[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 128 KB, 1107x1023, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525136 No.2525136 [Reply] [Original]

Why are most famous artists men? Where are the women?

>> No.2525139

Who is Vagina O'Keeffe

>> No.2525141
File: 519 KB, 833x1024, ArtemisiaGentileschi--JudithBeheadingHolofernes1620-21.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525141

>>2525136
>Why are most famous artists men?
Historically it has been much more difficult for women to pursue careers in fine art.
>Where are the women?
All throughout art history.

>> No.2525142

>>2525136
something something mysogonistic something tumblr something I dont fucking know. They don't try hard enough maybe? Its not like its a field where your judged off your sex when you bring your portfolio in, you're judged off your work. So not getting a job is nobody's fault but your own

>> No.2525143

Because men have historically been more pressured to do something with their lives. Women always had the fallback option of being a housewife.

>> No.2525146
File: 254 KB, 1600x818, ROSA BONHEUR - La labourage nivermais, le sombrage - Óleo sobre tela - 134 x 260 - Museu d'Orsay - 1849.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525146

>>2525142
>Its not like its a field where your judged off your sex when you bring your portfolio in, you're judged off your work
I was young and naive once. What is implicit bias? And gender played a much larger role in earlier eras.

>> No.2525147
File: 128 KB, 1118x1536, a-mi-voix-1958.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525147

>>2525143
women have been expected to be housewives even if they would prefer to be artists. in earlier times, women couldn't even make use of nude figure drawing because it was considered immodest, plus the whole not being taken seriously thing.

>> No.2525149

Somehow everyone in threads like this is magically an expert on women in history.

Please, everyone: Kill yourselves.

>> No.2525150

>>2525149
A+ contribution lad.

>> No.2525151
File: 1.34 MB, 2476x2000, Hjalmar_Lundbohm_1892.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525151

>>2525149
fucking faggots, knowing things about stuff

>> No.2525152

>>2525142
>judged purely off of work
Women were discriminated in the workplace until about the 80's, even still it does still have a bit of traction.
Important galleries were always lead by a group of old men who had been raised to think of women as objects, commissioners the same. If Van Gogh had a hard time getting into one of these galleries, imagine what it would have been like for a women painter at the time.

>> No.2525154

This offends me as a vegan transgender atheist who vapes and crossfits 4 times a week and im also a feminist as I identify myself as a pastafarian apache helicopter dog mega multi combo god of hyper death and if you dont agree with me You're an ignorant arrogant globaphobic sexist lesbian

>> No.2525155

>>2525146
>Give in 2 portfolios anonymously
>1 is by a male the other by a female
>The judge picks the male just because

Doubt it, prove me that this sort of discrmination happens specifically in the art field.

>> No.2525156

>>2525154
XD
>>>/b/

>> No.2525158
File: 57 KB, 604x377, 1458226596816.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525158

>>2525154
>mfw I can't tell if this is even satire anymore.

>> No.2525159

>>2525154
Briebart's comment section exists for the sole purpose of containing people like you.

>> No.2525160

Women are simply inferior. No matter how much you talk or chase your rights. You are weaker and you will never be accepted by men as equals. Never. Using your pussy for power only goes so far. The world is built on power not picking berries. Tips fedora

>> No.2525161

>>2525156
Found the Apache helicopter.

>> No.2525163
File: 1.44 MB, 3004x4184, Labille-Guiard,_Self-portrait_with_two_pupils.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525163

>>2525155
when are portfolios anonymous? prove to me that this is the standard today, then prove this has been the standard throughout art history.

>> No.2525165

>>2525161
straight white male (sans fedora). good guess though.

>> No.2525167

Because white men only acknowledge white men. Coincidentally, who are all the ones in higher up positions with power?

White men of course.

>> No.2525169

>>2525167
Yes. Every other race is inferior. I have no problem with any color, but as I am white, I would like to see the white race be superior. Thats all there is to it. Its human nature.

>> No.2525170

>>2525141
This.

>> No.2525171
File: 205 KB, 420x426, 1447122313278.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525171

>>2525167
>who are all the ones in higher up positions with power?
>White men of course.

Nice try Shlomo but you're not fooling anyone here.

>> No.2525172

>>2525169
but we're generally talking about men and women of the same race in a given society (if we're looking at the history of Western art), so there are no genetic pressures to exclude women. purely social.

>> No.2525174

>>2525173
/r9k/ is leaking into other boards

>> No.2525175

>>2525173
You could thank your otherkin apache helicopters you flaming faggot.

>> No.2525176
File: 92 KB, 995x1200, portrait-of-artist-s-husband-the-painter-antonio-zucchi-1781.jpg!HD.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525176

>>2525175
your apache helicopter meme has absolutely nothing to do with this thread

>> No.2525178
File: 37 KB, 400x386, 1459782911727.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525178

>mfw /v/ /b/ drawthread kiddies have ruined this board

>> No.2525180

>>2525178
>frogposting

Back to r9k to you.

>> No.2525181

>>2525167
>jews
>white

>> No.2525182

>>2525136
>Why are most famous artists men? Where are the women?

http://www.foxnews.com/health/2014/02/27/study-reveals-why-autism-is-more-common-in-males.html

>> No.2525184

>>2525172
Women are weak.

>> No.2525186

This thread proves this board is dead. OP starts a thread basically about art history and it quickly turns into HURRR JEWS, MEN > WOMEN, BACK TO THE KITCHEN

>> No.2525191

>>2525186
I know, /pol/tards ruin everything. Literally the new furries.

>> No.2525192

>>2525191
>muh internet boogeyman!

>> No.2525194

>>2525142
I have literally been turned away from a portfolio review because the reviewer didn't think I drew what I was showing him. In his own words when I came back the next year he admitted it's because I'm female. A good percentage of times I've gone to portfolio reviews I've been asked "did you really draw this?" as they look me up and down. I haven't let that shit stop me but it does happen.

>> No.2525196

>>2525192
The /pol/tard is immunized against all dangers: one may call him faggot, shtiposter, neckbeard, virgin, it all runs off him like water off a raincoat. But call him a /pol/tard and you will be astonished at how he recoils, how injured he is, how he suddenly shrinks back: “I’ve been found out."

Face it nigger, nobody outside of your echo chamber likes you and your ilk.

>> No.2525198

>>2525182
This doesn't take into account misdiagnosis. Since women are believed to rarely have autism, most doctors don't even consider it. I've been laughed at when I suggested it to my therapist, because "girls are good with people", but got my diagnosis after seeing 4 different doctors.
Also, not all artists are autistic, obviously. Other than that, I don't wish to participate in this thread's discussion because we all know it's gonna turn into a /pol/ shitfest

>> No.2525199

>>2525194
No, sexism doesn't exist, go back to kitchen, you stupid feminazi lelz

>> No.2525205

>>2525196
>>2525198
/pol/ has absolutely nothing to do with it you realize you faggots do this shit to yourselves right? /pol/ doesn't come in here and shove "redpills" down your throats just admit it you guys are that bad you are r9k incarnate but in a lesser level.

>> No.2525206

>>2525186
>>2525191
Stop glorifying women you fucking cucks

>> No.2525208

>>2525154
9gag is here. Go back.

>> No.2525212

>>2525194
What was he? White? Latino?

>> No.2525216

>>2525154
>and crossfits 4 times a week
Lost it

>> No.2525219

>>2525216
What, your dignity?

>> No.2525220

nowadays most of the renowed fine artists, photographers and performers are women. talking about +70% here

>> No.2525244
File: 108 KB, 1075x788, judith.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525244

>>2525141
Gentileschi's Judith/Holofernes is so much better than Caravaggio's.

>> No.2525256
File: 68 KB, 633x758, 1444209848870.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525256

DELET THIS FUCKING THREAD

>> No.2525269

>>2525244
She looks like she's just realized she's making a mistake in chopping a dude's head off halfway through.

like

>ooooh, shit, wait, this can't be right. Damn, that's not going back on is it. Better keep going I guess.

>> No.2525272

Men have better spatial awareness which is also why they are better drivers.

>> No.2525281

Women simply have less artistic ability on average . Also likely less interested in art on average.

>> No.2525283

>>2525272
Spatial awareness is something that can be trained.

Also women are better at distinguishing colours, etc. But that's something which you can also train.

>> No.2525285

>>2525194
>and then everyone stood up and clapped because this totally happened

>> No.2525289

>>2525244
I dunno man, the faces are way, way more expressive and the pic is better composed

Gentileschi's one is still amazing though, I'm just nitpicking at this point

>> No.2525575

women in general aren't as good at things as men

"woman is the nigger of the world" - John Lennon

>> No.2525591

>>2525194
This.
Had the same thing happen to me, even one of them questioned "You want to present your work so you can prove a point missy? Don't bother if you would never be 'man' enough". Still not giving up looking for a promotion as it has been a decade of no luck so far, so keep trying until someone actually accepts that your a passionate artist. If you complain about it they won't take you seriously because you're a hole, and dicks sees holes as inferior. Sad reality, but never give up.

>> No.2525614

>>2525281
this is completely untrue
at most they are less likely to pursue anything to the level of mastery

>> No.2525615

>>2525194
which country do you live in

>> No.2525643

>>2525149
It doesn't take an expert to know that women were kept out of the art world for most of western history. Thats why some women in the past used male names. There are also some known cases of art being removed from the western canon because it was found out that the artist was a woman....

>> No.2525644

>>2525206
>He doesn't know what cuck means
Fuck off back to /pol/

>> No.2525645

anyone got that copy pasta about how all art is phallic?

>> No.2525653

>>2525139
MORE LIKE VIRGINIA O'QUEEF AMIRIGHT GUYS?

>> No.2525661

>>2525591
arent the majority of some art schools girls an women though (at least here in the states) i remember the majority of the magnet art kids at my highschool were girls to

>> No.2525722

>pilled
>cucks
>jews
>autism

Oh look another thread ruined by /pol/. Really that board needs to go, it's worse than /b/ and the posters there really are the worst. Way to kill an art thread yet again.

>> No.2525764

>>2525661
Yes, women in general also do better at school. But it's still not as acceptable as it seems to have a career, to be a leader and master of your skill. Of course it's getting better and better, but it's still not rare meeting people who don't respect you because of your gender.

>> No.2525793
File: 313 KB, 709x443, 1459500390947.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525793

>>2525167
>what are jews

>> No.2525794

this won't mean anything here, but the two biggest deviantart users are both chinese girls

>> No.2525805

>>2525141
>>2525147
>>2525152
>>2525643
>Historically it has been much more difficult for women to pursue careers in fine art.
Sure, women often had it hard. But if you listened to something more than feminist propaganda, you would know that men often had it just as hard.
Da Vinci couldn't get higher education because he was a son of a peasant, but it didn't stop him from gitting gud.

>>2525136
It's common knowledge that women have smaller brains than men, and that they stop developing (or, as they like to call it, they reach "maturity") much sooner than men. Most of them is simply incapable of having enough self-discipline, perseverance and curiosity that's needed to reach mastery.

>> No.2525821

>>2525805
Okay and what of in the case of women who are highly skilled in ways that surpass men but still can't gain recognition because they are female?

Cite some sources for your statements dude because everything you say sounds like total bullshit

>> No.2525823

>>2525136
I think at least a part of it is due to the same reason there aren't as many successful women in art these days. Men and woman are a bit different in that the majority of women are of average talent, average intellitgence with very few being either super dumb and worthless and very few being very talented and smart.

Now with men the average is much more spread out, there are many super dumb men, many average men, and many very smart and very talented men.

Tldr there are more talented male artists out there. Combine that with the blah blah womyn opression and there you have it.

>> No.2525825
File: 131 KB, 1280x720, 1440823013621.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525825

>>2525136
male dominant society

>> No.2525829

>>2525821
>women who are highly skilled in ways that surpass men but still can't gain recognition because they are female
They don't exist.

>> No.2525832

>>2525136
Because we keep letting them get away with mediocrity.
The day women stop getting jobs, attention and affection because they have a vagina and start having to work to be noticed in a population of 7 billion, maybe they'll start gitting gud.

>> No.2525833

>>2525152
Nigger the most important gallery in modern art history is owned and directed by a woman.

>> No.2525834
File: 175 KB, 680x763, Laurel_D._Austin_02a.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525834

>>2525136
Laurel D. Austin, she is my art god

>> No.2525837

>>2525167
Your nose is poking through the curtains.

>> No.2525841

The only difference is when men get told they're shit and not gonna make. They go back to their desk and keep drawing. When women get told they're shit and not gonna make it they go crying to tumblr because the world is literally raping them.

>> No.2525843

>>2525832
underrated

>> No.2525846

>>2525764
It's not our fucking fault that women hate other women and keep bullying each other.
If you're not getting hired it was because the bitch in HR doesn't want sexual competition in her territory, not because you failed the interviewer's banter test.

>> No.2525867

>>2525821
GIVE ME ONE FUCKING EXAMPLE YOU HUGE FAGGOT. I honestly just wish i could fuck people like you up on the street. You are fucking worthless.

>> No.2525869

Moot bringing back /pol/ was a huge mistake. It's easily the worse board of this cite.

>> No.2525870

>>2525869

/pol/ is the containment board. Before /pol/ every board on 4chan was infested with stormfront.

>> No.2525872

>>2525870
I think it's stupid and everyone who goes on that board is stupid. They 100% think Jews, blacks and women are behind everything and evil. They really think this.

This people need real lives and need to go outside.

>> No.2525880

>>2525870
that's just a lie.
that's like saying the anime thread contains the animefags or that the pornthread contains the pornfags.
they don't. it never works out that way. they only bring more of the same with them.

>> No.2525882

>>2525194
Are you even capable of producing art? You have nothing interesting to say. Everything you do is a thinly-veiled ploy for attention. You lack the worldview to produce art. Everything you do is cold and soulless, just like you. Do women even feel love?

>> No.2525900

>>2525821
>women who are highly skilled in ways that surpass men but still can't gain recognition because they are female?
Name even a single example. They don't exist.

>> No.2525902

>>2525872
Going outside doesn't change things, there always were and always will be ignorant bigots.

>> No.2525909

>>2525902
>le bigots XD
Nice meme. Explain to me how Jews are less than 2% of the American population yet have almost complete control over the news you watch, the newspapers you read, the movies you see, and the Supreme Court you abide by.

"Today, seven Jewish Americans run the vast majority of US television networks, the printed press, the Hollywood movie industry, the book publishing industry, and the recording industry. Most of these industries are bundled into huge media conglomerates run by the following seven individuals:

Gerald Levin, CEO and Director of AOL Time Warner

Michael Eisner, Chairman and CEO of the Walt Disney Company

Edgar Bronfman, Sr., Chairman of Seagram Company Ltd

Edgar Bronfman, Jr, President and CEO of Seagram Company Ltd and head of Universal Studios

Sumner Redstone, Chairman and CEO of Viacom, Inc

Dennis Dammerman, Vice Chairman of General Electric

Peter Chernin, President and Co-COO of News Corporation Limited

Those seven Jewish men collectively control ABC, NBC, CBS, the Turner Broadcasting System, CNN, MTV, Universal Studios, MCA Records, Geffen Records, DGC Records, GRP Records, Rising Tide Records, Curb/Universal Records, and Interscope Records.

Three out of nine Supreme Court Justices are Jewish."

Just a coincidence, right?

>> No.2525910

>>2525909
Just parroting /pol/ again huh?

>> No.2525913

>>2525870
>Before /pol/ every board on 4chan was infested with stormfront.

You mean like now? /pol/ doesn't contain shit.

>> No.2525914
File: 22 KB, 804x743, 1448232148698.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525914

>>2525909

>> No.2525915

>>2525163
Never said that, it was what people call a hypothetical.

>> No.2525918

>>2525805
>men often had it just as hard
well history doesnt support that because of the obvious

>> No.2525919

>>2525910
>Have evidence in front of you
>HURR DURR ITS /POL/ LOOK THE BOOGEYMAN

>> No.2525922
File: 429 KB, 399x614, 1462725133052.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525922

>>2525910
>>2525914
These are not arguments. See how I made a claim and then supported it with statistics and factual evidence? Now it's your turn.

>> No.2525923

>>2525919
Post your work.

>> No.2525930

>>2525909
Because they're educated and competent people in general? And yes, you could say women are in general less educated and competent, but that doesn't mean all of them are.

>> No.2525931

>>2525909
>jews suck because they're better than me
>women suck because I'm better than them

ok

>> No.2525932

>>2525930
Okay, so we agree on the reason as to there being more famous male artists than female artists: not oppression, not patriarchy, but the simple fact that men are, on average, the more competent artists.

Thanks. That's all I really wanted to hear.

>> No.2525933

>>2525910

>Gets information about current control of affairs
>Information is neatly laid out and easy to google to confirm for self.

MYUH MYUH ITS JUST THE /pol/ CIRCLEJERK MYUH

Ive seen a lot of people give a hella shit to these guys because they're assholes, but being an asshole is not synonymous with being wrong.

>> No.2525937

>>2525932
There are reasons for it though, it isn't some genetic magical talent.

>> No.2525939

>>2525937
Correct. Its just the proven fact that men tend to take more risks for the greater payout than women.

I think we can agree that being an artist, and solely so, is a pretty fucking risky move.

>> No.2525941

>>2525939
Thats why if you look in japan where you can leave off being a manga artist there are fuck ton of women working in it

>> No.2525948

Jesus does this board not have any mods? Why is this thread still here? Why the fuck is this board allowed to erode away like this?

>> No.2525952

>>2525941
More than men?

bby pls

>> No.2525954

>>2525941
Lol

"Leave off"

Im guess you mean live off. You really can't unless you make it big with some heap of garbage like Naruto.

>> No.2525958
File: 18 KB, 300x285, 1460926058501.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525958

>>2525948
>OMG THIS THREAD IS TRIGGERING ME LIKE HOW IS IT STILL UP I CAN'T EVEN LIKE WOW

>> No.2525964

>>2525937
>this much damage control
I'll bite. What are those reasons if not some patriarchal conspiracy, not oppression (as already established), and not, as you now claim, biology? What's left?

>> No.2525967

>>2525964
Witchcraft.

Probably not that.

>> No.2525974

"white" men

>> No.2525975

>>2525909
So?

>> No.2525977

>>2525975
It must be physically painful for someone to be this fucking dumb.

>> No.2525978

>>2525136
Everywhere.

>> No.2525980

>>2525915
That's not just any old hypothetical though, that's a key detail that would change whether or not the gender is known.
Prove that your hypothetical scenario is actually in practice in the real world first, since that's still an argument you are putting on the table that needs addressing due to the importance of what personal details are disregarded through anonymous submissions.

>> No.2525987

>>2525909
Don't worry lad, i know the protocols.

>> No.2525988

>>2525977
Wew lad.

>> No.2525996
File: 30 KB, 353x296, image.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525996

>> No.2525999
File: 1.13 MB, 156x183, 1461817480677.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2525999

>>2525996

>> No.2526001

>>2525999
I'm sorry I don't go to /pol/, I don't get your stupid memes and jokes.

>> No.2526003

>>2525872
there are some people with fairly moderate views there. A good bit of them think the stormfront people are idiots as well. There's more people on /pol/ than Nazis.

>> No.2526010

>>2526001
That's okay, your triggered asshurt is joke enough.

>> No.2526014

You can replace famous /artist/ with any profession for this question. Women are less successful because there are few women artists that have talent and pursue it. Done.

>> No.2526019

>>2526014
There is not nearly enough SJWfag fuel in there,

>> No.2526020

>>2525136
because art is worthless and that's what men excels at.

>> No.2526030

>>2525867
>Being this edgy
Stay frosty m8

>> No.2526033

>>2525922
>pol can't back up their shitposting
Come on guys, we await your jpgs

>> No.2526035

>>2525909
>watch hollywood flick
>sudden urge to reproduce with a brown woman and kill all whiteys

Now I understand why. Thank you, /pol/. I am now le redpilled.

>> No.2526059

>>2525805
>most of them is simply incapable
what were you saying about brain size?

>> No.2526060

Fuck, I actually have something to contribute to this thread but I don't have the book I need to reference at hand.
But basically, being an art student in the past was pure hell. Todays 'starving artists' live in luxury by comparison.
There were some art clubs where students and artists gathered once a week and were served a meal. For many of them this was the only hot meal they had in a week.
Not to mention the competition was brutal, few people made it. They didn't want women to expose themselves to this, not only because they didn't want more competition, but they simply wanted to shelter women from the miserable existence of the struggling artist.
There still were and are plenty of female artists though, but I believe women have had plenty of other ways to be creative, such as weaving, sewing and various crafts.
Art doesn't have to be confined to sculpting and oil painting, but maybe we should ask ourselves why we hold certain art forms in higher regard.

>> No.2526067

>>2526060

Because they require a higher degree of skill, that's why.

>> No.2526085
File: 10 KB, 240x240, 1444530965627.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2526085

>>2525136
>125 replies and 19 images omitted.

Nice bait OP, nice bait!

>> No.2526087

>>2525805
>S-stop talking about her problems, we have them too! STOP!

>> No.2526096

>>2525591
>>2525194
Do you really expect people to believe that men are some kind of comic villains? At least come up with some statistics.

>> No.2526099

>>2525821
>Cite some sources for your statements dude
Could you be any more of a hypocrite?

>> No.2526101

>>2525909
>whites dominated black because they are superior to them
>jews dominate everyone because ???
apex kek

>> No.2526140

>>2526033
I'm from /pol/, you fucking retard. So far, I'm the only one to have backed up my claims.

>> No.2526145

>>2526087
>falsely claim a problem is exclusive to women
>get corrected--both genders actually face this problem equally
>make fun of men anyway to save face
This is a special kind of stupidity. Then again, you are a woman.

>> No.2526156

>>2526101
>jews dominate everyone because they have the highest average IQ of any race and are a very resourceful and fiercely united, exclusionary people by default
Fixed. You don't even know the argument you're chortling at. How dumb can you get?

>> No.2526157

>>2525805
>men have it just as hard as women in art

That's the equivalent of saying that abled bodied people have it just as hard as disabled body people when it comes to finding a job.

Yeah, no shit Sherlock. Everyone has problems finding work, but if it comes down to hiring an abled body person v. a disabled person who has the better fucking chance of getting the job? Not the disabled person even if they both are equally qualified for the job & can do it just as fine.

What's so funny about your post is then you go on to claim that women have smaller brains than men as if that's supposed to mean that they are less intelligent after stating that stupid shit in the beginning of your post.

>> No.2526173
File: 51 KB, 287x596, 1462772282993.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2526173

>>2526157
>comparing being a woman to being disabled
Do you live on the same planet as the rest of us? Women do not have a harder time than men in finding a job. If anything, thanks to "diversity" quotas that force companies to hire and promote women regardless of their qualifications simply to have an even 50/50 split, it's the exact opposite.

>> No.2526179

>>2526157
Go back to tumblr.

I'll agree that there are plenty of retards in here spouting all sorts of bull shit but women have no problem getting jobs in art if they can produce work just as good as their male counterparts.

The burden of proof is on the person making the claim "Woman can't get jobs in art because, woman." Provide hard evidence beyond the fact that more men have these jobs (which isn't proof of anything) or go back to tumblr and spout your SJW bullshit over there where the rest of the sheep blindly agree with dumb rhetoric lacking in hard evidence.

>> No.2526180 [DELETED] 
File: 195 KB, 798x770, 1440465568548.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2526180

>> No.2526186

>>2525194
post your work, it better be fucking BRILLIANT before I ever believe something like this.

>> No.2526208

>>2526157
Yeah? Who wants to hire a fucking retard to their workplace?

>> No.2526226

When did we go from
>women don't have any significant disadvantages in modern society!
to
>women have never had any significant social disadvantages in history!

>> No.2526231

>>2526173
>>2526179

Is it really ok to talk about something you don't really know about? Like, how can you hold an opinion about something that you are uneducated about? What are you even basing this info on? Something that you read about?

>> No.2526242

>>2525805
>It's common knowledge that women have smaller brains than men, and that they stop developing (or, as they like to call it, they reach "maturity") much sooner than men.
You do know that they reach the same level of maturity right? Men aren't any more mature or intelligent because they take longer, male brains are simply slower due to extreme hormonal imbalance while going through puberty. Stop cherry picking only the "common knowledge" that suits your arguments.

Also here's a documentary about women in art through history.
I didn't really pay much attention to it but I know there was one dame who had it rough because she wanted to paint what the big boys painted. (she did gain recognition in the end I think).
And one who drew very nice scientific illustrations but was never recognized.

>> No.2526244

>>2526231
I don't have to be a woman to tell you that women are not at a disadvantage in the modern Western workplace. That's simply a fact.

>> No.2526246

>>2526244
>>2526231
While it does hold true that women are sometimes in a disendvantage (maternity leave bullshit) that's not really the case in the art industry.
If a studio is faced with 2 equally skilled artists they often chose the woman to bring some balance what is often a male-based team.
(and if gender balance is not an issue they simply look at experience and later on maybe their schools if they are still equal). But that shit rarely happens, it mostly comes down to who has the better skills for the project in question.

>> No.2526249
File: 79 KB, 600x1185, 29f.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2526249

where the fuck are the mods

>> No.2526250

>>2526242
forgot link (don't know if you can watch it on the page or not I watched it on viasat history).
http://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p01y5r66

>> No.2526267

>>2525930
>>2525931

I'm willing to agree that jews have better discipline and drive and therefore succeed more, on the same proportion women have less discipline and drive and therefore fail more.

But you're not, you'll still claim women are opressed but somehow jews don't get special threatment from other jews who do the education and hiring for these high-paying jobs.

>> No.2526276

>>2525909
Time to take a break from the internet, anon

>> No.2526280

>>2526249
too busy hunting malaysia

>> No.2526286
File: 536 KB, 1642x2388, 0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2526286

>le where are the mods

>go to this link: http://gijinka.blogspot.my/
>save a chapter or two
>everytime you see a thread being shat by aspies from /pol/, storytime the goddamned thread with the chapters.
>instant moderation

It works like clockwork.

>> No.2526288

>>2526244
>>2526246

But what are you basing this on? Facts? Stats? What you think is right? What?

Do you have a source for this?

>> No.2526289

>>2525958
Are SJWs the new yuppies?
They're equally eloquent.

>> No.2526296

>>2526060
Because they require sacrifice.
You have to be an utter neet faggot to believe something that doesn't require hard work is equally valuable to something that does.

>> No.2526321

>>2525870

>Be Canadian
>Literally no black people here
>I wonder why /pol/ hates them so much
>Black person moves into my neighborhood
>Playing throw the rock with his kid
>Nearly hits me in the face
>Suddenly, nigger nigger nigger nigger

>> No.2526338

>>2526321
>playing throw the rock with his kid
>with his kid
>black man actually raising his kid
nice try

>> No.2526344

>>2526338
Epic XD.

>> No.2526348

>>2526338
>Canadian blacks do raise their children.
>Mexican blacks are musical magic negros.
>South American blacks are sports stars.
>Caribbean blacks are alt religion entrepeneurs or hitmen.
>African urban blacks are more likely to be successful professionals or military.
>Arab blacks are good businessmen.
>Asian blacks are still slaves or IT people.

It turns out the problem isn't blacks but certain people shoving their noses in black business.

>> No.2526356

I'm in pretty good Animation drawing course, no bullshit modern art painting or whatever, everyone gets graded and recognition ONLY through good work. Mostly drawing

My class has about 20 people in it, but only 5 of them are male, the rest are female.

The best students in the class by far are 4 of the 5 men and 1 girl. My female teachers talk about this and say that men are more determined, harder workers and just have the proper thinking mind in order to understand the nature of drawing over women.

Its not sexist but reality, there are very hard working girls in my class but they never come close to these few guys who spend all of their time on their work. Does it mean that girls can ber great artists? No. Does it mean on average that there are more exceptional men artist than women? Yes.

I believe personally that men are more obsessive, more ambitious, more determined and less emotional than women. That is why they excel at certain jobs (like drawing, politics, business).

>> No.2526407

>>2526321
This is how I feel about whites. The actions of one represent all of them.

>> No.2526408

>>2526356
This, women gravitate to easy recognition, like gender studies for example, where you're valuable just because you exist.
One of my female art teachers kept telling the female students if they ever learned to obsess about anatomy and perspective as much as they obsessed about ruining each other's lives they could be as good as the males and finally be worth more than their soon-to-sag tits.

>> No.2526416

>>2526356
>know women who work hard as fuck
>know men who don't work hard at all

Your teachers are pretty stupid though.

>> No.2526453

>>2525136
>Why are most famous artists men? Where are the women?
They are busy being women.

>> No.2526533

>>2525136
Where they don't have to work to get attention.

>> No.2526548

>>2525219
xD

>> No.2526554

>>2525136
there arnt as many women doing something =misogyny
there are more woman doing something
=girl power
women=meme

>> No.2526843

Because men are better painters.

>> No.2527222

ITT: People who have never spoken to a female that isn't their mother.

>> No.2527242

>>2526356
>men are less emotional than women
Just better at hiding it.

>> No.2527280
File: 1.23 MB, 1746x1364, media.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2527280

>>2525167
Pure coincidence, right? That's what Prof. Goldberg taught me.