[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

File: 31 KB, 570x201, garggle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

View image removed from Google Image searches. Now have to visit the webpage itself. Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:23:07 2018 No.3312528 [Reply] [Original]

>Today we're launching some changes on Google Images to help connect users and useful websites. This will include removing the View Image button. The Visit button remains, so users can see images in the context of the webpages they're on.

>The Search by Image button is also being removed. Reverse image search *still works* through the way most people use it, from the search bar of Google Images.

>For those asking, yes, these changes came about in part due to our settlement with Getty Images this week (see also https://www.theverge.com/2018/2/15/17017864/google-removes-view-image-button-from-search-results …). They are designed to strike a balance between serving user needs and publisher concerns, both stakeholders we value.

>Ultimately, Google Images is a way for people to discover information in cases where browsing images is a better experience than text. Having a single button that takes people to actionable information about the image is good for users, web publishers and copyright holders.

Source: https://twitter.com/searchliaison

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:28:32 2018 No.3312532 >>3312528 There is no design-oriented excuse for the removal of View Image. There are only corporate moneyline excuses. This is a garbage change.

>>	Nose "I never troll" Bro(...) Fri Feb 16 06:29:31 2018 No.3312533 >>3312532 its still on the top right though? How does this bother anyone?

>>

Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:30:54 2018 No.3312535
File: 57 KB, 1030x806, 1487936603453.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>3312528
>>3312532
>>3312533
https://d3vr.github.io/viewimage/
Time to suck google's dick.
Someone will make a greasemonkey extension for this functionality anyway, guaranteed.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:32:06 2018 No.3312538 To get the image, click the bookmarklet when you've got the image you want to view active

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:33:41 2018 No.3312540 File: 1.40 MB, 1206x1080, 1500823363861.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Actually here we fucking go https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/view-image/jpcmhcelnjdmblfmjabdeclccemkghjk

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:34:48 2018 No.3312541 >>3312528 Always working against consumers. Truly cyberpunk future stopped being fiction.

>>	Nose "I never troll" Bro(...) Fri Feb 16 06:34:53 2018 No.3312542 File: 427 KB, 1037x1134, Capture.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3312535 literally no need.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:35:13 2018 No.3312543 >>3312528 Damn.. what's the best place to find various fresh references? Preferably in high quality

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:35:53 2018 No.3312544 >>3312542 It's not a full sized image you cuck, I already tested it. Use >>3312540 Looks like someone already restored the button doing the same thing that the bookmarklet did.

>>	Nose "I never troll" Bro(...) Fri Feb 16 06:44:31 2018 No.3312550 >>3312544 Yes it is.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:44:52 2018 No.3312551 >>3312540 now we just need the option to click on the number dimensions to look for the same image in different sizes >>3312542 >It's not a full sized image you cuck, I already tested it. actually it is but its one click too many

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:48:14 2018 No.3312555 >>3312540 thanks for the virus

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:50:53 2018 No.3312561 File: 79 KB, 250x298, 1490204966006.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3312555 https://pastebin.com/F2K61EYJ The code looks clean to me to my inexperienced coder eyes, although I didn't write it.

>>	Nose "I never troll" Bro(...) Fri Feb 16 06:51:54 2018 No.3312562 >>3312551 thats still a thing though. Just reverse googly search and it offers you the size setting.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 06:56:34 2018 No.3312563 File: 93 KB, 1366x1246, 1490196719962.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3312550 It isn't. Compare the size of the image received to the one you get via the extension. The image dimensions are different.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 07:00:12 2018 No.3312565 >>3312543 second this

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 07:05:35 2018 No.3312568 File: 5 KB, 530x112, ok.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] Ok.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 07:13:09 2018 No.3312573 >>3312568 bing and other search engines also don't feature a "view image" button, but you can open the original website and take it from there. i typically avoid flickr as you can almost never get anything off of there.

>>	Nose "I never troll" Bro(...) Fri Feb 16 07:13:59 2018 No.3312574 >>3312563 I think youre opening the wrong one buddy. If youre confident thats not the case, give me your steps.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 07:19:26 2018 No.3312577 >>3312562 again, its one additional click one too many

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 07:40:12 2018 No.3312594 >>3312568 >duckduckgo Enjoy being fucked like the rest of us. At least google isn't pretending they're nice.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 07:49:40 2018 No.3312600 >>3312594 elaborate?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 09:16:51 2018 No.3312652 >>3312600 DDG is shady as fuck

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 09:22:58 2018 No.3312653 >>3312652 >shady as fuck again, elaborate

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 09:26:10 2018 No.3312654 >>3312573 >bing and other search engines also don't feature a "view image" button Bing does.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 09:29:41 2018 No.3312657 >>3312653 It tracks you just as much as google but unlike google it doesn't disclose it. It's owned by some weird company that has no sources of profit. There's no way they don't sell your data.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 09:37:56 2018 No.3312668 >>3312657 >It tracks you just as much as google Not the same anon, but do you have a source or some article about this?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 09:52:57 2018 No.3312675 >>3312532 >google changes something >its somehow worse now Why its always like this? Nothing has changed, they didnt learn jackshit from ruining over half of youtubes features Wow im just shocked that this shitty company hasnt gone bankrupt yet

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 09:57:32 2018 No.3312678 Skimmed through, but can't you just simply right click > view image anyway? What's the issue exacly?

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 09:58:49 2018 No.3312681 >>3312528 I noticed that, I fucking hate it

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 10:06:31 2018 No.3312690 >>3312678 Even if it's one more click, they're literally changing something to make it work slower for the user. It's a shit design choice.

>>

Anonymous Fri Feb 16 10:11:26 2018 No.3312693

>>3312675
Same as EVERYTHING else that becomes the industry standard or big enough to not care. They have to stop making changes for the positive because they create so much gravity that they spend 100% of the time dodging bullets and just trying to avoid all the controversy that gets sucked into them.
Google/youtube,
microsoft,
adobe,
Apple,
Intel,
Facebook,
Pretty much any AAA game studio,
They're all actively getting worse or stagnating because popularity and notoriety forces your focus to swing to bullshit.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 10:26:49 2018 No.3312701 >>3312668 You mean you can't tell what is shady just by the art style? >>3312675 >>3312693 The only reason they used to be good was to secure a dominant position. They never cared about the people.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 10:47:20 2018 No.3312711 >>3312678 doesn't show the full resolution image tho

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 10:51:02 2018 No.3312713 File: 8 KB, 250x250, 1512400516710s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3312701 >can't tell what is shady just by the art style? >>3312711 it.does

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 11:06:32 2018 No.3312725 >>3312713 right click "view image" shows the thumbnail size of the image for me.

>>

Anonymous Fri Feb 16 11:08:03 2018 No.3312728
File: 78 KB, 669x696, 1501877657246.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Downside to it you'll have to deal with all the bullshit the website that hosts the image with. The upside is that the rest of the world will have to deal with your bullshit to get to your images now.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 11:22:40 2018 No.3312740 https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/view-image/ and fixed

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 11:25:33 2018 No.3312741 Everything just gets worse Netflix changing desktop ui to shit mobile ui youtube just everything google just making reference collecting unnecessarily tedious.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 11:31:18 2018 No.3312746 >>3312725 Are you right clicking the thumbnail or simply not waiting for the expanded image to cache fully? I had the same problem as you, but I waited a bit and trying to open the image again and it was the full resolution.

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 11:34:08 2018 No.3312748 File: 1.43 MB, 2800x1232, 8._cht_190345_2800[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3312725 worked for me

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 11:47:18 2018 No.3312757 >>3312746 Thanks, you're right the caching was the problem, works now.

>>

Anonymous Fri Feb 16 11:50:26 2018 No.3312758

>>3312675
because when a company grows too fast it fucks up the ratio of actual competent people to useless idiots and since there are way too many idiots around doing nothing and since the competent people get overworked to hell the absolute worst people end up promoted to managment and then they use that position to ensure nobody threatens their power and they get other people into managment who are loyal to them because when you cant actually bring amything to the company you are going to be desperate to have as much power as you can.
Then competent people eventually get fed up and leave or get fired for beiing too competent or because the company is downsizing and they where too busy to suck up to someone
Thats why all big companies are shit

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 16:36:54 2018 No.3313000 >>3312758 >when a company grows too fast it fucks up the ratio of actual competent people to useless idiots like when they hired moot

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 17:22:20 2018 No.3313047 File: 725 KB, 1205x566, googlebtfo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >2010 >still using Google

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 17:35:51 2018 No.3313076 >>3313047 Yandex is the way to go bruh

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 18:55:14 2018 No.3313148 >inb4 4 years from now google will die out

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 19:13:00 2018 No.3313165 >>3313148 i wish

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 19:14:50 2018 No.3313167 File: 390 KB, 601x584, 1518455877292.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3312740 >firefox

>>	Anonymous Fri Feb 16 21:55:44 2018 No.3313291 >>3312528 We're going to need more reference threads

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 17 03:31:34 2018 No.3313535 File: 13 KB, 250x250, 652.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3312540 >>3312535

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 17 16:35:18 2018 No.3314157 >>3312740 I downloaded this one, but it kinda sucks. Sometimes it opens a different image from the one you clicked

>>	Anonymous Sat Feb 17 17:03:49 2018 No.3314190 File: 113 KB, 1920x741, Capture.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 20 02:41:24 2018 No.3317114 >>3312528 damn

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 20 02:57:12 2018 No.3317131 Startpage has a view image function still. But yeah, this really sucks. I went to Getty images and sent them a "fuck you" email. Google just keeps getting worse.

>>	Anonymous Tue Feb 20 22:36:41 2018 No.3317958 >>3312563 You're probably trying to open up the image, when its thumbnail hasnt even finished loading. Once it's finished, you can open it up in a new tab with the normal resolution.