/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Just looks bad.

>>2123016
It is good that you are capable on spending a long time on a single piece. This is a beginner piece, it's not really something you are going to get useful crit on. If you really want some feedback I'd recommend posting it in the beginner thread. But besides that I'd say start working on something else and think about starting to study about art as well as trying to make it.

You have a lot of work and study ahead of you. Good luck.

>>2123016
nice effort, really, but you should put that effort towards advancing your studies. Its an interesting concept for a piece, but without the skill to actually logically approach the design process it will always end up looking amateur.

interesting, sure, if the concepts good enough, but amateur.

Try looking at your picture for yourself and deciding what looks off about it, then you'll have a gameplan for what to work on improving.

Do that with after all the pieces you make, have a little period of reflection to really critique your own work.

Not sure what you are suggesting. I've read keys to drawing and some Loomis so my fundamentals are strong. The construction on show is a stylistic choice designed to evoke some discomfort in the viewer.

Don't be so quick to judge, anons. There is more to art than technical proficiency.

Thanks for looking.

>>2123059
the only discomfort i feel is the idea that whoever made this could have strong fundamentals

>>2123059

>>2123063

Post your art then, toolbox. I've thrown mine out there for the world to share.

>>2123067

The world isn't going to be sharing this

>>2123059
>so my fundamentals are strong
They're not. You have almost zero concrete knowledge of how to draw a head and your coloring book page is flat (zero knowledge of light and no diversity in the lineweight).

>There is more to art than technical proficiency.
What kind of critique are you looking for? Your idea COULD be cool, but because of the low technical skill in the painting, you failed to communicate your idea effectively and the emotion you wanted the audience to feel.

>>2123068
That fucking burn.

>>2123070

Well looks to me you cunts are angry. That's exactly what I wanted this work to produce. Mission accomplished.

While you nerds are watching dynamic sketching, I'm busy sharing my gifts with the world. Enjoy, pleb.

>>2123077
Lol

>>2123077
krom is that you?

>>2123059
reading is not the same as understanding.

Honestly, I'm done with this place. I share something I worked damn hard to create and for what? This didn't just take two days, it took years of filled sketchbooks and spilled paint. And all I get it bitches griping that they don't understand.

I guess this is how Picasso felt. Fuck you guys. I'm done with this place. Way to go. Your loss.

>>2123090
>This didn't just take two days, it took years of filled sketchbooks and spilled paint.
Damn, looks like you wasted a few years to get to nowhere. Your drawing is literal kindergarten tier. Stay mad though.

>>2123090
I'm interested in what's in those sketchbooks. Care to share? It's sometimes difficult to judge an artist based on one painting and other examples of your work might enlighten us.

no one can be this delusional, right?

...right?

>>2123090
0/10 too obvious

>>2123077
>>2123090

>>2123016
honestly it's terrible. i'm sorry but why are you spending two days for something that looks like this?

I got second hand embarrassment from this.

>>2123016
It looks gay. Shove your paintbrush up your ass and quit art, faggot.