/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Show them the original photo?

>if I flip it surely people won't notice
lmfao always with this

>>3138835
Link the pictures you study when you do studies, goddamn fucktard, if you don't do that, you deserve all kinds of shit.

>>3138835
Learn to give proper attribution. If it's a study of another painting, write "after (original artist/work)" on it. If it's a study of a photo, link to it.

Copying isn't a crime, but failing to give attribution is poor form and misrepresentation.

Keep your studies to yourself and only post "original" work.

>>3138851
this

>>3138848
>Copying isn't a crime

Well technically in most cases it is, including photos you didn't take yourself and didn't pay for the license to use.

Just depends on if the original author has the money and willingness to sue.

>>3138844
it's to cheat Google search

>>3138835
that fucking jaw
ewww

>>3138835
Stand your ground and show proof.
When you're going against bigger artists, it can be really hard (or impossible) to get them to truly acknowledge what they did. Even worse, their shitty fans always come crawling to your doorstep trying to stir up shit and whiteknight them. (Or worse, worse they might be selling the copycatted pic.) Keeping your mouth shut might seem to be the better option, but artists that are dense enough to post copied images have more than one skeleton in their closet.
If you are a big-name artist, it's important to be aware of the impact you have by opening posting copied work. There's nothing wrong with studying the techniques of other artists, but please don't do this shit in the open for everyone to see.

At first I wasn't convinced, but look at the reference photo. The "copied" art uses the same reflected light shape in her eyes as the "original", instead of using the same shape as the reference.

The artist copied the person's art, not the photo.

You're wrong OP. You're all fucking wrong. Only I am right. I am God. Worship me.

>>3138883
why delet

>>3138835
since you drew from a photo, who's to say he didn't draw from the same photo?

>>3138887
Because I found the actual original photo and I was the stupid one lol

Ya it's just as op says

>>3138835
to make it 100% obvious

>>3138897
the "fake" is more original than her photocopy, because it changed the hair, clothing, and background.

>>3138835

>>3138869
Technically, no it isn't.

There's a general concept in law that the courts "do not trifle with trivial matters." A study of someone's painting or photograph would be a trivial matter. Also don't forget that a study is inherently an academic exercise, as is posting it to invite critique.

This is why studies should always be labelled as such.

>>3138897
>>3138835
Art is in a really sorry state these days. This shit is the epitome of art for pretty much any normie.

>>3138904
i bet these girls have hundreds of followers and likes. i bet everyone tells them they're fucking amazing and talented

>>3138897
she practically copied the photo. what the fuck is she complaining about

>>3138910
The artist in the OP has 26 thousand watchers

>>3138917
your mom has 26 thousand dicks in her ass

>>3138917
>meanwhile I have a dick and am grinding boxes like an autist

>>3138917
wonder how many of her drawings are just paintovers

>>3138835
It's okay, /ic/ told me great artists steal all the time and no one really cares! Just look at Ilya. You're just imagining all this shit being flung your way.

>>3138908
>>3138908
this

why are people so obsessed with copying celebrity portraits?

>>3138904
Actually I think the one on the left is a copy of the one in the middle, both of them have fucked up facial proportions. But fucking coping a photo and complaining about what is the original is pathetic.

>>3138910
>>3138922
She clearly says that that is a study of a photo and attaches it. Unlike the other artist in OP.

https://ayyasap.deviantart.com/art/Miranda-Kerr-study-and-process-608784591

>Giving attention to some whore who's tracing photos

Shit like this is only a problem between bottom feeders on bullshit sites like DA. This is not a major issue.

>>3138983
This. Wanna protect yourself from drama quern art thieves? Have a real art job.

>You will never experience a hoard of beta orbiters white knighting you while another hoard of jelly autists flooding your page with views and even having a thread made on /ic/

Why live.

>>3139030
Work harder, as a woman she had a much harder time than you getting to where she is today.

>>3139032
>as a woman
>she had a much harder time
>getting internet whiteknights and attention

what fucking planet do you live anon?

>>3138961
it seems like the left is using the middle one as a reference, and the middle one just liquified the photo and then straight up traced over it

>>3139032
are you retarded

>>3139046
>the middle one just liquified the photo and then straight up traced over it
kek, give up on art anon, you're NGMI. you're too easily impressed by something as mundane as an ok portrait study.

>>3139043
The planet where men are naturally more driven and visually-oriented, and don't have to pretend that 26,000 furries with no money constitutes a business?

>>3139055
what gibberish is this? who's talking about furries and business?

>>3138835
ayyasap made it very clear her art was a study. art__yuyu on the other hand did not. If you try putting either one's art and overlay it on to the original image, neither of them line up. However if you line up yuyu's to ayya it does in fact line up quite well. (If you ignore the image being flipped and hair color change to hide it was a traced image of a study). This is honestly laughable, just look up art__yuyu on instagram. They have a history of blatant tracing and paintovers. Their works constantly change in qaulity and look like absolute shit. Even in the image you originally posted it's obvious she painted over and edited ayya's work. If you can't tell they simply sharpened and changed the hue of the lip shine you are severely autistic. Ayya was right on this one, too bad she retracted her claims because some Russian slag tried pretending her work was completely independent from hers even though her drawing looks nothing like a study of the reference picture, but a direct rip from ayya's (which her study has stark differences from the reference picture)

>>3138835
that artist suck, same face syndrome, same fucking nose, disusting

>>3138898
The fake is a paintover of her study (look at the eyebrows, what are the chances if you're using the original photo?).

>>3138835
>How do you protect yourself from scumbags like this?

I date and sign all my Bargue Plates.
Seriously just always credit the original then no one can accuse you of anything without looking dumb.

>>3139115
Apparently it was art for this girl. God knows why anyone would do a portrait of someone and use someone else's photo as a reference.

>>3139066
>I'm illiterate and have no ambition

She worked extremely hard to get nowhere. A man would have gotten SOMEWHERE.

>>3138955
why were the old masters so obsessed with drawing portraits of some noblewomen sluts?

>>3138997
>>3138997

We literally have a thread on the first page where a Marvel illustrator stole and painted over someone elses illustration.

>>3139132
Because they were paid to do it and nobility were the best paying clients right after the church.

>>3139145
And celebfags are probably the best-paying clients nowadays, so nothing really changed

>>3138835
Bitch thinks she owns a celebrity's likeness because she traced her face? Maybe someone should tell her (((manager))).

>>3139175
I think it's more of the fact that they clearly painted over her study and they didn't even bother liquifying the eyebrows, etc.

>>3138835
I literally don't give a flying fuck about DeviantArt drama, and neither should you.

>>3138835
both are total shit. no one in the world gives a real fuck about either of them.. so what are your inflated egos trying to protect.

>>3138835
this study is of such little consequence that it hardly matters except that it exposes the thief of having extremely poor character. On the other hand, the original artist posting this photo study proudly and signing it as if some study is something to be proud of as a stand-alone work of art is laughable.

>>3138910
Not to whiteknight, but the right one show some painting skill at least. No creativity and anatomical skill, but to paint like that you need to go a long way.

Id be mad if it was an original creation that really had my input

>>3139436
>the thief

wow this board is completely retarded.

are they proud she gave redhead spongebob teeth? theyre mad you "copied" better lol

>>3138835
Link the shared reference photo and enjoy the Streisand effect upon the accuser.

>>3139774
>>3139888
See
>>3139118
>>3139115
>>3139098

>how to protect yourself from scumbags like this?
make your own shit from your imagination
don't use references only to trace over them

>>3138835
Making deviations to "call out" other users is literally against the rules, and explicitly sited in DA's rules. Report them to DA and they will take action.

>>3138846
>>3138848
Fair use does not require attribution.

>>3140859
>Fair use does not require attribution.

It's not a legal matter, but one of courtesy and avoiding minor shitstorms like this one.

>>3140859
stealing copyrighted material is not covered under fair use. Especially when you profit from it commercially. There have been legal precidents, like the photographer who took the photo of Obama that was used in the Hope stencil, who took the artist to court and won.

>>3139115
>The fake is a paintover of her study
Yeah I realized 5 seconds after making my post.