/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2843769
It feels like we can still be equal.

>>2843769
This doesn't belong on /ic/. Fuck off.

>>2843772
Don't take your frustration out on me.

>>2843769
>googles "tetrachromat art"
>all subpar
>mythbusted.jpg

>>2843785
Pretty sure you can't paint worth a shit so, yeah, better than your stuff.

>>2843786
Also you can't say it's subpar if you can't completely see all the colors the artist conjured.

is fourth cone better or worse than ligameme

>>2843789
ligameme is a brand of nosebro so that automatically makes it inferior

>>2843769
What does that even mean "more colors"? It's not like there exist some unknown, vibrant primary colors. The only colors those people could see more than others are millions of subtle hue and chroma variations which is ultimately completely pointless.

>>2843797
>It's not like there exist some unknown
Except there are unknown colors that don't "exist". Just because you can't see it doesn't mean it's not there.

>>2843797
>It's not like there exist some unknown, vibrant primary colors

also
>talking about "primary colors" in context of sight
read the sticky

no i don't have the sharingan sr

>>2843787
then its basicly a bunch of people smelling each others farts and irrelevant :^)

>>2843946
Wanna know what else is irrelevant? Your pitiful existence (^:

>>2843769
But even if you have that superhuman vision memegene or whatever, your paintings would still look the same to the rest of people without it. What's the point?

>>2843949
:^) No u (^:

>>2843799
Cool. But they don't exist in any digital color mode nor real life color pigments either, so why does it matter again if you see them?

>>2843978
>But they don't exist in any digital color mode nor real life color pigments either
I know /ic/ is stupid, but you cannot be this stupid, can you? Get some coffee and come back to me after you reread your post.

>>2843985
>
Can you even name a single display not using sRGB?

>>2843769
What's the point of being able to see more colors as an artist when your audience won't be able to?

>>2844014
It makes you a naturally born painter. Something >>2843992 fails to grasp.

>>2843985
Are you literally retarded or just trolling? Do you actually believe you can somehow mix some secret color that normal people can't see? What do think they see in place of that color?

>>2844022
this is retarded
women see more colors than men as well, are they inherently better painters?

>>2844022

>tfw values matter more than color
https://youtu.be/bBHPSUfnpXA?t=55m29s

>>2844061
>women see more colors than men as well, are they inherently better painters?
Uh, that's the whole point cpt. obvious?
>>2844060
something you cannot see how is that hard to understand

>>2843787

It's safe to say that they don't see colors we don't, but they see colors better. Where we see dark greens, browns etc, they might derive a greater variety of color. It almost seems like tetrachromats see life with the saturation turned up. All of their artworks are shrieking and give me a headache. I like my greys, they allow colors room to breathe.

None of this really matters, of course. It's a spook like the ligameme. Value is most important.

>>2843949
Fuck off Derek

>>2843785
I decided to go ahead and to Google it.

It all looks like Thomas Kinkade shit.

>>2843978
>wants to paint
>doesn't even understand what color is

>>2844162
You are just too dumb to understand the point. There exists no medium, digital or traditional, that allows you to mix some special, unknown, vibrant color regular people can't see. EVERY color you see, everyone else can see as well unless they have some form of color blindness. The only thing that can vary is how many hue and chroma changes you can notice.

>>2844183
>The only thing that can vary is how many hue and chroma changes you can notice.
At least you admit something as an advantage. Might as well admit you're completely wrong at this point and born stupid because you pretend to miss the whole point completely.

Also, to some degree, many people do have some form of color blindness. You can try the various color detection exercise roaming the net to test your ability to see color. To people who have four cones, they can ace these test without breaking a sweat.

>>2844190
Not true. A lot of 4 cone people can't even see the colors better than regular people.

I might but I don't really have a away to find out for certain and I don't think there is really much advantage to it since if your art is being viewed and judged by trichromats who are about 98% of the world then it's not like they will be able to appreciate the extra colors I put in anyway.
Also I am pretty sure those tetrachromat art pictures are more of a hoax of sorts. The person making it probably just shoved as many colors the possibly could onto a canvas to give some sort of illusion to people that they can see more color when really if you can see so many colors you would probably want to pull back a bit more than usual since you are already assaulted with too much as is.

>>2843769
Me encanta <3

>>2844597
now you're not even making any sense

>>2843797
>what is light spectrum

>>2843776
Kek

>>2843951

This
>use 6 gorillion colors on a single painting
>no one can perceive it
>you still lack anatomy
>you are fired for being slow, overpolishing turds whose polish is not perceivable by 99.9% of humans

>>2845183
>you still lack anatomy

Good to know if still lack anatomy you can't make beautiful works. Truly the highlight of skill everyone must know. Tell me, whom did you learn this valuable information from, my fellow /ic/ncubator baby?

>>2845192

>shitting on the anatomy masters
You do not belong here, get out

Also stop cherrypicking, the point was that painting with 9000 colors is useless if you want to hold a living by painting

>>2845201

Where in my post am I shitting on anatomy masters? Did you legit just wake up?
>Also stop cherrypicking, the point was that painting with 9000 colors is useless if you want to hold a living by painting
Sounds to me you have a case of fox and sour grapes.

>spark
>ligameme
>now the fourth cone

and I am sure I forgot at least 2

>>2845258
List of valid and approved (by me) /ic/ memes as of 2017
>Ligameme*
>The fourth cone
>The spark
>Early start (–16 years old)
>Neuroplasticity
>Eidetic memory
>Autistic concentration
>ISPF personality type
>Aphantasia
>Visual snow
>Poor motor skills
>Grant Cardone
>NGMI Chan
>Late start (20+ years old)
>Kodyboy's type of autism
>Proko Kangaroo

>>2845275
Hm, though I'd remove visual snow. We can't have 2 visual memes coexisiting.

>>2845275
where is merc.wip?

>>2845281
anyone visiting here for the first hour will know it

>>2845275
3 more of those seem to be redundant

also that isn't a complete list

>>2843769
TFW partially color blind... I would settle for just the normal visible color range... :( Feels bad mang.

>>2844680
look it up
it shows that in practice, majority of people with 4 cones can't differentiate hues any better than regular people

same with the mantis shrimp not being able to see as much colors as they thought it would before testing it

>>2845284
Not true, sometimes /ic/ is slow and no one has posted it. Right now there's about two in separate threads.

>>2845275
/ic/ has the best memes