/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>2753755
Kek

You sound like a girl. And I don't mean that metaphorically.

>>2740071
If you were smart you'd try to steal their followers while they're not drawing.

Are we all going to ignore the fact that Santi keeps evading tribunal by deleting his posts to re upload the same one? hes done three times now and one of them is still up showing he just riposted....

I'm willing to spend my life savings to hire a programmer to help me make a small game; I'm going to succeed (or more likely fail and spectacularly so) on my own. Why would you ever offer an unconditional (or "barely" conditional) partnership with someone you barely know? Not only are you potentially sacrificing a shit load of money, but that's how this stuff happens.

Who is the person who wrote the article in the OP anyway? Is he just the "idea guy" / "project manager" or what? If so fuck him, honestly. He probably earned ludicrous amounts of money for doing next to nothing anyway so it's not like a major loss for him. Not that what the artist did was right-he agreed to take on the project, was paid very well as far as artists go, and apparently tried to steal this otherwise worthless idea guy's idea, so fuck him too.

Let's not lose sight of who the real victims are here, though: the Patrons and people like us who'd like to try and crowdfund something someday but have to wade into the noxious miasma created by untrustworthy shit heads with no business sense (or common sense) who continue to drop the ball time and time again. The more these crowdfunded projects go down (and it seems to be happening more and more often as these people realize there's no consequences...for them!) the less likely our own work might receive this kind of public financial support in the future.