/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>copyright (c)

>>1666983
what do you think of my post, does it get your stamp of approval?

>>1666983
>art by Cellar FCP.

>>1666989
drawthread plz leave

About to do line art soon, how's it looking so far?

>>1666992
but it is stylized her eyes are just closed!

>>1666983
Almost there guys. Need some help with the background, the cast shadows and such.

>>1666989
>Stylization General
That's great. Most of what is stylized here tend to be animuu but this staph being the "animu tred" a time ago. Feel free to post more.

>>1666997
Baby blue satin bedsheets.

>>1666999
hate satin.

>>1666995
Loli? No
Shota? No
Futa? No
Hentai? No
"O" face? No
Rape face? No
Flat face? No
Weird hair color? No
Extreme perspective? No
Impossible anatomy? No
Big titties? No
Flat chest? No
Big hips? No
Half animal? No
Can we see her putty? No
Can we see his pee pee? No
Done in Paint Tool SAI? No
Done in Photoshop? No
Shitty looking photograph? Yes

It's not stylized enough for these kinds of threads. You're going to have to take it else where, sorry.

>>1667004
Well that's pretty ludicrous.

>>1667006
>implying style can only mean mango/animu
We need moar people to post on these threads besides the pornfags and weebs.

>>1667017
But anon, if actual art is posted they wont be able to get away with talking about anime for 300 posts.

>>1666994
shit

>>1667006
How the fuck can you be retarded enough to mix up style with the subject matter? All of those things can be drawn in whatever style you choose.

>>1667017
What about now? Can i get a redline?

>>1667026
you welcome.

>>1667026

>>1667031
that's kind of a shitty redline

>>1667033
You're a shitty redline

>>1666997
I'm done with this. I promise next time I'll draw an actual background.

>>1667034
Shut up you double redline.

>>1667032
>>1667031
Is that the only style you anons know, shitty animu?

capatcha: This

>>1666983
What kind of music do you guys listen to when having fun drawing?

>>1667056
your mom's moans

>>1666992
But this is the Salon des Refusés from drawthread

>>1666994

clean work, good stuff. You know your proportions and you can apply them well to stylized work like this.

did you leave out the hands out of the shot for a reason?

>>1666994
Mmmm, now I am apprehensive about inking it, is it that bad?

>>1667071
Oh, thank you now I feel much better about continue inking it! Yeah there's nothing down there I need to find a reference for those hands

>>1666983
>that anatomy
how the fuck does someone screw up legs that badly?

and oh boy, retarded poses with no compositional flow 2: electric boogaloo. man, you fuckers have terrible taste.

>>1667075
It's the style.

>>1667077
Genre =/= style

Well, it might be complete shit, but at least I'm improving. I wish I didn't spend the first 20 years of my life only drawing stick figures.

>>1667104
good job honey.

if the artnon who advise me hampton can see this or everyone esle

my face still look flat ?

>>1667109
looks okay.

although, some people 'feel 3d' better in cuboids and and some feel it better in spheroids, blobs.

so you should try making a face out of blobs too and see if you like it better.

quick demo, is animated

>>1667109
It aint me, but its still shit. Its not the book thats the problem, but the perspective

>>1667117
i didint think of perspective on that one

>>1667117
i think perspective will come later once he get ride of wide faces

>>1666983
their lower body looks so fucking weird.

>>1667109
Perspective. Cuboids don't all have equal perfect sides.

>>1667112
Blobs are harder to visualize in 3d (for buhginnrs) because they only have "one" visible surface and it's difficult to tell their orientation in 3d space.

>>1667189
Dude i already know about that

and why you put prespective in the face since the overal head is like 30cm high and 15 width even if technically it the perspective who gives the depth to a form

same toughts on this one ?

>>1667189
>Blobs are harder to visualize in 3d ...

yeah, i realised after i made the gif that they might as well be 2d because there's nothing to indicate the depth really. i probably should put so equatorial lines on there.

but for me it's easier to think of blobs, in fact i think of other shapes as being blobs with some flat bits, or all flat bits in some cases.

>>1667196
stop drawing these flat ass anime faces and do faces with more dimensions

>>1667196
i like those flat ass anime faces

i never say i will not draw real faces

i want to do Japanese style comics

but i want to put my skill to the maximum
saying to my head "" he let's do alex ross 's panel " and do it fine you know what i mean

be able to draw realistic even if the most of the time i will do anime

you all need to study some face structure.

>>1667196
>>1667207
learn english first

>>1667213
YES SIR

>>1667213
you mean like gesture drawing ?

>>1667207
no you don't understand

i'm saying YOUR anime faces are flat

my anime faces aren't as flat

anime is quite a flat style in the first place and easy to get wrong

that's why you should draw faces with more dimensions

>>1667224
oh i get it now I thought you talking about width

your talking about deep

oh it easy to fix that

>>1667229
yeah i hope so just don't copy MY STYLE

>>1667075
Care to post your work, champ? Of course not.

>>1667222
no.
face structure.
so you can have a better understanding of what you're stylizing

>>1667075
>and oh boy, retarded poses with no compositional flow

Wow, you must be fucking terrible at composition if you seriously cannot see the compositional flow and rhythm these 2 poses create.

>>1667234
>ONLY THE GREATEST OF CHEFS MAY CRITIQUE THE FOOD I COOK

Seriously get this deviant art personality the fuck out of here.

>>1667239

At least the greatest chefs can elaborate on their critique

>>1667240
You don't deserve them because it'd be wasted on you.

>>1667241
and you just waste the time of the people you critique

>>1667242
More like your ass got hurt because you can't handle any amount of critique.

>>1667245
Is that really what you believe when people discredit your lackluster critique?

>>1667246
My critique isn't lackluster. Your ass is just made of glass.

>>1667247
Not the same person, but your critique is flat out wrong. Anatomy aside, there is a very clear compositional flow in these figures. This is the problem when rookies like you try to criticize the work of artists far superior than them. You think certain things are lacking, when in reality, you are just too much of a beginner to see them.

the poses are way exaggerated, but i still like the dynamic of the piece.
the poses are kinda overdone, but there is obviously compositional and gestural flow there.

>>1667224
face structure

>>1667231
you know what they said every anome looks like sailor moon
>>1667235
oh ok thanks
>>1667247
what if you ass was specially made for my coq
ps capachat seed dwmess

>>1667248
Except I didn't make that post because there's no point critiquing art when the artist isn't able to read it.

>>1667250
Mind your own business, kid.

>>1667247
It is. You can't seem to grasp the basis of critique. When critique is basically presenting an argument and follows the usual rules of presenting a good argument. One has to point out the problem/solution and elaborate the reasoning behind it so that discussion may ensue otherwise it becomes either just an opinion or a very uneducated argument which almost always devolves into name calling and insults. Your "critique" as it seems is the same tactic that tumblr uses to negate any form of dissent towards the critic.

>>1667254
Quote one of my critiques, asshat. I bet you think it's >>1667075

It isn't, eat shit.

>>1667255
So you felt it was a good idea to defend someone who gave lackluster criticism?

>>1667250
Is he wearing a bird on his head?

>>1667257
I thought I just told you to fuck off with your "POST YER WERK FIRST WAAAAH" shit. I didn't make any comment about his critique. Learn to read, niggernose.

>>1667260
and what makes you think that's mine?

I was just explaining the merit of getting good actual artists with credibility to critique.

>>1667258
who knows ?

>>1667262
And I was explaining to you that credible artists aren't waiting on hand and foot to critique your shitty stylized art. Even if one happened to wander by you end up idiots like >>1667250 who copies every fucking thing he sees.

>>1667250
Hey jackass, I'm pretty sure those equatorial lines the guy drew in his examples for you were meant to demonstrate depth. You don't need to plaster them on your drawing if people could visualize depth in your drawings.

>>1667269
You also seem to leave out the part of being able to explain one's own critique.

>>1667270
Why would I talk about something you came up with on your own after assuming I was >>1667075? Stop being asshurt from every little thing, quit trying to justify your shit art, stop stylizing for half a second and learn some fundamentals.

Update on Rikka.

>>1667269
they were for what then ?

>>1667275
i not sure if the roight foot can twist like that

>>1667272
Now what are you talking about now? As I said, I only talked about the merits of having an artist who knows what he/she was doing in critiquing and that just vaguely and generally stating so-called problems isn't a very good critique. I didn't justify anything about what the artists here did but I just tried have a fair view on things.

But you seem to be content on using strawman arguments to support your stances.

>>1667281
I'm not disagreeing about how to critique, retard. There's nothing wrong with stating obvious errors. I think what you really want is for me to also discredit >>1667075 as bad critique and I don't think I will, just to spite your dumb "my opinion is right" ass. Fair my ass.

>>1667279
...for demonstration, you complete idiot. Look that up in the fucking dictionary or go to your own local language art community if you can't understand english.

>>1667279
it can't twist like that
try it yourself

>>1667285
Well, if you want to think that then I can't stop you.

>>1667255
We were talking about THAT critique you quoted and then you replied with "my critique isnt lackluster" Of course anyone would assume you were the guy who wrote it, why the fuck else would you make that comment? Holy fuck, you are so stupid it makes my head hurt.

>>1667289
So you make a mistake identifying someone and I'm the stupid one? Sounds logical... retard.

Let's make it easy for you to understand. He can critique and I can critique too. His crits aren't my crits. My crits aren't lackluster. Get it, kid?

>>1667292
So, on an anonymous imageboard you didnt think that tidbit of information to be important?

>>1667275
i think the gesture is too straight (weird right?) try twisting it even more

this gesture might have some anatomy issues but i think it captures what i mean


>>1667279
>>1667287
it can

do you even have feet

it's not even twisting, it's in line with the leg's natural direction, tilting downwards a little. if there's a problem it's that it's pointing upwards (towards the leg) too much

>>1667026
>>1667051

Actually kind of nice. Though I'd get rid of the far leg in the first one because it seems plain broken. Some more elegant black lines that emphasize the more important forms of the figures would work better than just haphazardly dashing them in. Continue Anon, try some figures with full backgrounds that compliment the style.

Crit please?

>>1667341
the chick on the left has misaligned highlights that makes her look derpyeyed

>>1667026
this is cool

>>1667345
Looks fine to me.

>>1667341
Great job, looks good.

>>1667341
heads too big.

>>1667254
Real art critiques aren't about fault finding, that's called feed back.

>>1667341
the way you draw the neck is pretty bad. study them

Is it possible for me to remain shitty at drawing even after a couple years of really grinding down the fundamentals? Is there a point I should give up and realize drawing well is simply something I can not achieve?

>>1667438
I doubt you grinded cuple of years of fundamentals then.

>>1667438
All you did was grind anime, fag.

I wish I could draw like dis.

>>1667452
I wish you could too, more stuff to laugh at

>>1667452

>>1667442
Let them drown in their quicksand

>>1667453

>>1667461
Sugoi, sugoi.

>>1667455
Too bad you suck at drawing ;)

>>1667461

>>1667466

>>1667341
>tokyo mew mew
underage grill pls go

>>1667040
Using flesh color for the fake boobs, while realistic, makes it look kinda like a girl with some sort of horrifically deformed breasts. I'd go with something that looks less like skin.

>>1667474
Where do you think you are?

>>1667452
Not to discourage you but those knees look painful.

>>1667473
Changed the hue and saturation a bit, but that's the last thing I'll do to this stinker.

Can't I just learn to draw animu bullshit for shekels?
I do like western style though.

>>1667481
Where the fuck is the neck?
Where are the collarbones?
Why are the arms so short?
Head is too flat and big. Doesn't fit with the body at all.
Lots of mistakes around the pelvis and the lower torso.
Colors are dull and unimpressive.
Lol @ those elbows and shoulders.
Perspective doesn't seem right at all.

Someone redline this for this poor guy adap

>>1667452
Flat face
Short arms
Disproportionate ribs and stomach
Poor foreshortening on legs
Wtf kneecap
>>1667453
Flat face
Hunch back
Neck placed wrong
>>1667461
Flat face
Clavicle too protruding
Legs connected to hips wrongly
Broken ankle
>>1667467
Flat face
Breast look flat
Mangled pinky
Legs and hips look wierd

>>1667485
*asap

>>1667484
What?

>>1667486
I love /ic/

>>1667486

Too bad this artist is easily a 8/10 in the hentai world.

>>1667481
Collapsed chest. Is that for a reason? Is the head suppose to be in front or behind the shoulder? Is the mangled anatomy for some fetish? Just asking.

>>1667481
Study more

>>1667341
Zakuro looks really good actually, I like everything about her, but Mint(?) looks kinda weird, especially the way her head tilts on her neck.
It looks like her neck is too forward or her head is too far back (i'd say the latter). Her mouth is shaped weird as well.
Also I can't believe no one has said anything about that hand, just look at yourself in the mirror or something to make it less bad.

>>1667496
Not that Anon, but why did you guys wait until the last minute after they polished it all up?

>>1667499
/ic/ culture

>>1667499
It was too shit.

>>1667481

would be okay with all the other shortcomings of this drawing if you would just omit the dick. It looks awkwardly placed and it isn't drawn/ rendered well.

>>1667501
>>1667502

I thought it was the exact opposite? Like an Anon posts a wip and some dick comes in and tells them to stop polishing that turd and what not. So let me get this straight, if someone's hair was on fire and nobody told them you'd just wait until every last fiber was obliterated?

I'd like to have someone tell me, wouldn't you?

>>1667481
Not sure if I should scream or puke.

>>1667452
I like this guy cause he draws my waifu a lot.

>>1667481
This gotta be a troll yo...

>>1667506
Delicious.

>>1667491
As if they have any standards. As long as it's perverted they'll like it.

>>1667481
Needs more Loomis.

>>1667499
I can't be expected to follow every shit making weeb from the beginning? I call'em as I see'em, when I see'em.

>>1667503
Real Talk.
80% of /ic/ didn't attend art school and/or doesn't have the artist eye.
Some of them wait to watch you burn.
Some try to tell you what's real.

>>1667517
>Some of them wait to watch you burn.

You guys are a riot.

>>1667481
Refer to
>>1667485

>>1667517
pic related

>>1667519
>>1667521

Thanks

>>1667521
>>1667517
You don't even need a degree to know that this guy >>1667481 made a lot of mistakes.

>>1667517

>To be an illustrator, you have to go to art school.
>To be an illustrator, you have to "have the artist eye"

It's funny. In the 15th century, it was said that only special people chosen by God had a certain skill and those who had not developed that skill could never develop it ever and, in turn, never be as close to God as those who knew said skill. What was that skill? Oh yeah!

[fuckyou]Literacy[/fuckyou]

>>1667481
Artist here.
>>1667504
>omit the dick
Yeah I did think at some point.
>>1667508
Not trolling, I actually want to draw hentai and stuff, i'm still just learning, I do study my loomis and draw pixelovely every week.
>>1667515
>every shit making weeb
Like if you aren't one of those, I stop watching animoo/mango since I was in late elementary school, I just want to draw porn and make a living out of it.

>>1667521
>>1667523
>>1667519
>>1667517
>>1667481
Sounds like someone is feeling a little sensitive about their own work. Are you in denial about something you're doing wrong anon?

>>1667540
No, I was curious why you guys waited until the last minute.

>>1667550
Because they didn't have the eye to see the problems before/while they were developing. Or at least that's what I would assume. Maybe they just weren't following the thread until that point. It's also safe to assume that the content matter has some effect on them.

>>1667533
>I just want to draw porn and make a living out of it.
Fine, but why the weeaboo style if you stopped with that shit since elementary?

>>1667558

>They don't have the eye

>>1667562
Maybe he likes "weeaboo" style but doesn't like watching anime? Also there's a Korra reaction image and while it doesn't actually prove anything about tastes, its pretty much just western anime.

>>1667570
>>1667571
So in essence this all boils down to making excuses via MUH STYLE, but made implicitly? Classic!

Why are LoL artists so good?

>>1667574
I'm not saying it boils down to anything. I'm just saying a possiblity why that person draws that way. Why is /ic/ so catty?

Also there's nothing wrong with anime style if the person can actually draw (not saying that person can).Instantly dismissing things because of MUH TASTES is really no different than ignoring errors because of MUH STYLE.

>>1667562
I think hentai works better when drawn weeaboo style, I do want to blend it with something else. Perhaps that could look more appealing.
>>1667571
>Korra reaction image
Is just a random image I found in my folder, I watched the first season and thought it was okay but just that, not huge avatar/korra fan.

>>1667577
Yeah it's all colorful and prettyful and everything but that figure looks painful and uncomfortable

>>1667579
Well that's why I put the "Doesn't prove anything about tastes..." thing. But I realize now I worded it horribly.

>>1667578
I pointed out the mistakes when I saw them, taste wasnt a factor, it's in discord and doesn't have structral sense. And the only retort is that their vision of the work wasn't concerned with such trivial matters, they just wanna draw hentia for money.

>>1667591
Correct me if I'm missing it, but I don't remember the artist ever just dismissing technical errors because of MUH STYLE. Someone asked why they were drawing anime-style and they answered why. That's all.

>>1667599
>I actually want to draw hentai and stuff,
>I stop watching animoo/mango since I was in late elementary school, I just want to draw porn and make a living out of it.
All from >>1667533

There's a smell of muh style and confused weeb thinking brewing here.

>>1667612
Were you expecting something else from the MUHSTYUL general?

>>1667612
I don't really get that vibe, but okay. They still didn't dismiss anything though; just didn't comment on it. Doesn't mean they're not taking the critique.

>>1667599
I asked if the terrible anatomy was on purpose, and it flew over the anons head, in return was, " I just want to make porn."

>>1667599
>>1667622
Ma'am/Sir won't you just stop feeding the troll? The guy replies like if the trap-drawing-anon was actually paying any attention his posts.

>>1667577
gr8 b8 m8 i r8 8/8

>>1667612
You do realize you are posting in the cancer general right?

>>1667615
Good one! It's ironic that while these threads seem to advocate a receptivity, it's funny that every redline, every critique, and every suggestion is submitted under the impression it was suppose to look like weeaboo.

>>1667540
Try again.

>>1667632
Quite sweety, the grownups are talking

>>1667579
>weeaboo style
I don't understand...

>>1667641
SPANK ME

>>1667345
Noted! Thanks anon.
>>1667353
Also noted! Thank you.
>>1667407
Yeah, it seems neck/collarbone critiques are pretty common with me so that seems like a good idea.
>>1667498
yeah I agree with her head being too far forward/the weird tilt. Maybe I was fixated on drawing both the buns or something? Either way thanks anon! I'll try to see what I can do about the mouth/hand too.

>>1667635
>b8

artist who did this is paid for this and has a wide fanbase.

what about you ?

>>1667642
>I don't understand...
I'll put it this way, while I love pic related, I think it is easier to fap to your pic related.

>>1667663
While I can agree about the body, is it REALLY easier for you to fap to those crackwhore bags on that face? It's really weird.

>>1667700
> is it REALLY easier for you to fap to those crackwhore bags on that face?
That Samus doesn't have crack whore bags. Oh wait, I think you misread. What I meant was that while I fancy Sanders' art (as well other western artist) I'll rather fap to a Turtle.Fish.Paint's hentai.

>>1667706
Oh, you're right, I did misread.

>>1667663
Not the anon below you but rather >>1667642
JAB is still drawing? Love his comics

>>1667577
>good
Lol'd.

>>1667761
cherry pickin'

anime all looks terrrible guys, look here.

>>1667728
What da fuck is JAB?

>>1667769
Can he draw more than one face? Or is count to potato the only thing he can draw? His bodies are wonderful though.

>>1667781

h-his styuhl

>>1667781
there is more than one face, you just can't tell because your an idiot.

>>1667802
Provide proof? Everything he draws, especially the woman all have the exact same face. It really is muh style. I am not hating on his drawing abilities (he really can draw) but it saddens me he chooses not to attempt to have some diversity.

>>1667769
>>1667663
Look exactly the same and aren't the same girl. Please stop sucking his dick.

>>1667805
the two in the thread are proof. you're turgid bumble eyes can't get past the big similarity of the stylization to the small individual differences.

>>1667806
>The hair and eyes are different colors11!

Come on man don't troll. Even the face shape is exactly the same. The lips, nose and eye shape are also exactly the same. The only slight difference you could argue is the white one's eyebrows are slightly thicker.

I'm not gonna argue with a blind man who can't get past looking with his dick.

>>1667809
you are wrong, overlay them if you don't believe me. the features are similar but the placement is different.

nooblords like you can't really detect placement of features well. that's part of the reason your drawings look so silly.

overlay, you'll see.

>>1667806
They are literally the exact same face drawn from different distance.

>>1667815
>>1667812

>>1667812
The difference here is the brunette's left eye which is all kinds of fucked up now in a full sized image. The face line, lips, nose and right eye all almost match up. Which is the case since he drew both images separately, but kept the same cookie cutter female face in his mind while drawing. Try to draw two circles, chances are they'll look similar but not exactly the same.

I'm not hating on his "style" and he can draw but to deny he often draws the same female face is outrageous.

>>1667820
>>1667812
Did overlay them. The nose is slightly different, mouth is identical, eyes are the same other than the slight difference in eyelashes and the highlight. For all intent and purposes, they are sameface.

>>1667663
>>1667769
>>1667781
>>1667800
>>1667802
>>1667805
>>1667806
>>1667812
>>1667815
>>1667824

>>1667830
This is fucking hillarus

>>1667830
>Not posting the gif version


I am so disappointed anon

>>1667847
silly me.

sorry about the sketchiness, its my first time trying to aesthetically warp anatomy to this degree and I got a bit nervous. Do these proportions look bad (like, uncanny valley or just plain ugly)? If so, any way to improve them?

>>1667279

The twist happens at hip socket, not the ankle, and I can get my foot to point downward almost completely (kinda hurts though and not a good way to kick). It's just a matter to breaking up fiber buildup in the joint to accomplish this.

>>1667824
>see only the nose eyes and shape of the face are different. otherwise completely the same!

>>1667056
The Crazy Dave Mixtape Vol 3

>>1667868
It's his style.

>>1667864
Stylization is based more on line work. The proportions are not bad at all (although the right arm on the first figure looks a little weird though). Play with your lines a bit more by using straighter lines, more details, less details, curvier lines, etc.

>>1667864

The only one that seems extremely off is the first figure. Her arms lack form definition, and the two halves seem to blend together. Unclear form is the main cause of making stylistic works appear wrong.

The first two figures also have pasted on facial features and the third figure seems to have a head drawn it such a way as to intentionally avoid drawing the other side. Otherwise, there are no glaring anatomy issues on any of them really. It's a solid attempt.

Also, it's a sketch. Don't apologize for sketchiness, fuzzy lines, and otherwise sloppy work in a sketch.

>>1667824
But the problem is that there is so little of a difference that it shows no huge difference between the two. The face on many people, even if they are the same race, environment they are raised in, etc. shouldn't matter. That is like saying that all Americans look the same.

Any major gripes with anatomy/gesture before I move on?

I'm having such a hard time figuring out how to do this perspective.

>>1667892
Wireline the original, or use the marble slab tactic

>>1667892
Because her left arm is broken as fuck. Find a better reference, then trace it while looking at the big picture to clear any misconceptions you had about the perspective. Then erase that layer and redraw it how you tried in the picture you linked.

>>1667890
He seems to have a giant tumor where his crotch should be, might want to fix that, anon

>>1667890

He has child-bearing hips, and that's making his legs look too short for his body.

>>1667894
Not >>1667892, but what's the marble slab tactic?

Any House of Cards fans on tonight?

>>1667892
Yeah, perspective people are way out of my comfort zone. I just did a few from Posemaniacs.

>>1667894
I googled for it and nothing showed up. Are you talking about just making the rectangle and dividing it with an X?

>>1667898
>>1667899
Duly noted; thanks.

Why do my shoulders look so fugged.
I'm trying to do more of a side angle than my reference.

If anyone has any references in a similar angle and/or pose I would appreciate it if you posted some or linked me. I'm having trouble finding them

>>1667892
>Sycra's coil technique nig nog

>>1667915

>>1667915
It looks like you aren't breaking down your forms very much. turn the major muscles into shapes then refine them into their normal shapes, you'll end up getting a better feel of the muscles and your free handing will improve.

Bretty messy still, is this style even worth cleaning up?

I've been staring at this too long to figure out what's wrong...

>>1667957
>do I suck in what?
>oh yeah, I suck at "x"
>to learn "x" I ened to elarn "y" first
>repeat this until you die

Keep doint what you do, make some effort. :^)

>>1667963
Ignore the typos, I'm drunk

>>1667968
I just came to the sudden realization that I have never attempted to draw anything while drunk. I might have to attempt that this weekend.
Also yes, always new shit you have to learn if you want to reach your full potential.

>>1667642
Woah, what's up with her breasts? They look kind of detached from her chest, plus it's not at all comfortable for a woman to lay on her chest like that.

>>1667993
Saw that too. I was more concerned about what the thing under her hip is. And how strange her back connects up. The image looks so well done from a glance too.

I feel like this would be nice to share.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FMUYG1hkY5c

>>1667892
Work on your forms, Mark chong is in the sticky but people scroll pass him most of the times, he explains things from a programmer's perspective alot.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JHefdroQdDo

>>1667970
your not an artist if you're not drunk

>>1667888
people with down syndrome all look the same to some people too. some people just can't into the little things.

the sad thing is watching these detail blind people trying to fumble their way through learning to draw. is like watching a guy with no fingers try and solve a rubik's cube.

How do you draw anime eyes? I want to get into that, but it always comes of awkward, and I don't really know how perspective applies to something that stylized.

>>1668048
you should watch mark crilleys videos lmao.

>>1668048
they work like normal eyes they're just simplified, you have to imagine them as giant balls though, not as flat circles. then you take out pretty much all the lines outside of the lids which you'd usually use to indicate form. and the rest is up to you! for example the iris is often elongated even when it's not foreshortened for some reason.

>>1668048
it may sound obvious, but they're just stylized real eyes. if you don't understand how to draw a real face/head (at least to some degree), you will never understand anime heads properly either.

and honestly, for starters it doesn't even need to be that deep. just some basic understanding is enough.
otherwise it'll just turn out like >>1667196 >>1667250

>>1667481
hey I relined your foot licking one before

the colors look pretty good but it's probably too late to make any changes to the drawing

>>1668113
Man Kyle, how much do you draw a day? You went from hilariously awful to pretty decent(even if your figures are still a little stiff/wonky) in under a year. It's honestly impressive no matter how I look at it.

>>1668121
few hours a day on average id saay

Help, its looking fuzzy.

>>1668134
You've been drawing for how many years?

>>1668134
What kind of practice do u do a day? I've been practicing for 5 months and I feel I'm hitting a wall. Currently going through Bridgman, have went through vilppu and some Scott Robertson but my biggest issue is definitely seeing figures in perspective

>>1668157
show your current work

>>1668137
way too much light, and don't use purdy phertershoop brushes for stuff like grass, draw it in blotches and show grassblades at the change of lit/dark spots
might want to find some references and decide on values before you colour

>>1668164
And then your past work. I want to see how much you've improved.

>>1668164
I mainly do sketches because I read here that when beginning it's better to draw in terms of volume so I only have pen on paper work and pencils.

>>1668181
Heres in october last year. I'm only showing my imagination work. I got much better in reference work. I know my imagination work really needs improvement

>>1668134
Wow, this look good. Do you have a tumblr/da where i can see your other works?

>>1668166
Better? I still have a lot of colouring to do.

>>1668113
WHERE WHERE YOU TWO DAYS AGO!?

I am pretty new to art but I will help anyone who needs help from me.

>>1668278
Thats purty good! How old are you?

>>1668278
I'm sorry since you have such a great attitude. Unfortunately I don't belive there is anyone who would value your help and the best help I could give you right now would be to read and learn the sticky.

can someone post a link to kyle's tumblr, I forgot to bookmark it D:? pretty please :3

>>1668334
cantdoshitwithoutreference.tumblr.com

>>1668335
top lel

>>1668278
come on fag you suck
even im way better than u

>>1668184
btw deltoids inserts halfway down the humerus

>>1668278
Do you even into anatomy? Haha...

>>1668411
>>1668431
Can you please fuck off back to reddit or whatever?

>>1668465
wow arent you a top lebel troll?
haha XD

Alright, before I rev up the turd-polishing engine, what are the glaring mistakes that I'm missing?

i drew this to day, i love anime. is there anthing that i could have done better? what did you like about?

>>1668497

legs are really long

>>1668520
Holy shit, how did that escape me? They're like fucking stilts! Thank you!

>>1667900
marble slab is just draw a big rectangular prism and add axes on the the center of each face and try to limit your form and structure within that space.

>>1668558
What's going on with the right arm? Why is his left arm in such an awkward position? His feet are not both standing on the same ground. And I'm not sure if you intentionally drew something to try and cover up anything that seemed too difficult for you, but don't do that. If for some reason you want to, at least draw out where everything is supposed to be, even if it's covered.

>>1668564
His right arm is supposed to be holding a pipe but it's pretty much just a reminder for me to draw one - but you're right, it's super messy and I shouldn't do it.

And i kinda tried to make him to have his other arm behind his back, kind of like you see in some old military portraits. The more I think about it, though, I like the idea of having him hook his thumb in his belt better.

And I see what you mean about the feet - I had some trouble with them and moved on to work on something else. I guess that means I should practice my perspective a bit!

Thank you for the pointers, I'll try to work on it!

>>1668564
Can anyone please draw an example of this marble slab thing on his drawing? I'll suck your dick.

>>1668569
The drawing's pretty flat but I'll see what I can do

Any changes I should make to this before I begin my poor attempt at giving it color?

>>1668667

i like your style, a nice little design that is pleasing the more i look at it.

On the left: This was a combo of using a photo reference, some proko, and some imagination.

On the right: Practicing to make the head/face a bit more realistic and trying to visualize how the ears would work.

What do I need to focus on (other than the obvious inability to side view)?

>>1668558

legs are really short

>>1667892
The vanishing point is from between her feet (pretty much the floor of the of where she stands). It is slanted so you would build from that point. This is pretty much a low bird eyes view.

planning on making this sketch a larger project in the soon future. I am doing a larger sketchup tomorrow. Anything that I can improve on other than hands?

>>1668717
the nose is too pronounced. make the outline of her face more round, like her jaw and the chin

the neck/shoulder area is really off, try and go learn how it works

>>1668719
thanks for the advice!

>>1668691
Hey, thanks.

>>1668278
please tell me how you make yourself look so cool with your kanata and damn son, you been working out? nice triceps

>>1667885
>>1667886

yeah, the fat one was kind of an afterthought because I wanted to see how 6&1/2 heads would look on a wider figure... I didn't pay too much attention to the faces either, I was just testing out the proportions, but if they look alright then I'll stick with it and try to make it feel more natural to draw

I cleaned up the linework a bit and oh god its ruined how the fuck do you even draw the pelvis and thighs

>>1668199
Not that anon, but the grass blades in front of her look pretty bad. I'd suggest making them a bit thicker maybe. Also, her hair seems to defy gravity.

>>1668692
>more realistic
Not with that kind of nose.

And the neck is way too thin, face too flat, and the front of the neck is too far back. That's all referring to the material on the right, by the way.

I'm no expert, but I'd say this is deviantART tier at best.

>>1668717
I'm gonna add that the way her arms are look painful. You might want to find a good reference for the hands, because I know they're pretty hard to draw. And the eyes above her look pretty horrible. It kind of looks like an eye I might have drawn in second grade.

Any help would be appreciated.

>>1668759
He looks fabulous. Is this an original character/costume design?

>>1668759
The most obvious couple of things I see wrong with it is that the legs are extremely skinny and the eyes seem a bit too high up. The shoulders seem a bit odd as well, but I'm not the best with anatomy so I'm not going to say anything because it would probably be wrong.

>>1668771
no, your right about the eyes, and the shoulder. i think i put the neck to down low.
thanks for the feed back.
>>1668769
yes, but i don't have a name for him.

I could use some advice on the color, I'm not liking violet and yellow, is there a better color I can use with violet?

>>1668788
Oh god wrong thread, i was in the wrong tab...ignore this sorry.

>>1668667
this is really good.
tumblr?

>>1668759

>retarded feet
>retarded face
>noodle legs

5/10 would not bang

Any of you guys have anime/manga artist you guys take inspiration from or follow? Would like to know who to learn from or what style to be influenced by.

>Can barely get head drawings down
>Not really good at figure gestures
>Now these threads show up and I want to draw anime

But once again I'm not so good. It's hard failing so many times just to succeed only once in a rare moment. Does anime get easier to draw with the fundamental skills or is it something you can just jump into and learn the fundamentals while you're in it?

Are there different body proportions regarding anime characters?

A normal human body is about 7 and a half heads tall, eyes are the size of the mouth and in the center of the head. Is there somethings to know about stylized anatomy?

>>1668885
Maybe try to check the proportions your favorite artists use for differentn types of characters.

>>1668885
i'd say the average is 5-6 heads?
there's no standard though, it depends on how tall/mature you want your character to be.

>>1668884
everything gets slightly "easier" with fundamentals.
but then again not really, since looking at this thread, apparently fundamentals are not that easy to aquire.
just focus on spending time and getting more experience.

Any comments on this, or is it crap?

>>1668759
Right hand is too wide.
Eyes/Eyebrows too high.
Knees
Legs need muscle definition (even babies have muscles).
Positioning unusual and unnatural for a wave

>>1668885
No one that draws counts heads. Measuring heads high or whatever proportion measuring you're using is ok to familiarize when you're first learning, but no one that draws measures their drawings.
What you do is you draw and you go with what looks good.

>>1668925
Stop giving advice to these aspiring artists, Dobson.

>>1668933
while browsing through a hentai site, i stumbled upon this picture and would like to remind you guys to study your anatomy so you don't end up drawing like this.

Could any kind anon that understands moonrunes please tell me how this method is supposed to work?

>>1668936
Quite the belly button

>>1668944
Theres nothing of value here, get peck's atlas of anatomy + bridgeman + hampton

>>1668747
Better?

>>1669152
stop color shifting

>>1668692
Jesus fucking christ just kill yourself

>>1669163

No u

>>1668335
There's nothing wrong with using references.

>>1669152
You need to stop touching the saturation slider man.

>>1669177
>>1669154
>>1669152

I'm pretty sure that was a joke by another anon. 7/10 I laughed.

>>1669177
Its so tempting though

>>1668971
already have those books, I wasn't thinking of using it for anatomy overall, just a way to simplify it
or is it shit for that, too?

>>1669208
Nah ignore that guy. It's fine、nothing great though. It's not going to help much if you don't already have some grasp on anatomy/perspective, and you should obviously only use techniques like this when you want a simplified style. My moon skills aren't that great, but from what I could read from what's written, it doesn't seem important. Images are rather self-explanatory.

>>1667957
The head is too big and you should consider pushing it back as well.
Also the face is too wide right now. Move it closer to the ear line so you have less cheek. The jaw line could be tweaked as well.

A few tips I can give you are to drop imaginary vertical lines from vital points and see where they interact with the rest of the body, look for balance and symmetry. Another one is to give more attention to various lengths. Also, draw a middle line and try to follow it.
That'a about it. Flip the canvas a few times when drawing the construction and choose a neutral color for the background so it doesn't interfere with your color perception.

Otherwise, this looks pretty oldschool, I like it. Keep it up!

>>1668113
Hey Kyle, thanks for the redline. I feel like I can do pretty decent stuff when using reference (pic related) but then when drawing from imagination everything is just wrong, any idea for how to improve when drawing sans reference?

>>1669288
pic related here.

h-have I improved, kyle-senpai?

>>1669383
That face though..

>>1669393
hey we all have fantasies about raping mentally challenged girls.

>>1669393
actually, why does the hair look like it's made out of clay..? You should have a softer, not clumped the fuck up feel to it.. Learn to learn from life and real people.. pic related.

>>1669383
The feet is probably the only thing decent here. Everything else needs work. Most noticeably the face, hair and shoulders area. Their hand looks like it belongs to a fire burn victim with their skin melted together.

Keep at it champ.

>>1669383
The things directly above the eye are eyelashes, not eyebrows. Eyelashes are black regardless of your hair color. Did you just not think about that, or was that intended to be make-up or something? Regardless, it's really distracting.

>>1669401
>Eyelashes are black regardless of your hair color

I'm a ginger and people often remark I look freaky because my eyelashes and eyebrows are so blonde they look non existent. If you're fair haired/skinned you can have blonde eyelashes/eyebrows.

>>1669396
>>1669397
>>1669401

thank's, i'll keep practicing! And the eyelash color was a conscious choice, but if it's distracting, i'll stop

>>1669411
hmm, you probably have a genetic disorder that has stopped the production of the black-melanin pigment (pheomalanin). doesn't count.

>>1669416
oops sorry eumelanin not pheomelanin

>>1669416
Nah I just think you're used to seeing women wear make up which is popular. If you have blonde hair even you'll have blonde eyelashes. My sister is blonde and has a similar issue, although her eyebrows are a bit darker.

In anime it can look ok if you do it right, such are with Shiro here.

>>1669418
probably, i had a blonde girlfriend once, my first girlfriend actually, i can't remember what her eyelashes looked like.

>>1669418
Bitch she's albino. White hair, white skin, red eyes.
Okay, sure eyelashes aren't always 'black', but they are always dark. If you get the right angle and reflection, eyelashes can have color, but 99% of the time, just go with black.

>>1669416
have you ever seen a true ginger? they have literally NO dark hair at all. next time you see some dude with red hair, look at his eyelashes. they will be anywhere with white-blonde to an amber orange color.

>>1669427
so then ginger's do have a genetic disorder that suppresses [or modifies] the black melanin pigment,case closed.

>>1669429
The problem is most blondes you see are dying their hair. Hair darkens naturally with age most of the time. Even then the eyelashes never usually get darker than medium brown. Asians obviously have dark hair, so their eyelashes are dark to start with.

I only posted Shiro since she was the first one to come to mind with colored eyelashes. Another example is that dark skinned girl from Bleach with the blonde eyelashes.

The problem with that guy's image is the linework is black, which makes it distracting. If he colored it brown it would work better.

>>1669439
After some short research I found:
>black hair = black eyebrows + eyelashes
>brown hair = brown or black eyebrows + eyelashes
>blonde hair = black/brown/blonde eyelashes + blonde(/brown? according to claims at least) eyebrows.
The eyelashes are always darker, unless some pigment disorder shit, than the hair color. And females use mascara a lot, which tends to be black, but goes to light brown.

Point being, go with black eyelashes.

>>1669450
It's personal taste and if that anon wants to draw colored eyelashes, it's present and common in reality so he can do it.

Most anime tend to make it black but can be too striking on a fair skinned girl. Like here. The eyelashes are not black but a deep brown/purple color (and even fades to medium brown on the ends). It softens the facial features just a bit since the front girls are fair skinned and haired.

Point being, it's a preference and not a solid anime fact.

>>1669461
Even those are a gradient of mostly black with color at the end, which my guess is meant to resemble eyeshadow. Also, in the show their eyelashes most certainly are black along with almost every other character in every anime I have seen, with select few exceptions. Hence '99% of the time, just go with black". Anyway, I was fucking giving him advice on what would make his drawing look better. He can take it or leave it, but I was being helpful.
>it's a preference and not a solid anime fact
No, it's more of a solid anime fact. If he intentionally wanted to deviate from it, that's fantastic. That's what creating style is all about. But to me it looked very distracting in the image, and I don't think he made the intentional choice of doing it that way.
Now kindly sir, stop being a douche.

>>1669463
It's outlined with black but if you color pick it you'll see it's brown and medium brown. All it does is soften the face up slightly instead of doing all black which can look hideous.

Please stop stating your opinion like it's solid fact. All I am pointing out was your initial "all eyelashes are black" comment was wrong in both reality and anime. And it's not even something rare. But thats all I'm gonna say about it since we clearly both have conflicting views on the subject.

>>1669464
>I was pointing out was your initial 'all eyelashes are black' comment was wrong...
Well fucking no shit. Read the fucking post you replied to again, and then grab a gun, and shoot yourself in the face you pathetic waste of oxygen.

>>1667901
He looks kind of wide at the bottom, but I think it's a rather solid drawing. Nice likeness.

>>1669244

Thanks so much! I will put those tips into practice.
I'll update soon but it might be in the next thread.

>>1666994
reposting

>>1669498
i think you should focus on fundamentals and anatomy before you try to do anything from imagination stylized.

>>1669507
>dat parrot

>>1669507
Thanks, it was fun breaking the rules for a change.

>>1669507
Mikufag does seem to be doing fundamental exercises. Even his stylized stuff he uses very heavy construction. More so than most people I see here using.

No one here should drop doing what they like (stylize drawings) to grind fundys before going back to it. Me personally work on a 2/3 ratio. I'll draw two stylized pictures, then spend 8 hours on several pages of figure, anatomy, etc study. Which I repeat every three days when I cycle my schedule.

All it does it burn you out on creativity and desire to draw.

>>1669520
this a hundred times

>haven't made any progress since I posted 2 days ago.

Cant wait to quit my job next friday so I can draw all ay every day.

I need serious help

And how do I make it look like he actually ripped his stomach open?

>>1668944
I like this, the drawings are dynamic and the style is cute. Wish I could understand as well.

>>1669558
You did it as if he's only pulling on his skin. To rip his stomach open he should pull on his flesh. Right?

>>1668944
>>1669559
There's not really much to understand. It's simply another way of constructing the body. Instead of using cylinders, balls and boxes, the artist uses rhomboids (I think that's what their called, diamond-like shapes). If there's more buried in the moonrunes it's more than likely explaining the process, which is shown in the pictures.

Saging because most of my work is poorly drawn fetishy stuff.

>>1668944
Granted my nihongo skills are not top-notch, and I can't even read the hand-written parts, but he talks about the importance of overlapping forms in making the silhouette read and balancing the figure correctly.
He also specifies multiple time (like multiple time in each paragraph) that he "thinks" this is right, it's "probably" the right way etc. I don't know if it's false modesty or what, but you probably shouldn't take this guy as a textbook anyways.

>>1669561
Ah, that makes sense, thanks! I don't really know how to make it look like that but I'll definitely try!

As for the anatomy, I feel like something's off but I can't tell what. Do you see anything weird?

>>1669623
The skin should be rather stretchy were it is ripped. It only has a fraction of the resistance at that point. His fingers should also be wrapped around the edge of the skin with his thumb pressed up against the other side. The rest really depends on style I think.

>>1669507
no
it's good to start now. and then she needs to do both.
especially gestures and figure studies.

>>1669383

The eyelashes take the focus away from the eyes, warm colors have a habit of doing that over cool colors. To make them seem lighter, perhaps you should keep them minimal as possible. Be careful with the eye area itself, the shading makes them look really sunken, the eye is raised and rounded but the shading doesn't account for this. Below consider using highlights to emphasize the highness of the cheekbones, rather than shade to give depth to underneath the eye.

Set some time aside to practice locks of hair, it's pretty fun, and can be used for other objects (grass, ribbons, etc) and once you get good at that do some quick sketches with hair and faces. And don't forget to pay attention to ears.

Also, the heel of the foot shouldn't have so many wrinkles, and the big toes could use a little improvement.

Keep working and don't give up, the fact that people respond means they care enough to criticize, as opposed to lost causes.

>>1669739
thank you! I'll keep that in mind, and I'm aware that I need to practice drawing faces and hair, so I'll do that

>>1669450
I have dark blonde/light brown hair and my eyelashes are so blonde you almost can't see them at all when I'm not wearing mascara, same goes for my mother and one of my close friends. It's more common then you think, you are just used to seeing women with make-up. That being said, very fair-skinned blonde girls and red-heads look better with brown mascara then black.

>>1669466
Not that guy, but... wow, every argument you ever presented here I just disregarded on the spot what I read this comment! You've got issues if you think that's a way to win a conversation over in your favor...

>>1669383
the feet look pretty good
where's your other/older stuff

>>1669383
the feet look pretty good
where's your older stuff at?

>>1669793
thanks! here's my lewd tumblr: http://redcheeksofficial.tumblr.com/

I have no idea whether I have any skill at all. Nevermind the subject.

>>1669739
>the fact that people respond means they care enough to criticize, as opposed to lost causes.

>>1669764
I was going off the scientific articles I could find on on it, not what I've personally seen. I honestly wouldn't pay the slightest attention to the color of someone's eyelashes unless something really strange is going on with them. Obviously, if it's the case with you, it's possible, it's just rare/out of the ordinary. At least from the articles I could find (which was rather limited).

>>1669765
Not trying to 'win a conversation'. I want to 'have' a conversation. There are plenty of times when I'm mistaken on something, and that's fine. I'd appreciate it if someone corrects me. But when someone tries so hard to correct me multiple times without even paying the slightest attention to what I said, it's beyond disrespectful. I'm a reasonable person, but I am not going to have a one ended conversation with scum like that.

>>1669989
You can look at it this way: if you get no response, then there's nothing to point out as wrong, so good job?

>>1669995
If there's something I'm sure is that that's not the case.

>>1670000
that's never the case
if something's not bad it never gets ignored
if something's bad it will get ignored

>>1668667
Your lines give me boners.

He doesn't seem to technically be off-balance, but the way his legs are positioned makes him feel a little off somehow. Not sure what it is exactly, so maybe it's just me.

I started working on this and was wondering if it looked okay- I'm hoping to and improve on my shading and wok a little on studying light logic- so far this mainly has just the base colors slapped on- turn your screen brightness down to 50 % if you cant see the sheer fabric

>>1667957
I feel like the legs are a little off that's the main thing that's sticking out for me. perhaps the head is a little to large as well? It gives an awkward sot of feel with the pars being a little different on each side. perhaps play around with the proportions. Hop this was helpful ; w;

>>1668181
I like the designs. Are you working on a character concept?

Hey guys, this is my current wip but man am I having trouble with the hands for this one. Any tips? I know for the future I'll be studying more on anatomy but for the sake of me hopefully finishing this soon could someone help me out? thanks

>>1670118
>turn your screen brightness down to 50 % if you cant see the sheer fabric
No, you fucking draw it in darker dumbass.

>>1670138
You have to decide what you want the hand to be doing. Right now it's slanted as fuck and hovering in front of her chest. Also, just look at you own damn hand as reference. Does your hand look anything remotely like that?

>>1670139
It's current opacity is very low because I'm working on the skin. Here's a previous version-

>>1670138
you can look up some generic hand poses here http://www.posemaniacs.com/tools/handviewer/ it's in the right Colum- this program lets you turn the hands so you can get the right perspective or view of the hand pose- hopefully this can help

>>1670118
>>1670145
The lower part of her face looks pushed in. I don't know what her feet are supposed to be doing but it looks painful.
Her hair (and most of the colouring really) reminds me of Lisa Frank.

>>1670149
He is up on his toes in a sort of dancing motion. He should look like he's about to spin toward the view ( his right). currently he's sort of in a stepping back motion getting ready to spin - I've ben told my images look a little too stagnant at times. I'm not sure how to make things look like the 'flow' better though.

>somebody has a hate boner

>>1670150
Yeah, I would've never guessed that, he (? I seriously thought that was a chick with the bra thing) looks more like he's about to fall over. Do some gesture drawings to try to get a feeling of movement or something.

>>1670150
I can't really say what you should do in this case, it's very important to consider at what point (in time) you want to draw the character to best represent the motion you want to get across. Actual imagine where the character's weight was before the movement, what movement they will be doing. Now, being that it's a drawing, you don't have to be so strict. If you want it to look like a flowing elegant dance let's say, you should/can try to incorporate that in the construction, and in your lines themselves. I'm sure none of these things are actually news to you, but actually take more time to think about them and make a decision with reason behind it. If something doesn't work, it's just a lesson learned for next time.

>>1670150
>he
Oooh.

>>1669989
The 2 common stages of no feedback

>too early to criticize
No one can say much beyond 'draw more' because everything is wrong and you just don't have enough experience.
>work has gotten alright/better with no glaring flaws, but it's too boring
The poses/characters/storytelling are just kinda boring even if most everything else is done alright. But not exceptionally well. And now the mistakes in your work aren't as obvious so there's both less feedback and criticism.

draw more and keep building that visual library

>>1668181
your hands blow dick, either don't bother drawing them at all finished when they are smaller or practice the fuck out of that.

>>1667056
Stuck in the Sound

>>1668899
It's a mess, your lines don't even know where they're going. Stop chicken scratching. Or use this as a basis to make something cleaner with confident lines.

I'm on page 18 of Fun with a Pencil.

How many Blook heads should I draw?

B-be g-gentle... I'm fragile...

>>1670233
I'm kind of new to all this but is the top of the head supposed to look concaved? And the eyeballs look a little flat

>>1667864
I think the legs look a bit like chicken legs
Making them a bit longer or thinning the thigh might look nicer

>>1670156
>>1670160
Thanks!

>>1670238
>concave

Oh shit really? I didn't notice...

The eyes are just supposed to be floating energy thingies.

>>1670233
i really like that, it's got a bit of an old school airbrush comic vibe. if you finish it up with some harder edges, maybe exaggerate the lighting a bit and look at some 90s heavy metal or judge dredd covers to see the kind of textures they have an incorporate that you'll have a cool style going.

>>1670229
Depends on how well you are doing. I wouldn't spend too much time until you are at the full head construction part.

>>1670233
Well, that's a giant image. Is this intended as the final product?

>>1670277
Yeah, fixed it too!

>>1670290
are you going to take my 90s rendering advice? it'd be such a shame if you don't

>>1670183
>>1669909 fits in which one of the two?

>>1669909
Is that the nigga from Inuyasha?

Both look like poop, I'll redo nagisa and mint's eyes because they're giving me the heebie jeebies.

>>1670320
You're 16, why are you still here

>>1670033
Hey, thanks. Now that you mention his legs, he does look pretty off-balance; I never really noticed that before. Your input is much appreciated.

>>1670317
>Nevermind the subject

>>1670346
Why does this have to be mentioned all the time? You don't even know if that's true for fuck's sake.

>>1670277
>Depends on how well you are doing. I wouldn't spend too much time until you are at the full head construction part.
I get the gist of it. I drew about twenty heads and most of them came out okay.