with a story and i can draw all the loli i want?
it's clear to me the end goal is to draw loli, cause they get off to this. versus, for example, making people aware that pedophilia is a bad thing.

thread looks like it derailed and no one is posting, should i bother posting a drawing i did? or wait till next thread

>>3353952
>someone that gets off to murdering people in a game
Stop with the stupidstrawmen. If you play a gagme like COD you like it if you kill people.
If you play a hack and slash you like beating up masses of enemies. And yet you dont enjoy murder. You enjoy the murder, and yet you dont enjoy reall ife murder. You fap to loli, which isnt even in a realistic style like a lot of games but in Anime style, a style that makes even fat people seem desireable, and yet you you dont like chlildren in real life. Because those are 2 separate issues.

>>3353966
thread already reached post limit. that's why I'm talking about pedo shit and don't give a shit about being off topic.
make a new thread or something.

>>3353967
>If you play a gagme like COD you like it if you kill people
Imo it's more about the competitive aspect of the game mechanics. in the first place you probably like to beat your opponents. whoever likes this because of murdering people, probably seriously has issues lol.
>If you play a hack and slash you like beating up masses of enemies.
same as before. you can't just say it's about the gore and murder. games give you satisfaction that goes beyond the lore.
>And yet you dont enjoy murder.
correct
>You enjoy the murder, and yet you dont enjoy reall ife murder.
if somebody plays those games because of the murder aspect I would say they have issues. not saying they will go on a rl killing spree, cause that's completely different, but I would probably say they are more fucked up than someone that play those games for other appeal besides the murdering.

Porn on the other hand is pretty onesided. You find a person attractive and you fap to them. You find children like characters more attractive than developed adults drawn in the same style. bad news, famalino.

I feel like it's coming out a bit boring. Probably too late to change anything major but criticisms appreciated.

>>3353989
see, this is what I'm talking about, anon.
if this doesn't appeal to pedophiles, I really don't know what does lol.

>>3354001
but drawing it, wheter for money or not, doesn't make you one
>>3353989
left girl's legs are too short, and maybe try not to make the pose of right girl too symmetrical .

>>3354035
>try not to make the pose of right girl too symmetrical
That's a good idea, thanks.

>>3353655
>sorry for breaking it out to you
Literally every time this phrase is used the one saying it is trying to make his emotional argument sound more legit by implying it's "just the facts". It makes you sound as convincing as calling the other party a "kid", as in not at all.

>>3353978
>You find children like characters more attractive than developed adults drawn in the same style
Drawing or liking loli does not imply that at all.

Futhermore you are kind of right, but also wrong.
A shooter like splatoon isnt nearly as fun as slaughtering humans. Mortal combats gore would not be fun were they robots. In mortal combat i love the brutalities and fatalities, and I enjoy the gore for what it is.
And that is very realistic, anime does not even come close to real life. I still dont like dead people.
But its not even about fapping to it or liking it, its about creating drawings because this board is not the fap board its the art board.

so much arguing not enough porn art

>>3354112
>drawing pedo shit for money
doesn't make you a pedophile. it just makes you an immoral person.
>drawing pedo shit cause you like it
makes you a pedo

>>3354119
>bump limit reached
makes ya feel dumb, right?

>>3354121
>drawing gore shit cause you like it
makes you a psycho

>>3354177
pretty much, yeah.

>>3353753
Post art

Christ, just nuke this board already.

>>3354413
agreed

>>3354119
I would post more, but I want to do more than post slight improvements only to see what I need to fix before people get a chance to critique it.

>>3353553

This helps. Thank you.

>>3353594

I don't understand what you mean by "stiff". Can you elaborate on what you mean by something that's stiff versus something that's fluid?

update

Give me Kyle and BBC's blogs please.
I'll take other artists too as long as their work is has appeal and color.

Added in key details in the frames, drew out the lower body to help anchor the remainder to come, the original four frames have been given their base colors, and improved the feets’ anatomy.

Goal is to clear up as much commission work as I can to finish the linework by Friday. Will edit accordingly.

>>3354713
Great folds on the shirt anon. I have to get back to practicing cloth and clothes, thanks for reminding me.

>>3352935
There's such a thing as a uniboob. It's pretty rare and i've only seen a handful of women that have it. Dillion Harper has it. I think it's pretty hot, but i doubt most people would know what it is and think it looks strange in the drawing.

>>3354691
>Can you elaborate on what you mean by something that's stiff versus something that's fluid?
for one irl you'll never see something so symmetrical as the pose you drew. google "dynamic gesture" or something. but as I already said all these concepts are too advanced for you. if you don't even understand what "stiff" means, then you're hopeless, anon.

>>3354411
KYS, imbecile.

Well I know there is still lots of fundamental flaws but I had fun coloring it.

>>3352121
i got some for reference

>>3352456
Dolphin pussy is so superior it's not even funny. They can time their orgasm to match yours and they secrete something that can keep your orgasm going for a long fucking time.

A friend told me btw.